---1:59 the capital is breached.

---At 2:38 p.m., Trump tweeted: "Please support our C*****l P****e and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!" Some videos show the r****rs were telling police that they should be on the same side.

---At 3:13 p.m., Trump tweeted again: "I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!"


This lie that Trump did nothing for three hours is utter BS. For people in a protest, outside, it ain't like they are looking at their TV sets, is it?? What was the best way for him to get a message to the mob? Tweeter, of course, something we all see on our hand held phones that we carry everywhere.


And it still amazes me how 9 out of 10 sources who report this even cut out or flat out refuse to report Trump's words, "peacefully and patriotically."

So l*****t h**ers, tell us why, in your own words. We have our version of why, tell us your version. Not one of you l*****ts Trump h**ers has answered that question yet, and it has been posed many, many times. What is the purpose, in your own words, for censoring those words of Trumps???? And now, why do you hide the Tweets he sent out shortly after things got out of hand in the Capital????

And while you're at it, tell us why Trump authorized the National Guard to be brought in says before the r**t, if he was the one who planned the "i**********n?"

Your fictional narrative is and has been falling apart. Cheney and members of this committee lie flat out and lie by omission, censoring bits and pieces as I have pointed out here. Most of their witnesses testify that someone the know told them something happened; the really stupid ones say that Trump was really mad. Oh, not just mad but REALLY mad!! Is being mad a crime?????? This stuff wouldn't stand up in divorce court!!!!!

If it wasn't so stupid it would be laughable. This is a committee of our congress of the USA. Is this where we are now, kangaroo courts on prime time TV, looking like some made for TV movie about a c*******t court and their mind bending propaganda?????????? Little Kim is, I'm sure, very proud of Cheney and the democrats.

Terryln Hall was just six years old when her mother, Faith, was fatally shot by a former boyfriend.

Now, nearly 30 years later, Hall and her sister – along with their uncle – oppose Alabama’s plan to execute the man who k**led their mother. Unless a judge or the governor intervenes, Joe Nathan James Jr, 49, will die by lethal injection on Thursday evening at a south Alabama prison.

“We thought about it and prayed about it, and we found it in ourselves to forgive him for what he did. We really wish there was something that we could do to stop it,” Hall said in a telephone interview with the Associated Press.

Should the wishes of the family be respected, or does vengeance belong to the state?

Donald Trump
by Robert Reich | July 26, 2022 - 7:23am

Today, Donald Trump returns to Washington — his first visit since leaving in disgrace after J****** 6 — to deliver the keynote address for the America First Policy Institute’s “America First Agenda Summit.”

The purpose of this confab is to give Trump some policy creds as he prepares to announce a 2024 run for re-e******n. Brooke Rollins, one of the organizers of the Institute and the Summit (who was domestic policy adviser in Trump’s White House) says “having worked next to him for almost three years in the White House, a lot of people didn’t give him enough credit for his policy vision.”

Sane people don’t give Trump credit for having a policy vision at all. In the annals of political oxymorons, a “Trump policy vision” must rank very high.

To have a policy vision, it is first necessary to have some capacity for thinking about policy. Trump never did and never will.

To think about policy is to contemplate something beyond oneself. Trump can only think about how something will reflect on his own reflection. The only policies he’s ever cared about are those that advance Trump.

Policy entails a degree of deliberation, of assessment based on logic and fact. That’s not the Trump we’ve known, either. When president, Trump never read memos. He never looked at graphs or charts. He h**ed numbers. He is contemptuous of data, analysis, science, reality.

To have a vision is to be forward-looking. But Trump always looks backwards – to vindicate himself, retaliate, take revenge, exact retribution, settle scores, counterattack, return fire.

“It’s an opportunity for President Trump to come to Washington and give a visionary speech about why the future would be better with his leadership — and to the degree he focuses on that it could be a very important speech,” says Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker who remains close to Trump, about tonight’s address.

But Trump can’t get over the past. Especially now — after weeks of the J*** 6 c*******e hearings exposing his conduct before and during the i**********n at the Capitol — does anyone seriously expect him to stay on message about the future?

Maybe if they drug him and administer an electric shock every time he diverges from the teleprompter text his policy advisers have prepared for him, he may surprise. But the outtakes from the remarks he was supposed to give on January 7 suggest even this will pose a challenge.

On the rare occasion Trump has offered a vision about the future, it’s been a weather prediction. Remember when he warned the public that Alabama was going to be hit by Hurricane Dorian — long after Dorian was already heading toward the Carolinas, leaving Alabama back in the sunshine? Rather than admit error, Trump had his White House policy staff release a 225-word statement defending his erroneous warning, and spent the next four days defending himself with a doctored and outdated hurricane map that looped in Alabama with a black marker, followed by assertions that his prediction was accurate at the time he issued the warning (it wasn’t), a week-old map that showed a low probability of tropical-storm winds in a small corner of Alabama, and incessant tweets culminating with “What I said was accurate! All F**e News in order to demean!” and “I accept the F**e News apologies!”

It's been the same with all his bogus claims – starting with the crowd size at his inaugural, to v***r f***d in 2016 and again in 2020, to “unknown Middle Easterners” streaming across the southern border in migrant caravans. He lies, then defends his lies with more lies, then rips into those who tell the t***h. That’s always been his MO.

The worst job I can imagine is to be a Trump policy adviser. It would be like running behind an elephant with a giant pooper-scooper.

In addition to Rollins, the America First Policy Institute -- described gingerly as a “White House in waiting” -- is run by Larry Kudlow, Trump’s top economic adviser, and Robert O’Brien, Trump’s national security adviser. It has a staff of 150 and an operating budget of $25 million.

I have no idea if they’re doing serious policy analysis. Trump’s former trade adviser Peter Navarro, appearing on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast Friday, called the organization “a dumping ground and haven for a lot of the failed people from the first administration, the RINOs, and the disloyalists who let Trump down.”

It’s the nicest compliment I’ve heard anyone give the Institute’s personnel, but I still doubt they’ll get Trump to be a policy visionary.


They always return to the scene of the crime.
Excerpt:
I have no idea if they’re doing serious policy analysis. Trump’s former trade adviser Peter Navarro, appearing on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast Friday, called the organization “a dumping ground and haven for a lot of the failed people from the first administration, the RINOs, and the disloyalists who let Trump down.”

Hoorah.
America First !!!!!!!
Or second here.

States are scrambling to pass legislation that allows red states to simply declare e******ns in their state invalid for one trumped up reason or another. They give secretaries of the state, e******n boards in counties, or the governor the power to declare at some level they do not agree with the outcome of e******ns, and they simply install e*****rs that v**e for the loser of the state e******n.

Now the new law being looked at on a federal level has language in it that allows governors to choose a slate of e*****rs, thereby making it to where the state has no legal recourse to challenge the reasons they would do such a thing...of course this causes a direct contradiction to the supreme court position which is that states have control of what they do, and here the GOP wants GOP governors to have the unchallenged power to decide they don't agree with an e******n and overturn it for that state.

It's bad enough that a state loses the v**es of 50% of it's citizens that lose an e******n even though they v**ed for the other candidate, but the GOP wants governors to simply overturn the e******n because they want to...and it is not like these stop the steal republicans wouldn't do that in a heartbeat.

https://www.rawstory.com/christina-bobb-oan/?utm_source=push_notifications