One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Super Dave
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1665 next>>
Sep 3, 2018 05:03:04   #
Interesting
Go to
Sep 3, 2018 05:01:15   #
BigMike wrote:
Anyone notice a whole lotta posts at once?

Someone must have been needing to vent!


I just ignored him.

Spammers bore me
Go to
Sep 3, 2018 04:59:40   #
Take a breath, spam-boy
Go to
Sep 3, 2018 04:58:00   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Those things look good. It doesn't seem to make a difference in my small area.. I don't like that there is a criminal probe going on and people are going to jail who have associations with Trump. . That cannot be overlooked by me. Wanting to terminate native sovereign status and classify them as a race would be a devastating move on our native peoples. . He has to have rallys a lot of rallys and he incites anger and capitalizes on it. Statements like there will be violence and civil war if the GOP loses in November. What in Sam Hill is going on?
I don't see him being elected for another term and he may even be primaried. In the mean time "Maybe he'll get ran over by a truck" Donald Trumps words.
Those things look good. It doesn't seem to make a ... (show quote)

Trump is POTUS, not lord of America. State and local governments have much to do with your area by design.

Trump cant make your neighbors stop v****g Democrat.
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 21:59:37   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
You at least acknowlege that Trump is a jerk. How that makes him suited for the presidency I can't percieve. Before Trump was elected I predicted he would cause a lot of contreversy and that he would be chewed up and spit out. Well look where things stand today. I was not so far off on my prediction. You are right it is about America and not about the man in the chair. That is why we need a humble statesman who puts the average citizens of this country above his own ambitions.


It was an e******n, not a se******n.

It was Trump or Hillary. Easy choice.

Trump had a low bar to jump over, but he's done much better than I expected.
The economy is booming.
ISIS is all but gone.
Unemployment is historically low.

Can anyone imagine Hillary making good decisions? LOL...
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 21:55:14   #
permafrost wrote:
My gosh dave, you seem so lost..

The American policy was decided when the nation in 1978 (?) agreed to have this body arbitrate the amount of money we owed Iran..

and as was clear in my post, we got a good deal in the amount of money...

You seem to think the INtl court was start up and then demanded the US obey...

No, that was not how it worked,, back in the 70s the US and Iran, maybe some others also, agreed to form the court/arbitration to settle the matter between the two nations..

If you do the math, President Obama was not in office when that was worked out..

so the outcome was very good for the US and only acceptable for Iran.. we won in the court/arbitration..

I know it is hard to work it out,, but think for a while, you will see the working mechanism..
My gosh dave, you seem so lost.. br br The Ameri... (show quote)
Obama risks American servicemen's lives sending $Billions in cash to fund terrorism...

And you say "We won..."

I guess you just told everyone who's side you're on.... Because America lost. The terrorists are the only people that got cash.
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 20:35:42   #
permafrost wrote:
HAHAHAHA.

I will try and tell you again, but it is late and my book is calling..

tax revenue to date is down... If you look back to April, revenue is up for that month.. for reasons i listed.

If any part of the tax bill needed to be temporary, why not any one of the several specific gift to various corporations and the rich..

Looking for the GOP to repair the bill on behalf of the Middle class are you.. When was the last time that happened??

the reduction in use of any of the safety net programs has not effect on the deficit at all.. It may at a later date by being able to cut the cost of the program.

but reduced usage of the program has no effect at all.
HAHAHAHA. br br I will try and tell you again, bu... (show quote)


You actually just said that reducing the # of people on welfare does not reduce the cost of welfare.... Amazing admission..

So that means that Socialist programs aren't meant to be efficient or fiscally responsibile. They're meant to spend all of the $ they can steal.

Amazing admission... Just amazing...
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 20:04:38   #
permafrost wrote:
No, that is not what I said... stop making my post match you wishes and dreams.. they are not even close..

pay attention and stay awake..

the finding of a court... do you see it as an order, an obligation, or an agree upon solution?? Stop twisting words to try and cover you own inability to understand the obvious..

If you look back at my posts, you will see the name, the date formed, the favorable decision that we were given and the full description of event covering the money..

with even a small effort you can very easily also find the full terms of both the cash turnover and the agreement on arms.. No problem finding this information..

As a reminder, who are those that maintain the agreement was working? All the other 6 countries in the agreement, the US State Department, the CIA, the full Intelligent community of the US and most of the orange fools
advisers...
No, that is not what I said... stop making my post... (show quote)
So you're going with lie #1. An non-American court ruled that they could set American foreign policy and demanded that Obama funnel $Billions thru Iran to support terrorism. And in response Obama bent over, grabbed his ankles, and took it right up the Hershey Highway.

Well, I can't say that's any better than lie #2.

One problem with that lie is that if Obama really did think that international courts have supremacy over the Constitution and the powers the Constitution gives POTUS, then there was no reason to do it in secret. He could have informed everyone that terrorists were about to get a large cash infusion.

Oh... BTW... Did the foreign court make Obama risk American servicemen's lives by sending cash, or was that Obama's idea of "icing on the cake" for his Mullah/terrorist buddies?
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 17:09:18   #
permafrost wrote:
Why do people not appreciate what Pres. Trump has done so far?

What’s there to appreciate?

Tax bill- sure it added a few bucks to my paychecks this year, but experts agree that its going to only continue to do that to wealthiest people after a few years.
You poor jealous little boy.

The people that pay 95% of the taxes are getting a bigger tax cut than those that pay nothing.

Do tell....
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 17:02:54   #
eden wrote:
Because I criticized Palin I am a woman h**er?
I’ve said worse about Trump so I suppose I’m a man h**er too. (Well at least I don’t discriminate...I h**e everywan 😁)

I get it, you like Palin. That is your privilege. I don’t like her and that is mine. Can’t be ignored though that she has faded into obscurity, appropriate in my view since she has nothing intelligent to add to today’s political discourse.
If you ever listened to her instead of swallowing what you are spoon fed your know better.

She was a fine Mayor and Governor. She de best part of her ticket.
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 15:11:07   #
Kevyn wrote:
We watched the dignified funeral services of two very different and great Americans this weekend and the praise heaped upon them by statesmen and dignitaries. Who do you think will taint themselves giving a eulogy when your illustrious Pumpkinfuhrer gives up the ghost? Perhaps his pal Vlad, Richard Spencer, Roy Moore? Nutjobs like Hannity, Limbaugh and Alex Jones come to mind. The point being that no one of any stature or sense of decency will touch the job with a dung fork.
I remember when the Democrats used Paul Wellstones' funeral for a h**e-rally.

It didn't work as intended.
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 14:46:53   #
eden wrote:
Ah yes Sarah Palin, the gibbering scatterbrain that the GOP bosses forced on McCain in hopes of rounding up the tea baggers v**e. Instead the head of the ticket was repeatedly humiliated by her amateurish cringeworthy performance. The McCain family are not perfect but in these times show American class and decency. Sarah Palin and her motley family of reality show social failures are the poster child for poor white trash. I wouldn’t want them at my funeral either.
Your hatred of women is noted.

Palin was dignified and loyal to McCain. McCain was an ungrateful angry asshole to allow his henchmen to degrade her.

The only time McCain led Obama in the polls was between the time he picked Palin and when he suspended his campaign.

As many, or probably more conservatives v**ed for Palin than McCain.
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 14:40:39   #
permafrost wrote:


Do you think it is coincidence that only the tax changes on the Middle class are temporary while all the gifts to the very rich and the Corporations are permanent???
Of course it isn't a coincidence. It's a political tactic.

Since budgeting rules don't permit the economic benefits and that everyone knew would result from the tax cut:
(1. The feds are now receiving more income to to government now than before the tax cuts, reducing the deficit.
2. Welfare, unemployment and food stamps have reduced since the tax cuts, again reducing the deficit. )

The deficit numbers Democrat sheep bleat out repeatedly would be too huge of a number if both were made permanent, so they picked the ones that Democrats would h**e the most to make permanent.

IOW..... The GOP punked i***t Democrats into making the argument you're making right now. So now when (hopefully soon) the GOP puts up a new bill to make the tax cuts permanent, Your i***t party is already on record pretending to agree with it.

This keeps happening to you because your motivation is hatred of those keeping your party from power instead of MAGA.

Don't you people ever get tired of looking like i***ts?
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 14:09:24   #
permafrost wrote:
You have no wish to believe, you have no understanding of international cooperation, you have no ability to put facts together..

I have given you the details more then once..

Yet you can not understand.

I recommend you go outside and enjoy nature while we still have a safe environment.. it may help, but I hold little hope for you..

If you can think of any real question, other then repeating what has already been a topic.. ask away..

Also have to say, I do not think your remarks are in anyway your belief, no one can be so uninformed or subject to accept such foolish remarks as you seem to be.. I think you play a game..

No hope for you at all.
You have no wish to believe, you have no understan... (show quote)
Was it cooperation, or was it was capitulation?

Make up your mind.

1st you said an international court ordered Obama to fund terrorist.

Now you've just said Obama cooperated with some unnamed international body that for some unknown reason wanted Obama to fund terrorists.

Well, which is it?

Pick a lie and stick to it.

If you pick the 2nd lie, please tell us who was iin that international group, other than Iran, Syria and Russia, that Obama cooperated with
Go to
Sep 2, 2018 13:57:04   #
permafrost wrote:
The only ones who insisted nothing was accomplished under Obama were those wanting the very rich and the international corp to have more money then they already had..

And so, do you think it better for America to give the power and wealth to 10% of the population, or the promote v****g to all citizen as intended by the law of the land?

do you think it is better to have a national health program or wait until each patient is near death and then spend the maximum amount on saving the person at the last moment?

Or maybe let them die untreated in some collection point?\
The only ones who insisted nothing was accomplishe... (show quote)

Are you seriously unaware of how the rich made our under Obama?

You just didn't hear about income ine******y in the F**e News outlets under Obama because it didn't fit the dishonest Democrat Party narrative.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1665 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.