Cameron is on the right track. Take away their passports; surveil family and friends.

I***tic though it may seem; there are still those who refuse to accept the t***h about ISIS and similar groups. These people want to destroy everyone who does not believe as do they.

If a t*****r is found out, he or she should be shot. Period, no waiting period, and no illogical trials and appeals. Let one of these jackasses k**l your child or a loved one or a co-worker, and your tune will change.

I wish our president would say that it is time to eliminate ISIS. Not hit them until they come to the bargaining table; no, outright destroy them...period!

Your analogy says the same as mine - both observers have insufficient information to come to firm conclusions.

What we do know from more recent and easily observable history is that the expanded use of energy has increased both the quality and quantity of life. Further, the lowest cost energy sources remain, at this time, to be carbon based. We also know that efforts to increase the cost of carbon based energy will decrease the overall standard of living for those who are subject to those increased costs. Meanwhile, if everything you say is true about g****l w*****g or c*****e c****e or wh**ever the next name will be is true, we are not on this planet alone. China and India are not subject to efforts to artificially raise the cost of carbon based energy and will use the increased cost imposed on us to further their own standards of living.

Why can you not accept having a religion?

Is there a particular reason why the definition of religion must not include your system of faith?

Is it perhaps your view:

Every religion believes that they are the only real religion, but that is not true, because Socialist Batman's system of concepts he holds to be true and authoritative is what must be followed by everyone. ???

That is why you call yourself Socialist Batman. Because you intend to force your religion on everyone under the pretence of your religion, not being a "religion."

You call yourself a socialist which means that the collectivist concept of the state as the power to be honored. Any discussion of socialism and the philosophy of the collective state will explain that quite well if you choose to read it. Do you honestly believe that people will voluntarily give up their individual rights to liberty and property so that all can be shared as a communal group, with no extra benefit for those who work hardest, but a demand that all share with those who do not work? Most of us do not choose to be s***es or serfs as socialism requires. Therefore the state must have control if not ownership of all property and that is only possible if people are forced to believe that the state is all powerful and rightous (ie god)

They Never Came Near Him
They Sang Them At Their School Assemblies
In Various Locales For Their Parents And Families

One I Saw On The News Is Were I Got My Siggie
'Will Lee-e-dus To Free-e-dum'
Their Teacher Looked Like She Was Wearing A Bantu Costume
The Class Was Mixed Race

One Group Performed On CNN
And A 13yr Old Black Child Spoke Beyond His Age
Why His Parents Would NOT Be V****g For Barack Obama

The Hostess Was Taken A Little Aback By That Performance

Of course I do. I am a researcher. You obviously do not know how to read. The internet is full of data research, methodology, results, who, when, etc that now shows the earth is in a cooling cycle, that it may be premature, and that there is some worry about it.


If you are just going to repeat things that support what you want to believe...regardless of how outdated that information is...at least be honest about it.

The earth is a homeostatic organism. It tends to shift only so far in one direction before correcting back the other direction. Always shifting. Never remaining static for long. Basic science you could be aware of if you wern't so lazy as to listen to Gore et al instead of keeping current your self. I have a great great nephew who is in 4th grade. He is more current about this than you. Sad.....

You talk about burden of t***h. Do you know what that means? Let me explain something for you:

There are more than 1.000 geometeoroligists that were surveyed asking about g****l w*****g. Far less than 10% of them said they agreed with Gore. More than 90% disagreed and said there was no data supporting Gore's position. Interesting that the majority of the less than the 10% who agreed with Gore received fundng from him. 90+% said no. Bud, .....that meets burden of proof but don't take my word for it. You can google as well as I.......maybe.