[quote=Lily]http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2015/03/31/if-liberals-are-the-good-guys-why-do-they-lie-so-much-n1978646/page/full
If Liberals Are The Good Guys, Why Do They Lie So Much?
Liberals never argue with one another over substance; their only dispute is how to prevent the public from figuring out what they really believe. Meanwhile, it is a source of constant alarm to conservatives that the public will not understand what they really believe. Ann Coulter
If you listen to liberals, youd believe that conservatives are h**eful, r****t, cruel, selfish dishonest, mean-spirited f*****ts while liberals are compassionate, caring, open-minded, honest and giving saints who want the best for everyone.
If thats true, then why is it that liberals have to incessantly lie about what theyre doing, whats happening in the world and also lie about conservatives?
For example, take this latest flap about Indiana passing a religious freedom law that prevents Christians from getting run out of business if they refuse to participate in gay weddings. The law should be unnecessary given that the First Amendment already prohibits the making of any law
impeding the free exercise of religion, but getting beyond that, there are similar laws in 20 states. Even Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have signed onto similar laws. Yet, you have liberals claiming that discrimination against gays will be rampant and even that b***k A******ns will be turned away from stores for religious reasons because of the law. Of course, thats not happening in any of the states with similar laws and it wont happen in Indiana either.
If liberals are the good guys, then why do they have to lie about what the law does?
Remember when the Trayvon Martin shooting hit the news? Most people thought a 12 year old kid was attacked by an adult who had uttered racial slurs about him and then shot him to death for no good reason. Wh**ever you may think of the case, there was a court case and we found out that wasnt what happened. Trayvon Martin was a 17 year old football player; Zimmerman didnt make any r****t reference to him. Martin attacked Zimmerman and was physically beating him when he was shot.
If liberals are the good guys, why do they lie about cases like this one?
You could ask the same question about the Mike Brown shooting. At first we heard that Mike Brown was just an innocent kid who was attacked by an officer and then shot to death while he had his hands up and was pleading with the officer not to shoot.
Yet, what did we find out? Mike Brown had just robbed a convenience store; the officer thought he was a suspect. Brown attacked the officer and tried to take his weapon, then was shot running at the cop while ignoring his orders to stop
If liberals are the good guys, why did they lie about this case? There were businesses burned to the ground. The town of Ferguson, Missouri has been economically decimated and police officers have been K**LED because of the tensions created by this case. If liberals are the good guys, why havent they apologized for the lies that were told? Why havent they taken any responsibility for the lives they destroyed?
How about rape culture? We hear about that incessantly and the statistic thats quoted over and over and over again is 1 in 5 college women are sexually assaulted. Even Barack Obama and Joe Biden have used this statistic. Theres one problem: That statistic comes from a Campus Sexual Assault Study that has been proven wrong. Although there is a hot debate about what the real numbers are, most people agree theyre probably much closer to a still too high 1-in-50.
If liberals are the good guys, why do they have to lie about this? Rape is as universally condemned as anything can be in the United States; so why not work with everyone else to fight it instead of lying about it?
Then theres Obamacare.
No piece of legislation in modern history has been sold with so many willful lies about what it would do. Obama told people they could keep their doctors, keep their health care plans and that Obamacare would save the average family $2500 a year.
None of that turned out to be true.
If liberals are the good guys, why did they have to lie to the American people about Obamacare? If liberals are good people, why arent they apologizing for the lies they told?
Of course, we could go on and on with these examples because this has become the standard modus operandi of liberalism.
1) Lie about your opponents. Lie about what happened. Lie about what you want to do.
2) Deny that you lied. Smear your enemies for accusing you of lying. Count on your fellow liberals in the mainstream media to turn a blind eye.
3) When you get caught lying, shrug your shoulders and say, So what?
If youre a liar, maybe youre actually not such a great person. If you feel like you need to lie in order to get people to adopt your ideas, maybe theyre not such great ideas. If you have to lie about your evil enemies to get people to dislike them, then maybe YOURE THE ONE WHOS THE BAD GUY.[/quo :
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
asphaltman wrote:
Yes he did, but He saved them, He told them to not sin anymore.
He was speaking to the harlot that was to be stoned to death when he told her to go and sin no more.
KHH1 wrote:
Normally, that kind of statement would garner negative emotions from people...but the world sees people on the right for who they really are...not who they think they are fooling the world and presenting themselves as..it is 2015.....and a saltine is a saltine...and will never change............like the Geico commercial states, "Everyone knows that"..........
I too would like to know why w****s are the only ones ever mentioned when it comes to buying and selling s***es. More s***es were bought and sold by b****s and Arab Muslims than anyone. The person merely asked you a legitimate question and you start misdirecting and name calling. When that sort of tomfoolery begins it's a perfect giveaway of " do as I say not as I do" liberal bs.
Richard94611 wrote:
Your post is inaccurate and way, way off because, among other things, you do not see that your "i*****l a***ns" are also consumers and buoy up the economy to a very great extent. You didn't take this into account. And I don't for a minute believe the statistics you have posted. Give us the URLs, please.
I know for a fact the numbers she posted are true. And for all the money the i******s put back into the economy they send 92% of the money they earn,( the majority under the table), back to the country they came from. The bottom line is illegal means illegal. When Americans are out of work and i******s have enough to survive and send back home then this country and all who support Barry and his ways are just as sorry as him.
Jeffh****r wrote:
I'm
If nukes worry you so much why don't you blame Obama about North Koreans death threats to america or the daft that China russia and Pakistan all threaten the U.S. on a daily basis?? Huh you're only worried about fukkin jews!! Unbelievable how brainwashed you morons are by the FUKKIN jews.
Mr. H****r, as an f-ing Jew I know it's pure ignorance on your part when referring to the Jewish people. If you do some research on your own instead of just parroting the lefts hatred of all things Israel you might learn some t***h. Every country that has tried to destroy or engage Israel in war are either non existent or penniless. So keep thinking that the Israelis are the problem. Remember that the next time you see the poor misguided Muslims whack off another head.
KHH1 wrote:
It is extinction...breeding gives the species an extension.....and i'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say i know you were not implying black people were like pigs...so i'll chill on that one....
The majority of b****s are like pigs. Black kids getting beat up for "acting white", hands up don't shoot knowing this is a lie still use this crap. Ebonics, the laziest way to use and butcher the English look language. V****g for someone just because of the color of their skin. B****s selling their own people into s***ery for a profit. If it walks like a duck.
Antisocialist wrote:
I could balance the budget in 1 minute.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Worried for our children wrote:
Barack Obama traded five Taliban soldiers for Bowe Bergdahl. Despite State Department statements to the contrary, we know at least one of those Taliban headed back out to k**l Americans.
But the Bergdahl situation matters at a different level than that. It matters because the White House, when confronted by who Bergdahl once, sought to smear the people who pointed out he was a deserter instead of dealing with reality. The smears included attacking honorable American soldiers who dared to point out their colleague was a deserter.
Megyn Kelly had Bergdahl's fellow soldiers, Evan Buetow, Cody Full, Gerald Sutton, and others, on her television show shortly after the news of the Bergdahl trade. Kelly and the soldiers came under withering attacks from the left and people inside the Obama Administration.
Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Brandon Friedman, suggested the soldiers were psychopaths.
Barack Obama himself used Bergdahl's return as a photo op to suggest he was acting as a great Commander in Chief.
Leftwing activists like Brian Beutler, Joan Walsh, Josh Marshall, and others took to their various media platforms to attack conservatives for daring to challenge the prevailing media narrative about Bergdahl's release being some sort of great triump.
Even now they are spinning rapidly to claim it would have been irresponsible to leave a man behind and that, somehow, no one knew he was a deserter.
And that's just it. This is why Bergdahl matters. It was known at the time from his fellow soldiers and others what had happened. Instead of dealing with the reality, the White House and its defenders chose to attack the character of American soldiers, members of the media who challenged their narrative, and conservatives.
This is another example of the left being so invested in Barack Obama that they'd deny reality and let terrorists loose rather than admit this should never have happened in the first place.
And the punchline is this.The same President who let loose five Taliban for one deserter and possible would be Taliban is telling us to trust him negotiating with Iran.
http://www.redstate.com/2015/03/26/why-bowe-bergdahl-matters/
Barack Obama traded five Taliban soldiers for Bowe... (
show quote)
Worried, great article. Every word is true and the back stabbing left knows this. They would rather circle the wagons around this loser while calling our brave military personnel psychos and whack jobs. These are the same people who can't wait for that low life piece of trash Clinton to run. Truly a sad day in America. Again, great post and thank you.
just_sayin' wrote:
Anybody know who wrote this???
Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know too, that Islam has always been a part of America 's history."
AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE
Dear Mr. Obama:
Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians. Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians. Can you show me one Muslim signature on the:
United States Constitution?
Declaration of Independence ?
Bill of Rights?
Didn't think so. Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England? No. Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the s***es in America ? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human s***ery. Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates s***ery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed s***es." Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama?
Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.
Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they?
Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the N**i's in k*****g Jews.
Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania k*****g nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East . No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day.
Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims whose asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.
And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America. Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslims.
And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan .
Also, don't forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers. That, Mr. Obama is the "Muslim heritage" in America.
Anybody know who wrote this??? br br Barack Obama... (
show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Trooper745 wrote:
You are a hoot! We can tell by your posts here that you're a real "kolege grajate". Right up there with Walter O'Brien.
Three times, eh?, ..... and you still write replies in this forum like and eighth grade dropout. If you go for a fourth degree, ... consider making it Professional Writing.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
grumpymarine wrote:
Why not change the law and allow the military to carry a gun on base? The powerful liberals have armed guards.
Mr. Dinsdale sir, I know many veterans on this site that would welcome these cowards to show up at their door. I live in Myrtle Beach S.C. and I run from no one. This phony in the white house who can't stand the military or anything American sure can't be depended on to put a stop to this madness. So bring it on all you "lone wolves".
JMHO wrote:
Ben Carson, an emerging p**********l candidate for the Republican Party, was captured in an unguarded moment by a GQ reporter calling President Obama a psychopath for the seeming ease with which he lies to the American public.
GQ repforts that Carson had come to the Capitol Hill home of Armstrong Williams, a conservative media impresario who officially serves as Carsons business manager, for the presidents State of the Union speech. Shortly after, the two began discussing the speech and Obama.
Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WNDs Email News Alerts!
Williams said, GQ reported: He looks good. He looks clean. Shirts white. The tie. He looks elegant.
And Carsonsof uick reply?
Like most psychopaths, Carson said, the news site said. Thats why theyre successful. Thats the way they look. They all look great.
Williams later said, GQ reported: He faces the same challenges you will face. Hes got to convince people to believe him. Thats all hes doing, selling his narrative.
And Carsons reply: But he knows hes telling a lie. Hes trying to sell what he thinks is not true. Hes sitting there saying, These Americans are so stupid, I can tell them anything.
Williams, meanwhile, told Carson shortly after the speech and while helping him prepare for a round of cable television interviews to leave behind the psychopath comment.
We dont have to call him a psychopath, Williams said, GQ reported. I dont want you to go to CNN with that kind of mood.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/ben-carson-obama-is-a-psychopath/#TVHXglxjYQ6bU1e2.99
Ben Carson, an emerging p**********l candidate for... (
show quote)
Dr. Carson was just saying what the majority of people with any sense already knew. Barry is a stone cold liar and heartless pos
JFlorio wrote:
I am wondering if most who visit this sight took the time to read or listen too, perhaps the most disturbing and ridiculous speech ever given by a U.S. president. A week or so ago president Obama gave a speech where he says he was directly speaking to the Iranian people. He started the speech by saying Happy Nowruz to the Iranian people, then went on to explain how the holiday was being celebrated in our country also. Didn't see any Federal Holiday called Nowruz personally. Once again he tries to impress by proving his Islamic roots. What is the point of talking to the Iranian people? They have no say in what they can do or who they can influence. He goes on to say that we should resolve our differences diplomatically. Great talking point. All BS. They have lied to us and the world for twenty years. So what do you accomplish besides looking like a sap when you negotiate with the worlds largest sponsor of terrorism? Obama then says the Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons. Is this the stupidest statement ever uttered by Obama? Why would we be wringing our hands over negotiations with Iran if their Supreme Leader has already forbade nuclear weapons? Even their president Rouhani has said they would never develop nuclear weapons. He says the talks have made progress. How? Even the congress is kept in the dark. Obama goes on to say that his message to the people of Iran is that together we should speak up for the future we seek. What the hell is he talking about? Iran seeks no peace. They are sponsors of much of the terrorism in the world. Iran seeks to destroy our only ally in the region. You know the only country over there vaguely concerned about human rights and values we believe in. Are we somehow now allied with Iran? I missed the memo. Obama then ends thi bys ridiculous and disturbing speech by the leader of the most powerful country in the world by saying, "Nooroozetan Pirooz. What an embarrassment our president is. He is such a scholar and great admirer of Islam you would think he would understand al-Taqiyya. This is the Islamic practice of lying to infidels. It is not a sin to lie to us infidels if you have the promotion of Jihad in mind. Hmm. Somehow I think Obama knows this and really doesn't care. Why would that be?
I am wondering if most who visit this sight took t... (
show quote)
Jim, great post. The word also used is Hudna. A hudna is just a sleight of hand trick used so groups like Hamas and Hezbollah can rebuild after they have depleted their arsenal. Islam is pure hatred.
PaulPisces wrote:
You've written a more elaborate deflection from the question of the post, but a deflection none the less.
This thread is about the validity of Cruz's citizenship requirement for the presidency vs. Obama's.
Try to stick to the issue at hand.
In other words, Barry is OK because he's a black democrat but Cruz is bad because he's a Cuban republican? I guess I read the constitution wrong because I could've swore that Cruz was eligible. The difference between Barry and Cruz is Cruz has put all out there to see, Barry spent millions to make his past go away. Advice to the people who try and defend the slime in any party. You can't forever. Barry has been proven to be a fraud, hence the lefts foaming at the mouth about Cruz. Cruz has pointed out the phony that is Barry, win or lose Cruz is a winner in my books.
Billhuggins wrote:
You child molester! A change has to occur on every level of spending. The ND is so big your children and their children will have nothing because you want to spend their money. Your parent's generation passed on little debt to you; but, you are bankrupting your children's children. Therefore, you, Sir, are a major child-molester
Billhuggins, I agree that the libs think that this country will never buckle because of their stupidity. Off with their big heads!!!! Good post Bill.