The Joint Chiefs of Staff, are the conglomerate of military intellectuals who have the training and the sk**ls to make our country more than viable in a world gone crazy with the stench over-liberalized bulls--t!

I trusted these people with my life while I served, and I would do so again today. I trained, I served, and I felt confident in their abilities and competence to get us into the position to win.

Now, these people who should be allowed by our politically inept elected to do this job, are treated as if they are no more important than a drug dealer or pimp on the street.

When Akbar and the rest of the goons decide that talk is no longer enough and that they need to act; these are the people who will be tasked with a response.
Thanks to morons at the top; they have been hamstrung and relegated to bit players. This shameful incarnation of this important brain-trust is unacceptable and dangerous.

Here's my guy, if the Army should need to be on point:

http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/rv5_images/leaders/odierno_lg.jpg

God was real firm with the Jews about mixing in the OT.
Nehemiah 13:26-27 Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? yet among many nations was there no king like him, who was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel: nevertheless even him did outlandish women cause to sin.
27 Shall we then hearken unto you to do all this great evil, to t***sgress against our God in marrying strange wives?


Race Mixing in the OT was a sin and great evil.(vs 27) Furthermore, it was a sin and great evil against.....God. The interracial marriages of Solomon were the direct cause of the disintegration of the kingdom. M**************m destroyed the nation of Israel. That is not r****m or bigotry it is history.


There also are many practical reason race mixing should be warned against. For example the children will not be accepted by either the culture of their father or the culture of their mother.

Where is the major who told his commander those words about some senseless orders handed down through the chain of command. Oh yes, I am sure that this one order came from the very top of that chain. Do you suppose that Major is still in the Army? Well, he isn't but then anyone like him that refuses to blow the morale of his troops, about 500 of them in this case, will find himself outside looking in. I sure hope there turn out to be a very high number of these officers in the future.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/t***hrevolt-org/bill-whittle-sir-i-will-not-obey-that-order/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=361542e324-Mailchimp_FrontPageMag&utm_term=0_57e32c1dad-361542e324-156868073

=====================================

I get what you're saying, and you're right. Radical Islam is a huge threat. It's a ticking time bomb. They've already set up a Sharia tribunal court in Texas. We're in the early stages of a major problem with the 'm**************m' nonsense that has miserably failed in Europe.

However, b****s are not going to come around to believing w****s have any interest in their better interests. They're being sold a bill of rotten goods by their own progressive people in order to exact their radical agenda. Obama will have to be long gone before they remotely come around...which will be a long while. And, believe me when I tell you, the Obamas will have only just begun after he leaves office. "The Obama Foundation" will have millions/billions poured into it to keep the fires burning.

Nonetheless, you can't blame the OPP folks for being fed up with the BS from the black community. They refuse to open their eyes to see how they're being used. They refuse to see Obama's actions for what they are. And when you have false accusations of r****m on a daily basis around the country (Trayvon, Ferguson, etc.), it gets pretty tiring.

There have been many discussions claiming that the Church and God welcomed homosexual behavior, so I took several hours and researched some of it, particularly through the concept of "Gay Liberation Theology. Perhaps some of this information will be useful since I included sources, please feel free to get the books and do your own reading on the subject.

There have been several threads with much the same kind of claims about Jesus being homosexual and the Catholic Church having ceremonies for same sex weddings, as well as other related concepts. Rather than rewrite each comment slightly differently, I am taking the liberty of writing one post that is my comments for all three. Therefore, there will be some parts of each that do not pertain to your specific concept, but my arthritic hands can only do so much typing before having to call it quits for the day, so i ask for your indulgence. Please also note that I am remaining civil and polite in my response and I hope you will be courteous enough to do the same. thank you.

The prime discussion was about Jesus as a homosexual, in that context the idea that Hie instructed his disciples to love one another meaning have sex with each other. Also the claim was made that there were same sex weddings in the old Testament.

Much of the idea of Jesus as a homosexual comes from Robert Goss and the book Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted up.Goss said that as a child in the Catholic church he, like a number of boys imagined Jesus as a strong, sexy man and wanted to pull back the loin cloth on the Crucified Jesus and fondle and have mouth contact with His g*****ls. Goss said that entering the Jesuits was like entering a candy store for young same sex attracted men, that the flogging that was part of the spiritual process was highly erotic and for many included masturbation. He believed that the flogging was an erotic practice started by St. Paul who was a homosexual (according to Goss) The concept of homosexual wedding ceremonies was carried over to the Gay Liberation Theology, which mixed with Black Liberation theology was part of Rev. Wright's preaching in Obama's church.
Gay Christian interpretation of the healing of the paralyzed servant of the Roman soldier as Jesus firming the sexual relationship of the Roman solder and his servant. The Greek word used in Mathew's account to refer to the servant pies can mean son or boy, or manservant or purchased sexual s***e, depending on the context which here was used as man servant not sexual s***e. By rewriting the Bible, the "Gay Theologians" claimed that it refereed to the sexual s***e of the soldier, who Jesus happily made whole again.

The "gay theologians" also claimed that the brotherly love between David and Jonathan was actually homosexual in nature. According to gay theologians the only loving relationships are sexual in nature, no other kind of real relationships exist. , therefore Perpetua and Felicity were homosexual lovers rather than two women who loved each other in a nonsexual bond of deep friendship.
That also defines the relationship between Jesus and John of a homosexual nature, and when Jesus said to his deciles The most important commandment is that you love one another, that meant copulate with each other.
One of the most important concepts according to Goss in Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up, is , according to Goss "To say Jesus Christ is q***r is affirming of the concept of God identifying with the experiences of injustice and that the soldier stabbing Jesus in His side was symbolic homosexual assault.Jesus the Q***r Christ is crucified repeatedly by homosexual violence (Q***ring Christ pages 162-168) The concept of nomadic people could also represent bi-sexuals who go between same sex and opposite sex partners, as stated in the same book

Other references The Bible and Homosexual Practices, What Have They Done With Jesus, Something Q***r Happened to America, and Surprised by the Power of the Spirit.
This took hours to put together but I hope the information and the sources will be food for thought.
.There have been several threads with much the same kind of claims about Jesus being homosexual and the Catholic Church having ceremonies for same sex weddings, as well as other related concepts. Rather than rewrite each comment slightly differently, I am taking the liberty of writing one post that is my comments for all three. Therefore, there will be some parts of each that do not pertain to your specific concept, but my arthritic hands can only do so much typing before having to call it quits for the day, so i ask for your indulgence. Please also note that I am remaining civil and polite in my response and I hope you will be courteous enough to do the same. thank you.

The prime discussion was about Jesus as a homosexual, in that context the idea that Hie instructed his disciples to love one another meaning have sex with each other. Also the claim was made that there were same sex weddings in the old Testament.

Much of the idea of Jesus as a homosexual comes from Robert Goss and the book Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted up.Goss said that as a child in the Catholic church he, like a number of boys imagined Jesus as a strong, sexy man and wanted to pull back the loin cloth on the Crucified Jesus and fondle and have mouth contact with His g*****ls. Goss said that entering the Jesuits was like entering a candy store for young same sex attracted men, that the flogging that was part of the spiritual process was highly erotic and for many included masturbation. He believed that the flogging was an erotic practice started by St. Paul who was a homosexual (according to Goss) The concept of homosexual wedding ceremonies was carried over to the Gay Liberation Theology, which mixed with Black Liberation theology was part of Rev. Wright's preaching in Obama's church.
Gay Christian interpretation of the healing of the paralyzed servant of the Roman soldier as Jesus firming the sexual relationship of the Roman solder and his servant. The Greek word used in Mathew's account to refer to the servant pies can mean son or boy, or manservant or purchased sexual s***e, depending on the context which here was used as man servant not sexual s***e. By rewriting the Bible, the "Gay Theologians" claimed that it refereed to the sexual s***e of the soldier, who Jesus happily made whole again.

The "gay theologians" also claimed that the brotherly love between David and Jonathan was actually homosexual in nature. According to gay theologians the only loving relationships are sexual in nature, no other kind of real relationships exist. , therefore Perpetua and Felicity were homosexual lovers rather than two women who loved each other in a nonsexual bond of deep friendship.
That also defines the relationship between Jesus and John of a homosexual nature, and when Jesus said to his deciles The most important commandment is that you love one another, that meant copulate with each other.
One of the most important concepts according to Goss in Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up, is , according to Goss "To say Jesus Christ is q***r is affirming of the concept of God identifying with the experiences of injustice and that the soldier stabbing Jesus in His side was symbolic homosexual assault.Jesus the Q***r Christ is crucified repeatedly by homosexual violence (Q***ring Christ pages 162-168) The concept of nomadic people could also represent bi-sexuals who go between same sex and opposite sex partners, as stated in the same book

Other references The Bible and Homosexual Practices, What Have They Done With Jesus, Something Q***r Happened to America, and Surprised by the Power of the Spirit.
This took hours to put together but I hope the information and the sources will be food for thought.
.There have been several threads with much the same kind of claims about Jesus being homosexual and the Catholic Church having ceremonies for same sex weddings, as well as other related concepts. Rather than rewrite each comment slightly differently, I am taking the liberty of writing one post that is my comments for all three. Therefore, there will be some parts of each that do not pertain to your specific concept, but my arthritic hands can only do so much typing before having to call it quits for the day, so i ask for your indulgence. Please also note that I am remaining civil and polite in my response and I hope you will be courteous enough to do the same. thank you.

The prime discussion was about Jesus as a homosexual, in that context the idea that Hie instructed his disciples to love one another meaning have sex with each other. Also the claim was made that there were same sex weddings in the old Testament.

Much of the idea of Jesus as a homosexual comes from Robert Goss and the book Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted up.Goss said that as a child in the Catholic church he, like a number of boys imagined Jesus as a strong, sexy man and wanted to pull back the loin cloth on the Crucified Jesus and fondle and have mouth contact with His g*****ls. Goss said that entering the Jesuits was like entering a candy store for young same sex attracted men, that the flogging that was part of the spiritual process was highly erotic and for many included masturbation. He believed that the flogging was an erotic practice started by St. Paul who was a homosexual (according to Goss) The concept of homosexual wedding ceremonies was carried over to the Gay Liberation Theology, which mixed with Black Liberation theology was part of Rev. Wright's preaching in Obama's church.
Gay Christian interpretation of the healing of the paralyzed servant of the Roman soldier as Jesus firming the sexual relationship of the Roman solder and his servant. The Greek word used in Mathew's account to refer to the servant pies can mean son or boy, or manservant or purchased sexual s***e, depending on the context which here was used as man servant not sexual s***e. By rewriting the Bible, the "Gay Theologians" claimed that it refereed to the sexual s***e of the soldier, who Jesus happily made whole again.

The "gay theologians" also claimed that the brotherly love between David and Jonathan was actually homosexual in nature. According to gay theologians the only loving relationships are sexual in nature, no other kind of real relationships exist. , therefore Perpetua and Felicity were homosexual lovers rather than two women who loved each other in a nonsexual bond of deep friendship.
That also defines the relationship between Jesus and John of a homosexual nature, and when Jesus said to his deciles The most important commandment is that you love one another, that meant copulate with each other.
One of the most important concepts according to Goss in Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up, is , according to Goss "To say Jesus Christ is q***r is affirming of the concept of God identifying with the experiences of injustice and that the soldier stabbing Jesus in His side was symbolic homosexual assault.Jesus the Q***r Christ is crucified repeatedly by homosexual violence (Q***ring Christ pages 162-168) The concept of nomadic people could also represent bi-sexuals who go between same sex and opposite sex partners, as stated in the same book

Other references The Bible and Homosexual Practices, What Have They Done With Jesus, Something Q***r Happened to America, and Surprised by the Power of the Spirit.
This took hours to put together but I hope the information and the sources will be food for thought.
.There have been several threads with much the same kind of claims about Jesus being homosexual and the Catholic Church having ceremonies for same sex weddings, as well as other related concepts. Rather than rewrite each comment slightly differently, I am taking the liberty of writing one post that is my comments for all three. Therefore, there will be some parts of each that do not pertain to your specific concept, but my arthritic hands can only do so much typing before having to call it quits for the day, so i ask for your indulgence. Please also note that I am remaining civil and polite in my response and I hope you will be courteous enough to do the same. thank you.

The prime discussion was about Jesus as a homosexual, in that context the idea that Hie instructed his disciples to love one another meaning have sex with each other. Also the claim was made that there were same sex weddings in the old Testament.

Much of the idea of Jesus as a homosexual comes from Robert Goss and the book Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted up.Goss said that as a child in the Catholic church he, like a number of boys imagined Jesus as a strong, sexy man and wanted to pull back the loin cloth on the Crucified Jesus and fondle and have mouth contact with His g*****ls. Goss said that entering the Jesuits was like entering a candy store for young same sex attracted men, that the flogging that was part of the spiritual process was highly erotic and for many included masturbation. He believed that the flogging was an erotic practice started by St. Paul who was a homosexual (according to Goss) The concept of homosexual wedding ceremonies was carried over to the Gay Liberation Theology, which mixed with Black Liberation theology was part of Rev. Wright's preaching in Obama's church.
Gay Christian interpretation of the healing of the paralyzed servant of the Roman soldier as Jesus firming the sexual relationship of the Roman solder and his servant. The Greek word used in Mathew's account to refer to the servant pies can mean son or boy, or manservant or purchased sexual s***e, depending on the context which here was used as man servant not sexual s***e. By rewriting the Bible, the "Gay Theologians" claimed that it refereed to the sexual s***e of the soldier, who Jesus happily made whole again.

The "gay theologians" also claimed that the brotherly love between David and Jonathan was actually homosexual in nature. According to gay theologians the only loving relationships are sexual in nature, no other kind of real relationships exist. , therefore Perpetua and Felicity were homosexual lovers rather than two women who loved each other in a nonsexual bond of deep friendship.
That also defines the relationship between Jesus and John of a homosexual nature, and when Jesus said to his deciles The most important commandment is that you love one another, that meant copulate with each other.
One of the most important concepts according to Goss in Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up, is , according to Goss "To say Jesus Christ is q***r is affirming of the concept of God identifying with the experiences of injustice and that the soldier stabbing Jesus in His side was symbolic homosexual assault.Jesus the Q***r Christ is crucified repeatedly by homosexual violence (Q***ring Christ pages 162-168) The concept of nomadic people could also represent bi-sexuals who go between same sex and opposite sex partners, as stated in the same book

Other references The Bible and Homosexual Practices, What Have They Done With Jesus, Something Q***r Happened to America, and Surprised by the Power of the Spirit.
This took hours to put together but I hope the information and the sources will be food for thought.
.There have been several threads with much the same kind of claims about Jesus being homosexual and the Catholic Church having ceremonies for same sex weddings, as well as other related concepts. Rather than rewrite each comment slightly differently, I am taking the liberty of writing one post that is my comments for all three. Therefore, there will be some parts of each that do not pertain to your specific concept, but my arthritic hands can only do so much typing before having to call it quits for the day, so i ask for your indulgence. Please also note that I am remaining civil and polite in my response and I hope you will be courteous enough to do the same. thank you.

The prime discussion was about Jesus as a homosexual, in that context the idea that Hie instructed his disciples to love one another meaning have sex with each other. Also the claim was made that there were same sex weddings in the old Testament.

Much of the idea of Jesus as a homosexual comes from Robert Goss and the book Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted up.Goss said that as a child in the Catholic church he, like a number of boys imagined Jesus as a strong, sexy man and wanted to pull back the loin cloth on the Crucified Jesus and fondle and have mouth contact with His g*****ls. Goss said that entering the Jesuits was like entering a candy store for young same sex attracted men, that the flogging that was part of the spiritual process was highly erotic and for many included masturbation. He believed that the flogging was an erotic practice started by St. Paul who was a homosexual (according to Goss) The concept of homosexual wedding ceremonies was carried over to the Gay Liberation Theology, which mixed with Black Liberation theology was part of Rev. Wright's preaching in Obama's church.
Gay Christian interpretation of the healing of the paralyzed servant of the Roman soldier as Jesus firming the sexual relationship of the Roman solder and his servant. The Greek word used in Mathew's account to refer to the servant pies can mean son or boy, or manservant or purchased sexual s***e, depending on the context which here was used as man servant not sexual s***e. By rewriting the Bible, the "Gay Theologians" claimed that it refereed to the sexual s***e of the soldier, who Jesus happily made whole again.

The "gay theologians" also claimed that the brotherly love between David and Jonathan was actually homosexual in nature. According to gay theologians the only loving relationships are sexual in nature, no other kind of real relationships exist. , therefore Perpetua and Felicity were homosexual lovers rather than two women who loved each other in a nonsexual bond of deep friendship.
That also defines the relationship between Jesus and John of a homosexual nature, and when Jesus said to his deciles The most important commandment is that you love one another, that meant copulate with each other.
One of the most important concepts according to Goss in Q***ring Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up, is , according to Goss "To say Jesus Christ is q***r is affirming of the concept of God identifying with the experiences of injustice and that the soldier stabbing Jesus in His side was symbolic homosexual assault.Jesus the Q***r Christ is crucified repeatedly by homosexual violence (Q***ring Christ pages 162-168) The concept of nomadic people could also represent bi-sexuals who go between same sex and opposite sex partners, as stated in the same book

Other references The Bible and Homosexual Practices, What Have They Done With Jesus, Something Q***r Happened to America, and Surprised by the Power of the Spirit.
This took hours to put together but I hope the information and the sources will be food for thought.
.