Brian Devon wrote:
******
Actually, the old f*****t from Waco gets her Jew-hating news from Storm Front, Vanguard News Network, and the Council of Conservative Citizens (formerly the White Citizens' Council).
The old f*****t is especially pissed about the news these days because Ford Motors just appointed Mark Fields, a Jew, as CEO of its company. This has caused her to send 200 roses to the grave of Henry Ford, her "Protocols" hero.
As far as you are concerned, Brian.....you must be approaching total apoplexy....you're back to your typical name calling.....when you haven't the mental resources or acuity to conceive of anything else worthy of expressing. Go crawl in your little hole.....Again...you claim to be Jewish....to bad you didn't get the intellect. Ho hum....
Old_Gringo wrote:
They are too numerous to name them all, so you lefties just try to lump them all into one entity. Again, there is not just one Tea Party, there are many. Untangle your panties and try researching them. There are several in Texas alone.
There may be several little ones, but the I refer to is, as YOU are well aware.....the National Tea Party.....the ONLY one with real influence. And....call me a lefty? I am a registered Republican, you dweeb.......but I don't support either party...because NEITHER party gives a hoot about the US or its people...........but they sure care about their bank accounts, acquisitions, take overs, ad infinitum.....everything BUT this country and its people.
Old_Gringo wrote:
There is NO one Tea Party. There are many grass root Tea Parties, but not A Tea Party. You watch too much left wing news, i.e. MSNBC and CNN.
I watch ALL of the news......and, I refer to the Tea Party that is in national news all of the time.
There are NO other Tea Parties of mention.......so cool your jets, give it a rest, and just get bleeping real.
And....just who the hell do YOU think you are to tell me what news I watch? I watch it ALLLLLL.....so I'll be a little better informed than a Rush Limbaugh lover.....who I cannot stand to watch........not because of the news, but because he is such a repulsive excuse for a human being.
Old_Gringo wrote:
To reiterate, WHICH Tea Party? Please enlighten me for I am unaware which one.
Have you ever researched how many groups Soros funds?
THE TEA PARTY......I only know of ONE. You know, the one you hear about on the news every night, during the day, and in between. THE TEA PARTY......and you know EXACTLY which one I mean.
And, I know Soros funds many things. But, what YOU don't know is that I don't like any of them that attempt to obviate the will of the American people.
I don't just target the Kochs......I think they ALL, for the things they have done, should be drawn and quartered.
Soros....he's sneakier than they are. He's buying up all the land in the Midwest he can get his hands on....nothing like one man having enough land to influence the food supply. What a wonderful future we have in store in this lovely little plutocracy into which our country has evolved.
Old_Gringo wrote:
Which Tea Party is backed by the Kochs? There are a myriad of Tea Party entities, but NO Tea Party such as the RNC or the DNC. If you believe otherwise, you are sorely lacking of credible information.
The Tea Party that has the clout is backed by the Kochs and Rupert Murdock, but primarily by the Kochs. It began more as a grassroots movement, but the Kochs saw the opportunity and recognized the similarities of their goals and began funding it....moving it into quarters several years ago down the hall from Republican headquarters. I don't know if they are still in that location.
This comes, not as my opinion, but fact based on their funding. They have a myriad of venues they use to accomplish their aims, but have in several cases out spent all other visible sources of political contributions, but primarily unions.
Dave wrote:
Perhaps I read rage where none existed, but you seemed pretty worked up about Wal-Mart - I see people attacking them every day but few seem to realize they pay scales are equal to or better than the retailers they compete against.
As to the unions, they did have a role at times, but what they've done to the basic industries like steel and auto has hurt many people.
The real reasons people made more, with the exception of those places where unions ate their seed grain, was corporations needed to do that to attract the right quantity and quality of employees. If they were able to produce here with an even field of taxation a lot of those jobs would come back.
I am an independent - neither belong to or support any party - I see the Democrats and the established Republicans pretty much all liking to have the government big and intrusive - that provides them the power that they auction off to the biggest bidder.
The only political force I see that might offer hope is the tea party folks - while they certainly have presented some quirky candidates, they generally support limited government and simplified tax systems - and the established parties vilify them because they pose a threat to the establishments comfortable status quo - and that's also why you see so much attention on the Kochs - they are more libertarian than conservative - smaller government folks, and are not as politically active as the Soros, Buffett, Gates, Steiyers, Waltons, Pritzkers and other billionaire supporters of the establishment.
Perhaps I read rage where none existed, but you se... (
show quote)
Dave, I am VERY direct in my writing, which some mistake for rage or anger, which may have conveyed that to you. Please understand, if I do feel that LOL it will be REALLY obvious and one won't have to guess.
You are correct in what you write. I just view those with billions diverting the will of the people as unjust. The Founding Fathers could have never conceived of the existing situation, I guess, except as they experienced royalty and never dreamed, probably, that anything like this unbounded wealth would occur in America.
And, Dave...I am a registered Republican...but, I support neither party. They are bought and paid for. The Tea Party, backed by the Kochs is not my "cup of tea"....might have been had they stayed independent of the Kochs, but not now.
I hope for a party like that independent of any influence but that of the people.....then, we will have our country back.
Kevyn wrote:
I called Limbaugh a buffoon and dope feind referring to his clown like inane babble and habitual criminal abuse of dangerous mind altering narcotics. I do not ever remember commenting on his enormouus and admirable girth. Limbaughs corpulence is the one honest thing about him. He blathers on and on about many conservative values he obviously ignores in his personal life. Probibly the only thing he is honest about is his gluttonous consumption of food, cigars and as the great Rushbaugh puts it adult beverages. His sweat glistening ruddy pink complexion and puss swollen physique are the proud results of following the Limbaugh lifestyle, he wears it with honor in the way a star athlete is proud of the work and discipline it took to develope a toned muscular physique. Limbaugh's body stands as monumental testament to his pursuit of life's pleasures, with each cubic foot of flatulence emitted from either end of Limbaugh he announces to the world what he is made of.
I called Limbaugh a buffoon and dope feind referri... (
show quote)
Kevyn, there are subjects we may or may not agree on, as is the case with most of the OPP group.
But....this one post of yours is one that I agree with 100%. I must admit....on occasion, he does circle around the t***h, but not often enough for me to believe him much of the time.
The thing that turns me off is him....his appearance, his presentation....all of it. I cannot stand to watch him and listen to him....he is repulsive to me. And, he can throw stones, for one in a glass house, heard around the world...and destroy someone....while he sits there, like a boar hog in a sty....with the protection of a bully and no consequence.
There has to be someone who can replace him. PLEASE...let there be someone to replace him....who at least looks clean and presents himself/herself as professional.
Thank you, Neal....always nice to see a positive comment...and someone who marches to the beat of a different drummer.
My mother used to ask me...LOL....why I ALWAYS had to march to that....the beat of a different drummer.
When I was about seventeen, Neal, I turned around, looked her straight in the eye and said, "Mother, I don't have "A different drummer". I have the whole darned University of Texas Marching Band". She never asked me that again.....and never, never understood me.
no propaganda please wrote:
Actually, I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt but you may have some idea what I think of him and a number like him, but keep to myself. It is unfair to accuse anyone without any documentation to prove the accusation, so I don't post what I cannot prove.
Good approach to a dicey situation. I understand that he gets lots of .... for being liberal. But, there's no solution in his reactions. There is some "twist" somewhere that has created this. I have found that those feeling no power within themselves (and I feel that way sometimes as probably most of us do) often react in this manner. To me, it is regrettable, because with his determination and energy, he could accomplish some good....instead of just sitting on the computer and creating ill feeling. He's got the best going....he appears to be quite young. I hope he doesn't waste that gift in negativity and lack of accomplishment.
JimMe wrote:
If You Aren't Ready to Replace DemLib-Socialists & RINOs with TeaPartiers You Are Simply Allowing the Socialists to Nationalize EVERYTHING & Ultimately Turn Our Nation into "the United State of America" - BECAUSE THIS IS THE DEMLIB-SOCIALISTS/RINO AGENDA & the TeaPartiers Are Our 2014/2015/2016 Stop-Gap Organization...
Jim, I am a registered Republican, but I support neither party, as, with the present situation with unlimited campaign donations, each elected official is virtually bought and paid for.
I am not happy with this situation, and only see the rise of a third party that actually answers to the people as a suitable answer....'cause the two in existence definitely do not. I thought the Tea Party was going to do it, but I've become disillusioned with their int***sigence and refusal to compromise in any form or fashion. I think they have the right idea, but the Koch money and influence makes me awfully uneasy. To me, it is far more reasonable to "get you foot in the door" with a compromise and then proceed over the next few terms to alter the situation to the TP's liking. I definitely feel if the TP had done that on some things, the next e******n might have been theirs. Things just don't get done immediately in Washington....or in any political situation usually. Their movement is almost like molding clay.....but I'd(the party I v**e for) rather be the one with the influence molding "it" than on the outside looking in.
Tell me your solution, please, as I am sorely taxed to tolerate even considering the next e******n. I don't care for any of the candidates......but would hope one would appear from somewhere who truly cares about this country and is not owned and controlled as the others are.....and, I guess I can dream on as far as that is concerned.
What do you think....how can this be solved?
no propaganda please wrote:
There are a number of them out there, and sooner or later you will encounter them all. It should be easy to determine who they are as their responses are carbon copies of each other. A few of them can carry on civil conversations, but many of them just end up with a string of moronic statements mixed with crude comments. Most I ignore, as I am to busy to bother with them, some make statements that need discussion, and as long as they are being half way civil I am happy to enter into the discussion. I can carry on more lucid conversations with my neighbors goats than I can with BoJester, Kevyn or Brian. But then, I believe Brian has a particular dislike for me because I am a child therapist working with young teenage boys who have been molested.Since I approach the subject from a Christian perspective he has a problem with what I say.
There are a number of them out there, and sooner o... (
show quote)
Did it ever occur to you that it may not be just the Christian approach you apply to your patients? There may be another facet. And, LOL, the goats ARE preferable!
stevenkalka wrote:
Maybe Brian mistakes honest disagreement with h**e. People will always disagree. The late former mayor of New York Ed Koch once said "If you agree with me all the time, you should see a psychiatrist." In any case, the opposite of love isn't h**e. It's indifference.
You may be right, Steven. I certainly don't comprehend his behavior. And, to some....those of a different consciousness, the opposite of love may be indifference.
Others? Like Brian, they seem to view any differing opinion almost as an attack, it seems, rather than just an opinion....another's words spoken or written on a page.....but appearing as a threat to them or their ideas and instead of just saying, "Ok, you're entitled to your personal opinions", they go whole hog after yo' azzz.
To him, I am an anti-Semite because I speak against an infinitesimally small group of bankers, who just HAPPEN to be Jewish.....but who back all the wars on earth....and encourage them, as they are now doing in the Ukraine.
When I ask him what will happen to the other 14 million Jewish when the rest of the world realizes what is going on, and another holocaust may occur as a result, and as it has before in the course of history, he just goes ballistic.
He COULD use all that energy on a campaign for peace, for removing the Federal Reserve(which is owned and controlled by these bankers) from the US....or working in a myriad of other ways to alleviate such an occurrence. That doesn't seem to enter his mind. But, we're all here to learn lessons.......and I have my own. I sure as heck cannot handle his. I am just tired of his own brand of insanity......
no propaganda please wrote:
I agree with you. It is important to pay attention to all points of view. How else are you going to decide what is closest to the t***h?
Bo Jester, Brian, Kevyn and others like him are obviously against fat people. What they are saying about Rush in that regard is H**E SPEECH and if they can make the declaration that anyone who doesn't agree with them is guilty of h**e speech we can call their hatred of fat people H**e Speech with as much validity.
I believe you nailed it with your statement that disagreement equals h**e speech with Brian, though I am not acquainted with Bo Jester, Kevyn or anyone else like him. Logic has no meaning to some. This appears similar to persecution complex combined with a lot of victimization....used to deliberately abuse, badger, and berate others.
What I've noticed with Brian is when he is in full apolexy, the only thing he can come up with is that another is a h**er.....of some kind.....when his own speech and writing is nothing but h**e.
RETW wrote:
http://www.rense.com/general96/obsigns.html9
Wish I had made these.
But so true , so true
Way to go Washington.
Anti-Obama Signs On I-5
Near Seattle Draw WH Threats
You want to see something better than Burma Shave signs?
These are Northbound on I-5 (88 miles south of Seattle).
The federal government is now petitioning to have these signs removed, or Washington state will be denied additional monies for interstate highways.
The State of Washington replied, they will secede from the Union rather than be intimidated. These are a matter of free speech paid for by a private citizen. It seems the Obama government uses intimidation and ignores the First Amendment when they want to silence someone. These signs are priceless.
Bravo for the man who created them.
Bravo for the state of Washington!
http://www.rense.com/general96/obsigns.html9 br Wi... (
show quote)
There are some signs similar to these, but, only printed without the cartoon, on Hwy. 6 between Valley Mills and Clifton, Texas. "Our government" has also tried to have them removed. Don't know how the guy has kept them, but when I was up there a month or so ago, they were still there. In all honesty and t***hfulness, I really do not care for the cartoon....but I do appreciate the message.....and would like to see them appear EVERYWHERE in yards, on roadways, etc. But, with this government of, by and for the 1% of the 1%, I wonder if even that would get the message across.
B****sheep wrote:
So have you ever seen that really odd road sign driving through the petrified forest area, up a hill, that says "Caution. High winds may manifest"? Pretty sure it's where the road passes through a reservation. Weird way to say Wind Danger.
Have never been to the petrified forest...but, if the sign was put up by some segment of "our government"....then, it sounds typical......unless they were have a conference in the area. In that case, there would be lots of "high winds"...volumes and volumes of "hot air"...