banjojack wrote:
If I let rude, uncultured, semi-civilized troglodytes get to me, I would ruin my own day within ten minutes of waking up.
I copied your post and saved it for future use , I think it was that good ,thanks for writing it
OldSchool wrote:
Man, if you're ignorant enough to think Obamacare is successful, and healthcare will better in this country under it, you're a lot more ignorant than I originally thought. Not only ignorant, but also very gullible. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that Obummercare is an absolute disaster! Stop swallowing the propaganda and put that computer to work and do some REAL research with it, rather than talking out your butt. Get off the biased left-wing propaganda web sites!
Yeah. we're sure going to find out all right, come about the 2014 mid-term e******n when the Democrats get shellacked.
Man, if you're ignorant enough to think Obamacare ... (
show quote)
there is mounting evidence from v**er resistance to conservative v**er repression will have the opposite effect , and the data is that the ACA is getting the job done and helping the very people it was intended to help , and the ACA is essentially a heritage foundation idea so why are the conservatives against it , makes no sense, so 2014 could well be a net loss for the conservatives and a resurgence of the moderate voices in America
UncleJesse wrote:
This is actually a smoke screen. The gay Muslim socialist thing is nuttin' but a planted cover to avoid the real t***h, which is much worse. He is an advanced terminator series cyborg T-2008 that Skynet developed to create an alternate timeline allowing the rise of the machines via the ACA website.
Unclejesse , some of these people don't know the difference between sarcasm and their t***h , you could well be quoted as a source
BoJester wrote:
Business lobbyists on K Street applaud Boehner for slam tea party and other conservative groups and think that compromise is good for business.
Let's see who gets the big money support in 2014. Dems would be smart to help Boehner push his Immigration Bill
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/193166-business-to-boehner-hit-em-hard
Pragmatism will always beat out delusional dogma
ldsuttonjr wrote:
bluejacket: You need that appointment for the procedure as well! Lenin shot those who didn't agree with his summations of prose!
you obviously do not need the procedure as you are already damaged
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Hungry Freaks: Have you ever considered a frontal lobotomy? Control education, media and get everyone under national health care and we will gain control of their bodies
Lenin - 1905.
Lenin also said people who cannot read or will not read cannot see past the horizon , I think you should improve the quality of your prose and be more respectful
slatten49 wrote:
:thumbup: I agree. "Perception is reality", to most people. The t***h is too often dismissed, or overlooked!
Haven't we all fallen victim to our misguided perceptions? :oops:
yes we all have , because of the one fact that is undeniable , we are all human
slatten49 wrote:
:shock: :lol: :mrgreen:
I find that calling on my religious training at times helpds with the ups and downs of using this website , one thing that comes to mind that I learned a long time ago , A teacher told me -with most people reality is good only when it agrees with their perceptions
alex wrote:
how do you liberals come to this ridiculous conclusion an ID card doesn't have party affiliation on it
no but those who determine eligibility and access do and in several red state the process is slanted against minorities who v**e primarily democrat
Brian Devon wrote:
You sir, are quite correct. If you make a map of the "deck stacking" states, it pretty much follows the borders of the old confederacy. As Gomer Pyle used to say, "surprise, surprise!"
Yes I would also be considered a non-minority and if I can see the inequities and the general narrative supports what I believe I see , I then have to conclude it to be true
rumitoid wrote:
Thank you, blue, but I never understood why such things were not obvious; couldn't be bias, right?
some time ago I was taught that the when one defends the indefensible the first thing to die is reason
v**enoobama wrote:
Republicans are not and have not restricted any B****s from V****g. Bluejacket, tell me how many Black people you know, that don't have ID.? You can check each State that has V**er ID., laws and you will see everyone that is register can v**e and there has not been any problems at All.
You statement is not TRUE.
from Rumitoid
For over two hundred years an ID wasn't needed and now it is: what has changed? Massive v***r f***d...that has never been found. Incidents of such fraud, yes, and evenly split between parties (as long as you are not prejudice Democrat zombies; even the dead have rights, right?).
Rushing into place v**er ID laws shortly before an e******n that demographics clearly show far more Democrats will be adversely affected than Republicans and there is little time left to secure such identification is as the Republicans report, just protecting the v**e? Why did the change have to be sudden on how things were done traditionally for over two centuries? Why id the Pennsylvania legislature announce that their new v**er ID law would elect Romney? Oops, I know the answer: Democrat zombies, right.
Any expense that infringes or imperils on the right to v**e is called a "poll tax," a practice perfected in the segregated South. To most of us living in this modern society, spending close to five bucks on a cup of good coffee in the morning and perhaps not even finishing it, having bank accounts and making financial t***sactions almost daily, the possible imposition of getting what we see as a basic piece of existence, an official state ID, is ridiculous. What? Ten or twenty bucks? But more to the point, why the heck don't you have that anyway? Are you on the run or a terrorist? Some useless welfare flake?
he makes several good points you need to be aware of
philisophyman wrote:
It appears a lot of people h**e what the government is doing as a whole, so tell me, what do you h**e about the way the government is running in general? all opinions are welcome.
also, please no name calling!
I dislike the acerbic rhetoric and unwillingness of people to listen to the opposition and the distain a lot have for those who are concerned with real governance as their first priority not acquisition of political power
a and Texas
WoundedEagle wrote:
If the Gov't numbers can be relied upon, there's more unemployment in the minority, non-caucasion communities. Seems to me, those working would have a harder time v****g. And, how hard can it be to get an ID within 4 years, in time for the P**********l E******n?
The acquisition of ID for v****g is a minor inconvenience , that will have little or no effect over after the next v****g cycle and yes they will have ID's the only problem will be the ability of certain states for purely political reasons change the requirements to restrict v****g as we have seen in South Carolina , Florida and Texas , but suppression has been shown to have short term success but long term failure , but the long term changes in demographics are going to fundamentally alter the political makeup of our country , increased minority participation, and increased urbanization
WoundedEagle wrote:
If the Gov't numbers can be relied upon, there's more unemployment in the minority, non-caucasion communities. Seems to me, those working would have a harder time v****g. And, how hard can it be to get an ID within 4 years, in time for the P**********l E******n?
The acquisition of ID for v****g is a minor inconvenience , that will have little or no effect over after the next v****g cycle and yes they will have ID's the only problem will be the ability of certain states for purely political reasons change the requirements to restrict v****g as we have seen in S