Of course....just as we have the right to be offended by her opinion and can voice that.

It wasn't a personal attack. "F*ggots" and 'sissies' have been the targets of harassment and violence for ages. That is what you (the right) are proposing we return to, singling out a group to lawfully discriminate against.

I don't have the right to educated my children about accepting others if you have your way. You would shut them all down. I don't 'inflict' anything on anyone. No one is forcing parents to d**g their children to d**g q***n hour.

The problem isn't d**g q***n hour, or 'g***ming'...the problem is that you and the right want to see the LBGTQ+ community pushed back into the closet, to pretend they don't exist. Don't like d**g q***n hour? Don't go, don't take your children. Wh**ever.

My best advise? Leave them alone...treat them equally under the law and especially don't make laws the single the groups out as pariahs. Nothing good has ever come out of official discrimination.

Penis and sperm or vagina and ovaries. Why?

Yeah, I get it. Back in your day it was ok to beat up the 'sissies' right? And you did it and now you want to do it again.....you're fooling yourself if you think gays weren't mistreated 'back in your day'. Again....come up with evidence that 'g***ming' or abuse of any kind occurs more frequently by gays or admit you have none and are basing your judgment on fear of the 'unknown'.

Not offended. Yes, I find d**g q***n hour okay. I'm not the one trying to silence anyone's voice.

What is so offensive about d**g q***n hour that the right wants to shut them down? That is the 'silencing' of which you speak. No one is forcing the parents to take their kids to these shows and discussions.

And what's with the 'g***ming' business? There is no evidence that non cisg****r people abuse children more than cisg****red folks. G***ming is the boogeyman being used to shut down these events....another fear based on falsehoods.

Yes....our not hating gays and t***s folks means we are owned by them.

Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? Yikes! That reasoning is astounding.

I notice that you conveniently skipped over the assertion that L***Q+ do not abuse children at a higher rate than heterosexuals and that 'g***ming' is a trigger word for the rightists.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/22/fact-check-thousands-black-l***s-m****r-protesters-arrested-2020/6816074001/

https://apnews.com/article/records-rebut-claims-j***6-r****rs-55adf4d46aff57b91af2fdd3345dace8

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/08/george-floyd-k*****g-police-arrest-non-violent-protesters

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/01/07/nation/how-arrests-capitol-r**t-wednesday-compare-that-black-l***s-m****r-protests/


Nope....it's your response that it full of it.

No, you are not the only one. You have plenty of company in being wrong headed.

The council woman is a public figure and should know that she will get heat for her opinions. The right's obsession with 'g***ming' is a rationalization for dehumanizing L***Q+ folks.

"G***ming" and the 's****n e******n' are stories the right tells itself to justify abusing and denigrating those with whom they disagree. There is no evidence that L***Q+ abuse children more than heterosexuals, just like there is no evidence the e******n was s****n; just stories the right tells itself to justify their own questionable opinions and behaviors.

L***Q+ have way too much power.....sheesh. Just their coming out of the closet is scary, isn't it?

https://stopabusecampaign.org/2017/03/10/are-most-sex-abusers-heterosexual/

No...meaning that complaining by the original poster about not being able to find 't***h' in all the site he listed (those dreaded mainstream, lefty news sources) is irrelevant. There are plenty of other sites that can provide him the confirmation of 'the t***h' he already holds.

silly person. Haven't watched tv news in decades.

Right? Fox, Newsmax, Red State, Western Journal, National Review, Washington Times, Washington Examiner, The Federalist, etc., etc., etc. If one wants a right wing cocoon, the sources are out there.

Perhaps the OP isn't trying very hard to get 'the t***h'.

Why? Have you ever been in on of those costumes? They have a small area of visibility. It is entirely possible those young ladies were not in the characters field of vision. Seems like everyone is jumping to conclusions about the incident. OOOH....r****m, trauma, isolation, lawsuits.....

I'm not convinced that's the case.

I have more proof than you for your claim that the e******n was s****n. I just take the findings of the DoJ, Homeland Security, FBI, Trump administration figures as proof. Where is that proof for your claim, eh?

The Trumpists' mantra of 'proof' is a diversion from the fact that there is no proof of a s****n e******n. You made the claim....prove it. And wishing isn't proof.

I too am sick to death of the former guy and wish he'd stay in Florida and play golf. He's not living in my head rent free. He actually lives rent free in his supporters' heads. They can't come to grips with the fact that he bamboozled them then and now. They keep howling for 'proof' yet can't see what's staring them in the face: a concerted effort, led by the former occupant of the White House, to overturn an e******n despite being told by many in his own administration that he lost fair and square. They don't want proof, they want those that know the t***h to feign ignorance.

Not gonna happen.