And to repost what you should really be asking y9urself about aborting a child..... gocubs person.

As to your summary statement about a******n. Women were given a natural way to govern their own wombs. There are just a few days in 28 that women can produce life. If one wishes to not bring life to the world - then they (Man and Women) should abstain from sex in those few days.

Free sex with the man given right to abort the creation is not natural. No person has the right to destroy a creation of man and women union.

However, man did create a way to prevent a******n. Why don't woman use the multiple solutions if they do not want to bring a creation of their own image into the world. Why do men not ensure they are not performing sex that is likely to produce an un wanted child?

Those, gocubs, are the questions you should be asking yourself!

Here is what you should be looking at if you are as smart as you say! GoCubs like little bear cubs in a china world?
And actually, the real t***h on most of the subjects you list. Full article at:

https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/state-the-planet-better-ever

In one sentence you say the following. Tons of proof to the contrary."In sum, our planet is in a miserable state, we're told over and over."
When actually for all to discover that have not done so yet....

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the single greatest misinformation campaign in world history. The state of our planet and the state of humanity has never been stronger. Nature has never been more bountiful.

I recently wrote of the following six statistics which go a long way to proving how well we are doing. The response from the greens was vitriol and even threats to my physical safety for writing these t***hs. But no one refuted the facts, because, well facts are facts.

Here they are:

1. Natural resources are more abundant and affordable today than ever before in history. Short term volatility aside, the price of almost all natural resources - from cocoa to cotton to coal - is cheaper today in real terms than 50, 100, or 500 years ago. This has happened even as the world's population has nearly tripled. Technology has far outpaced depletion of the earth's resources.

2. Energy resources are growing. Energy is the master resource; and it is super abundant. Remember when people like Paul Ehrlich nearly 50 years ago and Barack Obama just three years ago warned that we were running out of oil and gas? Today, in the new age of oil and gas thanks to fracking, the United States has hundreds of years of petroleum and an estimated 300 years of coal. We're not running out of energy, we are running into it.

3. Air and water is cleaner than ever. Since the late 1970s, pollutants in the air have plunged. Lead pollution plunged by more than 90 percent, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide by more than 50 percent, with ozone and nitrogen dioxide declining as well. By nearly every standard measure it is much, much, much cleaner today in the United States than 50 and 100 years ago. The air is so clean now that the EPA worries about carbon dioxide, which isn't even a pollutant. (And, by the way, carbon emissions are falling too, thanks to fracking). One hundred years ago, about one in four deaths in America was due to contaminants in drinking water. But from 1971-2002, fewer than three people per year in the United States were documented to have died from water contamination.

4. There is no Malthusian nightmare of overpopulation. Birth rates have fallen by about one-half around the world over the last 50 years. Developed countries are having fewer kids, not too many. Even with a population of 7.3 billion people, average incomes, especially in poor countries, have surged over the last 40 years. The number of people in abject poverty fell by 1 billion between 1981 and 2011, even as global population increased by more than 1.5 billion. That's just short of a miracle.

5. Global per capita food production is 40 percent higher today than as recently as 1950. In most nations the nutrition problem today is obesity - too many calories consumed - not hunger. The number of famines and related deaths over the last 100 years has fallen in half. More than 12 million lives on average were lost each decade from the 1920s-1960s to famine. Since then, fewer than 4 million lives on average per decade were lost. When famine does happen, it's primarily a result of political corruption or malice, not nature growing too little food. Furthermore, the price of food has fallen steadily in the United States - and most other nations steadily for 200 years.

6. The rate of death and physical destruction from natural disasters or severe weather changes has plummeted over the last century. Loss of life from hurricanes, floods, hurricanes, heat, droughts, and so on is at or near record lows. This is because we have much better advance warning systems, our infrastructure is much more durable, and we have things like air conditioning to adapt to weather changes. We are constantly discovering new ways to harness and even tame nature.

Again, these are just standard facts - though not very well known. But you could look them up. The point is that human advance and growth of the economy leads to a steadily improving and bountiful planet.

And the growth comes as a result of free enterprise. The environmentalists have declared free-market capitalism a near-treasonous pursuit. In reality, free markets with reasonable and sane regulation, will save the planet from extinction. Meanwhile, the socialists, the c*******ts, the Sandinistas, the Stalinists, are the ones who did the greatest damage to the planet - with such avoidable catastrophes as the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

The environmentalists still believe that command and control rules and regulations - on how much water can be flushed from our toilets, what kind of light bulbs we can use, the temperature setting of our thermostats, the amount of solar and wind energy we must use, the type of energy efficiency we get from our household appliances, the amount of water we can use to water our lawns (as in California), even limits on how many kids we can have (as in China) - will save the planet.

They won't.

Freedom will.

This is very good news for those who believe that one of our primary missions as human beings is to make life better over time and to leave our planet better off for future generations. That's just what we are doing.

- Stephen Moore is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

As to your summary statement about a******n. Women were given a natural way to govern their own wombs. There are just a few days in 28 that women can produce life. If one wishes to not bring life to the world - then they (Man and Women) should abstain from sex in those few days.

Free sex with the man given right to abort the creation is not natural. No person has the right to destroy a creation of man and women union.

However, man did create a way to prevent a******n. Why don't woman use the multiple solutions if they do not want to bring a creation of their own image into the world. Why do men not ensure they are not performing sex that is likely to produce an un wanted child?

Those, permafrost, are the questions you should be asking yourself!

And actually, the real t***h on most of the subjects you list. Full article at:

https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/state-the-planet-better-ever

In one sentence you say the following. Tons of proof to the contrary."In sum, our planet is in a miserable state, we're told over and over."
When actually for all to discover that have not done so yet....

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the single greatest misinformation campaign in world history. The state of our planet and the state of humanity has never been stronger. Nature has never been more bountiful.

I recently wrote of the following six statistics which go a long way to proving how well we are doing. The response from the greens was vitriol and even threats to my physical safety for writing these t***hs. But no one refuted the facts, because, well facts are facts.

Here they are:

1. Natural resources are more abundant and affordable today than ever before in history. Short term volatility aside, the price of almost all natural resources - from cocoa to cotton to coal - is cheaper today in real terms than 50, 100, or 500 years ago. This has happened even as the world's population has nearly tripled. Technology has far outpaced depletion of the earth's resources.

2. Energy resources are growing. Energy is the master resource; and it is super abundant. Remember when people like Paul Ehrlich nearly 50 years ago and Barack Obama just three years ago warned that we were running out of oil and gas? Today, in the new age of oil and gas thanks to fracking, the United States has hundreds of years of petroleum and an estimated 300 years of coal. We're not running out of energy, we are running into it.

3. Air and water is cleaner than ever. Since the late 1970s, pollutants in the air have plunged. Lead pollution plunged by more than 90 percent, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide by more than 50 percent, with ozone and nitrogen dioxide declining as well. By nearly every standard measure it is much, much, much cleaner today in the United States than 50 and 100 years ago. The air is so clean now that the EPA worries about carbon dioxide, which isn't even a pollutant. (And, by the way, carbon emissions are falling too, thanks to fracking). One hundred years ago, about one in four deaths in America was due to contaminants in drinking water. But from 1971-2002, fewer than three people per year in the United States were documented to have died from water contamination.

4. There is no Malthusian nightmare of overpopulation. Birth rates have fallen by about one-half around the world over the last 50 years. Developed countries are having fewer kids, not too many. Even with a population of 7.3 billion people, average incomes, especially in poor countries, have surged over the last 40 years. The number of people in abject poverty fell by 1 billion between 1981 and 2011, even as global population increased by more than 1.5 billion. That's just short of a miracle.

5. Global per capita food production is 40 percent higher today than as recently as 1950. In most nations the nutrition problem today is obesity - too many calories consumed - not hunger. The number of famines and related deaths over the last 100 years has fallen in half. More than 12 million lives on average were lost each decade from the 1920s-1960s to famine. Since then, fewer than 4 million lives on average per decade were lost. When famine does happen, it's primarily a result of political corruption or malice, not nature growing too little food. Furthermore, the price of food has fallen steadily in the United States - and most other nations steadily for 200 years.

6. The rate of death and physical destruction from natural disasters or severe weather changes has plummeted over the last century. Loss of life from hurricanes, floods, hurricanes, heat, droughts, and so on is at or near record lows. This is because we have much better advance warning systems, our infrastructure is much more durable, and we have things like air conditioning to adapt to weather changes. We are constantly discovering new ways to harness and even tame nature.

Again, these are just standard facts - though not very well known. But you could look them up. The point is that human advance and growth of the economy leads to a steadily improving and bountiful planet.

And the growth comes as a result of free enterprise. The environmentalists have declared free-market capitalism a near-treasonous pursuit. In reality, free markets with reasonable and sane regulation, will save the planet from extinction. Meanwhile, the socialists, the c*******ts, the Sandinistas, the Stalinists, are the ones who did the greatest damage to the planet - with such avoidable catastrophes as the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

The environmentalists still believe that command and control rules and regulations - on how much water can be flushed from our toilets, what kind of light bulbs we can use, the temperature setting of our thermostats, the amount of solar and wind energy we must use, the type of energy efficiency we get from our household appliances, the amount of water we can use to water our lawns (as in California), even limits on how many kids we can have (as in China) - will save the planet.

They won't.

Freedom will.

This is very good news for those who believe that one of our primary missions as human beings is to make life better over time and to leave our planet better off for future generations. That's just what we are doing.

- Stephen Moore is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

So, you know nothing of history. One of our great American's named Davy Crockett is that little boy. Pretty accomplished American in most people's book.
The point is, average people let average and antiquated programs prevail. (OhB and his CDC heads)

Great American's realize the current system will not deliver in record time, a solution to make C***d ** into a memory. A memory that rewrote how the world reacts to bad actors like China in this case.

Your article reminds me of a boy named Davy. In his youth, living in the wild, he had a small knife. He had his cupboard full for what he needed.....skin the squirrels and rabbits his father k**led for food.

Then one day his dad perished and little Davy was confronted by a big bear. He grabbed his father's rifle and k**led the bear. If he was only left with the small knife(OhB's cupboard) he would have perished. Luckily, he had quick access to a bigger weapon to k**l the bear.

That is exactly what Trump and all of OhB's experts say today. They did not have the weapons to deal with a major p******c from OhB or any other president. And thanks to Trump's administration, they produced those weapons in very record time. Not a lie.

Just, weak minded people trying to destroy all the good that has been developed in the last 3 + years.

You are exactly correct about Kevvy boy.

Well balanced expression in business is reference to a three legged stool.
Kevvy boy is a perfect example of a one legged stool. Kevvy boy, in no way, stands balanced in the rule of law in The USA.

Clearly, peters, you have no respect for the law abiding citizen. All the list says is that the only fear one may have is the supposedly American who wishes to take away any freedom we have fought for since 1776 and actually before that time.

You are the perfect example of the people wishing to destroy Freedom. Sad to say that people exist in this country that agree with you.

Peter S again making the call before the play is over.

Actually, CA has 58 counties.

As to your quote, "some small states have counties the size of a little California city, and 100s of counties",
would imply more than 200 counties to be equivalent to "100's" of counties.
One state has more than 200 and that is TX-254.
And 6 states have more than 100. That means 43 states have less than 100 counties.
But the fact still remains that 2 states and 17 counties in CA and 5 counties in NY gave HRC the majority v**e.

Actually, CA has 58 counties.

As to your quote, "some small states have counties the size of a little California city, and 100s of counties",
would imply more than 200 counties to be equivalent to "100's" of counties.
One state has more than 200 and that is TX-254.
And 6 states have more than 100. That means 43 states have less than 100 counties.
But the fact still remains that 2 states and 17 counties in CA and 5 counties in NY gave HRC the majority v**e.

No - here is what I am saying.
319 square miles will never rule America.

319 Square Miles

The newly convened, Democratic-controlled House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the e*******l college. It seems that, since they couldn't win the last p**********l e******n under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation of why this is a very bad idea

In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the E*******l College to ensure the States were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?
The following list of statistics should finally put an end to the argument as to why the E*******l College makes sense. It needs to be widely known and understood.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
- T***p w*n 3,084 of them.
- Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.
- T***p w*n 46 of them.
- Clinton won 16

Clinton won the popular v**e by approximately 1.5 million v**es.
- In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more v**es than Trump (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; T***p w*n Richmond)
- Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular v**e of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the v**e of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national e******n.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!

And It's been verified and documented that those 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment.

Go ahead, hang your hat on population of NY and CA. We love your faith in polls. Democrats never abandon "Band Wagon" campaigns. Nor, do they do nothing in policy except r****t-r****t.

It would be nice if democrats accepted the fact that to survive, people have to work and belong to a very productive society. The more a democrat leader works to destroy, the more they destry themselves. Keep it up.

DOJ has nothing to do with Military Tribunals. Arguably, OhB may be charged in a Military Tribunal.

US citizens could go to Tribunals, and even dual citizenship people.

CNN article on legality.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/opinions/trump-military-tribunals-american-citizens-mcenany/index.html

Military Tribunal is not a DOJ function. You be the judge?

https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/opinions/trump-military-tribunals-american-citizens-mcenany/index.html