NO MATER WHICH PRESIDENT, DOES THE PASSING OF THESE SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDERS. IT"S WRONG.

And you approve and Condone Obama's 19 secret P**********l directives.

You must be the stupidest American on this OPP website.

To condone and approve his secretive actions or any previous secretive P**********l Law.

DO YOU FINALLY GET THE MESSAGE, . . . . . . . . . . . NEANDERTHAL. . . .


Your just full of compost and crap in your Brain you must be totally liberal delusional to the core.

Time to impeach the IRS Commissioner?
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/06/26/video-time-to-impeach-the-irs-commissioner/

What happens when an administration refuses to hold its officials accountable for deceiving Congress?

Eventually Congress starts looking for ways to hold them accountable directly.

The Department of Justice has already made clear that it won’t enforce warrants issued by Congress, so Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) wants to use the tools the US Constitution provides.

Jordan tells Steve Doocy this morning that he wants to impeach one such official, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, for ongoing deceptions in the probe of political targeting by the tax-exempt review department (via Daniel Halper):



Perhaps this is more of a question of priorities, but why start with Koskinen?

The IRS chief has certainly angered people with his special blend of arrogance and incompetence, but he wasn’t at the IRS when the abuses took place.

Koskinen got appointed in the wake of some rare head-rolling at IRS after the exposure of the political targeting of conservatives. Removing Koskinen — or at least making him the first example of Congressional power — seems out of place while James Clapper remains the Director of National Intelligence.

Clapper flat-out lied to Congress, and did so repeatedly, when asked about the nature of NSA’s operations. Clapper later even admitted he hadn’t told the whole t***h, deliberately keeping critical information about executive-branch abuses from the oversight of the legislative branch.

Those lies dealt with a much more bipartisan issue, and primarily angered Democrats ahead of Republicans at first, who certainly got more vocal about it after Edward Snowden began revealing the nature of NSA domestic trawling.

Despite this, Barack Obama has not even hinted that he’d replace Clapper despite his obstruction of Congress and the serious damage done to both constitutional oversight and intelligence operations by Clapper’s actions (and inactions for that matter, when it comes to Snowden).

That is by far the greater insult, and no one has yet attempted so much as a censure, let alone an impeachment.

Koskinen isn’t exactly small potatoes, but if Congress wants to flex its muscle, let’s start where the most damage has been done — and send a message that will ring louder and longer.

6/26/15 Oh My: Apparently, Hillary Clinton Didn’t Turn Over All Of Her Work-Related Emails http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/25/oh-my-apparently-hillary-clinton-didnt-turn-over-all-her-workrelated-emails-n2017671?

Despite Hillary Clinton saying that she turned over all her work-related emails  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/03/10/hillary-says-she-didnt-save-personal-emails-n1968599 to the State Department, officials over there said they just received a few leftover communications dealing with Libya, according to the New York Times.

To make matters a bit more awkward, the emails relate to longtime Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who was part of a secret intelligence ring  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/04/01/exclintons-aide-had-secret-intelligence-network-raises-questions-if-hillary-used-this-undisclosed-back-channel-n1979051 that was feeding Mrs. Clinton unsubstantiated information on the ground conditions in Libya. Initially, there were no indications that Mrs. Clinton even looked or read at the emails, but it was eventually established that not only did she read some of them, she forwarded a few to a State Department staffer.http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/24-emails-sid-blumenthal-hillary-clinton-released_952312.html

Last week, Blumenthal turned over 15 emails to the House Select Committee on B******i in a closed-door hearing; http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/16/hillary-clinton-sidney-blumenthal-b******i emails that the State Department said they could not find within the 30,000 the former first lady turned over upon discovery that she utilized a secret email system during her entire tenure as Secretary of State (via NYT)http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/us/state-dept-gets-libya-emails-that-clinton-didnt-hand-over.html?emc=edit_na_20150625&nlid=59075373&ref=headline&_r=5

Despite claims by Hillary Rodham Clinton that she provided the State Department with all of her work-related emails from the personal account she used exclusively when she was in office, the department has received several related to Libya that she had not handed over, according to officials at the agency.

The emails that Mrs. Clinton did not give to the State Department were between her and her longtime confidant and adviser Sidney Blumenthal. He did not work for the department at the time, but was routinely sending her intelligence memos on Libya.

There are 15 emails that Mr. Blumenthal gave to the House committee looking into the 2012 attacks in B******i, Libya, that the State Department cannot find among the emails that Mrs. Clinton handed over last year, according to a State Department official.

The House committee gave those emails to the State Department this month. A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton did not return an email seeking comment.

Mrs. Clinton has said that she provided the State Department with about 30,000 emails that were related to her work as secretary of state. She said that she deleted roughly the same number of emails from the account, saying those messages “were private, personal” ones about her daughter’s wedding, her mother’s funeral, family vacations and yoga.
…
The State Department then went through the emails that Mrs. Clinton had turned over, discovering that there were some that Mr. Blumenthal had given to the committee that Mrs. Clinton had not handed over.

Yeah, it’s the Clintons playing by their own rules, or at least; that’s what it looks like here. Oh, and there’s the whole secrecy bit.

This could be partially responsible for her drop in her favorables in the swing states, http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/06/17/poll-hillary-clintons-numbers-take-a-nosedive-in-swing-states-n2013733 especially when it comes to trustworthiness. Additionally, Clinton’s initial claims that she did not pass along classified information through that private server could be less than forthcoming as well.

She had planned to impose a no-fly zone in Libya, http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/06/18/hillary-clinton-planned-libya-nofly-zone-with-classified-info-through-personal-email-n2014450 possibly using sensitive information sent through that private emails system that was allegedly relabeled as unclassified by staffers to cover for Mrs. Clinton.

5 Things About People Who Remain Uninsured Despite ObamaCare.
http://blogs.wsj.com/briefly/2015/06/24/5-things-about-people-who-remain-uninsured-despite-obamacare/

The landmark 2010 Affordable Care Act was passed on the premise that more than 50 million Americans didn’t have health insurance, and needed it.

Five years in, it’s helped some, and passed over others–some of whom have chosen not to get insurance even thought the law makes it possible for them to do so.


1. There are lots of them:

Between 16 and 17 million people have gained health insurance as a result of the health law, most studies have concluded.

About 35 million remain uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a number that is set to dip to 26 million by 2019.



2. They're not who you think they are:

CBO says that by the time everything has shaken out, around 30% of the remaining uninsured will be unauthorized immigrants.

Another 20% will be people eligible for Medicaid who choose not to enroll, and about 5% will be people who were supposed to be eligible for Medicaid under the health law but don’t qualify because their state opted not to expand the program.

The single largest group — 45% – will be people who have access to insurance through an employer or could buy it on their own because of the law but have chosen not to.


3. It's not about politics:

When people say why they’re choosing to remain uninsured, their reasons are almost always financial — not political.

A study by pollster Mike Perry, commissioned by backers of the law, found that in almost eight out of ten cases, people concluded after considering everything that they were better off not spending money on insurance.

For many, money was tight, and paying debts, putting away savings and repairing a home or car all ranked ahead of getting health insurance when they are doing better.

The Journal also found examples of people who were comfortably off and just preferred to act as their own insurer.



4. They've really thought it through:

Mr. Perry’s study found that a large number of the uninsured had checked out their options on HealthCare.gov or a state site and weighed the cost of the plans’ premiums and deductibles against subsidies to offset those premiums and the penalty for going uninsured before they made their final decision.


5. They're getting care in other ways:

The uninsured still get health care — and that’s part of the reason they often don’t feel desperate about forgoing coverage. They find doctors and hospitals who take cash, and sometimes haggle for the price.

They participate in discount drug programs, buy cheap natural remedies, and sometimes even get care while they’re overseas.

And if they run into really big problems paying for care, they turn to emergency rooms, free clinics and charity programs that treat them and write off their bills — which works for them, although it has implications for everyone else.

And the blind man sees, and the one who sees is blind.

[color=blue]YOU LACK ANY OBJECTIVITY, OR ANY INTELLECTUAL THINKING CAPACITY, OR TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATION OF A SECRET LAW, CALLED BY WH**EVER NAME, PPD, PSD, or a SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDER, BY THIS PRESIDENT OR ANY PREVIOUS PRESIDENT.

NO MATER WHICH PRESIDENT, DOES THE PASSING OF THESE SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDERS. IT"S WRONG.

Useless Neanderthal. I could kick your ass any day of the week i***t.

Have you still not figured out how to use the OPP Tags, Useless Neanderthal. or are you still computer challenged ? LOL and still henpeck at the keyboard.

Lee Hieb, M.D., on saving nation from oligarchs: 'It's now or never'
http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/obamacare-and-f*****m-in-america/

Well, the guys in the black robes have chosen statism over freedom once again – Obamacare is upheld in the Supreme Court. How can people be free when they are dependent on the government for their very health?

I for one am not surprised at the ruling. After all who benefits? Certainly not you and I, because the individual has no lobby that can match the lobbies of big insurance, big Pharma and big hospital associations.

Who benefits? Well, hospital stocks surged 8 percent at the news of Obamacare being upheld. And just a few weeks ago (in anticipation of Obamacare being upheld?), I got a notice from Blue Cross and Blue Shield that my health premium was going up 24 percent – and that’s on top of the previous years’ raises of about 30 percent.

Big Pharma benefits as medicine prices rise astronomically.

Even my cat’s vet noted that the medicines he uses on animals have increased vastly in cost. In the case of a sedating agent, one he has used for decades, the price went from $8 a vial to over $40 a vial – if he can get it at all. The veterinarians, like we physicians, are seeing shortages previously unknown.

Why is all this happening?

Because monopolies always cause price increases and shortages. A free market fills demand with supply. Econ 101. And Obamacare – read Medicare on Steroids – is a government monopoly on medical care.

The hospitals are clearly in bed with the Obamacare oligarchs and expect to profit. Witness the Wall Street response.

And let’s call this what it really is – f*****m. F*****m is by definition an economic arrangement wherein government partners with private industries, choosing winners and losers.

Governments under f*****m control their economy and ultimately the behavior of their citizens through taxation and regulation.

The individual appears to have ownership of his property, but is limited in its use due to government regulations.




Every CEO of every hospital in America should read “Hell’s Cartel” by Diarmuid Jeffreys. It is the sad history of IG Farben – the German company that was, at the beginning of World War II, the largest chemical conglomerate in the world. Before Hitler was elected, the N**is kept knocking on the door of the board of IG Farben asking for contributions.

The board was comprised of mostly chemical engineers who were generally apolitical. But they got tired of the constant begging for money, so to make them go away the CEO of Farben gave the N**is a pretty good chunk of Deutschmarks, thinking they wouldn’t bother him any more. And in the off chance the N**is would win, then he thought IG Farben would have a seat at the table. (Where have we heard that reasoning?)

Here’s the help you’ll need to prepare your household for the realities of living under a centralized health-care system — order Dr. Hieb’s “Surviving the Medical Meltdown: Your Guide to Living Through the Disaster of Obamacare”

Lest anyone think the actions of an individual firm don’t count, the result was the tragedy of World War II because that single contribution really made the N**i win possible – they were down and out without that infusion of cash. But beyond that was the economic and moral outcome of the company.

At first, IG Farben – now a favorite son of the N**i regime – prospered. Government money poured into armaments, and chemical plants were on overdrive. The Farben guys probably plugged their ears eyes and nose while they picked up the money, but pick up the money they did – by the bucketful.

One of the small subsidiaries of IG Farben was Degesch – a small company that made insecticides. By the end of the war, 85 percent of the profit of IG Farben came from one chemical – Zyklon B.

Zyklon B was used to Gas and K**l over 6 Million Jews, in the N**i Concentration Extermination Camps.

Now, in spite of later denials, the company chiefs clearly knew what the N**is used the Zyklon B for. By the end of the war, one of the board members of Farben was literally stepping over dead bodies at Auschwitz to obtain measurements for a new synthetic rubber plant.

But Degesch (and its big motherhouse Farben) had a choice: They could keep producing Zyklon B and thereby stay afloat and return profit for their shareholders, which they did, or they could have chosen not to further produce the gas for the death chambers and go under – and maybe incur the fatal wrath of the N**i regime.

On balance, the entire profit made by cooperation with the government was certainly overshadowed by the destruction the company endured. Not a few of its workers and families were k**led by war.

Board members’ sons were not spared. Some of the chiefs ended up in prison (the head of Degesch receiving five years and others the death penalty), and the company was seen to be culpable for crimes against humanity.



Now, why do I bring this up?



Like Degesch, 75-85 percent of income to hospitals comes in various forms from the federal government.

Those dollars are already coming with strings and regulations upon regulations.



The one difference between Obamacare and Medicare is that Medicare was socialism by stealth.



But the Obamacare architects make no bones about their desire to see a one-party national health type payment system a la Britain or Canada.

And the money expended for medical care under such a system – much like the German system in WWII – is done on the basis of age and productivity. Even the U.N. has complained that such systems k**l old people by neglect.

So what will your local hospital do when the government decrees that they will no longer pay for t***sferring 90-year-olds to higher level care? Maybe they will accept that.

Then the age will be 85, then 75 – then maybe they will not pay for any treatment for a 90-year-old, or people who are not productive.




Well, you get the picture. When you no longer pay taxes but are a debit to the government ledger, what will they deem you are worth?

And will hospitals just keep going along with all this to get along and stay afloat?

Or will they recognize that this is not just about money and regulations but that they and their actions have moral consequences?

Will the CEOs and CFOs stand on principle for their patients?

I see no evidence generally of the latter. In today’s world, when the choice is compliance with money coming in or non-compliance with the money drying up, hospital systems continue to bed with the government to the detriment of quality health care.

Zyklon B was used to Gas and K**l over 6 Million Jews, in the N**i Concentration Extermination Camps.



Sadly, I do not see us ending well for the American elderly.



I do not see medical care being given in the future according to the sacred principles of Hippocrates – to put patients before all else, to do the best you can for the patient and not for some nebulous third-party payer or social entity.

I just attended a medical school graduation where the graduating doctors took an oath that included the oath to patient privacy. But I knew, if they did not, that the oath now means nothing.

The minute they start their internships, they will begin putting all their patients’ most private information into an electronic database that is pumped out to unelected government bureaucrats who have no allegiance to patient privacy.

We citizens, doctors and patients must give up our own handouts and recognize that a medical system based on theft of one individual for the benefit of another is immoral.




We must recognize the inherent evil in medical utilitarianism wherein. I can sacrifice your care for the greater good of more or younger people.




We must not ask the government for health care or any other subsidy, but instead restore freedom by saying no to government schemes, by unelecting the oligarchs and again embracing the principles of free market economics in medicine and in all facets of life.

The one difference between Zyklon B used to K**l over 6 Million Jews, and ObamaCare, MediCare is that MediCare is socialism by stealth and will decide American elderly people who are not productive, and not pay for medical procedure or palliative care.

Then at what age will ObamaCare, MediCare will not pay for any treatment for a 90-year-old, or people who are not productive.




Well, you get the picture. When you no longer pay taxes but are a debit to the government ledger, what will they deem you are worth?


Lee Hieb, M.D., on saving nation from oligarchs: 'It's now or never.'

This is what ObamaCare is leading to, socialism by stealth.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

[quote=Marcus Johnson]

So Obama has issued 16 "secret orders" and It's a problem ?

While Ronnie Reagan issues 325 and he was just doing his job?

Exactly what point are you trying to make?

This isn't even news worthy.[/quote]



Once again marcus, you spout off, with your mouth and your pea-size-brain, without even reading or understanding the article. It's time to unload on you.

Any Secret Government tyranny is actually more insidious and pervasive than might at first appear or perceived. You don't really understand what has been happening to this country since the American Revolution in 1776.


ANYTHING DONE IN SECRET BY OUR GOVERNMENT, IS JUST THAT. DONE IN SECRET ! ! ! WHY ?

ASK YOURSELF WHY ? WHY WAS IT DONE IN SECRET AND NOT DONE IN THE OPENNESS OF CONGRESS AND THROUGH PUBLIC DISCOURSE. WHY?

JUST LIKE THE TTP TRADE LEGISLATION, AND OBAMA'S SECRET FOREIGN NUCLEAR TREATY WITH THE IRANIANS. WHY ?

WHAT DOES THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAVE TO HIDE, BY SECRET LAWS. UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, OBAMA IS NOT ALLOWED TO DO THIS, AND OUR CONGRESS HAS ACQUIESCED THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO CHECK HIS EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY. WHY ?

And you marcus johnson, you 'CONDONE" these secret, unlawful laws and illegal behavior's by our GOVERNMENT and by this PRESIDENT or any OTHER PRESIDENT. Why ?



Naive and Stupid is no way to go through life. But in your case.




You always paint a rose colored picture, then throw a curved ball remark, that undermines the message of a posted article or comment.

Who made you GOD of the OPP Website. Your as ignorant as they come with your little glib, one-line-remarks. Pure unadulterated audacity and stupidity.

Which in every case your comments that you provide are "Straw-Man and what a Red-Herring" fallacy comment-remark is and comments in almost all of your replies comments. WHY ?

That is exactly what a fallacy is.

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes and distorted, or exaggerated and misrepresented the article-post of that position.

Your sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern marcus: Person A has position X.

Red Herring: in which an irrelevant topic is presented, in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic.

Post hoc: in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier.

A Slippery Slope: a person asserts that some event, must inevitably follow from another without any rational argument or demonstrable mechanism for the inevitability of the event in question.

marcus you don't realize that you follow into the trap of fallacious writing styles, and your lack of objective reasoning. Why ?

YOU LACK ANY OBJECTIVITY, OR ANY INTELLECTUAL THINKING CAPACITY, OR TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATION OF A SECRET LAW, CALLED BY WH**EVER NAME, PPD, PSD, or a SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDER, BY THIS PRESIDENT OR ANY PREVIOUS PRESIDENT.

NO MATER WHICH PRESIDENT, DOES THE PASSING OF THESE SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDERS. IT"S WRONG.



DO YOU FINALLY GET THE MESSAGE, . . . . . . . . . . . NEANDERTHAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[quote=Marcus Johnson]

So Obama has issued 16 "secret orders" and It's a problem ?

While Ronnie Reagan issues 325 and he was just doing his job?

Exactly what point are you trying to make?

This isn't even news worthy.[/quote]


So how is that Obama's most OPEN and T***SPARENT Administration working out for you. Obama has issued 19 secret P**********l directives, the most t***sparent Presidency ever.

The IRS Department erased thousands of backup tapes. Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. To the Lois Learner Tea-Party scandal. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

IRS destroyed hard drives. Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

State Department, destroy thousands of documents and emails. Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, destroyed 60,000 emails. Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Lisa Jackson served as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, hiding separate email accounts and blackberry under Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Eric Holders, Fast and Ferrous scandal and contempt of Congress, and Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Eric Snowden and the NSA spying on all Americans, Under Congressional Subpoena and FIOA Federal Laws. CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

This Obama Administration uses more secrecy laws and delay tactics by his political minions, they are filthy criminals, as the United States Government continues to sail into the morass of even more secret criminal activities as this post article states.

The Obama Administration have destroyed countless evidence and is using countless delay attics, so they won't serve any jail time.

That's why It's called OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. These officials just resign, with out any criminal prosecution and get full government pensions. Why ?

Meet the Unfaithful Departed: Meet The People Who Bailed On The Obama Administration
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-31/unfaithful-departed-meet-people-who-bailed-obama-administration



Oh by the way, Your Queen, Hillary and King Bill have a court date on January 20, 2016, for Federal [RICO] Racketeering Charges, FIOA Charges.
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150324-filed%20Clinton%20RICO%20complaint.pdf

Her highness may pacing a 4 x 6 caged brick wall building shortly.

I guess it's just more politics as usual.

Instead of you agreeing that secret P**********l directives are wrong. And comment on politicians and agency officials that lack with Ethics, Accountability, Integrity Morality and T***sparency. e.g. The list could go on forever.

You condone this behavior by secret P**********l directives and do not speak against this hypocrisy in our government.

You only cite and look at past presidencies and spout off more fallacious arguments to win the argument, and never address the actual issue at hand.

ANYTHING DONE IN SECRET BY OUR GOVERNMENT, IS JUST THAT. DONE IN SECRET ! ! ! WHY ?

NO MATER WHICH PRESIDENT, DOES THE PASSING OF THESE SECRET EXECUTIVE ORDERS. IT"S WRONG.



DO YOU FINALLY GET THE MESSAGE, . . . . . . . . . . . NEANDERTHAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hey take a good look at the failed Obama's Economic policy and GDP growth in the United States, if pitiful and laughable in trying to defend his U.S.economy growth and Rescission policy. Obama is a mediocre president at best.


If you want to debate, I found a Jewish recorded reference, of Jesus Christ in the Jewish Talmud book, which verifies his historical authenticity, a recorded entry of Joseph, Mary and Son called Jesus. http://www.torah.org/learning/mlife/LORch4-2b.html

Hmmm, Now why would the Jews record his name ?

So in all of your efforts being a DENIAL-IST "MARGINAL-IST," and "MINIMAL-IST" you come up short once again.

[quote=Marcus Johnson]

So Obama has issued 16 "secret orders" and It's a problem ?

While Ronnie Reagan issues 325 and he was just doing his job?

Exactly what point are you trying to make?

This isn't even news worthy.[/quote]


Is this what we can expect from you. You can do better than this. Your so boring and predictable.

You should be called the "MARGINAL-IST," or the "MINIMAL-IST" due to your demeanor, narcissistic nature and your lack of anti-intellectual thinking, your just a typical liberal, posting comments and replies lacking any substance objectivity and or facts to the discussion or the article-post.

Why are you so negative ? Ask that question to your self. . . . . . . . . . .

Your just a blow hard, egotist, grandstander, blabber, bull-s**t artist: who blusters and boasts in an unpleasant way and has strong opinions that other people dislike and boasts in an obnoxious or unpleasant way.

Your constantly telling you how much you are so superior and how great you are to the point, where it really annoys most OPP Readers.

Your opinions are always liberal democratic atheistic one sided arguments, which you lack objectivity and you always throw the curve ball, to put the article or opinions on the defensive.

You never add a well rounded view of a topic or article just a "MARGINALIST," or the "MINIMALIST" Liberal viewpoint.

Your so boring and predictable.


Your the King of the Democrat-Liberal-Progressive-Marginalist- Minimalists-Commenters on the OPP Website Posts.


Is this what we can always expect from you, in every one of your post thread comments.

"OHH , OHH, OBAMA GOOD" "DEMOCRATS GOOD" in a Neanderthal grunt demeanor type reply.

"OHH, OHH, "EVERYONE ELSE BAD," "REPUBLICANS BAD" "OHH , OHH, in a Neanderthal grunt demeanor type reply.




As usual, you did not understand the implication of the website, the types of secret Executive Orders or read the actual title of the secret laws that have been passed, by present and past presidents.

www.fas.org/ web site. Because of the Federation of American Scientists reporting and the nature and lack of governmental over-site, Americans citizens now can view the actual information, which is understandable for all readers, and hopefully for you ignorant, marcus.




Start viewing the world in a 360 degree's and not with both eyes closed and your hands tied behind your mental liberal oppression.



Start viewing actual wording of the of these secret laws being passed:
a. Secret P**********l Executive Orders http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/ppd/index.html
b. Secret PPD P**********l Orders http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/psd/index.html
c. Secret PSD P**********l Orders http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/direct.htm

Obama is up to a total of 68 Executive Orders, PPD and PSD orders total so far. I can expect that there will be more.

These are secret laws that 99 % of Americans know nothing about.

Inform yourself and others, to the secret laws that are being implemented on America Citizens in this country.

And not with your knee-jerkreactions and lack of liberal objectivity.

"OHH , OHH, OBAMA GOOD" "DEMOCRATS GOOD" "OHH, OHH, "EVERYONE ELSE BAD," "REPUBLICANS BAD" "OHH , OHH.



You have to be the most one-sided "OBTUSE" person on the OPP Website forum. Naive and Stupid is no way to go through life. But in your case, this is what can we expect.



It's not the EO totals marcus, Its the actual implications of the Secret Laws that are being implemented

Any secret EO law implemented that is intended and implemented needs to be questioned by all American Citizens. Democrat, Independent or Republican. marcus you lack any objectivity or intellect.

6/25/15 IRS Deleted Hundreds of Back-up Tapes Containing Thousands of Lerner Emails After Congressional Subpeona Was Issued

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/06/25/irs-deleted-lerner-emails-after-congressional-subpeona-was-issued-n2017329?

This used to be called obstruction of justice and tampering with evidence. 

According to new information from the House Oversight Committee, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration [TIGTA] Russell George and Deputy Inspector General for Investigations Tim Camus, the IRS deleted hundreds of backup tapes containing thousands of emails belonging to former IRS official Lois Lerner, the woman at the center of the conservative targeting scandal.

The tapes were destroyed nine months after a congressional subpoena was issued to the agency demanding they be preserved and turned over. 

"As Ms. Lerner’s hard drive could not be recovered and the 422 tapes most likely to have contained Ms. Lerner’s e-mails from 2010 and 2011 were erased in March 2014, we were unable to recover all of the missing e-mails.

Comparing the IRS e-mail t***saction logs to the IRS production to the Congress revealed there could be as many as 23,000 to 24,000 additional missing e-mails.

As a result of the investigative process, TIGTA was successful in recovering over 1,000 e-mails that the IRS did not produce to the Congress, DOJ, or TIGTA. The investigation also revealed that prior to our investigation and our efforts to recover Ms. Lerner’s missing emails.

The IRS did not search for, review or examine the two separate sources of backup tapes, the server hard drives, or the loaner laptops that ultimately produced new, previously undisclosed emails," George said during congressional testimony Thursday.

According George, 24,000 Lerner emails were destroyed. By the way, Lerner's hard drive "crashed" on a Saturday, the same week the House Ways and Means Committee sent the IRS a letter inquiring about the agency targeting conservatives.

6/24/15 Sen. Rand Paul to sue IRS, U.S. Treasury

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/sen-rand-paul-sue-irs-us-treasury/?page=all#pagebreak

Rand Paul is poised to become the first major p**********l candidate in memory to sue the government he seeks to lead as president.

The Kentucky senator will take legal action against the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service for what he says is the denial of his constitutional right to v**e on more than 100 tax-information treaties that the Obama administration unilaterally negotiated with foreign governments, The Washington Times has learned.

In what the suit says is a violation of Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, President Obama has not consulted the U.S. Senate about the treaties nor given the Senate an opportunity to approve or disapprove of the treaties. The administration calls them “intergovernmental agreements.” They require foreign banks to gather and share private financial information about millions of

Americans living and working outside the U.S. — information they would not have to disclose to the U.S. government if they lived and worked in the U.S.

The treaties or agreements are the enforcement mechanisms of the Obama administration’s Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), enacted by a Democratic-controlled Congress in 2010.

The act is despised by many of the estimated 8.7 million Americans living overseas, a record number of whom have — with great anger and reluctance, according to those who have spoken to the foreign and U.S. press — renounced their U.S. citizenship rather than attempt to comply with FATCA.

What percentage of them simply want to evade paying taxes to the U.S. government and to the foreign governments in whose countries they work and/or reside is unknown. The U.S. is one of the few countries that taxes its citizens on income earned and property held both at home and abroad.

President Obama pushed for the passage of FATCA as a means of capturing hundreds of millions of dollars in income and property taxes owed to the Treasury by those Americans living and working outside the U.S. But many Americans living abroad say the Treasury and the IRS are treating them as guilty of tax evasion until proven innocent.

“Obama owns this,” said Indiana-based GOP superlawyer Jim Bopp, the lead attorney for Mr. Paul and other plaintiffs in the case. “FATCA passed Congress right after Obama was elected, when the Democrats had majorities in both houses” of Congress.

“The issue is inescapably partisan for that reason and for the fact that no Republican [in the U.S. House] supported the passage of FATCA,” Mr. Bopp said. “The U.S. government didn’t start enforcing it until Obama started to target U.S. citizens overseas in the belief that they had a lot of money but not a lot of political clout sufficient to fight back.”

Nations that have approved these bilateral agreements or treaties with the U.S. include such major economic powers as China, Britain, India, Israel, Ireland, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, France, Spain and Switzerland, as well smaller states once considered as tax havens such as Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Lichtenstein and Luxembourg.

So far, 112 nations have agreed to collect or receive private financial information about Americans in those countries and to turn the information over to the U.S. government.

Constitutional clash

Mr. Paul, a Republican who announced his p**********l bid in early April, will join six other plaintiffs in the suit that a new organization called “Republicans Overseas Action” expects to file in a southern Ohio federal district court the week of June 29. The court’s Republican makeup is considered at least open to the constitutional arguments that the plaintiffs lay out.

The other plaintiffs base their claim of legal standing to sue the Treasury and the IRS on FATCA’s requirement that they surrender personal information in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable search and seizure and on the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments — in this case, unusually large financial penalties for late filings, however innocent, or for noncooperation.

FATCA requires foreign banks to violate the privacy of their American customers by disclosing bank balances and all financial t***sactions. The U.S. law levies a hefty 30 percent fine on foreign financial institutions that don’t cooperate with the Treasury’s requests.

The fine is actually levied against the American customer of the foreign bank, but critics say no bank can keep its customer base with fines of that magnitude.

The law also directly fines the American holder of a foreign account as much as 50 percent of the highest balance that was in that account at any time during a 12-month period as penalty for not reporting.

Mr. Paul’s suit argues that the administration purposely avoided calling the arrangements “treaties” and instead labeled them as “intergovernmental agreements” to escape having to get Senate approval. Earlier this year, Mr. Paul introduced a Senate bill to repeal FATCA. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not scheduled debate on the bill.

Michael DeSombre, an American residing in Hong Kong, is the worldwide president for Republicans Overseas Action. He sees Democratic presumptive nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton as vulnerable on the FATCA controversy.
“When FATCA was enacted in 2010, Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. Many overseas Americans complained how unjust and destructive this law is to U.S. embassies and consulate general offices around the world. What I want to know is what did Hillary do with those reports in this e******n,” said Mr. DeSombre.

The other plaintiffs in the suit Mr. Paul has joined say they have been denied banking and financial services in the foreign countries where they live and work. The foreign banks don’t want to be burdened with the expense and paperwork to comply with FATCA and therefore simply refuse to accept Americans as clients.

The Republican National Committee and the recently formed Republican Overseas Action aim to get as many of those Americans living or working outside their country to register in one or another of the swing states that decide the presidency in close e******ns. Republicans Overseas Action is paying for the lawsuit

Mr. Paul has joined as plaintiff.
The driving force behind the suit is a longtime conservative activist on the Republican National Committee, Solomon Yue of Oregon.

“The best way to defend 8.7 million overseas Americans’ right to privacy and constitutional protections is to cripple the IRS, FATCA and enforcement tools through legal action on constitutional grounds all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Mr. Yue, founder and vice chairman of Republicans Overseas Action Inc.

TURIN, Italy (Reuters) - People who manufacture weapons or invest in weapons industries are hypocrites if they call themselves Christian, Pope Francis said on Sunday. The Pontiff blasts Christians who invest in defence companies, saying "duplicity is the currency of today".... they say one thing and do another."

Francis issued his toughest condemnation to date of the weapons industry at a rally of thousands of young people at the end of the first day of his trip to the Italian city of Turin.

"If you trust only men you have lost," he told the young people in a, talk about war, trust and politics after putting aside his prepared address.

"It makes me think of ... people, managers, businessmen who call themselves Christian and they manufacture weapons. That leads to a bit a distrust, doesn't it?" he said to applause.

Francis reiterated his view that conflicts in the world today are tantamount to "a Third World War in segments".

Matthew 26:52 Jesus telling Peter, before Jesus was turned over to the Sanhedrin and Pharisees on the Mount of Olives. “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.



In Matthew 10:34–36, Jesus said He had come at this time not to bring peace to the earth, but a sword, a weapon which divides and severs. As a result of His visit to the earth, some children would be set against parents and a man’s enemies might be those within his own household.

This is because many who choose to follow Christ are h**ed by their family members. This may be part of the cost of discipleship, for love of family should not be greater than love for the Lord. A true disciple must take up his cross and follow Jesus.

(Matthew 16:24). He must be willing to face not only family hatred, but also death, like a criminal carrying his cross to his own execution. True followers of Christ must be willing to give up, even to the point of “hating” all that is in our lives, even our own families, if we are to be worthy of Him.

John 18:3
3: Judas then, having received the band [of soldiers], and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.
4: Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon him, went forth, and saith unto them, Whom seek ye?
5: They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am [he]. And Judas also, who betrayed him, was standing with them.
6: When therefore he said unto them, I am [he], they went backward, and fell to the ground.
7: Again therefore he asked them, Whom seek ye? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth.
8: Jesus answered, I told you that I am [he]; if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:
9: that the word might be fulfilled which he spake, Of those whom thou hast given me I lost not one.
John 18:10 Simon Peter therefore having a sword drew it, and struck the high priest`s servant, and cut off his right ear. Now the servant`s name was Malchus.
John 18:11 Jesus therefore said unto Peter, Put up the sword into the sheath: the cup which the Father hath given me, shall I not drink it ?
12: So the band and the chief captain, and the officers of the Jews, seized Jesus and bound him,
13: and led him to Annas first; for he was father in law to Caiaphas, who was high priest that year.

Here is a web site that most Americans don't know about, and you can check out the PPD, PSD, and EO directive issued and by which Presidency.

Remember that there is no Congressional, executive, or Judicial over-site on these P**********l decrees, they are the law of the land.




6/25/15 Obama has issued 19 secret directives
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/06/24/p**********l-policy-directives-form-secret-law/29235675/

WASHINGTON — A one-digit correction to President Obama's directive on hostage policy Wednesday had the effect of disclosing the existence of a previously unknown — and still-secret — Obama order on national security.

The hostage policy was originally released Wednesday as a p**********l policy directive numbered PPD-29. When the White House corrected that number to PPD-30, it meant Obama had issued a secret directive as PPD-29 sometime in the past 17 months.

Obama signed PPD-28, an order on electronic eavesdropping in the wake of revelations by Edward Snowden, in January 2014.

So what is PPD-29? No one's talking. A spokesman for the National Security Council declined to comment of the existence of classified PPDs Wednesday.
USA TODAY Obama order clears way for private ransom payments http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/06/24/obama-hostage-policy-james-foley/29209777/

"The only reason we know about it is the sequential numbering of the directives, and realizing they skipped a few," said Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, which tracks the directives. http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/ppd/

PPD-29 isn't the first to be tacitly acknowledged only by a missing number. Of the 30 PPDs issued by Obama, 19 have not been released. And for 11 of those, the White House has not disclosed even the subject of the order.

"It's not only the public that doesn't have copies. It's also Congress that doesn't have copies," Aftergood said. "It's a domain of largely unchecked p**********l authority. It doesn't mean it's bad, but it's lacking in independent oversight."

But they have the same legal force as an executive order, forming a body of largely secret law, said Harold Relyea, a political scientist who advised Congress on national security directives before retiring from the Congressional Research Service.

"The difference is that while executive orders are public by law — they must be published in the Federal Register to be effective —- PPDs are not," he said. "It is a kind of secret law. People have to obey it. But it's a directive that can allocate money, direct people or take a course of action."

USA TODAY Obama issues 'executive orders by another name' http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/16/obama-p**********l-memoranda-executive-orders/20191805/

What Obama calls PPDs have gone by different names by different presidents back to the Truman Administration. President George W. Bush called them National Security P**********l Directives (NPSDs).

President Clinton called them P**********l Decision Directives (PDDs). President Nixon called them National Security Decision Memoranda.

Wh**ever they're called, Obama issued 30 PPD, 11 PSD directives and 27 EO directives, issued 68 all totaled. Obama has been less prolific than his predecessors but we still have 17 more months before he leaves office. http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/psd/index.html http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/ppd/index.html
http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/direct.htm

George W. Bush issued 66 such orders, plus 25 more Homeland Security P**********l Directives. President Reagan issued at least 325. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/12/17/president-obama-executive-memorandum-response-column/20533933/

Some, going back as far as the Lyndon Johnson administration, remain classified. They can involve subjects including the use of nuclear weapons, ballistic missile defenses, space policy, cybersecurity and even continuity plans for the federal government in the case of a large-scale disaster.

The secrecy makes it difficult to know entirely what changes Obama has made in the hostage policy. The directive issued Wednesday revoked a prior directive by President George W. Bush in 2002. But that directive, known as NSPD-12, remains secret.

"You would think that if there's a new policy it would be a simple matter to explain what the old policy was," Aftergood said.

And even though Obama released his directive, it incorporates a classified annex with additional instructions to executive branch agencies. These PPD and PSD orders could have far greater effects than previous presidents combined, thats why they are secret.