In my opinion, there's more than one reason that the Jews are h**ed.
#1. God chose them over all other people to be his own children. Jealousy.
#2. As God's chosen people, they were to spread His word over all the earth. They not only didn't, they worshiped idols.
#3. The Jews have been cursed with the vengeance of God for their addiction to idols. Idolatry.
#4. The Jews are under punishment right now for refusing God's gift of himself in the form of Jesus Christ.
#5. People think the Jews k**led Christ. They didn't and neither did the Romans. Once Jesus had suffered enough, he gave up his own spirit.
The Great Tribulation will wipe out most of the Jews, but a remnant will remain until the end of the seven years.
I believe our blessings from God were and are because when Israel became a nation, we were the big boy on the block and we befriended her. God blessed the US so that we could be in that position when Israel needed us. Our country seemed to start going downhill with Obama and Hillary, I believe, because they wanted to distance the US from Israel.
Just look at the difference with Trump. His stance is STRONG on Israel's side and look at the economic abundance we are enjoying over that of 3 years ago. God said that whosoever blessed Israel, he would bless. God has kept his word!
I wasn't knocking Obama or Hillary...only pointing out their decisions to back away from our friendship with Israel that brought economic bad times on America. It goes back past Obama too. Dems and reps alike.
The only difference is that Trump has restored our faithfulness as an ally and the blessings started rolling in.

I’m sorry, you seem sincere in your beliefs but
I see the usual intellectual contortions to explain away that being born gay is a false precept and that one may simply “choose” not to participate in such “sin” and everything will be just fine. And what is the “evil” of “this way”? What two consenting adults do in private is our business?

“The Old Covenant period showed us, not only God’s capacity and ability for destroying evil, but also what things constitute evil, including the corrupting of His ways by His own people who, of all people, should know better.”

So, in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah God
had a hissy fit because of some impure behavior of some in the villages so he destroyed everyone, men, women, children,
goats, chickens and goldfish?

Seems harsh for a loving God. And what of the lesson? Did humans come into line after that? Did the example work for others?
Not so much apparently but I’m sure you will have a slick explanation for that too,

You are speaking in generalities and therefore you are getting answers in generalities.

What exact "God's psycopathic" behavior are you referring to? Give a specific example that you feel is beneath God. Just because you don't know what God's reasons may be, and I may not either, doesn't, by that fact, make them "psycopathic".

For example, the response to genocide: because it is God's right to cut off a people who have so corrupted themselves that even He can't see a possible redemption. Did you know that the Bible says:

“Precious in the sight of Yahweh is the death of his saints.” Psalm 116:15

Do you know why that is? It’s because, for a saint of God, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. I don't seek death, but as a blood-bought, born-again, child of God, I look forward to it, all in God's good time, nor do I mourn the death of loved ones in the faith. Why? Because death is the ultimate release from this world of sin, pain and suffering...and trials! But don’t think for a moment that means God doesn’t hold all life precious, because He does, and that is why He has declared murder to be one of the top sins. Many, if not all, of the nations who God had Israel wipe out sacrificed/murdered their children on altars (like how a******nists sacrifice their babies on the altar of sexual pleasure these days). God considered this cultural norm of theirs very evil, and worthy of death: cutting off the whole family or tribe so as not to pollute others. Seems to me, and I haven't catalogued it, that whenever God told Israel He was going to use them as His agent in executing judgement, He typically told them why they were being cut off from the living. If you say you want evil to end, but you don't have the ability to reform any and all evil-doers, through free-will, then who are you to judge God who does know, even the hearts and intentions of people and thus who needs to be cut off, and why, and when it will do the most good, for the greater majority, for the purpose of teaching us and the rest of eternity that choices have consequences.

Furthermore, it is written: “Jesus summoned them, saying, "Allow the little children to come to me, and don't hinder them, for the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these.” Luke 18:16. Did you know that God doesn’t condemn anyone to eternal death who has not committed sin? And children who don’t know or understand are not accountable, and thus do not have the judgment of death h*****g over them? That means that cutting off a family line, would be a merciful act from the ultimate perspective of a child who would have followed in the sins of the family...

“3As I live, says the Lord Yahweh... 4Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins, he shall die... 20The soul who sins, he shall die: the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be on him.” Ezekiel 18:3-4,20

“Bearing” the iniquity of the fathers is not the same as “visiting” the iniquity of the fathers on the children. It is an observable fact that children emulate their parents, and when they grow to adulthood, they either choose to be like their parents in attitude, or, in some cases, consciously choose not to be like their parents.

So, you first need to prove that you know, better than God, what the ultimate state of the peoples He had destroyed would be, that it could be proven they could have been reformed by less drastic means, before you can stand in judgement of His actions. And, failing that, you also have to stand in judgement of the people He condemned, to prove they did nothing worthy of death. And finally, you need to consider that when God created mankind, He gave Adam a commandment not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil lest he would die. And of course he did eat and brought death upon mankind. So, in order to condemn God, you will first have to prove that God is unjust for imposing commandments on people regarding what constitutes moral behavior and what doesn’t. But it doesn't end there, because then you will also have to know, ultimately, who only died in the flesh in this world (which the bible likens to sleep) but will live again in the resurrection; because the story isn't over yet.

This is really worth a listen. Video is self-explanatory. The world of leftism has redefined what is normal; up is down, black is white.
As always it is all about power and control.

T*********rism is the new frontier for L***Q activists and feminists, but how does it impact our culture, free speech, sports and the children who t***sition? Wall Street Journal writer Abigail Shrier expounds on the impact of t*********rism in society on this episode of The Candace Owens Show. (37 minute video)

https://www.prageru.com/video/the-candace-owens-show-abigail-shrier/

Well, I'm not dumb, but I can't understand, why she walked like a woman, and talked like a man...
Girls will be boys and boys will be girls, it a mixed-up muddled-up shook-up world, except my Lola.
(Ray Davies; The KINKS)

Tired, Boring—and Dangerous—Celebrity Death Wishing

By Victor Davis Hanson| June 2nd, 2019

Recently, New York writer Fran Lebowitz told Bill Maher on his HBO program that the U.S. government should turn President Donald Trump “over to the Saudis, his buddies—the same Saudis who got rid of that reporter.” Lebowitz thought it was cool to imagine on live television that the president might be chopped up in the manner of the recent murder of Saudi journalist and activist Jamal Khashoggi.
A veritable mini-industry of celebrity calls for Trump’s violent death or assassination is now old and boring—and getting dangerous.
As if on cue, actors, singers, comedians, and banal entertainers compete with each other to hope for the most gruesome manner of k*****g the president—and thereby insidiously lowering the bar for unhinged minds of what could be conceivable or even acceptable to big screen icons and popular culture’s cool crowd.
• The late celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain mused about poisoning Trump.
• Musician David Crosby thought of incineration.
• Actor Johnny Depp and rapper Snoop Dogg preferred shooting.
• Former CNN host Kathy Griffin, comedian George Lopez, and singer Marilyn Manson all imagined decapitation.
• The rock group Pearl Jam offered up the image of Trump rotting.
• The singer Madonna and musician Moby chose explosives.
• The New York City public theater fancied stabbing.
• Actor Robert De Niro seems pathetically fixated on repeated blows to the head.
• Comedian Rosie O’Donnell dreamed of Trump’s death by falling off a cliff.
• Actor Mickey Rourke threatened clubbing, while Charlie Sheen seemed to pray for some sort of divine intervention to eliminate Trump.
• Comedian Larry Wilmore says he would settle for old-fashioned suffocation.
Hollywood, of course, had been fixated on hating Trump since he first announced his candidacy—an obsession shared by the Obama-era CIA, FBI, and Justice Department.
Yet the idea that liberal celebrities, authors, and entertainers would publicly dream of various ways of k*****g a conservative president is not exactly new.

Former President George W. Bush was a favorite target of such entertainer death wishing. Remember the 2012 episode of “Game of Thrones” in which Bush’s decapitated head was displayed on a pike? Guardian newspaper guest columnist Charles Brooker invoked past shooters of presidents to k**l then-President Bush: “John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr.—where are you now that we need you?”
Alfred A. Knopf published Nicholson Baker’s novel Checkpoint. The book was nothing more than a monotonous dialogue of trite characters offering up ways to assassinate Bush. Filmmaker Gabriel Range gave us the 2006 “docudrama,” “Death of a President.” The slick production enacted a successful k*****g of George W. Bush.

Our elite entertainers do not just limit themselves to imagining the violent demise of conservative presidents like George W. Bush and Donald Trump. Any conservative elected official or their family will do.
Most recently, actor and comedian Jim Carrey tweeted out his dream that current Republican Alabama Governor Kay Ivey should have been aborted: “I think if you’re going to terminate a pregnancy, it should be done sometime before the fetus becomes Governor of Alabama.” In Carrey’s mind, that way Ivey would not have been able to pass a new restrictive a******n bill.

For greater effect Carrey included in his tweet one of his macabre illustrations showing an a******n tool sucking out Ivey’s head that is attached to the body of a fetus in a womb.

Last summer, iconic 1960s actor Peter Fonda envisioned a particularly sick form of violence against Trump’s young son, Barron: “We should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with p*******es. And see if mother will stand up against the giant a–hole she is married to.”
Try substituting the name of Obama for Trump, and such vile vituperation might earn the h**er permanent ostr****m, career destruction, or even legal consequences.

Do we remember the obscure rodeo clown who was banned for life in 2013 from the Missouri State Fair, because one of his assistants bought a stock mask of Barack Obama at a store and then wore it while working in the arena? The ensuing universal outrage at the local rodeo clown was based on the liberal insistence that even mocking the then president of the United States was not only r****t but dangerous and would bring p**********l h**ers out of the woodwork to conceive of violence toward then President Obama.
So why do left-wing celebrities express such political hatred?

First , they assume their supposed goals of e******y and fairness justify any means necessary to advancing them, including obscenity and calls for violence. Even sick smears are seen as virtue signaling from edgy social justice warriors. It is not unimaginable to assume that if some unhinged nut takes seriously celebrity talk of k*****g or injuring Trump and acts out one of their quite numerous fantasies, the celebrity death-threateners won’t be all that remorseful—given their boutique hatred of conservatism in general and the Trump family in particular.

Second , celebrities (many of whom are high-school dropouts) are by nature a bit arrogant and sometimes plain dumb. They wrongly confuse their ability to act or sing with some sort of intelligence and erudition. But since Plato, the philosophers have warned us that performance is more a natural than acquired gift, and may have nothing to with intelligence, wisdom, or learning.

Third , celebrities do not fear a backlash. The bosses of the entertainment industry are also left-wing for the most part. Even vile attacks against conservatives may be considered career enhancements. As wealthy elites, they believe they are privileged and influential, and so should be exempt from the legal consequences of publicly hoping or advocating for the death of a sitting president.

Fourth , entertainers love public attention, the more, the better—especially as they age or see their careers diminish. For the fading and the vain, even bad publicity is good publicity. A Madonna, Moby, Robert De Niro, or Rosie O’Donnell is not now enjoying an ascending career.

Fifth , many who express such obscenity and hatred are either direct or indirect products of the 1960s and 1970s, which destroyed cultural norms and sanctioned obscenity. For such celebrities boasting about the death of the president is part of their lifelong culture, the sort of vulgar talk they take for granted in music, film, and stand-up comedy. As a general rule, crude youthful actors age badly. The “Easy Rider” free-spirit Peter Fonda of 1969 mouthing off on his chopper now sounds cranky and befuddled when he continues his rebel crude shtick well into his creaky late 70s.

Finally , Hollywood and entertainers especially are divorced from much of America. The wealth, segregation, walls, nannies, servants, gardeners, climate, and privilege of Malibu, Beverly Hills, Montecito, or Santa Monica are not American normal. Almost no Americans live in the royal manner of a Jim Carrey or Johnny Depp. The New York City public theater would not ritually k**l Trump every night on stage if they were performing “Julius Caesar” in rural Alabama or central Oklahoma.
If one believes the beachfront of Malibu reflects the norms of American behavior or thought, then he is seriously delusional. So, expect celebrity-driven assassination chic to continue until either the country collectively says “enough”—or such sick rhetorical murder leads to the real thing.

Content created by the Center for American Greatness, Inc. is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a significant audience. For licensing opportunities for our original content, please contact
https://amgreatness.com/2019/06/02/tired-boring-and-dangerous-celebrity-death-wishing/

For your opinion to have any meaning you’d have to count the numbers of the left vs the right and factor in which has a higher representation on the forum. You can’t go by your opinion on how to classify either.

Then who classifies what is ‘h**e’? There is no one objective enough to be able to do it as everyone brings their own bias. Including you.

There are more here on the right so of course the right will come out ahead. This isn’t rocket science.

And the left occupies no high ground. Nor do most claimed centrists.