This is what every American should be doing. If you stand up to them, they'll leave. They have no power.
https://welovetrump.com/2021/04/04/get-out-pastor-kicks-out-the-c***d-police-from-his-church/?utm_source=vuukle&utm_medium=talk_of_town
Share this far and wide.
vernon wrote:
I don't think the folks in ny have to much sense
Gee. Yea think? Look who they elected as gov.
If he's not charged with attempted murder, the prosecutor needs to be hanged.
When is enough enough? When are Americans going to rise up and take the country back?
Kevyn wrote:
I love it, the Trumptards, sorry Trumpmentaly disabled now are done with baseball for standing for v****g rights, football and basketball for respectfully kneeling to protest police brutality and nascar for getting rid of the f**g of a defeated enemy. By the end of the year the only sport for them will be cock fighting.
It's painfully obvious that one of your last two brain cells has finally died, probably murdered by the survivor, which is simply overjoyed to finally be alone.
1ProudAmerican wrote:
I thought the "r****ded ape with brain damage" was referring to the old geezer in the white house NOW!!!!
The one what was in politics for for four decades and accomplished absolutely nothing?
proud republican wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-diego-stolz-... (
show quote)
The people who allowed this to happen will be judged and sentenced...by God. He sees everything. He knows every thought. They aren't getting away with anything. They just think they are. They're in for a rude awakening. Especially the Judge.
lpnmajor wrote:
Sorry, the r****ded ape with brain damage did NOT do better, and he had 4 years to try and get it right.
I suppose you think this comment was clever. Now we have no doubt who the r****ded ape is. If you require a hint, just look in the mirror.đ
Get people used to this, then introduce the mark of the beast. It's coming soon. Are you prepared?
proud republican wrote:
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/os-ne-desantis-v*****e-passport-order-20210402-k5g7n3vis5gfzebz7ot6xz4ala-story.html
Democrats say âtrust the science,â right?
Well, according to a new study, AOC is one of the least effective members of Congress.
LOL!
Sorry, but not sorry, DemocratsâŚ
AOC is a radical who attempted to introduce 21 bills into the legislature.
Fortunately, NONE of these radical bills went anywhere.
Ouch.
This is proof that just because the media props you up as an icon, it doesnât mean that you hold any actual power or influence.
It appears that AOCâs bark is MUCH bigger than her bite.
Thatâs not our assessment.
Thatâs according to the âexperts.â The science.
The best part?
This study wasnât done by a conservative thinktank.
It was performed by a BIPARTISAN group.
Thatâs right⌠both Democrats and Republicans found that AOC is one of the least effective members of Congress.
And considering the state of things right now⌠thatâs saying a LOT!
According to the New York Post:
Sheâs the queen of Twitter â but less successful at lawmaking.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among the least effective members of the last Congress according to a new survey from the nonpartisan Center for Effective Lawmaking â a joint project of Vanderbilt University and the University of Virginia.
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as âsubstantiveâ â but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor v**es, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
âShe introduced a lot of bills, but she was not successful at having them receive any sort of action in committee or beyond committee and if they canât get through committee they cannot pass the House,â Alan Wiseman, a Vanderbilt political scientist and co-director of the center, told The Post.
âItâs clear that she was trying to get her legislative agenda moving and engage with the lawmaking process,â Wiseman added âBut she wasnât as successful as some other members were â even among [other] freshmen â at getting people to pay attention to her legislation.â
When looking at the legislative effectiveness of all congressional Democrats, AOC was ranked 230th out of 240 Democrats. Among the 19 Dem lawmakers from New York state, she ranked dead last.
Among the bills that failed were a federal overhaul of public housing, a ban on fracking, and a mandate to provide full federal public benefits to i*****l a***ns.
Democratic House insiders said many of Ocasio-Cortezâs colleagues found her approach alienating.
âTweeting is easy, governing is hard. You need to have friends. You need to understand the committee process, you need to be willing to make sacrifices,â said one. âHer first day in Congress ⌠she decided to protest outside of Nancy Pelosiâs office.â
A second Democratic insider who worked with her in the New York delegation added that âlegislation was never her focus. It was media and narrative.â
Across the aisle, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-Brooklyn/Staten Island), told The Post, âHer ludicrous policy ideas would destroy our country â Americans should be thankful sheâs not effective.â As a current freshman Malliotakis does not appear on the list.
Reps for Ocasio-Cortez did not immediately respond to request for comment from The Post.
Fellow Democratic Socialist âSquadâ members fared better than AOC. Rep. Ilhan Omar sponsored 33 bills that also went nowhere, earning her 214th place, while Rep. Rashida Tlaib saw three of her substantive bills advance into committee â with one ultimately becoming law. She ranked 92nd.
Things werenât much better over in the Senate where Kirsten Gillibrand clocked in at 39 of 45 â with none of the substantive bills she proposed becoming law. Chuck Schumer landed at 33 â though Wiseman stressed that pols in leadership positions often fared poorly as their jobs required them to assist other members with their initiatives.
It wasnât all doom and gloom for the Empire State â which benefited from a large bench of lefty warhorses with clout in the chamber.
It turns out that governing is much harder than tweeting.
Fortunately, AOC is the queen of Twitter, but not much elseâŚ
Kickaha wrote:
That's not true. Obama signed an executive order creating DACA. Trump signed an executive order cancelling DACA and the Courts said he couldn't do that. It seems it depends on who created the original executive order and who is trying to cancel it.
On what did the courts base this decision and what gives them the right to interfere in the Constitutional powers of the executive branch? Seems, to me, that it's about time to start h*****g some judges. Seriously. I'm not joking. Hang 'em high. They've earned it.
Well, ain't that just a crock of s**t?
Kickaha wrote:
That's not true. Obama signed an executive order creating DACA. Trump signed an executive order cancelling DACA and the Courts said he couldn't do that. It seems it depends on who created the original executive order and who is trying to cancel it.
You admitted that it has been quite some time since you've read the Bible. And I'm guessing that you you never really studied it. You are commenting on something you don't know much about. That makes your opinion worthless. It's also obvious that you are biased, as well as closed-minded. So yeah. You're opinion is, pretty much, worthless.
RascalRiley wrote:
My opinion is worthless. There you go getting personal again and you complained about getting trashed? I am done
Not possible. Any Executive order can be overturned by another President.