One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Hartbreaker
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 27 next>>
Sep 17, 2014 08:53:38   #
swampbug wrote:
Based on my study of the Bible, I have concluded that God would likely be a republican (red). That balances it out quite well so not to worry.


Based on my study of the Bible, God is a king and not interested in politics but rather more interested in the individual.

Based on my study of politics and what they do, not claim to believe in, no party really serves God. They serve themselves.

Lincoln said, he did not care whose side God was on but rather he wanted to be on God's side. God does not pick sides because he is the only side that is correct.
Go to
Sep 16, 2014 09:35:03   #
skott wrote:
I live in a city that's economy is entirely based on government contracts. The fraud and abuse is staggering, but I never hear Republicans talk about cutting "defense" waste. It is nice to live here as the money always rolls in, no matter the deficit or the economy. There are always jobs available. But I know what it was like before the government came in, a small farming community.
One of the wasteful things that drives me mad is airfares. Travelers that are on the state dime travel business class all the time. I cannot afford to as a business class ticket cost about five times a coach ticket. I never hear the right complain about that.
I live in a city that's economy is entirely based ... (show quote)


You don't hear either party making any effort to cut defense waste. Both parties require the military to buy stuff that it does not want in order to create jobs. It is just another aspect of corporate welfare that both parties do. The Democrats are not willing to cut their pet projects, no, they cut programs that the military wants as they directly affect military preparedness. If Democrats really were after saving money in the military, they would ask the military what they want cut and not decide to cut the opposite.

The real question is what the Democrats really do want and why they do what they do?
Go to
Sep 16, 2014 09:32:11   #
She Wolf wrote:
How much fraud is there in pentagon spending? Perhaps we should cut off their supply of tax payers money. While we are at it Corp. Welfare needs to be axed. Our crooks in Washington need to be prosecuted.

Let's not attack the least of our brothers. Let's attack the real problem, the 1% who are above the law, pay no taxes, and rape the working people of this country on a daily basis.


I worked for the DOD for decades and that "Fraud" is mostly forced on the military by congress to create jobs in their districts and that goes for Corporate welfare as well and both parties do it.
Go to
Sep 16, 2014 09:28:51   #
skott wrote:
It was founded on both. Read Jefferson. Principles can exist without religion, although I am a Christian myself. I h**e that my religion has been taken over by people who want to judge and control other people. "Principal" is the guy in a school.


You cannot have both. If everyone is getting freedom from religion then no one is free to be religious. Students are being attacked every school day in this country because of the freedom from religion movement. Freedom of Religion means people are free to not have a religion. Freedom from religion means that people are only free to have a religion if they never show it openly and that is no freedom at all.
Go to
Sep 12, 2014 09:27:48   #
DJRich wrote:
But the knuckleheads who post the stupid things that demcrats and liberals say is the gospel t***h?

Get a life and quit being an ignorant h**er


Besides, bush was too stupid to tell a joke


No, you are just don't possess the ability to get one. Fact is that most of these make perfect sense in context. Most of the stupid things that Democrats say are even more stupid in context.
Go to
Sep 12, 2014 09:24:22   #
You wrote "FINALLY, THE TITLE FOR BIGGEST LIAR IN P**********L HISTORY HAS TO GO TO BUCHENEY" not the speakers history. Go back and read the tripe you print. I guess to a Progressive like yourself, being stupid is defined by actually calling you out on what you say since we know all progressives do is lie, it must be stupid to pay attention.

Jack2014 wrote:
Have you ever heard of a speakers history? Do you wear a stupid sign on your forehead?mif not get one! Boehner drank too much Black Jack today.

I saw a clip on the news today of Boehner criticizing Obama's bombing campaign against ISIS by saying ISIS can't be defeated without boots on the ground. Well Mr. Speaker, if you truly believe that and have balls bigger than a gnat's, why don't you introduce a resolution in the House authorizing the President to send in American combat forces if he deems it necessary
Have you ever heard of a speakers history? Do you ... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 12, 2014 09:19:37   #
We are a constitutional Republic but most local governments do have Democracy elements thrown in. Only on the Federal and State levels are we a pure Republic (and I can't say that really for all states but it is true of mine) and since the issue being discussed at the time was a local California issue, I allowed that though the local area may have Democracy elements, it was the representatives that made the decisions so that was irrelevant.

carolyn wrote:
Oh, but I will have to disagree with you. We are NOT both a Democracy and a Republic.

The definition of a Republic is: a state in which the sovereign power is vested in representatives chosen by the people.

The definition of a Democracy is in three parts: 1. Rule by the people.2. A community so governed. 3. The quality of being Democratic.

Actually we are a Constitutional Republic, which means we are a Republic that vests sovereign power in representatives that are chosen by the people to govern by the Constitution. This is where we have allowed our elected representatives to stray from what we are to expect of them. We now elect them and they in turn ignore what our Constitution demands from them.
Oh, but I will have to disagree with you. We are N... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 11, 2014 16:11:52   #
You say Boehner is the biggest liar in P**********l history? Uh, Boehner is not part of p**********l history. I guess that is just more proof that you have gone off the deep end.

Jack2014 wrote:
There is a horrible trend going on among R TPers running for congress, state legislatures, or even The presidency. We can easily come across case after case of Rs lying to the American people to get elected and then passing legislation or blocking legislation that they said they were either against or avoided comment on. Some of their classic examples are that they all ran on creating jobs in 2010&2012. You know,the 11 million that Bushcheney lost or sold to China for their war loans. Or now,how Buscheney predicted that if we left Iraq all hell would break loose? Yet,he signed the agreement that set a timetable for our leaving? Guess he would know about the utter mess they created. Remember the 3 month then 6 month then Mission Accomplished crap. Remember the promise Rummpsfeld made that our troops were prepared for Afghanistan and Iraq until he found out about rap lad side bombs belatedly? Of course the P de Resistance, are the 935 lies Bucheney's told to get us to go to war in Iraq! The whopper was the nuclear bomb-bomb.starting and finishing with yellow cake. We also find out now that Reagan gave Hussein the keys to Chemical Weapons and WP.fowitz,Rumppsfeld,Cheney knew all about it. They also knew he used all he had against the Iranians and Kurds.
Now everything is forgiven and bucheney is regaining his popularity among stupid people. Whitewash,whitewash,whitewash.
Then there is Romney. He couldn't say two words without lying twice. You know, he and Bucheney's shipped millions of good paying jobs to China along with technology. Romney even went to China and bought a s***e factory and sold it to one of his investors. He felt that the Chinese were tring to get in rather than get out because the barbed wire was pointed in. No mistake. He was told that the barbed wire was there to prevent outside Chinese from breaking in. Is he a dimwit along with being a liar. Bush 1 appears to be not as bad except for the " Read his lips" episode and lying about oil $$$ paying for the Kuwait War.
I'm not forgetting Clinton and his language difficulties which was another form of lie.but don't forget, he did not take us to war in either Afghanistan or Iraq.
Also,lets not leave out Rumppsfeld. This complete i***t approved military adventures in very difficult places. Since when did 5000 mile supply routes become insignificant especially thru choke points like The Khyber Pass and The Straight of Hormuz. Anybody see the huge junkyard pile of burned out supply and gasoline trucks on both sides of the Khyber.
The. There is Reagan. This puke lied about about the Missile Gap. He lied about our military inadequacies. He spent $$$ frivolously on Star Wars,tripling the National Debt. He gave Hussein CW and may have prompted him to go to war with Iran and then abandoned him. Reagan also didn't tell Americans he delayed the release of the Iranian Hostages for at least 3 months to prevent Carter from getting credit for their release.
Now,RTPers are blaming President Obama for everything their policies have caused. Cruz caused the Shutdown. Boehner caused all the problems economically with the Default. Ryan lies like a rug concerning his plans for his non-budget. It's obvious or should be that Rs and TPers can't produce a real budget. All else is camouf**ge
Boehner now says that the house has produced 40 jobs bills that the Senate is sitting on the CBO states that none of them produce a single job and probably will cost jobs. Remember the RTPer promises? They will create more jobs than President Obama! Where in China Romney?
.. None Of The 40 Jobs Bills That John Boehner Claims House Republicans Passed Create Jobs

By: Jason Easleymore from Jason Easley
Monday, September, 8th, 2014, 12:58 pm

Speaker of the House John Boehner is claiming that the House Republicans have passed 40 jobs bills that Harry Reid refuses to past in the Senate, but a look at the bills reveals that not a single one of them creates jobs.

Yesterday, Rep. Boehner (R-OH) wrote an op-ed on Time’s website that blamed Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for the state of the economy.

Boehner wrote

In the last year and a half, the House has passed more than 40 bills aimed at creating jobs, supporting wage earners, and easing the financial pains that working families all over America are suffering with in President Obama’s economy. Where are these bills now? They are stuck in the Senate. Why they are stuck, is a question for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
These bills are not thousands of pages long, nor are they partisan attempts to slam massive, new, and unwanted federal government programs down the throats of the American people. We all remember the disaster that became Obamacare. Passing something before we know what’s in it may be the Pelosi Doctrine, but it’s certainly not a t***sparent way to govern.
Instead these common-sense jobs bills, many of them bipartisan, are aimed at strengthening small businesses, allowing working moms and dads to keep more of their wages, and helping our seniors and our veterans. But instead of working with Republicans on the American people’s priorities in September, Senator Reid will instead focus on his obsession with the Koch brothers. This obsession is costing our economy jobs and has turned the United States Senate into a legislative graveyard.


The list of “jobs bills” reveals that the legislation falls into three categories. The largest category is tax breaks and gifts for the oil, coal, and natural gas industries. The second category is regulatory repeal, which is also another gift for big business. The last category is attacks on Obamacare. Boehner’s jobs bills for veterans increased fees for services to vets.

Nowhere on the list of jobs bills that Boehner wrote about is there an actual real live jobs bill.

Boehner has given a list of 40 bills that fit the Republican ideology, but history tells us that cutting taxes for the wealthy, giving gifts to special interests, and rolling back regulations are three policy choices that do not create jobs. Speaker Boehner’s jobs bills would not put more people back to work. The House Republican definition of a jobs bill is different from what most people think of as job creation.

The only job that John Boehner is trying to protect with this bogus list is his own.

None Of The 40 Jobs Bills That John Boehner Claims House Republicans Passed Create Jobs was written by Jason Easley for PoliticusUSA.
© PoliticusUSA, Mon, Sep 8th, 2014 — All Rights Reserved

FINALLY, THE TITLE FOR BIGGEST LIAR IN P**********L HISTORY HAS TO GO TO BUCHENEY.. NO ONE WILL EVER GET AWAY WITH THEIR NUCLEAR BOMB LIE AGAIN UNLESS WE LET THE R TPERS TAKE CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT.
There is a horrible trend going on among R TPers r... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 11, 2014 13:46:24   #
I guess you are one of those progressives that cannot defend their stance without inserting insults.

People like you are why I left the Democratic party and became an independent, because it seems that they could not carry on an intelligent conversation but rather reduced everything to a kindergarten level.

Regardless of what our system is, the example was of how a Republic works.


Brian Devon wrote:
**********
I guess you are one of those "challenged" conservatives who can't think and chew gum at the same time.

We are BOTH a democracy and a republic.

Those concepts are not mutually exclusive in spite of what the far right would have you believe.
Go to
Sep 11, 2014 09:35:44   #
Actually that is how a Republic works. A Democracy has all eligible v**ers v**e on the official policy and v**es for people to enforce it. A Republic v**es for people to make those policies.

Brian Devon wrote:
***********
Decisions about school documentation are not made by me. They are made by the duly elected govt. officials. This is how Democracy works. If you have questions about how the Calif. Governor, Attorney General, and the state legislature deal with such matters you would have to take that up with them.

Apparently Californians approve of how the Democrats handle such matters. Otherwise the Democrats would not hold all the statewide offices as well as the two U.S. Senate seats.

Have a nice night.
*********** br Decisions about school documentatio... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 10, 2014 16:01:59   #
We are still only choosing between two parties. This means that every e******n boils down to everybody v****g based on one issue because adding a second issue could eliminate all choices. A new system needs to be created. Imagine if instead a state line Pennsylvania (18 Representatives) decides that instead of dividing the state into 18 gerrymandering districts, it makes all slots state wide. And everyone gets to v**e for either 2/3 or 1/2 of the slots. That means either everyone gets 9 v**es or 12 v**es. They an also require that all parties can only submit as many candidates as there are seats. So the top 18 v**e getters will get in office and even with 12 v**es a person, several representatives will have less than 50% v**e for them. Small parties will have a chance to get representatives and if they do well, they will become more powerful and be able to get other positions. End the 2 party system.

DJRich wrote:
Another long time politician is v**ed out, which is the best example of true term limits.
When the people who v**e don't v**e for incumbents, they leave office and become lobbyists but that is another issue.
Here on good old OPP, there is constant apping and blather about imposing term limits on everyone except their own, personal favorite politician.
So far this primary season, one democrat and four republicans lost their jobs.
Proof that v**ers are smarter than bloggers, commenters, pundits and media fools.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/09/09/longtime-rep-tierney-concedes-defeat-in-mass-dem-primary-to-marine-vet-moulton/?intcmp=HPBucket
Another long time politician is v**ed out, which i... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 10, 2014 15:51:44   #
karpenter wrote:
KochBrosTP!!KochBrosTP!!KochBrosTP!!

http://rt.com/files/news/21/08/f0/00/fawks-3.jpg

Talk About Group-Think Clones
Their Hero Is A Fictional Cartoon Character

At Least 7-of-9 Had Knobs:

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/00/42/82/0042820c4fb88e75ec3c328477237757.jpg


I am a little confused about this Anonymous group that says that socialism is just another form of s***ery but in England is being usurped by the people trying to increase or defend socialism. Can Anonymous actually condemn this usurping and stay within their parameters? Or do they support socialism in the end?
Go to
Sep 10, 2014 15:34:31   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
Where does this $10.2 billion come from?

How many legal school age children are there in California?


That is $3000 per illegal and includes not just savings in schools but welfare checks (for every estimated 3 i******s, one is on welfare and collecting a lot more than $9000, the total for themselves and the other two estimated) and other government costs. Obviously policing cost is estimated to be reduced as well from the rest of the article.
Go to
Sep 10, 2014 15:24:44   #
oldroy wrote:
The man was told that being in uniform he may offend another student, other than his daughter he was to see a counselor about. The school superintendent said there were no such rules in the district, so I would hope that a security officer is looking for a new job.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09/10/army-officer-turned-away-by-security-at-entrance-of-daughters-high-school-want-to-guess-why/


It was just an individual working security as a contractor. This is not part of any official policy so no big deal. We cannot control an individual's behavior so we are not really answerable for that behavior until we condone it or refuse to condemn it when we are made aware of it.
Go to
Sep 10, 2014 15:20:36   #
Brian Devon wrote:
*************
I couldn't see this clipping as I have structured this website to favor text over images. There is just blank space where a clipping would have been.

I omitted the images after too many very juvenile graphics were posted to OPP.


OK, sorry then. I have to agree with your reasoning and I have done the same but noticed that I missed the point too often.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 27 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.