Oh, man! Do they not know that by k*****g this mother, wife, civil rights lawyer, they will incite the ire of American Feminist organizations!?
Boy, they surely must have lost their collective mind, huh?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/iraqi-human-rights-lawyer-k**led-by-isis/
Caboose wrote:
One c*******t out and obama will put another back in.
This link has five possibilities. If you think looking into this se******n is like viewing a can of worms or a viper pit, you are forgiven.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/218932-five-candidates-to-replace-holder
Super Dave wrote:
I'll bet there's a pardon in his pocket.
Now, that's just chilling.
It's bad enough being governed for six years by a r****t, low-brow, incompetent, pack of slugs.. do those apparently guilty of bastardizing the Constitution of the USA have to get a pass?!?
Well, since there is not one--NOT ONE-- white legal professional qualified, it looks like our r****t admin. will be appointing that Patrick dude from MA.
This *colorful;* six years has been so crammed with outrageous scandal- Obamacare, Fast-N-Furious, B******i, IRS, attack on FOX news...yada, yada, yada.. where are we to look first once we get the adults back in control?
If Obama had a son... huh?!?
.. or more clearly, SEX & our children & school.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/19181-sex-education-for-five-year-olds-pushed-by-p*******es?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_campaign=2c7bd2a4e0-The_Editors_Top_Picks_3_12_143_12_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8ca494f2d2-2c7bd2a4e0-289784773
skott wrote:
I didn't watch, but he has never said that it is not an attempt at an Islamic state. The problem is it is not. They are k*****g Christians, and Islamic.
If a Baptist group came out and said it was the Christian state, and began k*****g Muslims and Catholics and Episcopalians, and Mormons, Would it be a Christian state? He seems to understand this much better than you.
I read this over and still have no idea WTH you are trying to say.
Has Obama said that ISIS is Islamic as the name itself implies or hasn't he?
There's a simple question-- what's your answer?
cant beleve wrote:
The I***t chief only pretends to not understand. I don't believe he has an official diagnosis of r****ded YET
His clumsy tap-dancing all around naming the actual source of the murdering mob is, well, almost entertaining.
Almost.
If anyone here actually sat through that, could you please tell me whether or not Obama has discovered what that first 'I' in ISIS is?
Did he reveal his knowledge that ISIS has some relation to Islam?
"I did fail on the caps, didn't I? "
Still, 99.99% ain----er----isn't bad. :thumbup:
archie bunker wrote:
I can't disagree with your point here
Maybe Charles should have simplified it and just said: 'Liberal women are the loudest squeaky wheels for 'womens rights.' Why aren't they squeaking about this?'
I think all Americans should be raising hell about it.
As for 'womens rights' ...tired of it
'gay rights'...tired of it
r****m...tired of it
All americans have the same rights. The squeaky wheels have now created many 'protected classes' who use their protected status to infringe on the rights of the non protected class.
Just my opinion.
I can't disagree with your point here br Maybe C... (
show quote)
I would have agreed with you
100% had you capitalized Americans. ;)
The OP, I believe addressed the original statement towards the great silent majority of women (liberal) who are mute as rocks when muslim nastiness towards other women - say women in the ME, Africa, etc., (soon to be the USA) is highlighted in the press, pictured, and even video taped.
I would like to bend the OP's opening statement, though.. women in muslim countries with Sharia law are property, those men are their OWNERS.
Oh, and one more point.. I see mentioned in another post the tendency for American women to get all warmed-up over something they call "reproductive
rights-- we all know what those babes are mad as hell about is legalized murder of the unborn as nobody in this country with the capacity to reproduce is being kept from doing so. Some who dwell upon that may find the last point 'unfortunate', perhaps.
bahmer wrote:
Amen great post.
Agreed; two thumbs-up.
Our only problem is, and continues to be, the folks of the left have handed over all their reasoning power to a central 'authority' and refuse any other input. Period, as Obama says. ;-)
It's a pristine pity congress is composed of squids and bottom feeders.
If there were men in that body of perpetual tax-suckers, they would have done their duty and we'd have ole President Plugs... a HUGE improvement.
Better a president known as a fool than one known as an enemy of the state.
bahmer wrote:
Yeah but there friends.
They're more like butt-buddies, from my perspective.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/warren-buffett-profits-hugely-from-obama-keystone-decision/
Gee, we darned nearly got the full talking points blather on the last one: "your echo chamber", "di***ts", "braying sheep"-- LOL.. :-D
Lame, lame and mindless, insulting drivel meant to turn away the children, but adults can easily see through the cheap shots, ridicule, and derision... none of which matters 'cause that little boy cries "Wolf" too often and now his words, like Magic Mouth Obama's are meaningless. Totally without value and not worthy of any consideration.