Char4Dew wrote:
It is not asking for extra anything at all.
ARE YOU allowed to get married::
ARE YOU allowed to inherit your living quarters if your mate was to pass?
ARE YOU allowed to enjoy joint tax returns?
That is all they want same thing you have.
Dont BS this situation to fit into you prejudice mind.
EQUAL RIGHTS.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, what you want to do is distort the term marriage to fit an unnatural union. If you want the same conditions that are given to people that are supporting and increasing the population of the country, figure out how you are going to do that without reproductive possibilities. we need new citizens to increase the value and wealth of the country. Homosexuals do not add anything for the future, They are present persons only. Now new children to support our society. When childless couples die, that is the end of their contribution. Children are the necessary for society to grow, defend, and innovate.
Now having said that, you can form a loving partnership with all the present privileges that exist in a joined partnership, it just does not need to be called marriage. Why is using the term marriage so important when you do not and cannot fulfill the requirements of marriage to society?
You can have equal rights under a new term, just don't muck up the honorable term and essence of marriage if you cannot fulfill the requirements of it. Figure out a different term than marriage and campaign for the same e******y of that term to the configuration, but do not imply that homosexual partnerships can fulfill the basic reason for marriage is to legitimize children, and provide a safe and acknowledged relationship for that nugget of society.
You can have all the privileges except
parenthood , and any inference in that realm of marriage and the family. That is the big objection, homosexual unions can not and do not have skin in the game. They have no children that can carry on the name and the characteristics of the original parents. They want all the privileges without the problems of raising children.
It is a purely selfish pursuit, wanting the privileges of society without having to support it with the hard work of producing caring and producing new citizens.
Homosexuals want special privileges without the heart ache of producing new citizens to support the society. We need new workers, citizens, warriors, people that will work to improve society homosexual couples do not add anything for the future. It is once and done. Fine enjoy you life, but do not mess up the thrust of citizenship but wanting special privileges. If you are not going to support the influx of any new citizens to the society, you have no urge to improve it except for your own selfish contribution. This is the main problem with the definition of equal rights. Homosexuals want all the privileges, but don't want to have to contribute to the problems of improving it, by generating new citizens.
And adopting children should not be permitted, because they then get a distorted experience of true family life. Unless you experience it, you cannot teach it.