One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: IrreverentOne75
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Apr 16, 2019 15:57:17   #
tommsteyer wrote:
many thoughtful opinions. But what about MY main question?

Why can't white people stand up for themselves just like every other tribal group out there?


They can. The problem I see is that when they do the guilt-ridden, brain dead, i***ts that refuse to acknowledge White people should feel good about themselves go absolutely berserk. To these people a White P***e March is something from N**i Germany while a Gay P***e Parade is something to admire and a Black L***s M****r blockade of a freeway is peaceful protest.
Go to
Apr 15, 2019 23:01:35   #
Wolf counselor wrote:
There is a person of color alive today that has literally performed miracles.

But b****s don't even respect him or recognize his brilliance.

His name is Ben Carson.

And b****s are some of the most ignorant and h**ed people on the face of the Earth.


How do you even attempt to justify hating anyone only because of the color of their skin. I have to wonder whether you actually know any people of any color other than White. I am not a follower of any organized religion, nor am I a member of any political party. I consider myself to be a behaviorist, one who does not care about a persons color, but does care about their character.
Go to
Apr 15, 2019 22:42:56   #
byronglimish wrote:
It comes down to jealousy, God has blessed the White Anglo Saxon people's like no other in modern history.

When ultra r****t Obama started the white privilege campaign, it was to cause envy for what is actually the Creators blessing.


Okay, I just have to do this. Your post is absolutely nothing but radical religious Bullpucky. This malarkey about being blessed by a god is actually hilarious. You claim a "god blessed the White Anglo Saxon peoples like no other". There have been many, and I do mean MANY, scientific and cultural examples that were brought about by people of color.
Go to
Apr 14, 2019 16:37:22   #
PeterS wrote:
Conservatism, the gift that keeps on giving...


Liberalism: The disease that continues to destroy minds.
Recently elected Democrat members of the House of Representatives from Minnesota and New York make irrational statements like "someone did something in New York in September of 2001" and to the effect that " we have only 12 years before life will end on Earth" and the rest of the liberal lemmings readily agree with both statements.
Go to
Apr 13, 2019 00:47:32   #
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Likely due to it being an enhanced crime. The justice system isn't always just.


An enhanced crime? What in blue blazes is that?

Person one is standing on a street corner, waiting for a bus. Person two walks up a punches person one, knocking them down and then kicks them in the head. Is that a h**e crime?
Go to
Apr 12, 2019 23:37:28   #
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
It would all depend on the motivation, could it be called a h**e crime? Yes, does that mean it was? Not necessarily, but of course it would have to be thoroughly investigated to be certain.


Yet it is almost certain to be called a h**e crime if a White person attacks any one of the protected classes. Have to wonder why that happens.
Go to
Apr 12, 2019 22:57:31   #
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Doesn't matter where the meme comes from if it tells the t***h. Now if any part of that meme was unt***hful, then you would have a point, as it doesn't include any misinformation/disinformation, then the source of the meme is a moot point. S.D. state rep., Michael Clark DID say what the meme claims he said in a FB post, that is FACT, race based h**e crimes HAVE increased since Trump took office, that is also a FACT. those are the only two assertions made by that meme, therefore that meme is valid.

What? Anti-democrat memes are valid even though they ALL come from source that are anti-Democrat sources but because that meme was created by U.S. DemSoc, that makes it invalid? If I believed that way, I would have to lump myself with you guys, I want that LESS than I want to be lumped in with the Democrats. I believe that ALL people deserve rights and freedoms, not just those that match my skin color.

I may not always agree with Democrats on many things, I also don't agree with everything that Republicans, libertarians and Independents think or say either. Since I can't bring myself to align myself with ANY of the current political parties and truly believe that Dems, need to turn to the right and that the various "righty" parties need to take a left turn, I consider mys4lf a centrist, I wouldn't know what else to call someone that thinks that BOTH sides of the political spectrum are too far to their extreme.
Doesn't matter where the meme comes from if it tel... (show quote)


Just two questions. If a Black person attacks a White person is that a r****t attack? If a Brown person attacks a White person is that a r****t attack?
Go to
Apr 10, 2019 22:47:58   #
Fit2BTied wrote:
Since the entire unredacted Mueller report will not be released, the literal (liberal) t***slation of Kevyn's words is...

...Never...because...Orange Man Bad!...

It's OK, Kevyn (with a Y), we wouldn't expect anything more from you.


I honestly believe that we all should take into consideration that Kevyn [ with a Y ] is just slightly less intelligent than a dead tomato plant and cut him some slack.....NAH.
Go to
Apr 6, 2019 19:08:16   #
debeda wrote:
Yeah, I thought of that when I was writing it. Maybe allow reps three 2 year terms. But term limits are a must, as well as CANCELING "pensions" for Congress!


If they are still to be limited to terms of 2 years we still have the BS that as soon as they get elected they start campaigning to get re-elected.
Go to
Apr 6, 2019 18:37:18   #
debeda wrote:
maybe 3 years for reps. Good to be able to get rid of them faster if they're not "representing"


The only problem I see with that is it would require another federal e******n cycle.
Go to
Apr 6, 2019 18:20:50   #
maryjane wrote:
BUT, we, the ones paying the bill, are the VERY LAST people ever thought about by our congress. They give a brief thought to us only at e******n times simply as someone to believe their lies, cast a v**e for them and then we are supposed to return to our place of working hard, paying our taxes, and staying quiet. The entire Congress is d********g.


That is the very reason I have, for the past 8 years, kept telling everyone to v**e out the incumbent for the next two e******n cycles. When the third one gets elected they will know that their job is to pass a law setting term limits for Congress critters and if they don't do it they are gone the next time they have to run for re-e******n. This would allow them to set realistic terms. I suggest 2 four year terms for Representatives, same as the President, and 2 six year terms for Senators. Right now there are entirely too many Congress critters that have been in DC in excess of 40 freaking years. Some of been there since Ronald Reagan was in office.
Go to
Apr 6, 2019 00:10:46   #
2quick4u wrote:
I've been saying this for years...They can go demand or borrow or steal for their future schemes, but the everyday business of actually funding all the current give-aways is only possible because of the never ending inflow of tax dollars. What they take in daily is staggering..but it all goes right back out..and for reasons which these corrupt pols can't change. Stores, banks, and anyplace that honors/redeems the goods and services which the govt has promised (given)..to typically needy people for assistance (and political support)..can't remain in business long w/o getting reimbursed consistently, and on time, for being the govt's middleman. Disrupting this flow of $$$'s could have a staggering effect on the politicians..and this could possibly be done simply by postponing your contribution(s) for legitimate reasons. What are these poor impoverished people to do without anyplace to get their (free) "stuff'..and who will they complain to, loudly, when they can't??? The bureaucrats don't have a choice in this-they have to take care of those who actually hand the goodies out-and [they] are dependant upon the tax money which comes in daily to keep the machine humming (so they can create new schemes to further puff up their self-imagined importance).
I've been saying this for years...They can go dema... (show quote)


There is a legal way to reduce the amount of money deducted from your paycheck. If you raise the number of dependents the amount deducted would be reduced. If I remember correctly you can claim up to eight dependents without attracting any undue attention. Unfortunately, when you file in April you can only claim the number that you actually have and will, most likely, owe a large sum of money then.
Go to
Apr 6, 2019 00:03:25   #
Kevyn wrote:
Our workforce is aging out, most of the baby boomers are or will retire within the next ten years at the same time they will require more and more care in retirement and old age. Young immigrants will be able to fill those roles. Immigrant farm workers are necessary in many agricultural communities and keep our food prices affordable. Most of the new arrivals live with family and friends until established and then support themselves by providing valuable labor and sk**ls to our economy and in many instances opening businesses. Undocumented immigrants are not entitled to welfare, food stamps or medicade, a fact that is lied about consistently. Some do depend on private social service charities while getting established.
Our workforce is aging out, most of the baby boome... (show quote)


The dream world you appear to live in doesn't exist. The i*****l a***ns that you seem to put before American citizens may not be entitled to welfare, food stamps, or medicade [ by the way … what the hell is medicade?] but they are receiving hospital care and education at the expense of people who pay taxes. The term "undocumented immigrants" is a farce. These people who illegally enter the United States of America are, in fact, criminals violating federal laws.
Go to
Mar 30, 2019 13:50:33   #
permafrost wrote:
Well Tommy, I was going to add a few thing about the zebra k*****gs and the callousness of the toy gun maker..
But then I read the rest of your post filled with every thing from lies to misinterpretation..

fueled by Prager and the like. Nothing is correct.. Fueling the right via h**e and lies..."

I could spend the day refuting what you wrote, or I could take a walk in the sunshine..

MMMM which shall I do???


Well, well, well. It seems as though you have either missed or ignored just who is fueling the h**e these days. All anyone need do is look at the text messages, tweets, and posts from the Hollywood elite, the "unbiased" journalists and "so-called" reporters from the majority of print and television medias, and the newly elected Socialists in the House of Representatives to know that it emanates from the hard left resistance to a duly elected President.

I suggest you stay out of the sunlight due to the amount of brain damage you already have.
Go to
Mar 28, 2019 12:02:45   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Well, to start with, Mueller didn't exonerate Trump...............he said he found no evidence that they "knowingly" cooperated with Russian agents. Having trouble with the English language? The phrase " didn't knowingly..." means that they DID cooperate with Russia.................they were just too stupid to realize it. That's a worse indictment than collusion.


Oh, so you're attempting to tell us that you have direct proof that Mueller meant what you say he meant. Perhaps you might also be able to explain to us why the FBI decided that Hillary had not committed any crimes when she destroyed information about her servers. I honestly believe that you are under the influence of a severe case of Collusion Delusion.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.