Juan Williams was so wrapped up in DCC talking points that he sounded like Nancy Pelosi in blackface. Happy to see his air time cut back.

On the contrary, I think we are of like minds on the topic of Chris Wallace, though his recent vintage is too bitter for my taste. I find it commendable that Fox News affords opposing viewpoints, often to their detriment. The Left will not acknowledge Fox's striving for balance in its hard news programming, and Fox's hard core audience gets incensed at talking-points-spouting liberals given air time. A clear lose-lose for the network yet, to their credit I guess, they stay the course.

With Charles Krauthammer gone, RIP, Wallace was supposed to pick up the mantle of intellectual journalism for the network. But Wallace's deep loathing for Trump saw him abandon principled ideals, and he became a GOP antagonist; soft pedaling Dem guests while scorching GOP guests. And of course, his one-on-one P**********l debate with Trump (while Biden stood by in silence) will forever showcase his biased convictions. He morphed into an undercover operative for the DCC-run news media, and downplayed Trump's successes while turning a blind four eyes to Biden's failures. Fox got no accolades for sustaining Wallace's haughty commentary, and remained maligned as a far right news outlet despite providing the likes of Wallace with a powerful pulpit. I'm glad he's gone to a network with a reputation as sullied as his own.

A. You are one gaslighting troll.
B. The "Stay in Mexico" program was enacted, not with a willing Mexico, but with a Mexico threatened with economic sanctions and tariffs if Mexico did not comply. They complied. Sometimes you have to flex your muscles to get the unwilling to come around. That is what Trump did and that it why Mexico could not say "hell, no". Now, you may not agree with that tactic and that's fine, but it answers your question.
C. The current administration has neither the credibility nor the desire to persuade Mexico to comply.

2008: Obama - 69.5MM v**es
2012: Obama - 65.9MM v**es
2016: Clinton - 65.9MM v**es
2020: Biden - 81.3MM v**es

C'mon, man.

Maybe so. They are after all, a fringe group with questionable resources and organization. On the other hand, B*M & A****a are every bit the threat to domestic tranquility as the marginal players you've cited here. B*M & A****a are a full-fledged organization with a heirarchy of leadership, ample funding from sources foreign and domestic, and have outspoken support from national political figures, corporate media, Big Tech, entertainment and sports conglomerates, and the faculty rooms on most campuses. So if you think the slobs on the couch measure up in any way to the destructive influence B*M and A****a can wield in America, you are so sadly mistaken as to rethink where the genuine threats come from. When picking your battles, don't go after the weakest of your adversaries; focus on the existential threat.

You know it's funny how quickly the Trump bashers forget 2016. In that e******n, we were given a choice between two despicable people. Now the only one people remember as god-awful is Trump, when if Hillary won, we would have been just as much in the clutches of the "horrible and corrupt". Only difference being is that Hillary is far more calculating and does it for personal enrichment; Trump seems to do it because he's simply a terribly flawed human being. You see when given the choice of two despicable people running, you cannot later complain you elected a despicable person. Personally, I think Trump accomplished more good and was less detrimental to the country than Hillary would've been, but it doesn't mitigate his character failings; it just turned out better it was him and not her. So to all the Trump-h**ers out there, just think back to how conniving and utterly without scruples Hillary is, and lament the choices we were given, not the outcome.

There might be some merit to that argument, until you try to imagine how "the right" could possibly "create" 8 hour lines in largely democractic precincts: Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, etc. Fact is, mail in b****ts need to be counted on e******n day and reported as the polling results come in, not 96 hours later, and not disproportionately one-sided. But only when it flips a race blue. Has there been a single instance where uncounted mail in b****t flipped an e******n red?

I applaud your initiative to include multiple citations supporting your contentions. It is refreshing. But they are essentially from the same source(s) within the government e******n office speaking to multiple media outlets. I don't have time to research their tenure or career paths right now, (they could be deep state lifers for all I know) but I will accept them as bona fide sources if you will accept the possibility they are government functionaries enmeshed in the permanent bureaucracy.

Okay...... so that statement is so rich in detail and attribution. Aside from the imbecile in Georgia, who is delusional if he believes the last e******n was the most secure in history, I can't see how you are so in the know as to be able to not only quote conversation among e******n officials, but ascribe motivation to them as well. Why can't you just leave it that nothing was proven in a court of law that determined fraud on a scale as to change the outcome? Why must you peddle this "most secure in history" BS when you know the irregularities of process alone refutes such a claim? Jeez the overreach you employ to make your point eviscerates your argument.

No one has said, because no one has asked. But typical of the tone-deaf left who, having experienced the tumult resulting from e******n irregularities in 2020, have neither the sense nor decency to insure b****t accountability is beyond reproach. In person v****g on e******n day has been rendered irrelevant.

You got that right!

It’s not the decision to forego concession that is disconcerting, it is the apparition of uncounted b****ts, evidently mishandled at some level, that is of concern. Should concern everyone.

Such a troll.

It's getting quite a lot of air play on multiple outlets. I will not research that for you because you do not respond when the citations are provided. Rather than own up to how bad this looks, and how criminal it very well may be, you'll play the doubter and run from the t***h. Troll.