LMAO!! Quick! Somebody tell mueller and his 13 angry democrats!! Maybe there's still time to salvage this vendatta after all!!!

And again, where's the proof??? This Senate report is filled with ambiguous words and phrases such as your referral to "apparently" russia was listening. There was also "very likely," "might have been aware," "may have known" -- all of which are completely useless when proof is important and necessary. All that is, is a bunch of vindictive, biased people trying to connect dots that they cannot connect and so resort to using innuendo and suggestion in some desperate attempt to plant the notion that it's a possible conclusion. It didn't work for them, and it doesn't work for you, either.

Why, thank you, kind sir!

LOL, moldy. You're contradicting yourself. First you claim that the only reason the mueller investigation didn't result in clear and convincing evidence is because President Trump learned from his dad to "never leave a paper trail, no email, no voicemail ... " and that's how he "covered his butt" and escaped any charges. But THEN you claim, at a one of his massive rallies being viewed by millions of people on national television, he "ordered" wikileaks to reveal hrc's emails and golly gee he must have had the power to make wikileaks do it because they did.

Funny how the mueller team couldn't prove that was anything more than a joke, even with their 13 biased angry democrats working nonstop for over two years. Anybody with a lick of sense knew that was a joke.

It's just your TDS showing. H*****g onto the h**e because if you let go of it there's nothing to fill the void.

Yup. Definitely thrived. I was a farm kid and we worked in the fields out in the heat of the summer ... and did not have an air conditioned home to go to at the end of the day. You sat under a shade tree and drank iced tea until you cooled off ... unless you worked until sundown, then the tree was irrelevant. Life was good then.

First of all ..... Please, please, please ... Run Liz Run!!! See Liz run! See Liz wipe out! See Liz run oinking--oops, I mean crying--to daddy! LOL. Can't wait. Should be fun!

... interesting that you call President Trump a sore loser when hrc has shown herself to be the biggest, sorest loser ever in the history of politics along with her supporters, although abrams runs a close second. It's laughable. Pitiful, but mostly laughable. Oh, wait, maybe hrc can run with Liz. Best losing ticket EVER!!

I think he's talking about slojoe ..

Definitely the beer helped! And the neighbor's pond. Not the best combination when you think about it, but oh well, we survived.

An "extensive web of contact" means nothing unless those contacts led to collusion, and they did not.

Senator Rubio (who chaired the committee), stated:

"Over the last three years, the Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan and thorough investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 e******n and undermine our democracy," Acting Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said in a statement Tuesday. "We interviewed over 200 witnesses and reviewed over 1 million pages of documents.

He added: "No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive."

“We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 e******n,” Rubio said.

Most of the discussion with respect to individuals on the campaign were directed at Manafort (who, by the way, was Trump's campaign chairman for less than three months). And even at that Manafort was eventually convicted of financial crimes having to do with tax evasion and failure to report income--NOT collusion or anything to do with collusion or Russian connections. Carter Page was indicted, claimed he was framed (which apparently he was), and after a three year court battle he was acquitted of all charges. Roger Stone was convicted of lying to Congress and obstruction of justice--NOT collusion or anything to do with collusion or Russian connections.

Wh**ever the "contacts" were, it was just that--contacts and/or communication and did not involve collusion. Whether, as you state, "practically all of trumps people" (which is doubtful) were "vetted by Russian spies" or not does not mean they participated in any wrongful activity, and the fact that none of them were convicted of any such crime makes wh**ever the "Russian spies" did irrelevant.

As for the suit filed against Trump Management, Inc. and the Trumps, this has nothing to do with anything. I suppose your citing it is in response to my dismissing your comment about President Trump's "criminal training" from his father but it proves absolutely nothing. No one was convicted of a criminal act. The case ended in a settlement between the parties with no admission of any violation on the part of Trump Management, Inc. and the Trumps. And it means nothing with respect to what President Trump's father might have "taught" him; and you have absolutely no knowledge of what President Trump's father did or did not teach him. Only what you wish to believe.

I am old and could be misremembering .... but either way, it was cooler if you were moving. 😄😄😄

Me, too. And for all of our sakes. Don't want people like that in the House representing the American people. She appears to be so filled with h**e and anger and is solely focused on this "get Trump" agenda, it's ridiculous. The House and Senate should be spending all their time trying to figure out how they can help solve spiraling inflation, high gas prices, supply chain issues, possible food shortages coming, etc. etc., instead of wasting time and taxpayer dollars on a personal vendetta that only a relatively small group of DC TDS-driven politicians care about. IOW, those in the People's House should be doing the People's Work, because God knows we need SOMEBODY there to care about us and U.S.!!!

I know, since Hageman was ahead by some 20 points, and the Wyoming Republican Party ousted her. That never bodes well. But, if her daddy and his bigwig, wealthy friends pull out a nonstop campaign to help her out, I suppose she could make up some ground on that, at least in the primary, if she can get the dems behind her.

IIRC, President Trump held a huge rally for Hageman in Wyoming and had the biggest crowd ever in that state at that venue. I hope he holds another one before the primary. Miss Piggy needs to be taught a lesson ...

... "trumps people practically all got vetted by Russian spies." How many exactly? Who exactly? Which Russian spies "vetted" them? In what way were they vetted? What is the breakdown of those who (you say) were indicted for Russian connections and those who were indicted for things like tax evasion or financial crimes (IOW details of how you come to the conclusion of "most")? And who brought this information (i.e. proof) to the investigators?

How would you have any idea what trump did or did not remember from his father? Is there clear and convincing evidence that there was any "criminal training" involved or is this just another one of those "throw out some new innuendo and see if it sticks" kind of comment (i.e. the usual)? And how could he have learned to "pardon those who can implicate you" from a man who was long dead before President Trump became President and had the authority to do so?

You're just throwing s**t at the wall hoping some of it will stick.

He wasn't, with the people, but having been Bush's VP, he had a lot of high level political connections. And they don't really care much about the people as long as they get what they want.

I heard she also put out tv ads begging democrats to v**e for her in the republican primary. How sad is that? But, given the money and the political influence cheney has behind her with her dad and all his political connections--no doubt the bush family is involved, too--it's always possible she could eke out a win. I hope not, but politics is a dirty business and these people sure know how to play dirty.