One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jack sequim wa
Page: <<prev 1 ... 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 ... 672 next>>
Jul 15, 2015 17:59:38   #
KHH1 wrote:
So what did you get your undergraduate and two graduate degrees in? Also, what university faculty evaluation committee have you served on?


My first college commencement was pre-high school commencement age 16. Double majored K.U. business, psychology, J.D. law, Northern California University of law (boring), during which time updated Calc 1,2, and 3. Herbalist at Clayton, masters in psychology, social scientist from City University, author of three books.
Sadly I must disappoint you, as I never cared to partake in faculty evaluation committee's, or settle on offers to employ as professor.
Honor student that learned to communicate, without having the need use profanities. ....
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 17:37:28   #
KHH1 wrote:
What do you have to say about america and his r****t language and lack of spelling and punctuation? Do you have anything to say to HIM?


Who and/or what are you talking about?
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 17:18:45   #
KHH1 wrote:
LOWER TEST SCORES PERCENTILES? THAT STEREOTYPICAL THINKING IS WHY YOU R****TS WERE NOT PREPARED FOR BROTHERS LIKE OBAMA...MY PARENTS REQUIRED HONOR STUDENTS FROM K-12, DID YOURS?


Before replying hit quote reply, thus the reader knows to whom your replying.
How are test score percentiles, (not "scores...percentiles") r****t? I fail to get the connection, I thought I was referencing your claim to be a professor?
Never met an honor student with such poor articulation, continual profanity. Did your parents teach you that? Last, I'm not sure what race you are, I'm guessing that your not a true American as myself and lineage. Is being a native American Indian in your eyes make a r****t? I believe that uneducated, illiterate people that have indefensible ideologies default to calling others r****t in order to deflect the conversation, and in fact are h**eful r****t themselves!
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 17:00:38   #
KHH1 wrote:
talk to your fellow inbreds ALSO about their R****T LANGUAGE AND NOT ME EXCLUSIVELY OR GO PHUCK YOURSELF....


There's that scholarly usage of the English language. Your reference to my "fellow inbreds" I must assume, since your illiteracy prevented your ability to be specific, was directed towards anyone on your post whom disagrees with your narrow ideology. With certainty, never did my reply include other threads on your post.
Your instant reference to "R****T and PHUCK" only confirms my reply to you. I further can only assume your claim to be a "professor" is fraudulent, as would your ability to be a used car salesman with such poor ability to argue or articulate beyond that of a junior high school dropout, on meth, homeless and using the local library computer to post your ideologies that are indefensible.
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 14:55:40   #
Loki wrote:
When I first entered college, I found my professors impressive. After I was forced to drop out due to pecuniary strangulation, and did a couple of years at the University of Uncle Sam, (Army ) I returned to college and I was far less impressed, due mostly to having had my horizons expanded in a way that many of those professors, parochial in their ivory-towered tenure, had never experienced.


KHH1 has stated his ability to change students minds, in a professor of the century light. Reading his responses, remiss of dialogue resembles your honest description. ... parochial in his ivory - tower tenure. But more likely is a wannabe, insecure, non doctoral degree professor with severe insecurities due to peer pressure of surrounding scholars in their ivory-towered tenure.
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 14:27:42   #
KHH1 wrote:
A bigger joke is the fools who are talking schit about this Iran deal but remain mum on W's failure that resulted in N. Korea getting nukes and threatening America while all of you also sat their with your fingers in your azzes dumbfounded...now THAT is a joke indeed........



Your illiteracy of facts are marginally drowned out, injecting the need to assign a past president responsible, 7 years post of current events. The fact your narrow views are limited by media (left/marxist) input, remiss of t***hful facts. Once you have done the due diligence of (genuine) research that a university professor would expect from a Jr. college student, including references. Instead you argue a pro- obama, pro-Iran nuclear arms deal on several fronts, yet without supportive evidence as a poster of such an issue need do. Your claim to employ as a university professor is in question, if so........you fail perfectly.
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 11:43:22   #
KHH1 wrote:
Between the economy/economic policy, healthcare, wars/foreign policy, civil rights, supreme court decisions.....Pres. Obama has come through with flying colors...working Congress in the process...The Right knows this and it k**ls them...... :thumbup:


Iran Nuclear Deal Is Reached After Long Negotiations
By DAVID E. SANGER and MICHAEL R. GORDONJULY 14, 2015
VIENNA — Iran and a group of six nations led by the United States have agreed to a historic accord to significantly limit Tehran’s nuclear ability for more than a decade in return for lifting international oil and financial sanctions against Iran, a senior Western diplomat involved in the negotiations said on Tuesday.

The deal culminates 20 months of negotiations on a deal that President Obama had long sought as the biggest diplomatic achievement of his presidency.

A formal announcement of the agreement was expected later on Tuesday, when foreign ministers from Iran and the six nations it has been negotiating with will meet at a United Nations complex here in Vienna. Catherine Ray, a spokeswoman for the European Union, said a final plenary meeting of the six nations — the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia — will take place at 10:30 a.m. in Vienna, followed by a news conference, but she provided no further details.

Secretary of State John Kerry, second from left, meets with foreign ministers and delegations from Germany, France, China, Britain, Russia and the European Union on Monday in Vienna.Inching Near an Iran Nuclear Deal, Negotiators Go SilentJULY 13, 2015
Metallic seals like this one have long been used to prevent unauthorized access to nuclear equipment. New electronic and fiber-optic seals beam back confirmation that they remain intact.Awaiting Iran Deal, Nuclear Sleuths Gather Sophisticated ToolsJULY 6, 2015
Diplomats have declined to provide details until Secretary of State John Kerry and his Iranian counterpart, Mohammad Javad Zarif, speak at that event. Mr. Obama is expected to make a public statement in Washington, beginning a long process to sell the deal to Congress and the American public.
But the Western diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was discussing confidential talks, signaled that all of the main outstanding issues had been resolved, including the thorny question of how many years an embargo on conventional arms shipments into and out of Iran would remain in place.

The agreement and its annexes run more than 80 pages, Iranian officials say, outlining in painstaking detail how much nuclear fuel Iran can keep in the country for the next 15 years; what kind of research and development it can perform on centrifuges and other nuclear equipment; and the redesign of both a nuclear reactor and a deep-underground enrichment site that Israeli and American officials feared could be invulnerable to bombing.

But to strike the deal, Mr. Kerry and the other negotiators had to accept an understanding that essentially left in place most of Iran’s infrastructure at the country’s main nuclear sites, though much of it would be disassembled and put in storage. Iran is likely to cite that fact as evidence that it never gave in to the West’s demands that it dismantle its critical facilities.

Secretary of State John Kerry with foreign ministers and other delegates from the United States' negotiating partners in Vienna on Monday. Credit Pool photo by Carlos Barria
The agreement not to shutter Iran’s most advanced nuclear facilities is expected to be a focal point for critics in Congress, which now has 60 days to approve or reject the deal. Those critics have already complained that the deal being discussed would only delay the day when Iran would have the ability to build an atomic weapon.

The accord will be a political agreement, not a legally binding treaty.

Some restrictions limiting Iran’s program begin to phase out after 10 years. Then, after 15 years, Iran would be free to produce as much enriched uranium as it wanted. In theory, though, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, to which Tehran is a signatory, would prevent it from taking the last steps to produce a weapon.
With the announcement of the accord, Mr. Obama has now made major strides toward fundamentally changing the American diplomatic relationships with three nations: Cuba, Iran and Myanmar. Of the three, Iran is the most strategically important, the only one with a nuclear program and still on the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Although some provisions, including the arms embargo, are expected to be especially contentious in Congress, Mr. Obama’s chances of ultimately prevailing are considered high. Even if the accord is v**ed down by one or both houses, he could veto that action, and he is likely to have the v**es he would need to prevail in an effort to override the veto. But he has told aides that for an accord as important as this one — which he hopes will usher in a virtual truce with a country that has been a major American adversary for 35 years — he wants to win a congressional endorsement.

Mr. Obama will also have to manage the breach with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and the leaders of Saudi Arabia and other Arab states who have warned against the deal, saying the relief of sanctions will ultimately empower the Iranians throughout the Middle East.

The announcement comes after years of sanctions and covert cyberattacks to disable Iran’s nuclear program, which Iranian leaders insist is only for peaceful purposes.

Mr. Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, then the secretary of state, began the effort to reach an agreement on the nuclear program by sending aides on secret missions starting in 2012 to meet Iranian diplomats and explore the opening of talks, enraging Israeli officials who had been left in the dark.

A preliminary accord struck in 2013 temporarily froze much of Iran’s program and rolled back the production of a kind of fuel that was closest to bomb grade. The ensuing negotiations have been repeatedly extended and became Mr. Kerry’s single biggest mission. Once-rare American encounters with Iranian diplomats became routine. Along the way, Mr. Kerry has spent more hours with Mr. Zarif than with any other foreign minister.
Between the economy/economic policy, healthcare, w... (show quote)




Your author is not only delusional, but a liar of omission.
The t***h shall set you free.....or not. Do you follow facts, or lock step with propaganda?

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259469/obamas-iran-nuke-deal-lies-joseph-klein
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 11:18:32   #
KHH1 wrote:
at least they are not some old vile azz nasty r****t phucks........


After several months of reading your many post (most Marxist influence), they reveal your extreme r****m and intolerance, devoid of deeper thinking and education beyond lower test score percentile.
Anti-christian, anti-constitution, anti-Israel, anti-conservative, anti-white, pro-obama, pro-demoralization of america via pro-gay, pro-a******n, pro-communisium.
And to think so many spilled their blood, giving you the freedom to vomit your beliefs on this forum, and unsuspecting students you cause brain damage in an attempt to propagate h**e-filled, r****t, intolerance as yourself.
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 11:10:49   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
For your edification: The Fed does not lend money to the federal gummint. The Treasury borrows money by auctioning treasuries to the private sector. The US gummint owes money only to the private sector. That debt is also the savings, the financial wealth of the private sector, including furriners.

The Fed may lend money to foreign gummints to provide liquidity in a crisis or for some other reason. That has nothing to do with US gummint debt.

The federal gummint has no need to borrow money for any reason. The Constitution gives Congress the right to spend without limit and without income - in effect, to manufacture money. However, Congress passed a law requiring the Treasury to borrow enough to cover the annual budget deficit by auctioning interest-bearing treasuries. This was done to offer a better investment than gold and prevent depletion of the gold supply under the former gold standard regime. We no longer have the gold standard and Congress should rescind that law but does not.

If Congress rescinded that law and the Treasury stopped the auctions, all deficit spending would be the same as printing money without debt.

Why can you not get that through your dense skull? Why do I have to keep making the same explanation again and again?
For your edification: The Fed does not lend money ... (show quote)



Problem is the fed is printing, and infusing trillions that is/was not backed by t-bills. Also the fed has for the last 5 years been buying back t-bills that China, Russia,
And other countries have been dumping frantically to the tune of around 23 trillion.....you ok with that Marvin
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 11:02:09   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Please be specific about the criminal acts of the Fed. Or is that the best you can do?


The link I provided did just that
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 02:57:00   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Yes, the Fed moved money around to guarantee liquidity everywhere during the Bush Meltdown. It was all legal and every cent was accounted for. And if they lost a trillion, so what. It could have been much worse.

The Bush Meltdown was the fault of Congress, which refuses to regulate banks or Wall Street The Fed cannot regulate liar loans.

You are aiming at the wrong target.



This had nothing to do with tarp, QE or any sanctioned act. This was outside criminal act and your mindless.

At first I thought these other guys where being hard on you, calling you mindless, or shut up......I just think your a troll.
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 02:47:36   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Pure NWO crap. Paranoid ravings. Farrakhan indeed!


http://pubrecord.org/nation/8622/pentagon-papers-wall-street/?mid=5354

Your delusional in the face of evidence. .
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 02:30:21   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
You have yet to state a single act of the Fed that's criminal or even problematic. All you have is prejudice, the repetition of BS you heard somewhere. You are a fact-free ignoramus.



This will make you sick....

http://pubrecord.org/nation/8622/pentagon-papers-wall-street/?mid=5354
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 02:26:03   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
You have yet to state a single act of the Fed that's criminal or even problematic. All you have is prejudice, the repetition of BS you heard somewhere. You are a fact-free ignoramus.


http://www.dailygrail.com/blogs/fahim-knight/2010/1/federal-reserve-criminal-cartel-which-world-silent-about
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 01:48:36   #
[quot e= J Anthony]The fatali st-theory. We've been hea ring it fo r hund reds of year s. Yes, I agree a cat.aclysm is coming, but there are reality-based solutions and ways to tack onle these problems.The question is, how will we handle it? Are we all supposed to drop to our knees and wait to be saved? Where's the personal responsibility in that?
The root-causes of our multiple crises are many things- spiritual, sociological, psychological. And no one is implying that all can be hunky - dory and love and roses anytime soon. But we can do better.
I'm not an atheist, but nor am I a fanatic. I'm not saying Danielle or you are, but there are some contradictions to what you espouse. Just how many gods do you believe exist?
You can insist all you like that the reason the world is in such a state is because everyone doesn't think or worship like you do. A more realistic take is that we've allowed the power - mad and sociopathic to lord over us. We've allowed society to be dictated by our baser instincts. Not very Christ-like. Jesus was about spreading as much peace, love and prosperity as humanly possible in the face of oppression and insurmountable odds.To have a problem with that is rather anti-Christian.[/quote]


First I believe in one God, the God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. Second, I believe we are to watch for the signs as Jesus instructed, while fully doing our very best for not only today but tomorrow as well.
What is undeniable is fulfilled prophecies, and not just a few general interpretations, but specific prophecies of the end of the church age. 3500 year old prophecies fulfilled or in the process of fulfilling in our generation. Clearly only the mentally ill would stop seeking the best for our nation, but at the same time reality rears her ugly head. Just reported by the BLS, 4th month of job losses, while 375,000 ended unemployment without finding employment. Reports of failing small businesses increasing, while new business start ups continue decreasing, a historic 7 year trend. It's not the 18 trillion in debt that bothers me, it is our government's and our banks unfunded liabilities that have combined, topped 200 trillion dollars...wow, two hundred trillion dollars.
Europe two weeks ago officially stated they have reentered into a recession, and heading far deeper than their last (WHICH never really ended). Greece v**ed NO on further austerity, which means no bail out and removing themselves from the European union, which will happen quickly and that action alone will put the EU in a full spiral. Which means what for American manufacturing? The (recent last few months) high dollar value against world currencies has severely slowed new orders which is building inventories, which will starve summer quarter reports netting huge job losses and a nervous stock market. The fact that America had been on a decline for over a decade and heading for a sharp decline as we have seen the last two quarters proving where we are headed, towards collapse. Russia, China, India, the UK and a few dozen smaller countries all dropping the petro dollar (u.s. world currency) and dumping the Fed's T-bills like a bad infection. .....which means what to the very near future of the value of the American dollar?
The vast of the Republican and democrat party have and are v****g for anti American agendas repeatedly, which favor the elite, largest banks, while destroying jobs, the middle class, and continue adding restrictions.
What efforts by the Democrat's or republicans are you aware of to add jobs other than government jobs the last 7 years? It's been 7 years and, all both parties have accomplished, has nothing to do with economic recovery, why? Why did obama direct over 3.5 trillion in QE to Wallstreet instead of mainstreet?

Conservatives are often accused of wanting the economy to fail by the liberals for the reasons of disputing reported economic data, claiming our leaders agenda is damaging the economy and as a result have turned a corner beyond repair. Very much the opposite is true, rather hearts are grieved and hopes of revealing the true state of the union, and the deceptions of the occupant of the Oval Office will Awake a sleeping portion of the American population to reconize how close the hour of collapse actually is and result in a call to action.
The majority of Americans have no idea how the ecomomy work's, and continue to support in lock step policies proven to fail. And most recently a decaying moral population, cheerleading the very things that have caused nations to fall historically.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 ... 672 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.