One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Landsharkxray
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4
May 2, 2013 10:42:14   #
May we all send them there soon. Semper Fidelis!
lana ward wrote:
May Saul Alinsky burn in hell for all of eternity!! May all of his followers burn in hell too :))
Go to
May 2, 2013 08:23:48   #
Thank you Oldroy. I read the OUTPOST article, my first look at Alinsky. And my first knowledge of Gramsci. Throws some illumination on the current assault on Christianity in the military. All hope is not lost until everyone surrenders. I take it as incumbent upon anyone who has this knowledge, and can express the use of these tactics by Obama and his "army", to share the wealth with everyone they can reach. Nothing destroys a lie as effectively as the t***h.
oldroy wrote:
This is off topic but I fear that we may have allowed Obama and crowd to to a bit too far and they may not be stoppable any more. Read this paragraph by a man who is from the MRFF and see who the worst extremist bigot around really is. Remember he is being asked to determine what soldiers can do about their religion and which ones should be court martialed.

Weinstein goes on:
If these fundamentalist Christian monsters of human degradation … and tyranny cannot broker or barter your acceptance of their putrid theology, then they crave for your universal silence in the face of their rapacious reign of theocratic terror. Indeed, they ceaselessly lust, ache, and pine for you to do absolutely nothing to thwart their oppression. Comply, my friends, and you become as monstrously savage as are they. I beg you, do not feed these hideous monsters with your stoic lethargy, callousness and neutrality. Do not lubricate the path of their r****m, bigotry, and prejudice. Doing so directly threatens the national security of our beautiful nation.

I just read this and can't see us ever managing to escape the evil we are being pounded with by secularists of all kinds. Throw in the Southern Poverty Law Center and it gets even worse.
This is off topic but I fear that we may have allo... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 30, 2013 18:11:44   #
BINGO!
oldroy wrote:
Ah yes, Obama is more of a f*****t than a c*******t but he does want to use the methods that Lenin and Stalin used in their dictatorship. Of course, you have heard of the part of all that that they used to establish their party in control in the beginning. That would be the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. They told the people that since people can't live in the real communal way that C*******m calls for they would have to be led along by that dictatorship till they learned to live that way. Over 70 years later the people decided that that was long enough and they still hadn't learned and the government certainly wasn't withering and dying as had been promised. Yep, Obama is a lot like this or his string pullers are.
Ah yes, Obama is more of a f*****t than a c*******... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 30, 2013 11:13:03   #
I can not agree that it is misleading. I can agree that a conversation needs to be held by the people to decide what powers they should allow the states to exercise in the administration of their duties to the people. Most states operate under the assumption that they are to be served by the people and claim to act for the people in all of their actions, when, in fact, they act more for the governments purposes. For a government to be of, by and for the people, rights may be defined, but must be indefinite. This is what is articulated within Article X, BofR.
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
Right. However within the body of the constitution the powers and rights of the federal government are explicitly defined, all powers and rights not thus explicitly granted are explicitly denied the federal government. Therefore the "clarification" of the Bill of Rights can be and is considered by certain parties as a "definition" of the rights "granted" to the people. You would agree that this is misleading?

One such party are certain members of the judiciary sitting upon the Supreme Court.
Right. However within the body of the constitution... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 30, 2013 09:14:42   #
Thanx for the tip. Discovered that after the first fault. Fixed it. Thanks again.
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It helps if readers know to whom your comments are directed. If you want to respond and click on "reply", no one can tell who you are responding to unless you indicate their handle in your response. OTOH, if you click on "quote reply", the other party is named and his comment is quoted for you to reply to. It enables everyone to follow the conversations, the responses, etc.
Go to
Apr 30, 2013 09:08:21   #
He is an enigma, isn't he? C*******m, if that is what it will be called, is not dead. Actually, I haven't observed that it ever lived in it's intended form, and I doubt that it would survive if it had. The nature of man to desire power over others is ancient and pervasive. Some are content to wield it over the few in subservience to a master or a master class. Some must be the master of all. That's how we got kings and dictators. Kings are immediate, and if they can fend off those who would be king. are all powerful. Dictators are more subtle in there conspiricies, as with Hitler. They gain power with deceit and time. If nothing else, Obama is a deceiver. And perhaps, a puppet.
toosmarttov**eGOP wrote:
I love the way you say, "Don't believe the propaganda concerning the end of c*******m." Are we supposed to believe yours instead? Y'know like, "The EVIL that is known as C*******m is taking over the entire world." Really? Where? Most former c*******t countries have abandoned the principle, not that many truly applied it accurately. They uniformly used it as a tool for the subjugation of the masses.

So, is Obama a Hitler or a C*******t? It's not like the two ever really got along, y'know. Is it because so many FRWNJs CALL him a Hitler? What has he accomplished, or even attempted to deserve the comparison? I prefer facts and sources. Oh, and the sources must be legitimate; no FRWNJ websites. I will call b.s. in such an event.

Lots of FRWNJs call him a dictator, so I guess that's where the "Hitler" analogy comes from, although he's accomplished nothing particularly dictatorial. If he had, we'd have universal healthcare (not the hyper-conservative authored "Obamacare"), we'd be out of Afghanistan, he'd've ended the drug war, cut the DOD budget in half and handed Dick Cheney over to The Hague. None of this has happened, has it? I usually catch at least SOME news daily, but I haven't heard of any of these events occurring.

So far as being a c*******t goes, he hasn't broken up the "too-big-to-fail" banks; they've only gotten bigger and more likely to fail. That's not what liberals wanted, that's what conservatives wanted. It's certainly antithetical to what c*******ts want. In fact, the Dow was at 7949 when he took office. Now it's over 14,000. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. If he's a C*******t, he REALLY sucks at it.

Now calling him a F*****T? That I can go with, although his level of f*****m is VASTLY overshadowed by the Retghuglicons and their owners: ALEC, USCOC, the Kochs, etc.
I love the way you say, "Don't believe the pr... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 30, 2013 08:22:54   #
You state that the Bill of Rights is unnecessary and misleading. Now I understand your difficulty comprehending the statements and arguments of other comments. The first ten Articles of Amendment were designed to clarify and protect the rights of the people and the states and to protect the people from both federal and state governments. The original body of the Constitution describes the duties and authorities of the federal government and the manner in which those serving in it shall arise to and maintain office. The selective prosecution of either, as we have experienced these past decades, leads , as it is, to tyranny.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.