One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Augustus Greatorex
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 129 next>>
Sep 19, 2014 17:31:03   #
Caboose wrote:
I ask you plain and clear if you was q***r and you did'nt answer
till now. Now you say God will get even with me. What world
do yu live on? I judged you to be homosexual because of your
idea that we are not allowed to judge. Most q***rs has that ideology.


I think your behavior is immoral, Caboose.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 17:27:45   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Interesting discussion. Some valid and some not. I've always found it funny that so many see g****l w*****g as a political issue. Some think its a h**x and others think its going to result in a dead earth is not halted. Both are wrong, of course. Warming is real although with great variance ( a key concept in understanding at he potential for changes) and man has increased the rate of change, that too is true but we probably can't reverse it. Another t***h. As far as vaariance is concerned, the current "cooling" trend was predicted back in the 80's and early 90's. I remember some saying that the short term cooling that was to come would make it difficult for many to believe that g****l w*****g was real and not a h**x. One other point that I haven't seen mentioned as I scanned (and possibly missed) the previous comments, the previous warmer times that have existed on earth came about over thousands of years. The current trend is hundreds of times faster than has been seen in the past. Thats a key point, changes over thousands of years allow for species to adapt, where as changes in hundreds of years, allow for less adaptation.
Interesting discussion. Some valid and some not. ... (show quote)


The t***h is we don't know. There are less active weather observation stations in the USA, today, than in 1950.

There are more active weather observation stations in Omaha, Nebraska than in the whole continent of Africa.

Our ability to know our national average climate has sharply declined in the last thirty years. We have less data input than we did in 1980. A huge issue within the climatology field is the unrecorded use of estimates concerning data at defunct weather observation centers.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 16:03:29   #
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
Actually and I'm surprised you don't see more about it in MSM but the possibility of large quantities of CH4 being released from melting arctic perma frost posses the greatest danger of increasing global tempuratures.


This is probably the reason:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2733719/Hundreds-methane-vents-Atlantic-Discovery-570-seepage-areas-stuns-scientists.html
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 15:42:03   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
No, mostly I agree (not sure about your last statement).

The 2nd amendment says:

A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

I'm going to go home and research my copy of the Anti-Federalist Papers, but my take on this is also one of State's Rights, as well as individual rights. Each state wanted to reserve to themselves the right to keep the peace, as you say, within that state.

The Constitution was a hard enough sell to those independent former colonies as it was--they wanted some assurance of being able to retain that a certain amount of that independence.

I think you agree with me, right?
No, mostly I agree (not sure about your last state... (show quote)


To a degree, I agree with you. But I think Skott's logic is entirely false, as his primary premise is false. He wishes to use a contemporary definition for m*****a, rather than a historically accurate understanding of m*****a.

More than a desire for independence, the various states wanted a guarantee that their right to self regulation would not be infringed.

The federal government drug interdiction program is a perfect example of infringement of the federal government in states' self regulation. Both in arming state police and in seizing private property, our federal government has encroached on the liberties of the various states. Especially when we consider, the federal government's refusal to prosecute states that violate federal drug laws.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 14:39:10   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
The way I see it, is that our founders understood the need for a state m*****a, but that being so, individual citizens needed a means of protecting themselves from this very m*****a--thus the second amendment.


You should research m*****as of the colonies. A m*****a is armed civilians, more in line with our police of today, who stopped robbers and attacks by people seeking to harm their community. They kept the peace of their community.

One of our problems is police are, now, government jobs, rather than private security provided to and by a community. Knowing the origins of "law enforcement" in our country is key to this particular issue.

And imbecilic contrary claims.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 13:21:42   #
Dummy Boy wrote:
But the earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level is constant, it's called standard temperature and pressure. It is more accurate to say that ocean (any body of water) will absorb or concentrate more gases in it from the air based on temperature swings since pressure changes are effectively insignificant compared to temperature changes.

...but you were addressing me, I didn't bother to read Ghostcotcha comments...

Yes, I am incompetent in the Psychology field, but I know crazy when I see it.
But the earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level ... (show quote)


You asked about soda pop which we both know involves increased pressure to infuse more CO2 into it than would normally dissolve in water.

I did address you, but tangentially in regards to Nickolai's assertion concerning calcium carbonate which I found "obtuse." I was hoping you would elucidate me on that issue.

Your comments are always informative. And you write thought provoking, entertaining comments.

I don't recognize crazy, but that may be a failure to observe in the first place. Or its the assumption that we're all crazy.

I only took high school chemistry, so I don't know as much about it as someone of your profession.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 12:39:37   #
tdsrnest wrote:
Well don't just make your ideology statements show us the facts. I know you can find a propaganda site that can twist the numbers so let's see it. Just looking for a fair debate. Try checking CBO reports on Republican job creation reports. Try looking at GAO reports or reliable agencies that track this stuff


New Hampshire, the red state on the East Coast, is the state that pays in the most dollars to the federal government per federal dollar received.

You have no interest in a "fair" debate.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 12:21:17   #
Dummy Boy wrote:
The oceans and any body of water absorb gases, Ever have Soda Pop? The carbon isn't created, carbon dioxide is created when one burns things or when I breath. The carbon dioxide already exists, is what I'm driving at so it's absorbed. You're barking up the wrong tree, I'm a Chem. Eng. and if you think you know what you're talking about-you don't.

Apparently, you've never worked with boilers, they are vented not only to stabilize the pressure, but to vent off gases, Nitrogen, CO2, even oxygen.

Even metals are heated or literally baked to remove hydrogen, which causes embrittlement. It's big problem because it can cause fasteners to fail if they aren't baked, so yea, H20 absorbs gases, salts (ionic compounds).

And my point was that the oceans are not acidic, they are basic or alkaline. That's why I provided the explanation about pH. Freshman chemistry: take a class.

The reduction in the shellfish population is due to overfishing not acidic oceans. They just love makin' s**t up to support unsupportable thinking. Confirmation bias is not your friend.
The oceans and any body of water absorb gases, Eve... (show quote)


ghostcotcha wrote:
BTW.. Probably not for the simple minded liberals who feel their way to their opinions and proposed solutions I write the following for the higher educated.

Henry's law can be put into mathematical terms (at constant temperature) as

p = k_{\mathrm{H}} c

where p is the partial pressure of the gaseous solute above the solution, c is the concentration of the dissolved gas and kH is a constant with the dimensions of pressure divided by concentration. The constant, known as the Henry's law constant, depends on the solute, the solvent and the temperature.

For those of you who are thinking around me in the above and wondering how you put all that C02 into a bottle of coke without exploding the bottle, and why the apparent volume in the bottle of coke would not be reduced once the C02 has out- gassed. Consider another gas law of physics -- Boyle's law. It explains how a gas volume is reduced proportional to the ambient pressure...
BTW.. Probably not for the simple minded liberals ... (show quote)


Is he, right?

Or are we in agreement that ghostcotcha is wrong?

May I suggest as a Chemical Engineer you avoid the intricacies of Psychology? As you obviously are incompetent in that field.

I just asked where the carbon comes from when boiling water to create CO2.

The answer is the CO2 is dissolved in the water. Ghostcotcha is mistaken that CO2 does not dissolve in water under 1 atmosphere pressure. But the quantity of CO2 dissolved in water can be increased, with increased pressure.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 11:52:23   #
Hartbreaker wrote:
And that is why you are not given the right to judge other people. Yes you can judge right and wrong but only based on the scriptures but you are not allowed to judge other people.

Matthew 7: 1-2 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

You judged me for a homosexual just because I disagreed with you. Well I am not nor have I even been tempted in that way. So you judged falsely and in that way you will be judged.
And that is why you are not given the right to jud... (show quote)


I would use the word "condemn," because of the multiple different meanings of the word "judge."

Talking about the punishment of a behavior is condemnation. Talking about the appropriateness of a person's behavior is a form of judgment.

I would argue the judgment of your homoerotic nature may or may not be true, but is not condemnation. While the judgment that atheists will burn in hell is condemnation.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 11:37:59   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Another i***t who wants to detect and stop a v***s at the border. Did they stop teaching biology in grammar school?


Ebola incubation approx. 2 weeks. T***smission through body fluids.

In Africa contaminated drinking water is a major t***smission factor as boiling and filtration alone cannot remove v***ses.

Personal hygiene another major factor bathing and washing hands are not normal behaviors among many Africans, so germs on hand go in the mouth, go to other people.

Rape. Which is considered a normal activity by many Africans. Gang rapes put all participants at risk of contracting Ebola.

These are just three things that we in America already practice that would limit the t***smission of this particular disease.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 10:52:46   #
DJRich wrote:
Actually, it is only ONE BIG LIE, but it affects to different conservative states.

The silly and goofy republican meme that they "h**e big government" and that the "liberals are takers" and "liberals don't work, just take handouts" is like all other conservative republican crap. Just a big lie, since it is easily proven that each of the conservative states listed in this article, take far more than they contribute. If it wasn't for the money from the "left-coasts" the "heartland" would be even more of a wasteland of greed and envy, low-wages, and depair than it is now.

And for the numerous nimrods who post conservative crap and tripe here daily, read the entire article, you just may learn something.



http://www.alternet.org/10-republican-red-states-mooch-coastal-liberal-states?paging=off¤t_page=1#bookmark
Actually, it is only ONE BIG LIE, but it affects t... (show quote)


What are the federal dollars to these states for?

Consider Alaska a large indigenous population that our government pays. Oklahoma has the same sort of federal payments. Are these included in federal dollars offsetting what those states pay in? Why, yes. Yes, they are.

Let's not get too upset about federal funds to those two states, even though they are sizable amounts. Unless, you wish to relocate those people?

Second which states pay in the most dollars compared to dollars received. As the article doesn't wind up comparing those states with these "welfare" states, I suspect both groups of states are "conservative."
Go to
Sep 18, 2014 18:15:23   #
http://wnd.com/2014/02/new-terror-compound-found-in-heart-of-texas/
Go to
Sep 18, 2014 18:01:09   #
Anigav6969 wrote:
You obviously didn't read the post I was replying to...I have no tolerance or understanding of bigotry, hatred and ignorance....I can't help you there


Oxymoronic.

9696vaginA:
"I have no tolerance for the intolerant, bigotry toward the bigot, hatred of h**ers, ignorance concerning the ignorant."
Go to
Sep 18, 2014 17:18:02   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
A labor union is a union of laborers intended to increase their bargaining power against the power of management to determine their wages and working conditions.

Will that do for starters?


How will your ERL protect against collective bargaining?
Go to
Sep 18, 2014 15:28:10   #
Caboose wrote:
The King of Kings and Lord of Lords utterly destroyed sodom and
Gommorah and all the perverts in them. Is he not a Christian ?


That is a very good question.

I would have to say, No. The God of the Christians is not a Christian.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 129 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.