Good, about time. If ones word isn't good enough a false god isn't going to make it better...
PeterS wrote:
Good, about time. If ones word isn't good enough a false god isn't going to make it better...
Spoken like an atheist...or liberal...or both. I say both.
JMHO wrote:
Spoken like an atheist...or liberal...or both. I say both.
Gosh, you finally rubbed those two brain cells of yours together and figured that out. Aint you the smart conservative--and I had that figured out long ago...
PeterS wrote:
Good, about time. If ones word isn't good enough a false god isn't going to make it better...
we need to open season on atheist and q***rs in this country.
PeterS wrote:
Good, about time. If ones word isn't good enough a false god isn't going to make it better...
When God roast you over the fires of hell you'll know hes not a false God then.
Thank you, for the information.
But I hardly perceive its relevance. I prefer honest men to men who agree with me. If a man doesn't believe in God, why should he ask for God's help?
As long as saying, "So help me God." is not disallowed, I see no problem
Caboose wrote:
When God roast you over the fires of hell you'll know hes not a false God then.
Yikes!! You just scared me into converting. PTL and pass the beans!
Caboose wrote:
we need to open season on atheist and q***rs in this country.
Go for it, no one is stopping you!
PeterS wrote:
Good, about time. If ones word isn't good enough a false god isn't going to make it better...
I am curious, what is the purpose of proselytizing to the Atheist?
Caboose wrote:
we need to open season on atheist and q***rs in this country.
Would anyone convict you being a Christian with that loving attitude?
Freedom From Religion Is In The First Amendment
Right Next To A******n And Same-Sex Marriage
I served with people who were t*****rs to their oaths, so I do not see the point in their having used the word "God" in the first place.
A sense of self-duty is necessary for any oath to hold any weight. I can appreciate the meaning of the word, while others will not adhere to the principles it should instill no matter if it is included or not.
The armed forces of our country, are letting down the values associated with their legitimacy by eliminating God from the oath; but why should this matter to them? It is a relative in the eyes of the "New World Order".
We who know through the now-becoming-obvious, probability of the bible's being correct, are not surprised, even though we may feel a sense of outrage. This is why America is failing: it is re-defining itself, to appease the whims of a group or groups of self-centered fools.
Psalms 14:1
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
In the end; God will be the prevalent factor. believers, rest easy: the non-believers are setting themselves up for
THE big fall!
Caboose wrote:
we need to open season on atheist and q***rs in this country.
Hopefully a season of Jesus...I will not condone the use of h**e. This remark is far from the lips of Christ. I never have seen Christ admonishing anything like your proposal :thumbdown: :cry:
Hartbreaker wrote:
Would anyone convict you being a Christian with that loving attitude?
The King of Kings and Lord of Lords utterly destroyed sodom and
Gommorah and all the perverts in them. Is he not a Christian ?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.