One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Olden McGroen
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 65 next>>
Sep 16, 2016 10:52:30   #
rufa charnetski wrote:
We have a system of "checks & balances" within our Gov't & the President has to have approval of Congress; besides, future President Trump will be arming himself with the most intelligent Cabinet and military/world-economic/PR advisors you've ever seen. Suffice it to say, the American people need not fear because we will be in good hands

========================================================================================

You don't pay too close attention do you? Obama, alone, has rendered the Congress null and void with his unconstitutional use of executive orders and by regulation. (And no, I'm not saying that EOs in themselves are unconstitutional, I'm saying the way he uses them are).

I don't think Trump will be President, but let's say he is the next president... Trump has demonstrated that he will do wh**ever he wants to get the end result he desires. He's done it his whole life. He won't let a little thing like Congressional approval stop him.

You people just don't get it. Hillary? Trump? Doesn't matter. They're the same. I don't give a damn about campaign promises and grandiose speeches. I look at the character and track record of an individual. Neither of these two should be within a thousand miles of the White House.
Go to
Sep 16, 2016 10:34:00   #
markinny wrote:
reagan was also a dem at one time. he aged and matured. became a conservative and won every state but one on his 2nd run.trump offers new business, real growth economically vs. welfare and more taxes. a true recipe for disaster.no growth or jobs from the dems. where does the money come from for hillary,s pipe dreams. go TRUMP!!!

========================================================================================

Cherry picking just a bit aren't you? Yes, Reagan was an FDR Democrat once, but he was espousing core conservative principles looooooong before he ran for president. Like for 30 years.

Trump, on the other hand, has been a New York Democrat (for the most part) his whole life...until he decided to run for President last year. However, regardless of the party he claims to be part of, the policies that he endorses or has laid out for his platform are socialist policies.

Your assertion that he's offering new business and real growth. HOW?

And, you claim that he's NOT advocating for WELFARE and MORE TAXES? Do you not read the news? He's on record during THIS campaign supporting government subsidized Health Care for all, Paid Leave for Mothers and Child Care. How's that NOT Socialism? And how is he going to pay for it? MORE TAXES!!!

You stupid Trumpsters don't even listen to what this numbnuts even says...or his daughter. All you hear is a couple of buzz phrases and you're good. "Make America Great Again". Your whole basis for v****g for this fraud is a damn bumper sticker slogan. Your no different than the Obama and Hillary v**ers. No difference. All of you are a bunch of stupid lemmings.
Go to
Sep 16, 2016 10:13:30   #
working class stiff wrote:
My biggest fear is that he is a loose cannon. The consequences of his improvised utterances could be catastrophic. Folks forget that he questioned the value of NATO. He's playing footsies with Putin."

========================================================================================

You know, you bring up some good points about Trump. There are too many for one post. However, you reminded me when you mentioned that "He's playing footsies with Putin", that as common knowledge would have it, Trump is FIRST and foremost focused on HIS interests. I think he's playing footsies with Putin because it's in his best business interests. And, I firmly believe that's his ONLY interest in running for POTUS...to further the interests of Trump Enterprises. I don't believe he actually wants to win. He just wants the publicity and access for Trump Enterprises. Basically, he's in it to promote and boost his brand...and help Hillary win.

He doesn't talk about core principles, the Founders, the Constitution, limited government or liberty. He doesn't talk about them because he doesn't know about those things. He doesn't know about those things because he doesn't care about those things. And neither do his sycophants. Trumpsters care nothing about policy, integrity, honor or any of those things I mentioned about Trump either. The only thing they care about is "winning". They define winning as defeating Hillary. I, however, care deeply about all of those things. And it's those things that will not permit me to v**e for Trump. Of course, I absolutely can't v**e for Hillary either. Therefore, and it's too early to call right now, but likely I'll write in a name. If only in symbolism, my v**e will be for the person that I believe represents my core principles.
Go to
Sep 15, 2016 15:55:18   #
kenjay wrote:
No it's a v**e for both made by someone that is to confused to make a choice.


I'm not confused, I'm disgusted. There is no "lesser of two evils" here. There are just two evils. I don't v**e for evil. My principles won't allow it. Trumpsters don't know what the concept of principle is, so I don't expect you to understand.
Go to
Sep 15, 2016 13:48:04   #
Ricko wrote:
Olden-ironically we have a system,r****d or not, in this country. Using that system , Trump beat 16 qualified individuals for the nomination. Your guy did not make the grade and now you find fault with the man who did. In the event you are not aware, the only other choice is Hillary who is a proven failure. Trump has never held political office so we do not know how he will do but we damn sure know all about Hillary. So your diatribe does not serve any useful purpose except to potentially enable you to say, "I told you so". Yes, Trump is a deal maker. In politics that is referred to as diplomacy. I prefer Trump dealing with Putin as opposed to warring with Putin. I must admit that Trump was not my first choice either, however, I will support the party nominee. You are free to v**e for whomever you choose be it Hillary or Gary. If you should v**e for Gary you need not fear ever being sent to Aleppo. Good Luck America !!!
Olden-ironically we have a system,r****d or not, i... (show quote)


========================================================================================
A lot of projection there Ricko. No, my guy didn't win, but there were certainly other very qualified desirable candidates that I would've gladly supported. No, I find fault with Trump for his record, his deeds and words and not because "my guy" didn't win.

You Trumpsters don't get it. You either have standards, principles and values or you don't. If you do, then you have a huge problem with Trump. If you don't, then you don't.

The fact is, you, nor anyone else know what Trump is going to do if he gets elected. You're gambling on a guy that has changed his positions on policy issues more often than he changes his socks and you have the nerve to rebuke me for not trusting the guy. We all know that Hillary is scum. Got it. But, apparently "we" didn't recognize that same quality in Trump when we had a chance to pick a quality candidate. It's too late now. You get what you deserve. I just don't like taking bitter medicine that I don't deserve.

As for the "party"...I don't give two s**ts about the Republican party or their nominee. I'm not a Republican. They jumped the shark years ago. My loyalty is not with any party. It's for this country and the US Constitution. Something neither major candidate in this race knows or cares a damn thing about. Therefore, since neither candidate represent or reflect my values and principles, I will not v**e for either. A v**e for neither is NOT a v**e for either, no matter how you Trumpsters spin your pretzel logic.
Go to
Sep 14, 2016 19:46:31   #
Tell me Trumpsters, how many liberal, I mean, "conservative" policies does Chump have to role out before you start to get a clue that you PICKED THE WRONG GUY?!!!! And not only picked him, but you vociferously defend him without an ounce of fact or integrity to back it up and even had the balls to declare him to be a conservative. Hahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!! Give me a fuckin' break already!

Let's tally a few of them policies up....Let's see, there was the interview on CBS back in October where he was advocating for a "single payer health-care system"...remember that? Oh yeah, that's "conservative" alright. Lately, he's had his daughter Ivanka give speeches advocating policies for government paid maternity leave AND child care!!! More "conservatism"? What else? Oh yeah, he's advocated nationalizing the banks. It just goes on and on and on.

But I'm not surprised. Why? BECAUSE HE'S A FUCKING LIBERAL YOU STUPID I***TS!!!! He's always been a liberal. And policy after policy stance, he's proving it. I tried for months to point this out in the primaries, but all of you dumbasses called me names and defended him because..."He's a successful businessman and not a politician"....or, "He tells it like it is"....or, "He's gonna make 'merica great again"....blah, blah, fuckin' blah.

Let me be clear...Hillary is a fraud and corrupt...and so is Trump. They're cut from the same cloth. We HAD a chance in the primaries to pick the right guy and there were several choices, but HELL NO!!! You dumbass Trumpsters weren't having it. You gobbled up every drop of his BS and you're still doing it.

Tell me the difference between Trump and Hillary again? I'll tell you. About 12 inches. That's about it.

Get ready to pay "your fair share" of taxes. Doesn't matter which one gets in office. Actually, if Hillary gets in, there will at least be some Republican opposition. If Trump gets in, there won't be much of any opposition...except from the usual statesmen like Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and a handful of others. If you think the establishment GOP will oppose him, you're even more gullible than I thought. Trump is a deal-maker. He'll play ball with anybody. Even Putin.

All I can say is...you better scratch that fuckin' Trump bumper sticker off your vehicle...and I'll leave it at that.
Go to
Aug 17, 2016 10:21:20   #
TRUMP MELTDOWN PREDICTED: I told you Trumpeteers over and over on OPP during the primaries that Trump doesn't want to be POTUS. Trump is a Democrat MOLE!!!! His only purpose for running was to blow up the Republican party, help Hillary get elected and boost his brand. The MSM didn't lay a glove on him during the primaries because they WANTED him to win the nomination. Why? Because they knew that Chump was the ONLY person that could guarantee Hillary the win in November. So they laid back...and waited...and now that he has the nomination, they're unleashing hell on him...AS I HAD PREDICTED BOLDLY MANY TIMES RIGHT HERE!!! And not only does the MSM have PLENTY of ammo to from his past to hit him with, he keeps on pouring gasoline on the fire as an added measure.

You Trumpeteers really need to take a step back...and really look at this guy objectively...of which, if you are a supporter of his...You've NEVER done that. Anybody with an ounce of intellect and integrity could NEVER v**e for Donald Trump. BUT YOU DID...BECAUSE YOU GOT BAMBOOZLED. Ted Cruz was and still is the right man for the job. It's not too late. You can still v**e Ted Cruz. Forget all the lies told about him by Trump and Carson and Rubio. ALL LIES. Cruz is an honorable man that has stood up against both the progressive Democrats and progressive (RINO) Republicans...he has literally fought in the Supreme Court for our constitutional rights. His whole life has been about honoring and defending the constitution. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
Go to
Aug 4, 2016 08:40:22   #
PeterS wrote:
Sources describe the campaign as an incompetent; a backstabbing skeleton crew without any coherent message. And Donald Trump is making it worse leading to what staff they have to refer to the campaign as "Crazy Town." Trump, still hasn't made the t***sition from primary to national campaign and the fact that he is fumbling from one crisis to another doesn't lend well that he will ever make the t***sition. Trump is out of his depth and struggling to get out of debates where Hillary will just wax him on policy. His latest excuse is that the NFL informed him that two of the debates are in conflict with games even though the NFL said they never informed Trump of anything. So now, instead of moving on and talking policy Trump and his staff are once again trying to explain his unnecessary lies.

All of this of course is just bringing grins to the Clinton campaign who are sitting back and watching as Trump goes from one crisis to another. To use a baseball vernacular, Trump is being pitched slow balls, striking out, and having to explain his incompetence to his staff and others. It's not boding well for Trump and his staff appears to be at their wits end...

The question now, if Trump is just mailing it in and he needs to be replaced who will he be replaced with? Pence maybe but now the RNC is in the tough spot of trying to figure it out...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/on-the-trump-meltdown-1470179761
Sources describe the campaign as an incompetent; a... (show quote)



NICE GOING AMERICA!!! You had a chance of posting up a real Constitutional candidate on the Right and an avowed Socialist candidate on the Left and the opportunity for an epic debate between the principles of Original Intent vs Marxism. It would've been on display for the whole country (and the whole world) to see and decide which way it wanted to go. But NO, you chose two lying, corrupt and arrogant ass-clowns as your nominees. Makes me want to pimp slap the s**t out of anyone I see driving around with either candidates' bumper sticker on their car. Good friggin' golly!!!! We've been dumbed down into a bunch of stupid i***ts that can't make a simple and obvious discernment about two vial individuals. Forgive us God. Please have mercy on those of us that tried to do the right thing.
Go to
Aug 4, 2016 07:45:37   #
DJRich wrote:
It is obvious to all but the dumbest and lowest intellects in the country. tRump is NUTS, and is doing wh**ever it takes to lose the e******n, just so he can cry that the "e******n is r****d" and that he "wasn't treated fairly".

Well that is OK with Hillary and the dems, since more big name republicans are dumping tRump and now even republican congress critters are running away from tRump and his lunacy.

Apparently, the i***ts on OPP will be the last to realize the crap they have been slurping from tRump is just that, CRAP


http://nypost.com/2016/08/03/trump-getting-nuttier-and-nuttier-campaign-insiders-say/
It is obvious to all but the dumbest and lowest in... (show quote)


Sadly, I find myself in agreement with you. Of course, by your standards, and any rational thinking individual, anyone that would support Hillary is equally delusional.

I predicted this "meltdown" of a candidacy by Trump 4-6 months ago...right here on OPP. Of course, as always, I was eviscerated by the Trumpsters. My theory (then and now) was that Trump is a Democrat mole (likely paid by Bill Clinton and his supporters) sent to flip the Republican Party on its head by getting the Republican nomination (or splitting the Party) by hook or crook and then PURPOSELY derailing his own campaign in the general against Hillary, or at the very least, disenfranchise the Republican Party to point of splintering it into several factions, again to aide Hillary's victory to the White House. I said then, that the MSM would hold back their fury on Trump until after he got the nomination...and then both he and the press would sink his ship. And now, we're watching it happen in prime time.

Mind you, I'm not the originator of this theory, so I'm not taking credit for it. I just simply looked at Trump, saw that no one in their right mind could take this clown seriously...coupled with the fact that Hillary is the worst candidate anyone could dream of posting up for e******n...therefore, she needs a LOT of help...and the ONLY person that could match her baggage and unfavorability is Donald Trump. And, the power brokers putting this all together have banked on the majority of the American e*****rate (in both camps) as being a bunch of complete morons and electing these two ass-clowns as the nominees in both parties.

It's like I'm living in a horrible SNL sketch. We are headed for absolute total destruction. We're begging for it!!! And we'll get it. tick tick tick tick tick tick.....
Go to
Aug 2, 2016 09:44:31   #
Loki wrote:
Prove your own point. Show me a gun, or a knife or for that matter, a length of steel pipe that just got up and k**led someone. I dare ya.
According to the BATFE, the average gun recovered from a criminal is several years old and stolen. About all registration would do is establish whom it was stolen from, not prevent any sort of crime.
The vast majority of gun crimes are gang and drug related. Your reaction to gun crime is to punish people who don't and won't commit crimes. That is like revoking the drivers licenses of non-drinkers to stop drunk driving.
The FACT is that Eric Holder, former AG, said that any gun control with no provision for bans and outright confiscation would be useless.


YOUR mission, should you decide to accept it, is to find one instance of a country implementing a national registry that did not later lead to some sort of confiscation or ban.
Prove your own point. Show me a gun, or a knife or... (show quote)


I've been on hiatus from OPP for several months. After the fiasco that was the Republican primaries, I had to take a break...a long break.

Today, I decided to check in and check the pulse on OPP. Didn't take long to find ignorance and stupidity displayed for all the masses to enjoy. This is the first thread I came to. And, as always, your retort to this self-righteous moron is spot on.
Go to
Apr 26, 2016 10:44:17   #
With all of this nonsense about non-g****r specific restroom practices as displayed with the Target fiasco, I can't help but think..."What's really going on here?"

"They" constantly have us arguing amongst ourselves on issues in order to keep us distracted from what they're really up to. Today, it's restroom access, Trump, B*M, i*****l i*********n, gay marriage, Hillary's guilt/innocence, islamophobia, safe zones on campus, socialism and "free stuff", religion and on and on and on.

It seems they never run out of topics for "We The People" to be divided on. We're constantly being pitted one against the other: Right v Left, Rich v Poor, Black v White, Man v Woman, Religious v non-religious, gay v straight, etc, etc. The Titanic is sinking and we're all arguing over what china to put on the table in the dining room.

Here's an example of what they do: Housing bubble of 2007-08. Lenders put out risky loans to people that could ill-afford them in the first place...in large part, because the government forced them to. Thanks Bill. And, in spite of warnings from Congress, they kept on until the bubble burst. And what was the solution? TARP and later, Stimulus package. Both were to the tune of about $1 trillion each. They created the problem and then after much gnashing of teeth, came up with the "solution" to save our economy. Brilliant. We're so easily manipulated.
Go to
Apr 26, 2016 10:08:39   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
A tribute to some of our friends on the white who periodically display flashes of genius. Ala Dr. Ben Carson Bon Petit!

Let's go back to back Carson, and this one really is outrageously stupid:

Talking about i*****l i*******ts:

"Anyone caught involved in v***r f***d should be immediately deported and have his citizenship revoked."

Do I need to point out how stupid this is?

If they're not citizens they cannot v**e, that's No. 1, and that's too obvious and if they're i*****l i*******ts they don't have citizenship by the definition of i*****l i*******t

Is this guy really a moron? Had enough? http://rateyourmusic.com/list/Sluggo714/the_gop_has_all_the_smart_ones__quotes_from_right_wing_nutjobs_and_american_f*****ts/Enjoy LOL
A tribute to some of our friends on the white who ... (show quote)
=====================================================================================================================================

I think you're missing the meaning and context of "v***r f***d". By definition, if someone who is legally ineligible to v**e, manages to s**m the system and v**e anyway, then I'd call that v***r f***d. Don't get me wrong, while Ben is a smart guy when it comes to medicine, he's not so savvy when it comes to politics. I think he should stick with what he knows.
Go to
Apr 21, 2016 15:11:48   #
Singularity wrote:
"If you're so near-sighted that you can't comprehend the danger of men being allowed access to women's restrooms then I can't help you."

What you don't understand is that FTM t*********rs often look like cis men... Hairy, musclar, androgenized whether or not they have had surgery to add a penis.
Your solution requires them to use the woman's restroom. So either way, we will have persons who are or appear to be full cis males going in the women's room.

Before all this hullaballoo, t***s people used the restroom that they outwardly appeared to require and were able to use the stalls with doors to attend to business without advertising their "packages." Showering might be a little trickier, but I have girl cousins who are so modest, they shower at school, with other female classmates WITH A TOWEL AROUND THEIR TORSOS!

So, reviewing, whichever way the law goes we will have some t***s people whose outward appearance suggests one g****r while their g*****lia belong to another g****r so we will have:

MTF t***ssexuals who look like a gorgeous cis woman but have a penis. Like Caitlyn Jenner. Will they have to pee in the boys room? Shower with your cis sons? That is what you are asking for. So when the boys get boners will that mean they are q***r?

FTM t***sexuals who look like Adonis, but have not had surgically changes made, you would require to use the women's room. Giving the appearance of ...GASP... men in the ladies room!

NO MATTER WHAT RULE YOU MAKE, THERE ARE FOUR TYPES OF PERSONS TO ACCOMODATE IN A BINARY BATHROOM/PRIVACY/ SAFETY SITUATION.

Your new suggestion does NOT WORK the way you imagine it will.

I AM NOT ARGUING THE RIGHT OR WRONG OF ANYONE HAVING A MODESTY OR PRIVACY OR SAFETY ISSUE. I AM SAYING IT IS A PERSONAL PROBLEM AND THE AVAILABILTY OF SINGLE OCCUPANCY OPTIONS FIXES EVERYONES PROBLEM.

It is not a liberal/conservative ISSUE. It is a practical problem that is solved, fairly and totally effectively, for everyone involved by the availability of single occupancy rooms.

Again, your solution still produces the exact scenario which you say is problematic, (Full grown, apparant MEN in little girls bathrooms) while increasing the danger to vulnerable t***ssexuals.

Single occupancy, (or in my opinion, private stalls in multiple use restroom and shower facilities to provide privacy for the g*****lia) fixes the problem for all.
"If you're so near-sighted that you can't com... (show quote)
===================================================================================================================

Let me get this straight....

T******s have always used the restroom to where they blend in the best, right? MTF t******s use the stall in the men's room. No problem.

This has been working just fine. It's a win-win for everybody. Don't ask, don't tell. Go in the stall in either restroom, do your business and we're all good here. And if there's a single-occupancy restroom available, use it for your convenience.

But NO, that's not good enough. Now, they insist on using the restroom of which they choose to identify themselves (even though nature, the hospital/birth certificate, God and 20-20 vision do not)...and by doing so, inconvenience EVERYBODY ELSE. Everybody else is about 99.9% of the population.

The point is, it's not about them. It's certainly not ALL about them. It's about the consequences of such a policy. It's the tail wagging the dog. No, it's the flea wagging the tail wagging the dog.

What YOU don't get is that women and girls are going to be scared to go into public restrooms if men are allowed in there. The new rule says that anyone who self-identifies as being the opposite sex can go to the restroom of their choice. Key words here are ANYONE WHO SELF-IDENTIFIES. That means any guy can go anywhere he wants without anyone stopping him. And after awhile, no one will even notice him going into the women's restroom...of which will make it easy for a pervert to prey on the innocent.

While single occupancy may solve the problem in some isolated cases, it creates another. And that problem is the long lines to the one single-occupancy restroom due to the fear that some pervert will be in the women's room. Happy now?

My solution: If my wife and/or daughter go into the restroom...I'm going with them to check stalls first, then stand at the door. All I have to do is claim that I identify as a woman and the world is my oyster.

I mean, why not. We have a white woman in black face claiming to identify as a black woman while sitting as the leader of an NAACP chapter out west. Everybody's fine with it.

We have Elizabeth Warren claiming to be an Indian when she's blonde and pale as alabaster. Everybody's fine with it.

We have Donald Trump claiming to be a conservative and a serious candidate for the POTUS. Everybody's fine with it.

In this progressive liberal fantasy world of make-believe, we can be wh**ever we claim to be!!!
Go to
Apr 21, 2016 10:18:04   #
Singularity wrote:
If you shat a golden turd every morning, I bet you would complain that you should be able to s**t twice daily and it should be comfy, dammit!
==================================================================================================================

Myopic and obtuse is no way to go through life dear.

If you're so near-sighted that you can't comprehend the danger of men being allowed access to women's restrooms then I can't help you. I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

You're so defensive of the t****y that you don't see the danger of predators claiming to be t******s in order to gain access.

You're not seeing that the male-to-female t****y will NOW be using the women's restroom. Depending on the area, the "once male-now female" t****y will not be in a restroom with other men that want to beat them up...they'll now be in the women's restroom. Most women don't beat people up. Again, depending on the area you're in. Use caution and common sense if you have any. Therefore, the danger to the t****y is negligible.

Female-to-male t******s will now be using the men's restroom. Men aren't going to be threatened by this in any way, so the danger to the t****y is again, negligible.

NO, the real danger will be to the women and girls who will be subject to some men masquerading as a t****y to gain access.

If you can't understand this simple concept then I recommend some remedial biology and human behavioral courses.

Liberals want to be judged by their good intentions and not their inevitable horrid results.
Go to
Apr 19, 2016 18:22:22   #
Singularity wrote:
On THIS thread, the topic is the SOLUTION, availability of single occupancy bathrooms for EITHER, t******s who are uncertain where they are welcome or safe, AND/OR ANYONE ELSE who feels uncomfortable or unsafe with sharing.

This solution, not SPECIAL but available to everyone, solves the real and imagined problems anyone has about the issue.

I can't understand why you are pissed about the SOLUTION to your stated problem.
=========================================================

Let's look at this in the original context:

“I also ask that none of us practice g****r policing, where we attempt to restrict someone from using the same restroom we are using or make them feel uncomfortable for doing so,” Mea said. “If you feel uncomfortable sharing a restroom, then the single-occupancy restrooms will now be available to you.” - Bill Mea, acting President at Cooper Union (college).

In this context, Billy is stating that if straight people are uncomfortable with going to the restroom with t******s, then they can go to the single-occupancy restroom. He puts the onus on the majority (women/girls), not the t****y minority that created the problem in the first place. The t****y created the problem and now everyone has to be put out and scolded not to be judgmental about it.

It's the principle, not the solution to a problem that the t******s willfully created, that matters.

You Lefties are all alike. You all create problems and then want the public to bail you out of it. Whether it's gov't subsidies for a******ns, contraceptives, food, housing, you name it. You create a problem and then expect society to pay for it in some way. Personal responsibility is not on your radar. Not a concept that you can grasp. And that's the difference between Left and Right. The Left wants to remain little helpless juveniles in a magical Peter Pan fantasy world. The Right are the grown-ups in the room that are always having to say "no".

SOLUTION: 1. APPLY TOURNIQUET TO BLEEDING HEART, 2. USE BRAIN FOR SOMETHING OTHER THAN A HAT RACK 3. REPEAT
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 65 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.