One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: oldladyfromwaco
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 next>>
May 6, 2014 10:51:08   #
Blue Flu wrote:
Here is the connection to a YouTube video which received over 200,000 hits. My experience tells me that when someone is making a damning about someone that also incriminates himself that he/she is being t***hful.
This too is probably the explanation about how Obama was able to finance his attending 2 Ivy League schools.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lrf8DbrJH0


Just looked at the beginning of the video.
I am not concerned about Obama...could care less, but hope he is impeached while realizing it's an impossibility with the house and senate as they are.

My concern is with history, and what I wrote is true. Research it. If you look at my posts, you will see that I never accuse anyone of something in any rash manner....except perhaps calling Brian Devon either an i***t or a fool after about 20 pointless conversations....

I read years ago that the Rockefellers had picked O up, g***med him, and laid the plans for his presidency. He has certainly served them well.

In addition, I support NEITHER party, as they are both bought and paid for, and do not represent the people. I, personally and frankly, think they ALL stink and should be thrown to the wolves.
Go to
May 6, 2014 10:44:22   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
No. "Spirituality" is something no one can observe, as thus no one can prove you a liar.

"Pure religion" no one needs to claim, as all who observe can verify.


Gussy....Not ever great...and never will be...
Go crawl in your hole and pull it in after you.....since you live in a world where free speech and expression is NOT allowed....only YOUR skewed opinion........which is just what YOU want it to be.
Go to
May 6, 2014 08:06:02   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
But your two named choices ARE the "status quo", on steroids.


At least, they are not from the usual "runnings"....
Go to
May 6, 2014 08:04:40   #
Blue Flu wrote:
I'm a conservative.
Bush two is a war criminal who should be put on trial.
BTW, Bush 2 was about as conservative as Barney Frank.


I agree with you about Bush.
Are you aware of the comment by his father to his secretary to the effect that if the US public knew what that family had done to this nation, they'd be drug through the steets and hanged?
Did you know Bush's grandfather sold coal to the N**is during WWII....and had a European bank that laundered money for them?
Go to
May 6, 2014 08:00:40   #
kmikale wrote:
That's terrible that a "private" Baptist University would try to (how did Neal put it, oh yeah) indoctrinate those students like that! If I were those kid's parents, I'd yank them out of there pronto & send them to someplace like Virginia Tech where they could get some real "Lead for the Head".

Not that religious beliefs haven't been the source of some real barbarism over the centuries, to say that it's the source for the world's evils is a quite a stretch. Stalin, Mao & Hitler needed no "God excuse" to commit some of the most horrific examples of genocide against their countrymen in the twentieth century!

Regarding the Holocaust, here's an interesting tidbit for you:

“Darwinism by itself did not produce the Holocaust, but without Darwinism... neither Hitler nor his N**i followers would have had the necessary scientific underpinnings to convince themselves and their collaborators that one of the worlds greatest atrocities was really morally praiseworthy.”
&#8213; Richard Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and R****m in Germany

Actually, I personally believe that organized religion is mostly, well religion, not pure religion either.

"Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." James 1:27

Can you comprehend this?
That's terrible that a "private" Baptist... (show quote)


It appears to me that your concept of "pure religion" is what I call spirituality. And, that is what I practice...all of the time. That's how I live....just ask all of the people I have helped over the last 35 years....and there are many.
You may have a concept of your belief of religion, but you have NO idea what it is like at Baylor. And, I can assure you, you would probably feel as I do....if you have been there.
It is amazing to see youth, highly intelligent, young people "afraid of their own shadows", so to speak.....afraid to voice any opinion other than that prescribed....
You talk about "shunning"....Baylor's got it down. Hypocrisy? Top of the list....if they got rid of all the gays and lesbians, it would take a good percentage of their numbers across the board.
I have been off and on this site several times. And, I won't argue with you over YOUR beliefs....so please have the humanity and consideration to respect mine....especially since we appear to be "respecting" the same thing, though using different syntax.
If you know, have experienced, of what you speak, that's fine. Unless you have been to Baylor, or experienced life living across the street from a hard-shell Baptist church as a child 68 years ago, don't equate your experiences with mine.
I hope you have a good day.....but let me add that there was much more to WWII than you obviously see...and to its occurrence and the persecution of the Jews. Why don't you begin some research on the continued persecution of that race, why it occurs, and then, look up the Rothschild dynasty and The Crown, a 640 city within the city of London. Then, look up Menachem Begin's statements about "the master race". Particularly, look that up.
If you can do that, it might give you another view on "Darwinism".
Go to
May 6, 2014 07:44:43   #
petertimber wrote:
The USA has too many problems that require special attention and lots of $$$$ which other areas of the nation do not wish to be concerned with nor spend any money. It used to be where Congress would fill this need but they are all so busy cavorting with lobbyists (in Ancient Rome they were called "clients").The USA should be divided into 4/5 regional sections NE,SE,SW,NW and/or Alaska with a regional President while the National President presides taking care of foreign affairs, defense,post office, customs leaving immigration and immigration controls to each region. This would make the border regions responsible to maintain control of their borders since that is meaningful to them. All the other regions can deal with i*****l a***ns as they see fit since their impact is meaningful for that region.
The USA has too many problems that require specia... (show quote)


Ah...Peter, don't you know that that is already planned...already in the works...and comin' down the pike?

The "powers that be" put that out several decades ago, and I'm sure, with their goals of globalization and world domination, this will come to fruition as have all their other devious endeavors.

For me? I like the US just like its, MY country....and I WANT IT BACK!
Go to
May 5, 2014 16:10:03   #
LAPhil wrote:
That's exactly why I never put Texas down.


Thank you. That is appreciated. Have a good one.
Go to
May 5, 2014 16:09:08   #
Neal wrote:
Good Gracious, waco!! Someone who insists on thinking for themselves!! Congratulations :!: :!:

The sad t***h is that so many kids get irretrievably indoctrinated by parental religious beliefs that are presented as fact - not belief.


It is disheartening to see the number of Baylor students who are frightened to death to even listen to anything other than what is "sanctioned". Religion is the bane of the world....and, people still protect the one cause of most wars resulting in millions of deaths over the history of time. I will never comprehend it.
Go to
May 5, 2014 16:03:48   #
LAPhil wrote:
No harm, no foul. I guess I'm just getting a little tired of seeing the same posts over and over again about how we should give California back to Mexico. You can laugh it off for a while, but it eventually does tend to wear a little thin. I really do have a sense of humor about myself though.


I feel that, of all the states, yours and mine get the most criticism. Or, could it be a little bit of jealousy? Like I tell 'em....the whole country's moving here....so there's got to be something good about it.
Go to
May 5, 2014 16:01:42   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
So you would v**e for an avowed, and admittedly Socialist, Sanders, and as yet, not an admitted Socialist, Warren? Why not change your party affiliation from Republican to Rinocrat? Quit deluding yourself, and trying to convince others of your bona fides in the non l*****t arena.


I'll v**e for ANYONE other than the status quo.

There is no other choice....other than to NOT v**e.
Go to
May 5, 2014 13:41:51   #
LAPhil wrote:
I have never said ANYTHING disparaging about Texas.


Did you notice I put "LOL".....as simply something to laugh about....much needed these days....not derogatory to you, but for ALL the others who tease. Please forgive me.
Used to live in NM...and they H**ED Texans. Almost take it as most do.
Go to
May 5, 2014 13:12:39   #
LAPhil wrote:
Would you give us Californians a break already? We're not all like that. Some of us may be turn out to be your best allies in the war against liberalism. There's Old Gringo, B****sheep, and me for starters.


LOL...Yes...when ALL of you give us Texans a break, too.
Go to
May 5, 2014 10:51:49   #
astrolite wrote:
Probably not soon enough to save us from Hillary! The CDC estimated the infection started in Taos! If the whole coastal part of Cali breaks off.....could they be annexed by Japan?


I'm sure Japan doesn't want them either. Let's just let them float around until they sink under the weight of their own self-importance.
Go to
May 5, 2014 10:44:53   #
jay-are wrote:
What would Warren do that would be great? I don't really know what she wants America to look like?


I do NOT agree with all her views, to say the least, but this is her "platform". I just believe we need someone other than a rehashing rerun of the present political dynasties. Don't believe it will bring much change......but, LOL, I can always hope......and I sure as heck am not going to v**e for any of the other "candidates".....ya know....the devil or the deep blue sea choices.
Might v**e for Paul....or might just not v**e at all....since it really doesn't matter who we v**e for....it's all the same, and it's only gonna get worse. Now, how's that as a starter for your Monday morning? Depressing? I feel the same......considering the course of our country.

Was watching a news program the other night, don't remember which one, in which they explained that if Rand Paul got enough strength to get the Rep. nomination, the big money donors would flee to Hilary....or, as an open option...Warren.

I'm glad I'm 71....and won't be around to see the next century.

The following came from her site:

Afghanistan[edit]

Warren opposes continuing the war in Afghanistan and supports withdrawing U.S. troops home before the 2014 deadline.[2]

Israel[edit]

Warren supports a secure and democratic state of Israel and wants to ensure the security of Israel from external forces such as Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and others. Warren states she supports a two state solution, however believes Palestinian application for membership in the UN isn't helpful and would veto a membership application to the UN.[3]

Iran[edit]

Warren has stated that Iran is a "significant threat" to the United States and our allies. She strongly supports sanctions against Iran.[3]

Terrorism[edit]

Warren said America's number 1 responsibility is to protect Americans from terrorism. She says it's not a good idea to strip homegrown terrorists of their citizenship.[4]

Domestic policy[edit]

A******n[edit]

She is pro-choice and opposes any Supreme Court nominees who oppose a******n.[5]

Defense spending[edit]

Warren supports defense spending cuts. She has suggested reducing the size of the standing army to reduce deficit.[6]

DREAM Act[edit]

Warren supports the passage of the DREAM Act and comprehensive immigration reform.[7]

Gun control[edit]

Warren supports reinstating an extended magazine long rifle weapons ban as well as more rigorous background screenings, including for people who purchase firearms at gun shows, and she opposes limits on the sharing of firearms trace information.[8]

Healthcare[edit]

Warren supports the Affordable Care Act and opposed repealing it.

In the 2008 book, Health at Risk, in the chapter Get Sick, Go Broke, Warren and Deborah Thorne wrote that “We approach the health care debates from a single perspective: maintaining the financial stability of families confronting illness or injury. The most obvious solution would be universal single-payer health care.”[9]

Marijuana[edit]

Warren has expressed support for medical marijuana.[10] Though she is against legalization for recreational use.

L**T rights[edit]

She supports same-sex marriage, repealing DOMA, and passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).[11]

Occupy movement[edit]

Warren claims to have "created much of the intellectual foundation" for Occupy movement.[12]

Structure of government[edit]

Campaign reform[edit]

Warren opposed the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court Citizens United v. Federal E******n Commission and supports the DISCLOSE Act which would limit the 2010 Supreme Court ruling.[13]

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau[edit]

Warren was an early advocate for the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The bureau was established by the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law by President Obama in July 2010. In anticipation of the agency's formal opening, for the first year after the bill's signing, Warren worked on implementation of the bureau as a special assistant to the president. While liberal groups and consumer advocacy groups pushed for Obama to nominate Warren as the agency's permanent director, Warren was strongly opposed by financial institutions and by Republican members of Congress who believed Warren would be an overly zealous regulator.[14][15][16] Reportedly convinced that Warren could not win Senate confirmation as the bureau's first director,[17] Obama turned to former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray and in January 2012, over the objections of Republican Senators, appointed Cordray to the post in a "recess appointment".[18][19]

TARP oversight[edit]

On November 14, 2008, Warren was appointed by United States Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to chair the five-member Congressional Oversight Panel created to oversee the implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.[20] The Panel released monthly oversight reports that evaluated the government bailout and related programs.[21] During Warren's tenure, these reports covered foreclosure mitigation, consumer and small business lending, commercial real estate, AIG, bank stress tests, the impact of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) on the financial markets, government guarantees, the automotive industry, and other topics.[a]

Taxes[edit]

Warren supports the Buffett Rule, which would restore the Clinton tax rates on the top income bracket.[22]
Go to
May 5, 2014 10:19:45   #
BoJester wrote:
President Obama should be impeached for lying about being a Democratic president with liberal ideals.

The half-white christian Obama has been acting like a republican for the past 5 years.

Bad enough he was raised as a christian(Baptist, Unitarian) by his white grand-parents, went to Harvard, became a lawyer, and is loved by the rich on Wall Street, he also plays golf and takes vacations, like all rich republicans in leadership positions.

Some examples of Obama's republican credentials

Gitmo is still open following the Bush 2 policy

Drone attacks '' '' Bush 2 policy

Auto company bailouts '' '' Bush 2 policy

Lower taxes '' '' Reagan, Bush 2

Increase fees/taxes '' '' Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2

Immigration Reform '' '' Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2

War in Middle East '' '' Bush 1, Bush 2

Deaths in Middle East '' '' Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2

Solyndra '' '' Bush 2

Bio-fuel law '' '' Bush 2

Increase national debt '' '' Reagan, Bush1, Bush 2

Patriot Act/NSA " " Bush 2

Healtcare reforms " " Reagan, Bush 2, Romney,
Heritage foundation


No wonder the country continues to perform sluggishly.
The policies of the previous republican presidents are the policies of failure and the half-white christian Obama should either renounce them or be impeached.

Why do republicans and fox h**e him? He is one of them.

It is time for a real change, like either Senator Elizabeth Warren or Senator Bernie Sanders
President Obama should be impeached for lying abou... (show quote)


I WOULD GLADLY V**E FOR EITHER OF THEM!

Sanders is getting up in years....so why not him as pres...with her as vice to take over....continuing to bring sanity to the following e******ns....could be up to 16 years of sanity for the US. Could the US stand that? I, for one, would love it!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.