...the House starts passing laws on meaningful immigration reform, protecting and extending women's rights, expanding student loan programs, etc. in other words, reaching out to Hispanics, women and young people. The math does not support any other take. And if you never win the Presidency, you will soon lose the Supreme Court and all those rulings you cherish will be overturned by Democratic-appointed 50-year olds that are clones of Sotomayor. Do you realize this? There is no workable coalition right now for the GOP to capture the White House. And that is in part because the far right controls the primaries. Do you get this?

All you can do is "play defense" with the House. Until 2020 when the Dems will control redistricting and you lose the a House forever.

Do you understand this?

Are you saying that the protesters in Ferguson continually calling for justice are the ones who define the word? Did the Governor really define it when he said they needed to have justice and it would take vigorous prosecution to get justice? I think that Nixon has realized that he put his foot in his mouth when he made those statements from what he read from his teleprompter. Vigorous prosecution? He meant that for that Grand Jury he wanted to declare Wilson guilty of murder.

I would call justice letting Wilson's eye socket recover before they go after him.

Yup, and you have to take your shoes off to count all of them. I think that the State corruption should be handled by the people in the State. Much easier than wrestling with the Fed. The problem with forming groups to attack these problems is that the groups themselves become corrupted.

Ex. MADD

Mothers Against Drunk Driving was formed by a woman who lost her family to a drunk driving a three thousand lb. wrecking ball.
The aim and initial outcome was to lobby the State Legislature to toughen the drunk driving Laws.
After the initial few years the founder quit the organization because it had morphed into a prohibitionist movement!

It's absolutely true. This pretty much proves where the smartest people in the country live.
Missouri !!


Missouri has no illegal's; go figure...shouldn't the other states do the same?

Missouri's approach to the problem of i*****l i*********n appears to be more advanced, sophisticated, strict and effective than anything to date in Arizona. Does the White House appreciate what Missouri has done? So, why doesn't Missouri receive attention? Answer: There are no i******s in Missouri to demonstrate.

The "Show Me" state has again shown us how it should be done. There needs to be more publicity and exposure regarding what Missouri has done. Please pass this around.

In 2007, Missouri placed on the b****t a proposed constitutional amendment designating English as the official language of Missouri. In November, 2008, nearly 90% v**ed in favor! Thus, English became the official language for ALL governmental activity in Missouri. No individual has the right to demand government services in a language OTHER than English.

In 2008, a measure was passed that required the Missouri Highway Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration status of any person arrested, and inform federal authorities if the person is found to be in Missouri illegally. Missouri law enforcement officers receive specific training with respect to enforcement of federal i*********n l*ws.

In Missouri , i*****l i*******ts do NOT have access to taxpayer benefits such as food stamps or health care through Missouri Health NET.
In 2009, a measure was passed that ensures Missouri's public institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to individuals who are illegally in the United States.

In Missouri all post-secondary institutions of higher education to annually certify to the Missouri Dept. Of Higher Education that they have NOT knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States.

So, while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is important to remember, Missouri has been far more proactive in addressing this horrific problem. Missouri has made it clear that i*****l i*******ts are NOT welcome in the state and they will certainly NOT receive public benefits at the expense of Missouri taxpayers.
Taken from: "The Ozarks Sentinel" Editorial -