One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Old Thinker
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
May 29, 2022 14:33:33   #
Airforceone wrote:
BS. BS Here you go back at Old D******n why not get back on H****r B***n’s laptop.

I just don’t understand why this garbage gets spread by a bunch of h**e filled r****t while we are morning 19 kids slaughtered and Two teachers by an 18 year old kid who can buy military style weapons all because that i***t Governor Abbott signed into law the ability for that kid to buy it.

But you post a GD conspiracy theory what in the hell is wrong with you people.


Call it what you want but it is a very important issue that v**er integrity be well established. As far as posting current affairs, I see that you had time to spend on your political mouthpiece.
Go to
May 29, 2022 14:27:21   #
saltwind 78 wrote:
Airforce, It seems to me that those you call h**e filled r****ts, have found a unifying organization in the Republican Party. Are all Republicans criminals and r****ts? Of course not, but it seems to me that enough are, to make it a threat to innocent people, as well as national security.


I feel more threatened by the radical progressives and I am a innocent person. Pretty sure I'm in the majority too.
Go to
May 27, 2022 12:25:27   #
wiki isn't reliable
Go to
May 27, 2022 11:17:02   #
Tiptop789 wrote:
I'm surprised, I'd have thought you would know this? "An assault rifle is a selective fire rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine". Is this good enough or do I need to dig deeper? Or was this a test, did I pass?


You failed.... All firearms are assault weapons but nice try. Show me a weapon that isn't used for assault.
Make our schools safe and secure from entry by any unauthorized person. Then you can debate how to name rifles.
Go to
May 26, 2022 22:05:23   #
proud republican wrote:
Of course it won't...I***t moore doesn't get it, even if you repeal 2nd Amendment, which means rewriting Constitution, criminals will still be able to get gun on the Black market.. The only people who are going to suffer, is law abiding citizens...🙄


I watched Randi Weingarten, the head of the teachers union on MSNBC or CNN talking at length about the children and the teachers and pushing for gun control. She went on to say that part of a teachers job is to advocate for gun control. She nearly cried thinking about the loss of those kids and how tough the teachers have it. BUT! Not once did she say that we need to protect our kids and our teachers. To her and her ilk they apparently are expendable. They believe the end justifies the means.... After 9/11 they quickly increased security. Look at our airports, concerts, sports, etc. ...... After J** 6, a fence was quickly erected and armed personnel were abundant.....
WE HAVE TO SECURE OUR SCHOOLS FIRST and continue the endless gun debate later.
Go to
May 18, 2022 13:47:34   #
you said it.
Go to
May 17, 2022 15:06:44   #
RascalRiley wrote:
It started when Donny came down the golden escalator to cheers from paid worshipers in 2015.


I don't know who was paid that day but he sure got a lot of followers after that and they weren't paid.
Go to
May 17, 2022 13:30:54   #
jack sequim wa wrote:
The FDA restricted production of formula, even though no contaminants were found
What's that about? Shouldn't Biden be pressing to restock and increase production?


Right, I saw the goofy press secretary say that Abbott closed their plant and had to sort of walk it back and admit that it was because of the FDA. So, that was months ago, why was it not reopened earlier? Trump would have been on the FDA to get it done. Biden has to wait until CNN tells him there is a problem.
Go to
May 17, 2022 13:20:20   #
RascalRiley wrote:
"This is why we're going to take over every e******ns board in the nation," he remarked. "This is why we're going to take over every medical board in this nation. This is why we're going to take over state legislatures and D.A.s and attorney generals [sic] and secretaries of state and governors. And we're not going to stop. We are ascendant!" Bannon

https://www.rawstory.com/steve-bannon-replacement-theory/


Hmm... so what do you think prompted this call to action?... maybe v***r f***d from the left? Just curious but did you have a problem with Obama saying that he wanted to fundamentally t***sform the country, or that he wanted a National Police Force as well manned and well equipped as the military... Not that was really spooky.
Go to
May 17, 2022 13:15:29   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Study Turns Up Surprising Way 'Green' Cars Pollute More Than Gas-Powered Engines

By C. Douglas Golden
May 17, 2022 at 7:56am
Remember the complaints about the feasibility of electric vehicles, particularly in terms of limited range? Well, guess what, you climate-denier: You can’t keep hiding behind that excuse!

See, now that automakers are fitting bigger batteries into cars, that’ll dramatically increase how far you can go in-between charges. And with new, fast-charging stations being built with government money, you can easily get anywhere you want to go in a vehicle that doesn’t emit anything from its tailpipe.

You just may be emitting particulate matter into the environment at a much higher rate than you would in a gas-powered car, according to a new study.

(Here at The Western Journal, we’re making sure consumers know that electric cars don’t just run on rainbows and dreams; there are serious environmental tradeoffs politicians and environmentalists haven’t fully publicized, or even considered, as they push these vehicles relentlessly on American car-buyers. We’ll keep bringing America the t***h the establishment media won’t. You can help us by subscribing.)

According to a piece published Monday by the EV-centric outlet Green Car Reports, a British-based independent emissions testing firm found that particulate matter emissions from tires are 1,850 times greater under normal driving conditions than from a tailpipe of a gas-powered car.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, particulate emissions are “microscopic solids or liquid droplets that are so small that they can be inhaled and cause serious health problems.” It notes the particles “are also the main cause of reduced visibility (haze) in parts of the United States, including many of our treasured national parks and wilderness areas.”

The EPA defines particle pollution as “inhalable particles,” which are under 10 microns in diameter, and “fine inhalable particles,” 2.5 microns and smaller.

The firm that conducted the study, Emissions Analytics, had previously found in 2020 that particulate emissions from tires could be 1,000 times greater than those from tailpipes. That test was designed to capture worst-case emissions under legal driving, according to the report. But when researchers replicated the test “across a wider range of driving conditions,” they found the number was even higher.

“The fundamental trends that drive this ratio are: tailpipe particulate emissions are much lower on new cars, and tire wear emissions increase with vehicle mass and aggressiveness of driving style,” Emissions Analytics concluded.

Are you planning on buying an electric vehicle?
Yes: 3% (6 V**es)
No: 97% (210 V**es)
“Tailpipe emissions are falling over time, as exhaust filters become more efficient and with the prospect of extending the measurement of particulates under the potential future Euro 7 regulation, while tire wear emissions are rising as vehicles become heavier and added power and torque is placed at the driver’s disposal. On current trends, the ratio may well continue to increase.”

Furthermore, they found that adding half a metric ton (1,100 pounds) “of battery weight can result in tire emissions that are almost 400 more times greater than real-world tailpipe emissions, everything else being equal.”

That’s a daunting issue for carmakers, considering that electric vehicles already have a tendency to be heavier than gas vehicles because of the weight of their batteries, and the fact that buyers want greater range — meaning bigger battery packs. Weights of batteries vary among electric vehicles, but they average is about 1,000 pounds, according to information on BatteryStory.com.

According to a CNN report, the battery-powered Ford F-150 Lightning weighs 1,600 pounds more than a regular F-150 truck. The Volvo XC40 Recharge packs an extra 1,000 pounds of weight when compared to a Volvo XC40 with an internal-combustion engine.

There is a caveat to this: “An important difference between tire and tailpipe particle emissions is that most of the former is understood to go straight to soil and water, whereas most of the latter is suspended in air for a period, and therefore negatively affects air quality,” Emissions Analytics noted.

Related: Tesla May Buy Mining Company That Ruins the Natural Environment in Order to Build 'Green' Electric Cars
However, 11 percent of tire particulate emissions is smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter, which is “the common metric for fine particle dust,” which may become airborne.

Any way you cut it, though, it’s pollution going into the air, the water, or the soil that’s coming from electric vehicles. And it’s worse than tires on cars with lighter, gas-powered engines.

This is just one study, of course — but it’s also just one problem with the switchover to electric vehicles that progressives keep pushing.


Take spontaneous combustion, for instance.

In Paris, a state-owned public t***sport operator pulled 149 of its buses off of the street after two of them exploded last month. Also in April, a house fire caused by an electric vehicle charger in the Washington, D.C., area was reported to have caused $15,000 in damages. As Washington’s WTOP-TV noted, this came just weeks after another D.C.-area house fire caused by an electric car charger generated $350,000 in damages.

With public chargers — like the ones the administration desperately wants to fund — the issue is whether they work at all. A study in the San Francisco Bay Area earlier this year found that over a quarter of the charging stations weren’t fully functioning. Then there’s the length of time it takes to charge at public stations, as one Business Insider journalist noted in a tweet:

And then there’s the environmental damage caused by mining the minerals needed to build EV components. Or the fact that China controls most of the supply-chain access to said minerals. Or that EVs are considerably more expensive than gas-powered vehicles.


Pick your poison. Heaven knows there are plenty of them. We’ve found a new one in electric vehicles. It’s time the progressive left at least admits the t***h: There is no such thing as a free lunch.


https://www.westernjournal.com/study-turns-surprising-way-green-cars-pollute-gas-powered-engines/?ats_es=489ee1ba734a5f1f055e6be09233f635
Study Turns Up Surprising Way 'Green' Cars Pollute... (show quote)


Interesting, but in my opinion, there really is no such thing as Government money, it all comes from taxpayers
Go to
May 16, 2022 14:40:40   #
ACP45 wrote:
"The independence and authority of every nation, including the United States, and the sovereignty of every state in the U.S., is being handed to the g*******ts. Specifically, the healthcare infrastructure and actions of every country, every state, and every county will come under the direct control of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. No individual human being should have the power and authority to direct the healthcare actions of every nation and state in a “healthcare emergency” or at any other time."

On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.

This is not just about p******c planning. According to the Foreward to WHO’s regulations, there is no specific limit to what constitutes a health emergency, and it is certainly not limited to p******cs. The WHO advertises on their website that they are “committed” to complete health: “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” WHO’s domain is not limited to any specific disease or manner of t***smission, but covering “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans… ". These changes empower the Director-General of WHO to be the overarching official will enable WHO to declare global health emergencies relating to any aspect of global health, from food shortages, to c*****e c****e, to broken supply lines, to sanitation issues, to obesity, to medical “misinformation” and so on.

The amendments proposed by the Biden Administration do not require any Senate or Congressional approval. The Senate could object, but these amendments are not treaties, so the Senate may not have the authority or the clout to block them. The existing WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” v**e for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual v**es and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now.

We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration. If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their v**es to “no.”

The Biden proposed changes are Step 1 of our move to globalism.

Step 2 will be the WHO proposal to establish “a new treaty” with individual nations that would amend the Constitution of the World Health Organization. The world has already seen how any emergency, real or concocted, now or in the future, could then justify WHO taking over the entirety of government operations of sovereign nations, robbing all individuals of their freedoms, and fully crushing the democratic republics of the world. See our February 18, 2022 report, “Tedros Introduces G*******t Plan to Take Over the World’s Health Systems.”

Now is the time to do something about this treat. Here are the ACTION Steps: https://www.americaoutloud.com/what-you-should-do-now-about-the-who-takeover/

https://interestofjustice.org/
https://www.americaoutloud.com/biden-handing-over-u-s-sovereignty-to-who/
https://www.americaoutloud.com/tedros-introduces-g*******t-plan-to-take-over-worlds-health-systems/
https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution
"The independence and authority of every nati... (show quote)


I don't think the WHO knows the power of the second amendment.
Go to
May 16, 2022 09:02:12   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Trump ran on extremely good policies .
They were taken word for word from the original Progressive Platform.
After he was in , though, he somehow managed to forget all about them.
But his ewes never even noticed.
His sweet gullible ewes.


Please show me the "word for word" progressive platform that you are referring to.
Go to
May 14, 2022 22:02:17   #
PeterS wrote:
This group has been watching Fox and listening to the likes of Rush Limbaugh (may Satan rest his soul) for so long that today they are beyond being deprogrammed. H**e and division is the only thing they believe in and people like Marjory Taylor-Green are the new leaders preaching it to all...


It figures that your f**g logo is screwed up.... says a lot about you.
Go to
May 14, 2022 21:06:26   #
woodguru wrote:
He was told not to deride them, to treat them with kindness and stay firm on what the t***h and reality is. Try to remind them of a better kinder time before they became cognitively infected.

This proves democrats are trying to learn how to communicate with cult levels of cognitive dysfunction

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jamie-raskin-j***6-cult-deprogrammers-republicans_n_626475b8e4b00b4e017f0cf5


Sounds to me like they are trying to figure out how to brainwash the people that disagree with them..
Go to
May 11, 2022 14:22:37   #
RascalRiley wrote:
If only the republicans had done more e******n r*****g for Trump all would be well now. 😂


Yea, guess those Republicans just have too much integrity.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.