ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

"The independence and authority of every nation, including the United States, and the sovereignty of every state in the U.S., is being handed to the g*******ts. Specifically, the healthcare infrastructure and actions of every country, every state, and every county will come under the direct control of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. No individual human being should have the power and authority to direct the healthcare actions of every nation and state in a “healthcare emergency” or at any other time."

On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.

This is not just about p******c planning. According to the Foreward to WHO’s regulations, there is no specific limit to what constitutes a health emergency, and it is certainly not limited to p******cs. The WHO advertises on their website that they are “committed” to complete health: “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” WHO’s domain is not limited to any specific disease or manner of t***smission, but covering “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans… ". These changes empower the Director-General of WHO to be the overarching official will enable WHO to declare global health emergencies relating to any aspect of global health, from food shortages, to c*****e c****e, to broken supply lines, to sanitation issues, to obesity, to medical “misinformation” and so on.

The amendments proposed by the Biden Administration do not require any Senate or Congressional approval. The Senate could object, but these amendments are not treaties, so the Senate may not have the authority or the clout to block them. The existing WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” v**e for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual v**es and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now.

We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration. If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their v**es to “no.”

The Biden proposed changes are Step 1 of our move to globalism.

Step 2 will be the WHO proposal to establish “a new treaty” with individual nations that would amend the Constitution of the World Health Organization. The world has already seen how any emergency, real or concocted, now or in the future, could then justify WHO taking over the entirety of government operations of sovereign nations, robbing all individuals of their freedoms, and fully crushing the democratic republics of the world. See our February 18, 2022 report, “Tedros Introduces G*******t Plan to Take Over the World’s Health Systems.”

Now is the time to do something about this treat. Here are the ACTION Steps: https://www.americaoutloud.com/what-you-should-do-now-about-the-who-takeover/

https://interestofjustice.org/
https://www.americaoutloud.com/biden-handing-over-u-s-sovereignty-to-who/
https://www.americaoutloud.com/tedros-introduces-g*******t-plan-to-take-over-worlds-health-systems/
https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

This sounds like a serpent with ten crowns to me. Beyond scary.

Big dog

An original plan for world domination for sure!

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Here is just another reason to be skeptical of g*******t entities that are not held accountable for their policies.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

That freaking flaming i***t has no authority to alter or change anything in the make up a Our Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and not t***sfer the rights of the United States of America to any other entity for enforcement!!
Especially the World Health Organization (WHO) a spin off of the United Nations responsible for international public health, in Switzerland😤 They have absolutely no legal capacity over the United States of America none whatsoever just like the UN!

Amendments can not violate our individual rights and are unenforceable trying to change authority to an entity not that of the United States of America. Déjà vu to the other i***t Obama when he tried to limit our rights of weapons signing that UN gun treaty agreement that was unenforceable as well.👎

The Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are, in many ways, fused together in the minds of Americans, because they represent what is best about America. They are symbols of the liberty that allows us to achieve success and of the e******y that ensures that we are all equal in the eyes of the law. The Declaration of Independence made certain promises about which liberties were fundamental and inherent, but those liberties didn’t become legally enforceable until they were enumerated in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In other words, the fundamental freedoms of the American people were alluded to in the Declaration of Independence, implicit in the Constitution, and enumerated in the Bill of Rights. But it took the Civil War, which President Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address called “a new birth of freedom,” to vindicate the Declaration’s famous promise that “all men are created equal.” And it took the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, to vindicate James Madison’s initial hope that not only the federal government but also the states would be “constitutionally required to respect fundamental liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights” a process that continues today.

Now treaties are legally enforceable agreements with foreign countries but have to be approved by Congress before any guy in our oval office can contract to it!! …

Calling this an amendment is trying to usurp legal standings of our country and it will not fly.

Big dog

Big dog

👍👍👍👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍👍👍👍

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Of interest~~ The WHO now wants to have “binding authority” over its members~~~

THIS IS A VEILED ATTEMPT TO “LEGALIZE” CENTRALIZED PHARMACEUTICAL F*****M UNDER THE GUISE OF P******C PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE.

Basically, the power that the WHO currently has under the declared State of Emergency (which is completely bogus, there is no p******c) they now want to keep forever. With this treaty, they intend to cement and expand their centralized control of world governments.

The World Health Organization wants sovereign nations to sign a treaty that would grant additional legal authority to the WHO which would enable them to force their “One Health” decisions upon every country of the world.

In addition, the WHO wants more money ($10-$31 billion dollars per year!)

The WHO’s priority is NOT public health. The WHO’s real priority is capturing more power and money for itself and its corporate and its Non-Governmental Organization accomplices.

The WHO needs to be disbanded, not given any more power!!!

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is currently accepting comments from the general public to determine the topics that may be included in the “P******c Treaty”.

The time to speak out and stand up for your rights is NOW – but they’re not making it very easy.

The WHO website says that the first round of hearings will be held through a webcast on 12-13 April 2022. Sessions times are in Central European Summer Time (CEST).

Rogusky proposes:

THE PEOPLE’S TREATY

To Preserve Our Health Related Human Rights

All people eventually die. Health is not guaranteed. The law can and must guarantee and protect health related freedoms.

Article 1

Governments do not get to suspend human rights because of “emergencies.”

Regardless of the scope and/or severity of any disease outbreak or p******c, human rights remain inalienable and may not be abridged.

Article 2

The good of a nation is the sum total of the benefits enjoyed by all its people.

The rights of nations, states, provinces, groups and organizations are subservient to inalienable human rights.

Article 3

Bureaucrats do not have the right to deny potentially life-saving medications to anyone.

The right to try is an inalienable right. Each and every human being, alone, or in consultation with the healthcare practitioner of their choice, has the inalienable right to choose the form of treatment that they wish to utilize in order to maintain or restore their health.

Article 4

The right to refuse treatment is an inalienable right.

Bodily autonomy is sacrosanct and must ALWAYS be respected. No person, no organization and no governmental body has the right to demand that another person consume, inject or apply any treatment to their body.

Article 5

Discrimination based on medical status is wrong.

No person, no organization and no governmental body has the right to place any form of restrictions that require healthy people to subject themselves to any form of treatment or test in order to enjoy their inalienable right to travel, work, seek education, or gain access to public spaces or businesses.

Article 6

Lockdowns and/or quarantines of healthy people are wrong.

All people who are ill with diseases that are t***smissible have a moral obligation to separate themselves fro other people, but other people must be allowed to visit with the ill person so long as proper personal protective equipment is utilized.

Article 7

We demand complete t***sparency.

All depersonalized data from all clinical studies should be immediately available to everyone in the world to review in real time.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to their own opinion.

Every person’s experience is a valuable scientific observation. All human beings have the inalienable right to publicly express their opinion regarding the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of any treatment.

Article 9

Guilt cannot be legislated or contracted away.

All manufacturers, distributors, sellers and administrators of health care products and/or procedures must be held liable for any and all damages caused by their products and services.

Article 10

Government officials may start emergencies, but the people must be able to end them.

Speed can be an important factor in reacting to an emergency, but democratic principles demand that “We the People” have the right to determine when we believe the danger has passed.

https://cairnsnews.org/2022/04/09/who-ihr-treaty-will-override-constitutions-of-australia-and-america/

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

I'll agree to the people's treaty,. Will the WHO? And where is Bill Gates in all of this?

Kevyn

You have your panties in a bunch over allowing the WHO to declare a public health emergency. The declaration has no teeth it simply is a declaration not any treaty right to take over sovereign nations.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

True for the moment but read the article I posted about wanting to affix treaty agreements..

No coincidence the puppet in office filed his, not ours, meaning the US or its citizens!

CarryOn

🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲👏👏👏👏👏💯💯👍

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Exactly so LJ. That is Step #2, which will be harder to defeat.

Kevyn

This is nothing, a treaty needs to be ratified by two thirds of the senate. Tempest in a teapot Henny Penny nonsense.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Wrong:
Step 1
"These amendments will empower WHO's Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.

If passed, the Biden Administration's proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.'s 193 member nations, all of whom belong WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population....

These regulations are a "binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007." U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them....

The targeted nation is also required to send WHO any relevant genetic sequence data.

Worse:

The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12, 2022, leaving little time to protest before the scheduled v**e.

The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation's alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostr****m and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation." https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18534/who-death-trap
Step 2.
"The amendments proposed by the Biden Administration [color=red]do not require any Senate or Congressional approval. The Senate could object, but these amendments are not treaties, so the Senate may not have the authority or the clout to block them. [color]The existing WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” v**e for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual v**es and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now."