================
That was the program of Barack Obama where millions of Muslims from the ME especially Syria came over to the US 2009, to 2016. Our borders will be populated with Muslims from the Me, from Africa, and with pregnant women from South and Central American countries from Mexico, and also the Chinese. They all want to deliver their tons of babies in the US to claim birthright citizenship like Kamala Harris, who is a c*******t now a VP soon to be a president.

By 2035, it is projected that US will no longer be a white majority country, but b****s and browns, and yellow. Terrorists and drug dealers are all celebrating Biden won through stolen v**es. Most Chinese from Hongkong will come cause they love to be free. But US is becoming like China now, large government at the dictates of Biden.

Our hospitals will be filled with anchor babies, and we taxpayers have to pay for their medical care. Handouts don't care, they don't spend a dime for this. Except, their welfare money is now spread to tons of millions of people seeking for refuge. The Pope love this, US has now open borders.

https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/02/02/pushing-back-on-bidens-executive-orders-n320608?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=b5155075bc381059622b39d1f5d5f208

Red States Pushing Back on Biden’s Executive Orders
Stu CvrkFeb 02, 2021 4:00 PM ET

(AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
In an unprecedented flurry of authoritarian activity for a new president, the Hologram has signed 43 executive orders in his first dozen days in office. This from someone who as a candidate claimed that “Trump was a dictator” in signing various executive orders, as noted here:

“I’ve got to get the v**es,” said then-candidate Biden.

“I have this strange notion, we are a democracy … if you can’t get the v**es … you can’t [legislate] by executive order unless you’re a dictator. We’re a democracy. We need consensus,” said Biden.

Yet, it is abundantly clear that Biden is essentially ruling by diktat in reversing dozens of Trump policies – from canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline to enabling “t*********rs” in the armed forces to opening the border (and ceasing construction of the wall) to rejoining the Paris Climate Accords. Others being contemplated could involve curbing Second Amendment rights, a return to the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, new politically-oriented domestic terrorism laws, and curbing First Amendment rights including protected political speech on social media.

Many Americans are greatly concerned by the increasing suppression of constitutional rights, as publicly trumpeted by Biden apparatchiks and supporters in the legacy media. Big Tech l*****ts have already “canceled” the social media upstart Parler and suspended thousands of social media accounts of conservatives and Trump supporters. Some Biden supporters, including this PBS lawyer (!) – have even clamored for “reeducation camps” for Trump supporters. And this is just the tip of the iceberg, as the Left are emboldened in these actions because the Biden Administration is entirely sympathetic. How does the secret Democrat-led Senate ethics panel going after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) for challenging Biden’s E*******l College “win” (as reported here) comport with the Democrats’ pursuit of “unity”? The goal is THEIR definition of unity, which involves suppression of all dissension at all costs. Because their definition decidedly does NOT mean consensus or compromising with Republicans. Always remember that their word definitions are not commonly understood definitions but rather are twisted to service their political objectives!

Back to Biden’s EOs. First of all, executive orders are NOT laws but rather are “pseudo laws,” as explained by the American Bar Association here:

An executive order is a signed, written, and published directive from the President of the United States that manages operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively, so executive orders may be referenced by their assigned number, or their topic.

Executive orders are not legislation; they require no approval from Congress, and Congress cannot simply overturn them. Congress may pass legislation that might make it difficult, or even impossible, to carry out the order, such as removing funding. Only a sitting U.S. President may overturn an existing executive order by issuing another executive order to that effect.

[However,] … executive orders … have the force of law, much like regulations issued by federal agencies, so they are codified under Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Because EOs have “the force of law” similar to federal rules generated by the administrative state, some Red States have begun to push back. In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) filed a lawsuit to stop implementation of an executive order that directs a halt to all deportations of i*****l a***ns during Biden’s first 100 days as president:

According to Paxton, the freeze violates the Constitution and is a violation of federal immigration and administrative law as well as an agreement between the State of Texas and the Department of Homeland Security.

And a federal judge subsequently blocked implementation of that executive order, as reported here. Hurrah for a little Republican lawfare for a change after four years of Democrat filings before friendly l*****t judges to thwart President Trump’s actions!

But that is not all of the push back that is underway. In South Dakota, a state representative introduced a bill that would enable the state attorney general to review and reject p**********l executive orders that violate the Constitution:

The bill takes a broad view, stating that no executive order may be implemented “that restricts a person’s rights.”

The proposed bill would also allow the attorney general to block implementation of any order deemed unconstitutional if the order refers to:

A p******c or other public health emergency

The regulation of natural resources

The regulation of the agricultural industry

The regulation of land use

The regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards

The regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms

Excellent! Protection of constitutional rights is vital to the preservation of our constitutional Republic. The Biden administration policy objectives that curtail constitutional rights of Americans must be halted and reversed. Executive orders are ruling by diktat, not by consensus. It is the responsibility of the US Congress to write laws, not the Executive Branch. Executive orders are another manifestation of the administrative state – in this case by the Office of the President, bypassing Congress to implement policy through “pseudo law.” The practice has gotten out of hand and needs to be curtailed. More states need to pursue what South Dakota is doing.

Manning. My Mother-in-law is an East Texas farm girl born and raised. My father-in-law, aside from ranching, was a gun dealer specializing in the AR-15. To say they were conservative puts conservatives to shame. Now the point in all this is that when I had my stroke my mother-in-law, doing what all conservative farm girls do--moved in with us and took care of my daughter and my wife while I was in the hospital and then took care of me for 6 months while I was rehabbing.

Now to shorten this up a bit while Laverne was in E-Texas she listened to Rush Limbaugh and conservative radio and Fox News and Conservative news at night. To say she and my father-in-law were rabid conservatives is an understatement. Now all in total, Lavern was with us for about a year--minus weekends. Now at my house, we didn't listen to Fox News nor Rush Limbaugh nor any conservative programs for that matter. Now I mention this because over-time you could see Lavern change. The conservative accusations about Obama became less and less and before too long she had positive words to say about all of the Obama family--especially that he took care of his mother-in-law and she winked at me as she said she expected the same. And hey, so long as I can do it from my walker I will move the world for her.

Now, this is probably what is going to shock you Manning, and even though she says she didn't, I have a sneaking suspicion that she v**ed for Trump in his first term. But I know for certain that she didn't v**e for Trump his second term because I spent too many hours on the phone with her listening to her complain about the latest thing that Trump did and between my wife and me, we certainly got an earful.

Now my point to this long-winded storytelling is when we have propaganda pounded into us 24/7 we tend to believe it and with more certainty--even though we may have done nothing to validate what we heard. Now I'm not trying to convert you but I just want you to understand is when we live in a partisan world that is divided with t***h lying somewhere in between. Liberals and conservatives have been in this nation as long as we've had a nation. Do you think we would even be here if not for the first progressives?

But now, when you hear that liberalism and progressivism are the greatest evils ever to befall mankind, and you hear it 24/7 then not only do you believe it but you learn to fear it, and you fear for the future for your children and your grandchildren. The only thing I am trying to say is that maybe you don't need to fear it any more than the Evangelical Christians of 1776 needed to fear the words of Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and the early liberals that they hung around with. And it was certainly much bleaker than it is now so if we made it once, we certainly can make it again...

Close to 1 million Trump supporters came to Washington to celebrate President Donald Trump, and let Congrees know that they wanted the steal to stop and be investigated. And there is enough allegations and sworn affidavits attesting to that. They had no intention of r**ting. There were some bad characters embedded within the crowd that arrived early to the Capital building. To some respects they managed to rile up some Trump supporters and led them in the break in. I believe this was mostly A****a, but if it was also B*M or P***d B**s, it doesn't matter. They are the ones who need to be found and arrested and prosecuted for wh**ever possible. And these are Federal crimes and so there is no free perp walk by some Soros States Attorney. Most of the crowds had no idea what was happening and totally not interested in joining then and probably condemning them. Presdent Trump did tweet a message asking them to go home and most of his fans did so. This was in no way an I**********n started or encouraged by President Trump. It was all the bad actors within the crowd who weren't even anywhere near the President towards the end of his speech. They were getting ready for their attack.

Many talk shows are bringing up the matter that there were always greater police forces at B*M rallies. Well, Duh!!!. They were full of h**e at everything, prone to attacking the police lines, r**ting, burning, l**ting and even deaths. The Trump rallies were about happy people celebrating Donald Trump and there was no record of a strong police presence necessary in the past. Common sense.

Now today. Pelosi and Schumer are demanding amendment 25 to remove the President. For something he didn't do, but they h**e him. And this is that last chance to smear him in as vile a way as possible. I wish there was a way to remove them because they are both an embarrassment to America. Pelosi is a walking mass of hatred and evil and will do wh**ever she can to destroy wh**ever gets in her way. President Elect Biden is not saying he is for it. He better watch it because he is the type of person it was created for, old and slipping into senility. Vice President Pence, who is necessary in this accusation is not for it. To both their credits.

The FBI is already arresting some potentially bad actors from yesterday's break in at the Capital. Let it continue.

Meanwhile, let's back off until we get some real facts.

Logically Right

The woman who got shot was a Q***n enthusiast, she deserved to get shot, and so did anyone else inside the capital. I would have expected c*****l p****e to shoot A****a or B*M people, and they sure as hell should have been shooting anyone and everyone that breached doors, windows, and metal detector security.

The capital building is a secure zone when the full house and senate have convened, these aren't mall cops, it is their jobs to keep the people's house secure while congressional business is being done and lives are in the mix.

It's going to be very interesting to see what the orders were from the top, because security for some reason was at an all time low. Those who breached the capital buiklding should have been handled with at least the same degree of prejudice A****a and B*M protesters were when they dared to threaten city buildings that have a fraction of the importance our capital does.

As a patriot I'm pissed, and I expect anyone taking over government buildings to leave in body bags or handcuffs... and that goes for black or white terrorists

Will Joe even make it to the stage to even put his lying hands on the bible?
I am hoping that he won't.
That is my wish for 2021
Take a really good look at him and let this sink in
Now ask yourself, is this what you really want