Yes... he's very good at articulating his illiteracy... especially when reading off a teleprompter... otherwise hardly a great communicator ... but definitely has the charisma of a snake oil salesman who hisses with sibilent (sp ?) esses..
Radiance3 wrote:
================
The Judge's track records and his position at the Circuit Court, 2nd highest court of the land did not have any inch of what the BAR intent is presenting. Fact is the BAR gave him the highest honor in association and reference with his position for the SC Justice.
These are the DIMMS, they'll do everything evil, to provoking him for any reaction. The Judge's track records have proven all the impeccable records he had since the early years of his brilliant life. People are jealous, they'll do everything to destroy.
================ br The Judge's track records and ... (
show quote)
Agree... and in so doing they destroy themselves. Re the midterm e******ns the dems will not enjoy a majority in either congress or the senate for some time...
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Hmm, interesting Nick... so what would you like to see happen?
How does it look to you in the future, say, we have a ConventionOfStates.com Article V and it gets hijacked by t*****rs like some of the founders turned out to be?
What would you like to see ?
Suggest going to COS A5 and see how your concerns about "hijack" are taken in to account.
Read all the provisions as constructed on behalf of the states by FFs.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Being that women can make outrageous claims without any backup, evidence, or corroboration (and they might actually stick), it has become quite clear that men need "new rules".
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/new_rules_for_men.html Women has always strived for equal pay, equal judgement, equal everything when they are stacked up against a man.....and personally I don't blame them. But this current madness in the air will put a complete stop to that. Do you really think that a man is even going to want to be around a woman in the workplace when they can ruin your life in one quick swoop? Men are not going to be willing to take the chance....especially if it gets to the point where a woman can make an accusation (as flimsy as it appears) and bring you down, ruin your reputation, and your LIFE.
Being that women can make outrageous claims withou... (
show quote)
See your point about this current madness in the air... and agree that's just what it is.. madness but not a foregone conclusion that this is how the man-woman assoc. Will remain... IMO i believe there are enough good and decent men who will step up to defend their own honor and enough good women they associate with in their lives to back them when need be... at least the ones I know.
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
JACKPOT!
We are a Christian founded nation now wake up the Patriots and start going after the Muslim Scumbags...
Get ready to burn every mosque after they murder one of ours next time.
This day is coming.
Seems that obama may have lit the fuse when he declared during his faux presidency that America was no longer a Christian country.... dissed Americans who "cling" to their guns, religion & bibles... while showing deference and alegience to muslims and the Islamic faith.
oldroy wrote:
This article reminded me that the Left Leaners will never stop using a******n as their number One idea about judges. In this one they say that his change of mind concerning the fact that Roe v. Wade is "settled law". It is just that to them but there is nothing in the Constitution that allows the Supreme Court justices to legislate although the Left has been very sure that they can do that. My problem here is that they will continue to be against any judge who doesn't agree with a******n. It is important that our SC justices understand the Constitution and I am not sure most of those who were good Left Leaners before their appointment (Kagan, Sotomayor, and the old sleeper) agree about bench legislated law. I am sure they consider Roe v. Wade to be settled law and it is no kind of law.
I enjoyed reading this one, and am sure not one Leaner read much of it.
This article reminded me that the Left Leaners wil... (
show quote)
Absolutely correct... the Constitution guarantees the protection and right to Life.
... not the Destruction of it.
SC has not the right to legislate a******n on demand as law.
Seems that's why we hear left leaners so frequently say the Constitution is a "living and breathing document". just another way of fundamentally changing and contravening what true interpretation of our Constitution is as the founding fathers intended.
. when it doesn't suit the liberal l*****t agenda and ideology.
[quote=Blade_Runner]Yeah, Ford's involvement in th
is does matter, it matters a hell of a lot. Up until Feinstein orchestrated this sham, against Ford's wishes may I add, democrats on the SJC were desperately trying to find dirt on Kavanaugh. Then up pops the democrats favorite victim, an abused woman. Hot damn, they finally finally found the knife with which to cut Kavanaugh's balls off. SJC dems focused all the negative energy they could muster, to the exclusion of everything else, in their efforts to push the allegation of sexual assault to the max. This accusation brought a trickle of additional accusers and unleashed a flood of women vouching for Kavanaugh. Damn near two weeks the SJC dems ran with this, culminating in finally getting the reluctant first accuser to step onto the stage.
And there she was on the hot seat, at once a timid, frightened 14 year old girl, at once a defiant middle aged adult telling a story to a 25 year veteran prosecutor of sexual assaults. Within 24 hours, with the prosecutor's conclusions, the sex assault ploy began to fall apart, and now those charges have collapsed completely. Oops, Uh oh, and WTF just happened? The SJC dems sat there with a truckload of egg on their faces screaming for the FBI. They needed another approach, Kavanaugh gave his opening statement, and there it was.
Without compassion, without conscience, without any sense of decency or self-respect, without placing any value on human life, without any concern whatsoever for what they were doing, the SJC dems did what they always do, they politicized. They, and their sycophant media, psychoanalyzed the man they are attempting to destroy. They twisted everything Kavanaugh has said and done into a political weapon against him. This egregious ideologically driven campaign against a decent man is, in the best philosophies of human behavior, demonic.
In t***h, Brett Kavanaugh has a fine record as an appellate court judge, in fourteen cases he presented to the SC, the court overturned only one.
If Kavanaugh is confirmed to the SCOTUS bench, the world will still turn, the sun will rise and set, life will go on, and the democrats will continue their campaign to fundamentally t***sform America.
If Kavanaugh loses this seat, he will have every right and legal standing to file civil lawsuits for slander, defamation, and character assassination, not to mention the threats to his family, against every member of the SJC who attacked him.[/quo
te]
Well said... without care or conscience or sense of decency for human life.... shades of obama and hilary and their hideous souless corruption and deceit.
PJT wrote:
I'm 77 yo. When I consider the women I knew like mom granny 5 aunts. 9 female cousins and friends...I don't recognize this new breed of men hating extreme feminist stooge of one or any political party. They were all politically aware and tolerant. They wouldn't understand this new crop. But they had newspapers of various political persuasions to read. The Sunday talk shows were paneled by pro journalists not former DEM press secretaries, house speaker employees and generally partisan hacks all in bed with ABC CBS NBC CNN CNBC WASH. POST NYTIMES AND F**E PUBLIC RADIO all walking the same propaganda line. Looks like Hitler won after all and Dr. Goebbels would be so proud of our media.
I'm 77 yo. When I consider the women I knew like ... (
show quote)
Just a word here about the strong and principled women in your own family you mentioned... they never gave in to or gave up the fight against the corruption existing in the politics and suppression of freedom around the world at that time... nor should we now.
The fight to protect our freedom and liberty as Americans will always be before us... no matter in what form we see it as aggression and threat to our freedom, justice and liberty today.
PZG1225 wrote:
I couldn't agree more.
It will be wonderful when the country can get past this debacle. Confirm the man and let's move on! Linda was right in her post that there are many things we could be focusing on, but SCOTUS outcome will impact our country for decades to come, along with the outcome in November. World affairs will matter little if we lose our country. Agree?
Yes... that about puts it in the right perspective....
PZG1225 wrote:
Spot on. I'm getting so tired of hearing " I believe her story....I think something did happen to her, but don't think it was Kavanaugh". Even Judge Jeannine carries that sentiment which surprised me. She's a liberal activist, marched in the d********g pussy parade and she's been bought and paid for by the demonRat party. End of story.
Yeah... I was a little surprised too that Judge Jeanine seem to echo the same sentiment you refer to... much too gratuitous in assuming the something that happened was of a sexual nature... more likely what has happened to Ford during the last 36 yrs. is the diligent and distructive practice of Leftism, plain and obvious IMO.
MarvinSussman wrote:
Your gut feeling is guided by your political orientation, a classic case of seeing what you want to see.
Thank you for that opinion...however seeing is also a perception (gut feeling) not always or entirely guided by political orientation.... even the apolitical can have a ( gut feeling ) through observation & discernment of what may or may not seem to be credible..
IMO.... a classic case of seeing or prejudgement in seeing what you want to see? don't think so.
You may have viewed the testimony from a different perspective... political or not- can respect and appreciate that.
pafret wrote:
She won't face any charges because she says the memory was "recovered". Some Psychiatric intervention was necessary and such memories are not permitted in court. There is no way to determine t***h or falsity of such memories.
Kavanaugh can sue her in civil court for damages to his reputation as well as his job prospects. Most likely it will all blow away.
Well then if in fact the means justifies the end ... this debacle of a testimony & accusation against SC nominee Judge Kavanaugh is a clear example of such... whether or not the means employed result in the end intended remains to be seen.
"blow away" ? ... maybe.. more likely blow back for the dems in the midterm e******ns.