Man Who Threw Bacon at Mosque Found Dead in Prison Cell


Freshman Congresswomen Rep Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) have certainly made a splash in the three months since they took office. In that short amount of time both have been accused of making anti-American, anti-Semitic statements. Both Congresswomen have refused to apologize for their words and actions.

Despite Nancy Pelosi and Democrats refusal to reign in their h**e spewing colleagues, some people have expressed fear that the changes both women are proposing in Congress are a veiled attempt to implement Sharia law and to force non-Muslims in America to submit to their religious demands.

Let’s start with Fox News host Jeanine Pirro…Judge Pirro has been taken off the air for statements that harmed the feelings of Muslims – a key tenet of Sharia law. Perhaps we should ask Kevin Crehan of Great Britain this question. Unfortunately, we can’t ask him, because Kevin was found dead in his prison cell.

For those who don’t remember, Kevin Crehan was the vile criminal who carried out the most vicious attack on a mosque in Great Britain’s entire history. Crehan and three additional white nationalist terrorist cohorts carried out their premeditated attack on the Jamia Mosque in Bristol. It was a date that will live in infamy in Great Britain. In fact, it was an attack on all of Britain itself.

Following the attack, Crehan and his co-terrorists were spotted drunkenly walking down the street and laughing as they headed to the next pub. Those cold-hearted bastards.

Crehan later admitted to police that he alone launched the attack against the mosque, and that his three accomplices merely stood by and laughed. The British courts threw the book at Crehan. He got a year in prison for the assault, followed by 10 years of probation in which he is not allowed to approach within 330 feet of a mosque, to prevent him from assaulting any Muslims in the same fashion ever again.

The “r****t attack” – as it was dubbed by the British press – consisted of Kevin Crehan throwing two bacon sandwiches on the doors of the mosque as he walked by. Not BLTs. Just plain old fatback on white bread. The vicious terrorist Crehan didn’t even have the decency to put mustard on the sandwiches, which proves that the attack was premeditated.

Kevin Crehan made it more than half way through his prison sentence for “terrorism” before he was discovered dead in his cell. Kevin is dead because Great Britain has completely succumbed to Sharia speech codes under the guise of political correctness.

He played a childish prank while he was drunk and on a double date with his girlfriend and another couple. Absolutely no one was harmed by the bacon jihadi’s “attack” – yet it cost him his life after the British authorities imprisoned him.

You probably know about the recent “anti-h**e” resolution passed by Pelosi’s House. It started out as a condemnation of Rep. Ilhan Omar for her anti-Semitic Twitter feed but ended as a watered-down resolution condemning “all forms of h**e” (but especially the Orange Bad Man white nationalist kind of h**e).

Behind the scenes, there’s a different battle going on in the Democrat Party. According to the Washington Post, a group of Democrats met blocks away from the Capitol a few days ago, to try to “heal the wounds” between the Muslim Democrats and the Jewish Democrats. The little Maoist struggle session didn’t go very well, according to the paper.

To this date, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has never apologized in any believable way for her anti-Semitic rants. During the private meeting, Jewish freshman Rep. Dean Phillips – also from Minnesota – asked Omar to finally apologize, and for the Muslim Democrats to verbally consent to the fact that Israel has a right to exist and protect itself. That went over about as well as cow flatulence at an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rally.

The meeting evaporated in a big huffy meltdown after some shouting and accusations. Rep. Rashida “Impeach the Motherf***er” Tlaib left the meeting crying. Apparently, any speech questioning the validity of her religion is a “r****t h**e crime” in her eyes.

Freedom of speech? Forget about it. L*****t ideals like political correctness are a means to an end for them. Instead of “Give me liberty, or give me death,” their motto is “Sharia for everyone, like it or not.”

Kevin Crehan can’t answer the big question of whether we are better or worse for importing this problem. For the moment, Judge Jeanine Pirro doesn’t have a platform to weigh in on it, either. Will anyone in power eventually say the “unspeakable t***h” about this problem?

Home


BREAKING NEWS
The Gun Did It: Court Says Sandy Hook Parents Can Sue Remington




In a ruling that would appear to not only violate common sense but congressional law, the Connecticut Supreme Court said Thursday that the victims and families of the Sandy Hook school shooting can move forward with a lawsuit against Remington, the manufacturer of the Bushmaster rifle Adam Lanza used to carry out the massacre. Experts predict that the case will now go before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeing as how the Second Amendment and The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act both hang in the balance of this decision.

Not to mention the fact that, um, this kind of liability could literally end U.S. gun manufacturing and sales overnight.

From the New York Times:

In the lawsuit, the families seized upon the marketing for the AR-15-style Bushmaster used in the 2012 attack, which invoked the violence of combat and used slogans like “Consider your man card reissued.”

Lawyers for the families argued that those messages reflected a deliberate effort to appeal to troubled young men like Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old who charged into the elementary school and k**led 26 people, including 20 first graders, in a spray of gunfire.

In the 4-3 ruling, the justices agreed with a lower court judge’s decision to dismiss most of the claims raised by the families, but also found that the sweeping federal protections did not prevent the families from bringing a lawsuit based on wrongful marketing claims. The court ruled that the case can move ahead based on a state law regarding unfair trade practices.

It’s hard to see how Remington could be held liable for “wrongful marketing” unless they were specifically advertising a weapon that could feasibly be used to shoot up a kindergarten. Or making some kind of “Hey, weirdo, this gun is perfect for taking your revenge out on an unloving and h**eful world!” We’re pretty sure Remington did not engage in marketing of that sort, and so it is ridiculous to claim that they bear any responsibility whatsoever for what Lanza did on that fateful day in 2012.

It is impossible not to feel ongoing sympathy for the families who survived this terrible tragedy, and we don’t even have any particular ill will towards them for trying to seek redress wherever they can find it. Tragedy and logic rarely go hand in hand.

But that doesn’t change the fact that this sort of liability is outlandish, nonsensical, and in direct conflict with the Second Amendment. Not to mention, it opens the door wide open for manufacturers of knives, cars, pressure cookers, and any number of products to be sued for liability. Let’s hope the Supreme Court strikes this down, because it opens up a can of worms that could literally devastate American industry, to say nothing of our rights.

"Someone who the Obamas took tennis lessons from is caught committing a serious crime."

Please, friends at OPP. Everyone with any power probably has an association with someone who is, shall we say, less than honest, whether knowingly or not. O.K. The Obamas knew Ernst. That does not mean they bribed him or are part of this scandal. And by the way, I despised Obama's policies and v**ed for Trump.
Guilt by association doesn't always pan out. As for the people who c***ted/bribed their way through the admissions process, they should all be thrown out of wh**ever institute of higher learning they're in.