You called a person ignorant and told him to mind his own business on a public forum. That is rude. And it does nothing to advance the kingdom. It was also not a question that you made. Those were statements.

So another set of questions is

Why is Dummy boy so rude?
Does he consider that behavior Christian?
Does he see himself as a Christian?
If not, why does he ask so many questions judging Christians?
What gives him a right to judge a group he is not part of?
If he does consider himself Christian, how does he consider his rude behavior a loving example of being a Christian?

So another set of questions is

Why is Dummy boy so rude?
Does he consider that behavior Christian?
Does he see himself as a Christian?
If not, why does he ask so many questions judging Christians?
What gives him a right to judge a group he is not part of?
If he does consider himself Christain, how does he consider his rude behavior a loving example of being a Christian?

Wherever God came from is beyond our comprehension. Our senses are only designed to work in this universe. And our language is only designed to explain what we perceive in this universe.

This universe is obviously not eternal. It is falling apart every moment. Therefore it must have had a beginning. Therefore something must have started it. Even if that something had a starting point, there must be something without a starting point that began the process, a First Cause. That First Cause has no beginning and it is God.

And except for the calling it God part, the previous paragraph is agreed on by over 90% of physicists worldwide. The remaining ones cannot conceive of any other way than it being God and they refuse to believe so they are looking for a way out. They have yet to come up with one that does not point back to God.

Hawking tried to create a proof that it did not lead to God, but it ended up being summarized (it was hundreds of pages long) by other physicists (including atheists) as "The universe exists. God does not exist. Therefore the universe does not need God to exist." The problem being is that the second statement is not proven, merely assumed.

1-3. Time is irrelevant to God. Peter makes that clear. But beyond that, the way the word is used in Hebrew implies a metaphorical "day" (Meaning a definite time period) rather than a physical one. Also, the numbering gives sequence not necessarily that the days were contiguous. They happened in the order given but may have been separated by thousand or even millions of years. The idea that it happened in seven consecutive physical days comes from reading the Bible as though it were written in King James English.
4. Yes. Just look at the dog, coyote and wolf. There are all one species and can interbreed with any of appropriate size (obviously a Great Dane cannot mate with a Chihuahua). However the species remains constant. This is microevolution and there is a ton of evidence to support this.
5. The Bible says that "Kind begets Kind". The idea of a species giving birth to another species is ridiculous on the surface even to science. The idea that a species could with the small changes in microevolution could eventually create a new species is also unsupported by science. Scientists came up with the idea of "Punctuated equilibrium" to explain this. The idea is that every once in a while, some outside stress suddenly activates a hidden ability in our DNA that allows for the creation of many new species and then "natural se******n" reduces this down to a reasonable number. Basically they take the idea of a miracle where God creates a bunch of new species and try to make it an unthinking but natural occurrence, but it is still boils down to a Deus ex machina. They have tried other ideas for this, but virtually all of them have been disproven and the rest eventually boil down to a Deus ex machina to justify it.

What is difficult to understand is that the press keeps pushing progressive agendas but those agendas ultimately will lead to the end of the press as anything but a propaganda arm of the progressives. They are already working to silence dissension in the press as well as spy on them. This administration has had to apologize a couple times a year for their overreach into the press.

That was the purpose of the Lilly Ledbetter Act, to increase the cost of hiring minorities and women and thus decrease their employment so the white men that control the Democratic Party can help other white men get jobs. It is just another law passed by Democrats that had the "unintended consequence" of hurting the people they claim to be helping.

If you actually look at the effect of the laws and regulations that Democrats push, you will see that they usually are counter to what they preach. So it is getting hard to believe that those consequences are unintended. That is why I left the Democratic Party. I realized that they were lying about what they really supported. And when they say what they really believe, they end up apologizing for it later.

California has been allowing the students to decide day by day whether they are boys or girls that day and therefore which facility they use. This is because they believe that everyone should have a choice except those who would choose to not share a bathroom or shower with someone of the opposite sex. Those people are just intolerant.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-law-allows-t*********r-students-to-pick-bathrooms-sports-teams-they-identify-with/

Prove it.

First WMDs were found, just not meeting the standard that was given before the war.

Second EVERY Intelligence agency said that the WMDs were there so you must be saying that Bush knew more than all these intelligence agencies if you are saying he lied about the WMDs. because to lie means you must be saying something other than what you believe.

Your Ministry of T***h keeps saying stuff that has no backing whatsoever in hopes that people will start believing it.

Oh and BTW, the most corrupt administration in my lifetime (and that includes Reagan and Nixon) is President Obama's.

ha, ha, Surely you are joking because the KJV is also changed. That is why I studied Greek so I can read it the way God intended.

Because he realizes that I have a life and do not spend my whole life here and he realizes that your questions are irrelevant to the discussion.

The scripture I quoted is in every Christian Bible. The rest should be immaterial unless you are only willing to listen to those people who agree with you.

Ha, ha. He did that for a week and was lambasted by the hypocrites, I mean the main stream media and the Democrats for doing that, the same people who are not complaining that Reid has been doing it for years.

what is a constitutional right; the right to v**e as many times as you want even if you are not a citizen?

I wonder if progressives have ever read the Constitution as I keep hearing them claim rights that are not in there.

Yes, more evidence that you get all your news from the Democratic party. There have been dozens of bills that have nothing to do with Obamacare that Harry Reid has blocked. And he refuses to even allow Republicans to add amendments.

And you are so brainwashed, you won't even ask why. I will tell you, Because Harry Reid and the Democratic Party has not had a successful idea in decades and they are afraid of the contrast if they allow other ideas to be heard.