Don’t you just love NAIVE people! They have not learned that after so many polls! You know just where to go to get the numbers you want!

For democrats you go here! For republicans you go here.

So if you want mostly democrats you take most numbers of your poll here, with a little republican here!

And in reverse if you want Republicans to get the most numbers! You here, and then there for few democrats!

DA!

Yep progressive liberal republican dose not like conservative Pres. Trump!

Yep he was not a Liberal, cant have that, we have to stack the courts with the democrat mob, so boys can go in girls bath rooms and showers, girls can go boys bathrooms and showers in public schools!

got to be able to k**l them unborn babies, next will be the aged, got to be able to charge you with a crime, with out proof. yep judges are to be neutral, not any more!!

Trump brought back what the progressive liberals in both parties forced out of the US, to make the US dependent on other countries!

keep your head stuck in the sand, some day when you pull it out, you ask why are we a socialist dictator country? why didn't some body try to stop it!?

Lets talk DEMOCRATS and WELFARE

( 1 ) We have some 18 to 50 year olds fully capable of working, yet on welfare with a free roof over their head, food on the table and free health care! Kids in school

Study after study show there are generation after generation of families on welfare because that all they know! No one steps in to try to teach them a trade or responsibility.

( 2 ) Then we have all the REFUGEES we have to try and get into the work force housing and food and medical, kids in school

( 3 ) then we have the illegal’s we have to try and get into the work force housing and food and medical, kids in school

DEMOCRAT manipulate you all the time by using the word “DEMOCRACY”

Best Answer: Sure, most know we were founded as a Republic. Trouble is most don't understand what a Republic is.

In a Republic, v****g is a privilege.

Hence, when the nation was founded only white men who owned property were entitled to v**e in most states.

When v****g was turned into a "right", we became a democracy.

The reason the privilege to v**e was limited was to try to ensure the people elected would be loyal to the Constitution instead of a constituency.

A republic is not a [pure] democracy. It is a system of checks and balances so ordered to protect the rights of the individual, from criminals and most importantly from the democratically elected voices who claim to speak for the "public good." It is a limited "democracy".

For those who are confused by the issue, the essential point is this: is it right for another man to rape, rob and murder another? A democracy says yes -- if the majority wills it.

A Republic limits democracy to it's only useful purpose; electing officials to fill Constitutional offices. A wise v**er would not v**e for an official who campaigned on "public good" but only for the good of the Constitution, which is indeed for the good of the public.

Article II Section 1 contains the oath the President must take before assuming office. It reads:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


The oath does not say the President, nor any elected official may to the best of their ability payback with public funds or government favors those who v**ed for them or paid for their campaign. That type of crap is found in socialist democracies, not Republics and certainly not a capitalist constitutional republic.

I'm not in favor of trusting the future of our nation to the befuddled majority of the moment.

Just look at how the majority views the writ of habeas corpus, as a right.

But the Constitution Article I Section 9 describes the writ of
habeas corpus thusly:
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of r*******n or invasion the public safety may require it."

If it were a right, it could not be suspended for any reason under the Constitution.

Like the so called "right" to v**e, which felons can have suspended by states. In other words, convicted felons no longer have the "privilege" of v****g.

We no longer function as a Republic because for generations we have been told we are a democracy, so people tend to be a bit confused as to the difference.

Politicians prey upon the confusion and constantly insist the Constitution needs to be interpreted.

Say what!!! It's written in plain English for any who cares to read it.

The only things that needs to be interpreted are all the new laws which are pretty much written for lawyers for the benefit of lawyers and their clients.

Now, I'm not in favor of only white landed men having the privilege to v**e but it is a privilege, not a right. When v****g is a right, you get what we have now, or worse. Useless, expensive government that ignores the charter of its own existence in order to reduce us all to s***es for its own ends.
1 decade ago




In a Democracy, the majority rules. If the majority decided they wanted your bike, they could take it.

In a Republic, your bike is your property and you do not owe it to anyone. It cannot be taken against your will, by law.

America is a Constitutional Republic.

Therefore, the Constitution is the law by which we are supposed to be protected.

In a Republic, the individual is protected FROM the majority, by Constitutional Law.

A Constitutional Republic is what we were given. It is up to us to keep it

For bring back companies the DEMOCRATS force out of the US? and show us a 100% made US car or truck including all parts: and you might tell the UNION WORKERS what your wages and your BENIFITS they are paying for!

DEMOCRAT manipulate you all the by using the word “DEMOCRACY” all the time

Best Answer: Sure, most know we were founded as a Republic. Trouble is most don't understand what a Republic is.

In a Republic, v****g is a privilege.

Hence, when the nation was founded only white men who owned property were entitled to v**e in most states.

When v****g was turned into a "right", we became a democracy.

The reason the privilege to v**e was limited was to try to ensure the people elected would be loyal to the Constitution instead of a constituency.

A republic is not a [pure] democracy. It is a system of checks and balances so ordered to protect the rights of the individual, from criminals and most importantly from the democratically elected voices who claim to speak for the "public good." It is a limited "democracy".

For those who are confused by the issue, the essential point is this: is it right for another man to rape, rob and murder another? A democracy says yes -- if the majority wills it.

A Republic limits democracy to it's only useful purpose; electing officials to fill Constitutional offices. A wise v**er would not v**e for an official who campaigned on "public good" but only for the good of the Constitution, which is indeed for the good of the public.

Article II Section 1 contains the oath the President must take before assuming office. It reads:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


The oath does not say the President, nor any elected official may to the best of their ability payback with public funds or government favors those who v**ed for them or paid for their campaign. That type of crap is found in socialist democracies, not Republics and certainly not a capitalist constitutional republic.

I'm not in favor of trusting the future of our nation to the befuddled majority of the moment.

Just look at how the majority views the writ of habeas corpus, as a right.

But the Constitution Article I Section 9 describes the writ of
habeas corpus thusly:
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of r*******n or invasion the public safety may require it."

If it were a right, it could not be suspended for any reason under the Constitution.

Like the so called "right" to v**e, which felons can have suspended by states. In other words, convicted felons no longer have the "privilege" of v****g.

We no longer function as a Republic because for generations we have been told we are a democracy, so people tend to be a bit confused as to the difference.

Politicians prey upon the confusion and constantly insist the Constitution needs to be interpreted.

Say what!!! It's written in plain English for any who cares to read it.

The only things that needs to be interpreted are all the new laws which are pretty much written for lawyers for the benefit of lawyers and their clients.

Now, I'm not in favor of only white landed men having the privilege to v**e but it is a privilege, not a right. When v****g is a right, you get what we have now, or worse. Useless, expensive government that ignores the charter of its own existence in order to reduce us all to s***es for its own ends.
1 decade ago




In a Democracy, the majority rules. If the majority decided they wanted your bike, they could take it.

In a Republic, your bike is your property and you do not owe it to anyone. It cannot be taken against your will, by law.

America is a Constitutional Republic.

Therefore, the Constitution is the law by which we are supposed to be protected.

In a Republic, the individual is protected FROM the majority, by Constitutional Law.

A Constitutional Republic is what we were given. It is up to us to keep it

And look up more history you will find DEMOCRATS fought to keep s***ery and also fought to keep guns out of the B****S hands!!

Democrats use the word “DEMOCRACY” all the time!!

Best Answer: Sure, most know we were founded as a Republic. Trouble is most don't understand what a Republic is.

In a Republic, v****g is a privilege.

Hence, when the nation was founded only white men who owned property were entitled to v**e in most states.

When v****g was turned into a "right", we became a democracy.

The reason the privilege to v**e was limited was to try to ensure the people elected would be loyal to the Constitution instead of a constituency.

A republic is not a [pure] democracy. It is a system of checks and balances so ordered to protect the rights of the individual, from criminals and most importantly from the democratically elected voices who claim to speak for the "public good." It is a limited "democracy".

For those who are confused by the issue, the essential point is this: is it right for another man to rape, rob and murder another? A democracy says yes -- if the majority wills it.

A Republic limits democracy to it's only useful purpose; electing officials to fill Constitutional offices. A wise v**er would not v**e for an official who campaigned on "public good" but only for the good of the Constitution, which is indeed for the good of the public.

Article II Section 1 contains the oath the President must take before assuming office. It reads:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


The oath does not say the President, nor any elected official may to the best of their ability payback with public funds or government favors those who v**ed for them or paid for their campaign. That type of crap is found in socialist democracies, not Republics and certainly not a capitalist constitutional republic.

I'm not in favor of trusting the future of our nation to the befuddled majority of the moment.

Just look at how the majority views the writ of habeas corpus, as a right.

But the Constitution Article I Section 9 describes the writ of
habeas corpus thusly:
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of r*******n or invasion the public safety may require it."

If it were a right, it could not be suspended for any reason under the Constitution.

Like the so called "right" to v**e, which felons can have suspended by states. In other words, convicted felons no longer have the "privilege" of v****g.

We no longer function as a Republic because for generations we have been told we are a democracy, so people tend to be a bit confused as to the difference.

Politicians prey upon the confusion and constantly insist the Constitution needs to be interpreted.

Say what!!! It's written in plain English for any who cares to read it.

The only things that needs to be interpreted are all the new laws which are pretty much written for lawyers for the benefit of lawyers and their clients.

Now, I'm not in favor of only white landed men having the privilege to v**e but it is a privilege, not a right. When v****g is a right, you get what we have now, or worse. Useless, expensive government that ignores the charter of its own existence in order to reduce us all to s***es for its own ends.
1 decade ago




In a Democracy, the majority rules. If the majority decided they wanted your bike, they could take it.

In a Republic, your bike is your property and you do not owe it to anyone. It cannot be taken against your will, by law.

America is a Constitutional Republic.

Therefore, the Constitution is the law by which we are supposed to be protected.

In a Republic, the individual is protected FROM the majority, by Constitutional Law.

A Constitutional Republic is what we were given. It is up to us to keep it

STUDENT WALK OUTS OVER GUN CONTROL

LET TALK COMMON SENSE SHOULD WE

Question in a ”LOCAL DISASTER” who is the FIRST RESPONDERS? You are!

Who is the “SECOND RESPONDERS? The City is, THIRD COUNTY, FOURTH STATE, FIFTH FEDERAL!

FIRST RESPONDERS: Now lets talk school safety, Remember Common Sense now! Who is the first to see and hear about discontent student? Class Mates? Teachers? ( inform the Principle, Assent Principle, Dean )

School keep files on each and every student, they need to be kept updated, and if there is a problem student that makes a threatening comment, then it needs to be reported and investigated and recorded.

If there is a probable thereat parents and law enforcement should be called in to gather, and go over the situation.

SECOND RESPONDERS: if it has been deemed necessary to turn over the students files to the local Law Enforcement and if they feel it’s warrant pass it to the

THIRD RESPONDER: State and FBI.

Gee just think with all the school shooting that went on NO ONE HAD THE COMMON SENSE TO ALREADY HAVE THIS SIT UP ALL READY “DA”


We have some ELECTED that WANTS YOU BELIEVING IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT for any thing and every thing, skipping over LOCAL FIRST GETTING TAKEN CARE OF IMMEDIATELY NOT TO LATE, WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!!

Shrink the government work force and increase public work force, ya! Back to a small manageable government!!! sounds like a huge plus to me!!

Alan:Gomez
USA TODAY
Subject of Immigration

I saw you on Washington Journal the other day on the subject of Immigration.

First off lets talk about our Welfare Clientele, the ones that are 18 to 50 years old that are not working and are fully capable of working, but yet get a roof over their head, food on the table, medical care and their kids are going school.

But then again we also have all the refugees that are fully capable of working we have to try and get them into work force also and kid into school and medical care, and some can not work so they hit the welfare game.


Then we have the Illegal’s coming to the United States some taking the jobs the local welfare receivers should be doing, having kids, get medical and school,
MONEY! MONEY!

Gee! I want to go to America, They have wide open borders, I hear you don’t have to work there, and every thing is handed to you, all you have to do is v**e for democrats, that’s their cost for letting us in!!!

Then of corse we have group that want’s their Sharia law inserted into our LAWS here in the US.

“Sharia-ism absolutely is already here,” insisted Brighton, going on to discuss h**e groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Gee I’ve got Scottish, German, English in my blood so, let’s see is if Sharia law is inserted into our laws then a chance other nationalities will want their countries law also inserted into our laws.

Guarantee you the PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL Democrats and Republicans could care less if they did let all the different nationalities insert their laws, that way it would give them the chance of tarring up our CONSTITUTION

Alan:Gomez
USA TODAY
Subject of Immigration

I saw you on Washington Journal the other day on the subject of Immigration.

First off lets talk about our Welfare Clientele, the ones that are 18 to 50 years old that are not working and are fully capable of working, but yet get a roof over their head, food on the table, medical care and their kids are going school.

But then again we also have all the refugees that are fully capable of working we have to try and get them into work force also and kid into school and medical care, and some can not work so they hit the welfare game.


Then we have the Illegal’s coming to the United States some taking the jobs the local welfare receivers should be doing, having kids, get medical and school,
MONEY! MONEY!

Gee! I want to go to America, They have wide open borders, I hear you don’t have to work there, and every thing is handed to you, all you have to do is v**e for democrats, that’s their cost for letting us in!!!

Then of corse we have group that want’s their Sharia law inserted into our LAWS here in the US.

“Sharia-ism absolutely is already here,” insisted Brighton, going on to discuss h**e groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Gee I’ve got Scottish, German, English in my blood so, let’s see is if Sharia law is inserted into our laws then a chance other nationalities will want their countries law also inserted into our laws.

Guarantee you the PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL Democrats and Republicans could care less if they did let all the different nationalities insert their laws, that way it would give them the chance of tarring up our CONSTITUTION

While in the military, I worked in a NATIONAL SECURITY AREA I packed codes to enter the area and if I would have C*********D any thing in the area, in the mater of days, weeks I would have paper w area.

If I would ork setting in front of me.

With NAMES, DATES of who and what we talked about!!!!

Not months, or years!!