Okay, I am going to try to establish evidence that this particular idea is not only dangerous, but evil by design, as well as an a*********n and therefore against the nature of man, and the nature of creation.
The way the species was described in religion, specifically in the bible, is that God, the Creator, created Man in His Own Image.
Therefore the human person, was created in the image of God. ---Okay I can buy that.
Then according to Genesis:
"The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and wh**ever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.
But for Adam[f] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs[g] and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib[h] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.”
That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.
Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame." Genesis 2:18-25
So, according to what I read here, (and there are many versions), God made man, out of the clay of the earth in this image. Then took a rib of Adam (Human) and made a helper for him, which Adam named "Woman"
Therefore, "that is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh" That one flesh is human, because the human lost a rib and another being was made.
Make sense right? Well the Democrats beg to differ....
So what is the difference between a man and a woman? (Let's start here now leaving the bible, and entering into science)
A man is physically stronger than the woman. Biological fact.
A woman is the only one of the species that can nurture and carry the baby.
It takes the seed of the man, to join the egg of the woman, to create a new human.
This is an undisputed fact for since the dawn of the creation of man. For Adam was not born but created, and Eve was not born but made from Adam. This is shown in nature with in the species or as St. Jude writes, "with in their own domain"
Now a professor from Berkley, CA, Professor Bridges told senator Harley men can become pregnant.
Obviously the Bible and Science agree about the fact that it takes a man and a woman to create a new member of humanity. This is true. This is nature. This is not an a*********n, nor a sin. So that part of the equation can be proven over and over again.
However in Genesis 6, we read the following:
"When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. " Genesis 6:1-2
It has been widely accepted that the "sons of God" are known by another name: Angels. And that the daughters of man, were women. This is a commonly accepted interpretation, which also describes a fear imbedded in the animal instinct of the human person. This fear is spread amongst all of humanity for this happened in the beginning of the species.
So what does these two verses of the first book of Moses describe? This describes that the "gods" or "angels" has cardinal knowledge of women or some sort of sexual relations with the "daughters of man". Some ancient texts consider these women from the line of Cain, therefore wicked women.
So an angel had sex with a woman, what was the produce of that union? The bible relates that this off spring were Giants and all sorts of beasts. Even St. Jude relates to this one incident in human history warning his fellow Christians against such a*********ns when he writes:
"Though you already know all this, I want to remind you that the Lord[c] at one time delivered his people out of Egypt, but later destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their proper dwelling—these he has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day. In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
In the very same way, on the strength of their dreams these ungodly people pollute their own bodies, reject authority and heap abuse on celestial beings. But even the archangel Michael, when he was disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, did not himself dare to condemn him for slander but said, “The Lord rebuke you!” Yet these people slander wh**ever they do not understand, and the very things they do understand by instinct—as irrational animals do—will destroy them." Jude 1:5-10
But what is interesting about St. Jude is that he continues:
"Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain; they have rushed for profit into Balaam’s error; they have been destroyed in Korah’s r*******n.
These people are blemishes at your love feasts, eating with you without the slightest qualm—shepherds who feed only themselves. They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted—twice dead. They are wild waves of the sea, foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever.
Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about them: “See, the Lord is coming with thousands upon thousands of his holy ones to judge everyone, and to convict all of them of all the ungodly acts they have committed in their ungodliness, and of all the defiant words ungodly sinners have spoken against him.” These people are grumblers and faultfinders; they follow their own evil desires; they boast about themselves and flatter others for their own advantage." Jude 1:11-16
The saint clearly condemns these acts as a major a*********n and that this kind of knowledge should remain taboo and we as a species should steer far from the temptations of this a*********n. Make Sense? But, he warns that there will be those who, engage by their own desire, this a*********n and that these people will be judged and cast into the eternal fire(hell). A very harsh warning, to those who perverse the t***h of God, and his servants, and his people.
Now what specifically is Moses and St. Jude referring to?
In 1 Enoch, the sons of God are the “sons of heaven,” angelic beings led by Shemihazah. The name Shemihazah (שׁמיחזה, šemîḥăzāh) means “My name has seen” and is sometimes vocalized as Semyaz of Semyaza (Nickelsburg, 179). “Name” refers to God, so the name refers to constantly watching God. This is ironic since God will see this r*******n and render judgment on the Shemihazah. As the story progresses, however, Azazel emerges as the ringleader (but later Enoch will intercede on behalf of Azazel).
The two hundred angels take an oath to descend to Mt Hermon, find women to marry and have children with them. 1 Enoch 6:7-8 lists the names of the leaders of these angels. Most have names with some reference to God (Remashel, “evening of God” or Kokabel, “star of God” ).
In chapters 7 and 8 the angels make good on their oath and take women as wives. They teach humans “magical medicines, incantations, the cutting of roots and about plants.” The origin of folk-medicine is therefore ascribed to these angelic beings. The children of the angels are giants standing three hundred cubits (450 feet tall!) These giants eat so much food the humans cannot feed them anymore. The giants proceed to eat humans as well as all other kinds of animals.
The text notes especially that they drank the blood of animals, “sinning against them.” In the biblical flood story, the Noahic covenant includes a command about consuming blood. 1 Enoch 7-8 is a reflection upon this command which was probably given because the antediluvian world did in fact consume blood.
In addition to teaching humans in interpret a wide range of signs, they teach humans medicinal magic. The angel Azazel teaches humans metal-working, including making of ornaments and weapon making. Azazel also teaches them to make eye-shadow and other physical ornamentation. This may be a polemic against pagan practice of using make up in their religious ceremonies. Other angels teach the humans how to track the stars (astrology and divination) and the signs of the moon. These angels are responsible for teaching humans all sorts of sinful practices. Humanity cries out as a result of this oppression, a cry which “goes up to heaven.”
Therefore, the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah were taught to man from their fathers-the Nephilim
Now the focus in this topic is not the Nephilim, but the fathers of the Nephilim, 200 some odd, rebellious angels that taught man the acts of sexual impurity and other sexual sins such as rape, incest, etc.
Now the angels saw the Creator bring into existence all forms of life, and these rebellious angels knew how to pervert that life. They attacked humans, and inserted their genome into the human person. This almost destroyed the human race in the beginning. But now, it seems its back. These evil angels are responsible for the evils of r****m, and acts of desire, such as (the act of homosexuality).
Now today, there is an argument underway that states an unnatural act: A man getting pregnant and having a child. First of all the man, like the wicked women, the wives of the angels, would die a painful horrible death. But their produce would be much like that of the Nephilim.
The only scientific way, that a man could possibly get pregnant is through artificial means, for simply put the man does not have the equipment to carry the child to term. If the man survives the pregnancy's period, or the carrying of the child, how is the child supposed to exit the man? And in this Birthing process, what damage will that baby cause the man?
There are medical procedures that should always be taboo, and one of them is inserting the female organs into a man, or visa versa. These procedures are an a*********n and should be prohibited. Even if the surgery was successful, and did function properly, what phycological and physiological effects would occur on the male made female or female made male?
This type of procedure, was first taught to man from the angels, and then infected the human race with all sorts of evil, almost k*****g the species of the human domain. Now, in the realm of science which was not taught to man through the angels, we have discovered this immoral, taboo, unjust, and just simply wrong procedure.
You cannot physically change yourself from a man to a woman or a woman to man, and expect to live. Save civil rights, for a moment, or any phobia you may think I'm promoting, and just look at survival of such a person and the natural quality of life. Remember, Nature is against such a creature, and nature, not r****m will try to k**l and purge such a person. I feel sorry for those who get this procedure done.
Now let's say the procedure is successful, and a man is made by man into a woman. Then the next act would be, as an evil angel or a scientist because both would be curious, would be to make the artificial woman pregnant. Then the above questions I asked as a reason of practicality, would apply. How would this biological man carry such an a*********n? Would the person survive? Nature is already fighting against the a*********n, and Man (who takes the easy way out, would probably follow nature, for that is the nature of man. Therefore it is not bigoted, or r****m, or even a phobia to fear for the life of a fellow human being getting such an a*********n procedure.
A******n(an argument for another time) would be necessary to save the life of the male made female. And A******n is murder.
Sorry but this is my view point, and I back it up with Scripture and Science. Why does the other side believe so much in an evil procedure based on desire? Is that desire so strong that they will risk self preservation, or life itself to satisfy that desire? If that's the case I refer them to the whole book of St. Jude.
The End. Any Questions? Complaints? Statements? Please respond. Like to hear what you all think.
Okay, I am going to try to establish evidence that... (
show quote)