Thanks Woody. I knew I could count on you to solidify my point. The Maga principles have not changed in six years and they have been spelled out in great detail on this site more than once. Every single principle that we stand for is easily proven to be the same as those who founded the most free and prosperous country in the history of the world. Now, thanks to you and those that you idolize, we are in chaos and are in serious danger from enemies both foreign and domestic. If you want even a tiny bit of credibility, then take our list of principles one by one and show us how they might hurt anyone. Baseless slander does not count and for that matter, does not even merit a response.

According to a WPA Intelligence survey, 22% of Democrats think that "some men can get pregnant." What's even worse, although not at all surprising, is that the women are the ones who are really crazy.

It turns out that 36% of White, college-educated Democrat women think men can get pregnant. I've written before about how leftism damages women. It makes them extremely angry and neurotic. It also, apparently, cuts them off from reality. Sadly, these same women are a force to be reckoned with politically. They may be loopy, but they've got political power.

Here's the whole t*********r theory in a nutshell: while we once accepted that g****r was both (a) a linguistic term for languages that have male and female word forms and (b) a synonym for people uncomfortable with the word "sex," even when used in a clinical sense, for almost 20 years now, activists have been educating students to believe that sex is a biological construct while g****r is a person's innate identity. That's how your sex can be male, but your g****r can be female or vice versa. You can also feel like nothing at all or a fish or a potato.

It's all about feelings, nothing more than feelings. And in l*****t land, feelings always triumph over reality.

Because people have pointed out to the g****r crowd that there is no science supporting this worldview, they've done what l*****ts always do: resorted to the p***********e that is "social science," along with fact-free dives into "history." Daniel Greenfield has a strong article at FrontPage Magazine about "T*********r Historical Revisionism." He examines the newest theory in the Looking-Glass world that is academia, which is that the g****r binary was cruelly imposed on indigenous people by Western colonialism:

Now at Johns Hopkins you can find a class on "The G****r Binary and American Empire" which contends that "the sex and g****r binary was produced out of colonialism and statecraft in Americas and particularly through US imperialism" while PBS tells school students that "on nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two g****rs."

This is complete horse pucky. Why? Because of the most basic imperative driving every species: procreation. At a basic level, untainted by academic theories, everything that every animal does is intended to perpetuate its DNA.

When it comes to mammals, there's only one way to move that DNA into the next generation: a person with external reproductive organs (AKA a man) engages in a very specific activity with a person with internal reproductive organs (AKA a woman), and, if all goes well, that duo manages to send its DNA into the next generation.

That's how it's been done since the dawn of mammal-kind. It's instinctive. No animal, including the human animal, needs Dr. Ruth to explain.

Of course, humans are complex. Their emotional experiences may lead some to prefer non-procreative interactions with someone sharing their reproductive organs. Also, some people may look at the other people's reproductive organs and, rather than thinking, "We could have fun together and pass on our DNA," instead think, "I resent that I lack those organs while the other person has them." And people made paranoid by c*****e c****e or selfish by the perpetual adolescence in which modern society encourages them often decide to jump off the "DNA into the future" bandwagon altogether.

When it comes to "g****r envy" (for want of a better phrase), in the old days, the latter thinking was limited to envy and cross-dressing. Nowadays, it's become a dangerous cult that destroys minds and bodies, while handing extreme power to the government. In California, for example, while it's illegal for children to get v*****es, tattoos, or access to tanning beds without parental consent, the Legislature recently v**ed to remove parental rights over so-called "t*********r children."

But on the same day [State Sen. Scott] Wiener withdrew SB 866 [a failed bill allowing kids 12 and up to have v*****es without parental consent], he received overwhelming Democratic support for SB 107. This dangerous proposal authorizes California courts to take "temporary emergency jurisdiction" over out-of-state minors if they come to the state for so-called "g****r-affirming" care.

[snip]

Wiener's proposal now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom's desk for a decision. Newsom has until September 30 to sign or veto the measure.

It's not about the kids; it's never about the kids. It is, instead, about breaking family bonds and destroying children's control over the body God or nature gave them.

T*********rism is political. It's the politics of hatred (because I defy you to find me a so-called t*********r "woman" who doesn't h**e and wish to erase r**l w***n), mind control, the breakdown of the family, and the weaponization of neurosis, genuine mental illness, and extreme narcissism. Given the misogyny behind it, it's ironic that l*****t women support it most fervently, but they're sadly comfortable with the other aspects of this highly destructive political movement.

These aren't just your garden variety lies either.

You're raised in a family that goes to Church. You're taught if you do right then things will go better for you. Then you see your family fall apart for wh**ever reason and you think, "why I'm a good person?"

Later on down the road you grow up and leave home and don't go to church as much anymore and you get curious about the foundation on which religion is based that you were told.

You were told that the King James Version is the inerrant word of God and then you find out there have been a bunch of versions and many things have been left out of the Bible as well as words changed over time to suit the Church and then the whole thing starts to fall apart.

So you see the near death experiences on YouTube when you search for religious themed information and you also find the work of the Naked Archealogist who specializes in unraveling Biblical Mysteries and now you're really on a roll. Not only do you find that they know what happened to the body and bones of Yeshua or Jesus Christ but he was buried in the tomb complex of his family along with all of the right people in his family.

So what does this do to Christian beliefs that you've been told?

Its not necessarily that that they are lies but it more like the stories are told in the Eastern mindset where many things that are said are emblematic and not so factual like the Western Mindset.

It's a great deal to wrap the mind around so you watch some of the near death experiences and find that all of them have similar things in them and one of the biggest commonalities is that, "everyone gets in."

This exposes yet another fib of the organized Christian Church. If they aren't viewed as the Gatekeeper to heaven why would people want to attend?

It's a problem that would have been easily solved if all of the books of the Bible had been included in the Canon at the council of Nicea and the church had not created itself based on a need for power over the people.

It's a struggle that has messed up nearly every beautiful place on earth and now people are finding out the information they need to walk away from organized religion but not necessarily from Jesus Christ.

The ones that never seek, never find and that is the problem.

They are content in the message that church is giving out never mind the versions of bible, the changes in the words in it and the installation of the church as a power broker.

Does this sound familiar?

Perhaps you should do some research yourself by watching the results of the research of others. It's out there.

You can tell if its factual or not, when they show you the findings in physical form.

There is nothing wrong with a loving God who is inclusive to all but perhaps a few questions are in order.

I don't recall the part in the Bible where forcing religion on someone was a part of it. I was taught that a Christian was supposed to be happy as a Christian and serve as an example for what Christianity had to offer.

What happened to that? Well fibs have a way to making things quite ominous don't they.

But let’s just look at the last comments by Trump cultist. Trump stole secret documents and Trump cultist refer to it as an overdue library Book, and it’s nothing but a storage issue. Now remember Trump denied for over 18 months that he did not have them. All he had to do was open his desks draw.

As you can see Trump cultist are brainwashed, remarkably uninformed and lack critical thinking. Just think about there thought process if it snows in New England in the winter that’s there proof g****l w*****g is a h**x. These are the same embaciles who still think trickle down economics works and started taking horse dewormers to protect themselves from a v***s.

These people believe Trump when he said I am looking forward to showing my tax returns and financials because they are very high. Or build a Great Wall and Mexico pays. Or if I was president 9/11 would not have happened.The concept of g****l w*****g was created by China. Saddam Hussein was great he k**led terrorest. I am the most successful candidate ever to run.
Then these same people tell you Biden is a total disaster. So just some simple research shows something different so this is the Biden disaster.
Record Job creation, record business startup, best GDP growth in 40 years, record cuts to deficit spending, record consumer spending, home values rise, childhood poverty at record lows. But invariably one or two things happen they start complaining about some problem that Trump actually caused, then listen to economic growth under Biden was only possible because Trump was a disaster.
These people still don’t understand why gas prices that actually started under Trump. They totally ignore the facts that Trump officials at an OPEC meeting prior to the p******c forced OPEC into a two year deal to slash production to create a global oil shortage so oil companies were able to post high profits despite C***D. Then the Trump cultist start streaming that it’s Biden fault. This is because Trump cultist are stupid, brainwashed uninformed and lack critical thinking.

Then these Trump cultist see something bad like high gas prices and then make stupid comments that Biden cancelled the Keystone pipeline and the pipeline is approximately 2 years from completion. So a pipeline that’s not even online is the cause of high gas prices. Then they will tel you gas price’s we’re $1.50 a gallon even though these cultist know gas was at $2.89 a gallon and rising.

But Trump cultist buy into Trump stealing classified documents and for 18 months denied he even had them as an overdue library book and the theft is nothing but a storage issue.

But this divide in this country will not go away until Trump is put in jail and shut down his pathological lying.

On Aug. 24, New York’s Democrat governor Kathy Hochul gave a speech about how the Empire State is combatting what she repeatedly referred to as “gun violence.” Among other things, her remarks suggested that the state will begin using political and ideological litmus tests to determine who is a “suitable person” to own or carry a firearm.

There are two main methods gun control advocates use to advance their agenda, which ultimately would ban firearm ownership for anyone but those who protect the gun control advocates themselves or who prop up their regimes as police, soldiers, security guards, etc.

The first is to ban what they claim are unusually dangerous weapons.

The second is to ban the keeping and bearing of arms by those who they claim are unusually dangerous persons.

At first blush, neither seems like an inherently unreasonable proposition. Indeed, they almost seem like common sense.

But it doesn’t take connecting too many dots to understand that what is “too dangerous” in their minds includes America’s most popular types of firearms and magazines, and who is “too dangerous” includes any person who does not embrace their own politics and beliefs.

While describing recent changes to New York’s already draconian firearms laws, Hochul said (see video beginning at 11:30):

We also talked about, I mentioned, social media a number of times. I’ve called upon and working closely [sic] with our attorney general to identify what’s going on in social media. Those questions are now part of our background check, such as like in the old days you’d talk to someone’s neighbor. Now you can talk to their neighbors online and find out whether or not this person has been spouting, uh, you know, philosophies that indicate they have been radicalized, and that’s how we protect our citizens as well.

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20220906/gun-controllers-ban-firearms-for-radicals-and-designate-political-opposition-under-that-category

Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who she would consider 'radical'.

Since biden's speech and an excessive use of the term democracy, it is time to take a look at what are the evils of democracy, so we don't go down the path of absolute democracy, and its ill effects and tendencies.

A few people gather and decide were to spend Labor Day. 3 say the beach and 2 say a picnic. Three wins. Same thing if it was 10 over 9. A one time shot is fine for democracy. Where it goes wrong is if that same decision happens every weekend and the minority never gets its choice. Eventually that 2 or 9 will decide to go alone to what they want. Is that revolution, or just justice, or a just outcome. But it doesn't work in the long haul. Just an occasional one off.

Lets try another example. 51 out rule 49. Again, it sounds good on its face. But in an organization with long term rules and policies like a corporation or a government, the 51 start trying to pass rules that will enhance their perceived ideas of how they can increase their advantage to 52 over 48. Then the next time it is 54 over 46. and then 57 over 43. It accelerates in their power grab. And soon they see them selves at such an advantage as to set up their elected leader, via biased laws, to essential dictatorship. Then both sides start losing power to the dictator and his cronies. Then you have Venezuela or Nicaragua. But not the America that was created through our Constitution. And democracy will no longer exist as your rights to fair and honest v**es are now taken away, or stolen.

In America today, we have a very thin lead, held by the democrat Party. And they are very aggressively trying to change everything around them, to go from 51 over 49 to 60 over 40, overnight, with law after law jammed down the throats of America and Americans, whether they like it or not. And all to often they don't like it.

In America and in the U. S, Senate, we have one of the greatest tools to prevent these outrageous takeovers by bare majorities. The filibuster. The current bare majority is continually threatening to remove the filibuster for this and that, and in the process they have seen the removing of the filibuster work once, and then have to live with the results of the other party striking back and gaining an advantage. I refer to the filibuster in the approving of Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices.

The filibuster should be made a permanent part of our Constitution. Yes, it should have limits. Personally I feel 60 40 is about right. It keeps the minority from having absolute dictatorial power such as 65 - 35 would tend to do. On the other hand, 55 - 45 is to small of a check on the power of the majority. This will then tend to smaller and slower changes in laws, allowing the people to accept and adjust to reasonable laws or rebel to unjust takeovers of an out of control, bare majority.

That is what we are dealing with in America today. An out of control bare majority trying to change and control rules for e******ns nationwide, and opening our borders to fill our country with preferred people they perceive as future democrat v**ers, to giving vast amounts of money to perceived potential v**ers who will then v**e to keep them in power forever. And all this to the ultimate disadvantage of the country as a Republic that made it so great. They keep trying to forge a coalition of various minorities, so that they can stay in power and ultimately become a super power, over a bare minority that limits there excesses. This must never be permitted or, not only a misnamed democracy, but our Republic will fail, and we will have ens***ed ourselves.

Logically Right

The latest Trump scandal of the hundreds that have occurred during Trumps administration, and up to the current day is being ignored. Why did Trump take the highly classified documents from the White House, and what did he intend to do with them? According to the DOJ, Archives Dept., and the FBI, these documents were subpoenaed by archives. Trump pretty much ignored the subpoenas. According to the CIA and other security, and intelligence agencies, there is an ongoing investigation on what damage has been done by the former POTUS on national security?
The Trumpers have said that:
1. Trump declassified the documents before he left office. According to many of the White House staff, they would have heard about this declassification if it took place. No one ever heard of this action. One of the staff called this " bull s**t".
2. The FBI planted classified documents in Mar-a- Lago . That is utter nonsense.
Trump may face criminal charges for removing top secret documents from the White House, ignoring subpoenas, and other charges relating to this crime.
Please enlighten me concerning this scandal.