They can't avoid it because everyone everywhere is calling them out for what they are.

They let a madman=want to demagogue, dictator who has bankrupted business after business
out of his toxic personality talk them into making him their brand.

He started a anti-woman, anti-American movement, a c**p against the e******ns that would seek to
o*******w a freely held and f**r e******n and the t******r of p***r. He committed e******n f***d, he
illegally made off with state secrets deemed Top Secret and stored them in unsecured locations for
very like unscrupulous reasons and continues to raise hell to rally his mindlessbase so they will get
all worked up and send him more money.

Now he has more money than the RNC and he's broken them going into the midterms.

He is exactly what the MAGA crowd has let him become but he and them are being rejected at every turn.

The Shame must be very Heavy to know that what they supported was the rise of F*****m where they
game every thing they can in order to gain power against the majority of the free people.

You MAGA people should go to your room and stare in the corner and don't come out until you're ready
to say you're sorry. Sorry for being a t*****r to your country.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-search-affidavit-reveals-confidential-205424255.html

Are we headed for a civil war?
Star Parker asserts that 'shared values and principles' in America are nearly nonexistent
By Star Parker
Published August 23, 2022 at 7:44pm

I wrote a column in 2011, as the p**********l politics of the upcoming year were starting to unfold, with the headline "Why 2012 looks a lot like 1860."

The deep fracturing of the American e*****rate – remember the Tea Party? – leading up to the 2012 p**********l e******n was starting to look like what happened in the p**********l e******n in 1860, which occurred amid another massive splintering of the American e*****rate.

The issue of s***ery in the 1850s – whether or the extent to which it should or could be tolerated in America – tore apart the fabric of common values in the nation, and the result was collapse.

There were p**********l candidates in 1860 running on four different party tickets – the newly formed Republican Party, the Constitutional Union Party, and Northern and Southern parts of a split Democratic Party.

Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate, emerged victorious with just 39.82% of the popular v**e. Immediately upon the Lincoln's declared victory, seven Southern states seceded from the Union.

Soon there would be a bloody civil war.

A vibrant, free and democratic nation thrives with differences of opinion. But there is a difference between differences of opinion on specific issues of policy and fracturing of discourse because of absence of common ground of values and principles.

For a nation to function, there must be some common denominator of shared values and principles.

This common denominator of shared values and principles is dangerously eroding today, and animosities are sharpening and deepening.

Am I predicting another civil war? God forbid.

But the depth of animosities now is looking less like the healthy discourse of a free country and looking more like unraveling of our social fabric. It's dangerous, and we should be aware of what is going on.

A new survey released by Pew Research Center bears out this trend, showing animosities between those identifying with the two parties getting increasingly sharp and increasing numbers of Americans, particularly younger Americans, not happy with either party.

Per the Pew report, in 1994, 21% of Republicans had a "very unfavorable" view of the Democratic Party. Today it is 62%. In 1994, 17% of Democrats had a "very unfavorable" view of the Republican Party. Today it is 54%.

Seventy-two percent of Republicans now, compared to 45% in 2016, say Democrats are more dishonest than other Americans. Sixty-three percent of Democrats, compared to 42% in 2016, say Republicans are more dishonest than other Americans.

According to the survey, in 2022, 27% of Americans now have unfavorable opinions of both parties compared to 6% in 1994 who held unfavorable views of both parties.

This is all consistent with a new survey from Gallup showing that more than half, 52%, of young Americans born between 1981 and 1996 identify as independents.

Forty-four percent of those born between 1960 and 1980, 33% of those born between 1946 and 1964, and 26% of those born between 1928 and 1945 identify as independents.

Just as the presence of s***ery challenged the core values and beliefs on which the nation was founded, so today issues such as a******n, sexual identity, and the nature and existence of marriage and family are dividing the common ground on which we stand.

Related to this is the core question of government and its role in the lives of private Americans.

When our divisions become so deep that civil discourse can no longer mend what has unraveled, we need to tread carefully.

Another recent Gallup poll shows 53% of Americans saying they worry "a great deal" about crime and violence.

How can a nation remain intact when large parts of the population have absolutely nothing in common with each other regarding how they see the world?

Limited government and individual freedom are the classic American answers. Unfortunately, we seem to be going in the opposite direction.

We’ve done versions of this dance a dozen times before:

He didn’t do it; there is no story here.
You don’t have irrefutable evidence that he did it.
That “evidence” is a f**e-news plant.
Even if he did it, the Dems do it worse.
It isn’t so bad, actually. There’s this obscure loophole / tortured argument that excuses it.
You’re damn right he did it, because he’s a great patriot. We always knew he did it and we want him to do it again.
The “it” in these cases varies: Access Hollywood, Charlottesville, the Zelensky call, the Amy Coney Barrett superspreader event, J****** 6. Sometimes “it” is a trivial thing. Sometimes “it” is an attempted c**p. But the pattern is always the same.

We’re moving through the progression on the Mar-a-Lago search warrant perfectly on schedule.

We started out with the FBI targeting a totally innocent Trump. Then the FBI didn’t have an iron-clad warrant and probable cause. Then the FBI planted any evidence that might have been found. Then what about Hillary/Obama.

And as of this morning we’re at, Actually, President Trump was protecting those classified documents.

Twitter avatar for @michaelpfreeman
Michael Freeman
@michaelpfreeman
So have we completely abandoned (1) the FBI planted the documents and (2) someone else packed the boxes and he didn’t know what was in them, in order to go with (3) he knew they were top secret documents and thought they should be secured in a Florida social club?

Aaron Rupar @atrupar
Rudy Giuliani tells Newsmax that Trump was just trying to preserve documents by putting them in a safe place.
August 19th 2022

81 Retweets273 Likes
Mar-a-Lago is even better than a SCIF! Trump brought those documents with him in order to protect America’s secrets! Preach it Col. Jessup!

I don’t know about you, but I’m exhausted by this cycle. Who wants to live like this? Can’t we go back to Republicans trying to pass corporate tax breaks and roll back the regulatory regime while Democrats push to increase social safety-net spending?

Bring back the dysfunctional politics of 1980 - 2015!

The problem is that exhaustion is part of the authoritarian’s tool kit. They want to exhaust you so that you’ll check out of politics and try to take refuge in other areas of life. And then they take over.

Don’t give in to the exhaustion.

https://thetriad.thebulwark.com/p/kari-lake-ron-desantis?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo5NjA5MzkyNCwiaWF0IjoxNjYwOTI1MjQ0LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItODcyNzQiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.s91J2ZAOXW6pFoSIIrWC2fLxp7CBqv0dLpCsKYTa9Bk&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Biden does not have dementia. I have heard him misspeak on TV, which is something I do, espically when I am tired. Like I will think California and say Colorado. He does the same thing. I have heard him sutter. He has worked very hard to mimize his speach impediment, which is impressive. You just see him stumble over words now and then. That is what is left of his stutter. Stuttering dose not mean your stupid, or have dementia. Biden has preformed well at press conferences. I suggest you take one in, to see just how well he is doing. I do belive that Biden is not as sharp as he was, but being a bit slower doesn't mean all that much. You still come to the same conclusions in the end.

The hard right has been hiding behind the supposed right to be able to say anything they want as a protected freedom of speech for way too long.

The freedom of speech is not intended to protect a person's right to hurt or inflict harm on another person, who's rights to being free of oppressive or damaging speech.

Saying h**eful things is h**e speech, again not protected, saying things that incite violence or harm is inciting harm, again not protected under free speech.

When a h**eful person posts something on a h**e mongering social media site that says "someone needs to k**l, cut off their heads", or otherwise inflict violence and harm on a political "enemy", which is a word that messages that all forms of violence and harm are acceptable to thoise using the rhetoric...this is a crime. This is when people start saying the things that unhinged people respond to, that influences them going out and k*****g the stereotyped object of enmity and hatred.

My point here is that even trump's t***h social has agreed to turn over the names and posts of those saying unacceptable levels of inciting hatred and violence.

The trump supporting right is engaging in a war with the very intelligence entities that can and will use the things they say on social media to track them down and render them harmless before they do damage to people they do not agree with.