Well sorry but why not comment on the so called BS. Prove it or respond with your version of facts.
I get tired of listening to this BS by Trump supporters these people can’t respond to anything without either insults sarcasm, or h**e and when I respond in the same manner they cry like children. They get there cue cards from that Pathological lying SOB in the White House and when his lies, and stupid childish comments are exposed these people have no answer other than to attack.
What I post by no means is BS you people just cannot and will not except anything of facts.

Seems the denial is on your end. The evidence of possible closeness between Trump and Epstein is everywhere. While none of it is "damning" on it's own, with so much of it out there, it does add up to a fairly strong circumstantial case for at the least, a strong suspicion. One particularly "damning" piece is the fact that while Trump owned Miss U.S.A and Miss Teen U.S.A., Trump would walk on into the woman's and the girl's dressing rooms while they are in various stages of dress/undress and gawk about. Grown men should know better than to do such things, especially in the case of underage girls.

Was his walking into those dressing rooms an unthinking mistake or did he do such with the hopes of getting some good looks at naked/partially naked women and girls? His comments on the "Access Hollywood" open mic tape might suggest that it was in the hopes of seeing them naked/partially naked. There are also some photos of him and IVanka at very young ages that look very creepy, or perhaps the creepiness of those photos are in light of other comments and actions that we know he has made? He has made some very creepy comments about Ivanka on television and radio shows and in print interviews too.

One particularly creepy comment he made was on a talk show where he and ivanka were asked what their favorite thing they had in common with one another, Ivanka said golf, Donald comes off saying "Well, I was going to say sex...". Another very creepy thing he said on another talk show was "I've said that if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I would be dating her". Those are just two examples of oh so many on television and radio, think Howard Stern show and the comments Trump has made on that show. Trump is ALWAYS remarking on Ivanka's beauty, not so uncommon for parents, but most don't take it to the creepy level and discuss their child's body as Trump does. Most parents would also object if an on air personality were to ask if they could call the offspring "a piece of ass", Trump was fine with it and even agreed with him.

Trump IS a creep and he makes no bones about it either. Time to give up on all these feeble denials and admit the t***h, it is quite possible that Trump may just be as much of a p*******e as Epstein and that might explain why they were so close, until Epstein was outed as a p*******e and Trump had to distance himself.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0_axTST2aY (Trump's sex comment)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP7yf8-Lk80 (Trump's "dating Ivanka" comment)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp-ljdL13TM (Trump allowing Stern to talk crudely about Ivanka)


No denying any of those videos.

If someone has thousands, if not tens of thousands, of acquaintances, chances are there might be a few bad apples in the bunch. And leave it to PeterS to try to throw some shade on Trump for knowing the bad apples.
Nice try PeterS but it won't work. The 60 million plus v**ers who v**ed for Trump continue to support Trump because he produces the results he promises.
In fact, I dare say that many former never-Trumpers, like myself, support him more strongly the more unhinged the attack from the left becomes. I was a Ted Cruz guy all the way until Cruz dropped out. And Hillary was simply a bridge too far, so I held my nose and v**ed Trump. And have been extremely pleased since then.
So keep it up PeterS, and all you other unhinged lefties, the more irrational your attacks on Trump the more support you're creating for Trump.
No doubt he'll walk away with a landslide win in 2020 and his policies will get America's ship righted again and the #1 nation on earth again!

I like droll. What is really funny, though, is that you state "ninety percent of mainstream media" is negative towards the president: it never seems to occur to you people that the Free Press is not negative towards the president but that many of his words and actions are negatively effecting and affecting our country. When a teacher marks a wrong answer on an exam, does he or she have a negative attitude towards the student? If your child makes a mistake, is correction reflective of a negative attitude for the child?

And have you considered that if 90% of the Press is "against" him, maybe it's for an obvious reason: he is that terrible.

The discussion about Sanders leaving does not have to be deep, and that is another clever way you guys avoid responding to topics. So let me ask you directly, in keeping with the subject you have avoided to attack me: was she good or bad or just right as Press Secretary?

And have you considered that if 90% of the Press is "against" him, maybe it is for an obvious reason: he is that terrible.