You bring up a valid point. When people talk over each other and the subject keeps getting changed and you jump from one subject to the next, questions and answers get missed. Interruptions during questioning is a conservative concept of "correct someone when they are wrong" however the concept has been long abandoned by conservatives due to the results of the Jerry Springer show where in the end the entertainment was not in finding wisdom but rather in people shouting at each other.

The conservative concept has lead to a more combative liberal technique where the conservative ends up repeating themselves and the liberal is offended at the answer that is repeated. And again either the subject is changed or the two enter combat. Either way the message is lost.

This went from conservatives to the Jerry Springer show into modern politics. Where it is not what you say but what you do and how you handle it.

One side looks for compassion while the other side looks at reason while both sides seek justice.

But t***h lies in both.

Thank you for posting the interviews that are the basis of this topic. And while watching the interviews I notice that there are conflicting facts being circulated.

Because of conflicting facts which facts do you place weight on? Statistics from the White House which has the resources of the Federal government or the facts from the news media? Which one is more true?

The problem here is that both statistics and facts are correct and incorrect because a comparison is being made with different criteria used. Thus, the comparison being conducted compares apples to oranges.

Thus, the press calls Trump a liar and Trump calls the press dishonest. So it just falls back to who do you believe?

From a citizen view point, federal officers sent to protect a court house is an insult. From federal officals point if view we need more help because we are being attacked and local law enforcement is doing nothing.

Do you see that in the citizens point of view the criteria is different than the federal point of view?

Same holds true with the presses numbers and the white house numbers on the p******c.

Same holds true on the Russian bounty against American troops. Therefore these issues need to be vetted.

This is where I would say to Pete, "They're putting the cart before the horse" which seems to hold true to both the president and his enemies.

Is Trump cold and callus? No I did not see that in the interview. This was shown when the reporter asked about renaming the bridge in honor of John Lewis, Trump said in many words that he would not have a problem with.that.

So to honestly, and fairly, assess the situation, I see many people on the left, not taking the time to find the common denominator and instead using prejudice and jumping to conclusions based on that prejudice. The Dems need more patience.

Now once facts and statistics come in, we as a reader of those statistics have to interpret what we are reading. We as the reader then make up our own minds.

I for one believe Trump. But that is my opinion based upon the discreditable reporting on Trump. But I for one still attempt to verify because I don't trust either the media or the government because both were discredited before. And directly that is, not indirectly like the attacks on Trump have been.

The other issue which causes great dislike for Democrats and the media is the hatred and unfair treatment of Trump. Where the sediment is he brings it upon himself.

Conservatives, or liberals, Trump supporters or anti-Trump supporters, Democrats or Republicans in today's age are all hypersensitive. Where a Democrat says Trump is unfair a republican says the attacks are unfair.

Both are right because it was unfair in the beginning that is why Trump ran to social media. So if 10% of what Trump tours as accomplishments is true and this is with half the country fighting him. Imagine what could happen if everyone Democrat or Republican started working with Trump? What could happen?

Well, we do have a statistic on that. Trump shut down the country and everyone agreed and it happened in two weeks. Imagine how fast other causes could happen if the parties would work with him what could happen. Just imagine.

I hope I answered your premise question. I hope you can understand it as I'm seeing it. There is a place in this country for both conservatives and liberals and we can live in peace together. But as far as the Marxist thinking and c*******t thinking that is unacceptable for many proven reasons. As far as r****m, Robert E Lee never wanted a statue of himself, never wanted be hailed as a hero, because the ghosts of the past would haunt future generations. He was right and that's what we got to day. Therefore my advice to all would be let it go. What has been done in the past is in the past. Let it go back to the past. R****m was defeated in the past let it die in the past. I do not live in the past, I live in the present. Quit being up the ghosts of the past.

Well this was long and necessary but this is my take on all the issues covered in the video. Enjoy.

A Man named Harold; and a president named Barack.


This summarizes how most liberals view the US military:

Harold was a bright child. He grew up in America. He went to school and had a bright future ahead of him. Harold was full of life but was cut short in a violent moment. While few people had ever heard of Harold before his death, many did afterward And in death, something very shocking happened. What was so shocking, especially when it is compared to the death of someone else recently in the news?

Harold was Harold Greene, Major General, United States Army. On Aug. 5, 2014, Major General Greene was k**led by a Taliban terrorist.

He was returned to America with full military honors.

It has been a tradition that the president attends the funeral of General and F**g officers k**led in the line of duty.

Richard Nixon attended the funeral of a Major General Casey k**led in Vietnam and George W. Bush attended the funeral of Lieutenant General Timothy Maude, who was k**led in the 9/11 attacks.

While Major General Greene was buried, Barack Obama was golfing. The Vice President wasn't there either. Neither was the Secretary of Defense. F**gs were not even lowered half-mast.
Four days after Harold Greene gave his life for America, Michael Brown Was k**led in Ferguson, Missouri.
Brown was at best a young thug. In the minutes before his death, he committed a robbery at a local convenience store. According to other reports, Brown struck Officer Darren Wilson and shattered his orbital bone. Obama sent a three-person delegation to Brown's funeral!

Neither Obama nor Biden would attend the funeral of the highest-ranking military officer k**led in the line of duty since 9/11, yet he sent a delegation to the funeral of a thug.

When Margaret Thatcher, one of America's staunchest allies and Ronald Reagan's partner in bringing down Soviet c*******m died, Obama sent only a small low-level delegation to her funeral. The snub was not missed by the British.

When Chris Kyle, the most lethal American sniper in history was murdered, there was no expression of sympathy from the White House.

But when Whitney Houston died from a drug overdose, the Obama/Biden administration ordered all f**gs be flown at half-mast.

There was no White House delegation at the funeral of an American hero. American heroes die and Obama goes to the golf course.

A thug dies and he gets a White House delegation.

No wonder most "REAL" Americans hold Obama in such contempt, especially members of our Military.

And Biden is now expounding on how great the Obama/Biden Administration was.

Are these the kind of people you want to lead your country?

Stand up for the "Harolds" in America.

A Man named Harold; and a president named Barack.


This summarizes how most liberals view the US military:

Harold was a bright child. He grew up in America. He went to school and had a bright future ahead of him. Harold was full of life but was cut short in a violent moment. While few people had ever heard of Harold before his death, many did afterward And in death, something very shocking happened. What was so shocking, especially when it is compared to the death of someone else recently in the news?

Harold was Harold Greene, Major General, United States Army. On Aug. 5, 2014, Major General Greene was k**led by a Taliban terrorist.

He was returned to America with full military honors.

It has been a tradition that the president attends the funeral of General and F**g officers k**led in the line of duty.

Richard Nixon attended the funeral of a Major General Casey k**led in Vietnam and George W. Bush attended the funeral of Lieutenant General Timothy Maude, who was k**led in the 9/11 attacks.

While Major General Greene was buried, Barack Obama was golfing. The Vice President wasn't there either. Neither was the Secretary of Defense. F**gs were not even lowered half-mast.
Four days after Harold Greene gave his life for America, Michael Brown Was k**led in Ferguson, Missouri.
Brown was at best a young thug. In the minutes before his death, he committed a robbery at a local convenience store. According to other reports, Brown struck Officer Darren Wilson and shattered his orbital bone. Obama sent a three-person delegation to Brown's funeral!

Neither Obama nor Biden would attend the funeral of the highest-ranking military officer k**led in the line of duty since 9/11, yet he sent a delegation to the funeral of a thug.

When Margaret Thatcher, one of America's staunchest allies and Ronald Reagan's partner in bringing down Soviet c*******m died, Obama sent only a small low-level delegation to her funeral. The snub was not missed by the British.

When Chris Kyle, the most lethal American sniper in history was murdered, there was no expression of sympathy from the White House.

But when Whitney Houston died from a drug overdose, the Obama/Biden administration ordered all f**gs be flown at half-mast.

There was no White House delegation at the funeral of an American hero. American heroes die and Obama goes to the golf course.

A thug dies and he gets a White House delegation.

No wonder most "REAL" Americans hold Obama in such contempt, especially members of our Military.

And Biden is now expounding on how great the Obama/Biden Administration was.

Are these the kind of people you want to lead your country?

Stand up for the "Harolds" in America.

What you said is the arrival of the feds and their actions resulted in an increase in the number and violence of incidents so the feds should never have showed up. It is the height of absurdity to imagine enforcement action by a higher authority to stop the actions of criminals should not be attempted b/c those criminals have been given the green light by corrupt local politicians to engage in their criminal activity and the criminals will react violently when legitimate authorities move in to disrupt their cozy, corrupt arrangement.

I hope your realize the fallacy of your argument as it is akin to claiming the N**is combat energy increased during WWII when the US declared war and began to attack their assets. While that is absolutely true it was certainly no argument against declaring war on and attacking N**is just as it is not a valid argument to decry the deployment of federal law enforcement to protect federal assets the locals refused to protect just because the anarchists intensified their efforts when the feds showed up.

I hope your realize the fallacy of your argument as it is akin to claiming the N**is combat energy increased during WWII when the US declared war and began to attack their assets. While that is absolutely true it was certainly no argument against declaring war on and attacking N**is just as it is not a valid argument to decry the deployment of federal law enforcement to protect federal assets the locals refused to protect just because the anarchists intensified their efforts when the feds showed up.

You are partially on the beam. Federal agents are not in Portland to effectuate arrests under state law as there are plenty of federal laws being violated by the r****rs. Federal agents have no requirement to hand over anyone they arrest to a peace officer, example the FBI arresting someone for bank fraud or the secret service arresting someone for counterfeiting, as they themselves have arrest and detaining powers under federal law. As far as the magistrate, that would be a federal judge with charges determined by the US attorneys office.

Federal agents, according to federal law, are NOT required to restrict themselves to the property they are protecting but are authorized to move any where in the vicinity, not only to pursue those who have damaged federal property or prevent those who appear to be preparing to do so but to ENFORCE ANY FEDERAL LAW THAT APPEARS TO BE BEING VIOLATED ANY WHERE IN THAT CITY. Remember, many federal agents are already in most American cities (FBI, DEA, FPS, Secret Service, HHS, Marshals, etc.), they are legally authorized to the there and absolutely do not need the permission of locals. What the President is doing is merely supplementing the federal presence already there. BTW, it doesn't matter what the Navy vet was asking the officers, he was repeatedly asked to move on and refused to do so, hence the encouragement of the batons and gas. He reminds me of the three year old who is told to take the nail out of the electric outlet and instead of doing so replies "...but I am only..." - ZAP.

In a free country you not only have the freedom to think what you want, you also have the complete freedom to chase down the t***h of something you have heard or seen. A person posting a claim that federal agents released innocent people who were wrongly apprehended doesn't mean that actually happened. The only information I could find was dozens or people arrested by Portland police, not the feds, early in the protest were released, not b/c they were innocent but b/c the local DA directed them to be released. Even if it did happen, nothing burger; sometimes the wrong people are arrested and are released when the error is discovered. What is NOT happening in Portland as a common practice is people being arrested who have done nothing wrong who were merely strolling down the street. What IS happening in Portland is a r**t with r****rs destroying property and assaulting police and innocent civilians. What IS happening in Portland is local politicians allowing the r**ting to go on and instructing local police not to "interfere" with the r**ting. What IS happening in Portland is the deployment of federal police to protect federal property (read that YOUR property) from r****rs attempting to destroy said property that is not being protected by the locals. So go ahead, feel free to not believe your lying eyes about what is going on in Portland and instead believe MSM propaganda. Be assured, however, that the mob will one day come for you, no matter how woke you believe yourself to be.

Seth answered your comment earlier!
Quote: "What these r****rs are doing goes well beyond "peaceful demonstrations," more in the realm of i**********n and straight-up terrorism..."
While just walking down the streets they destroy businesses of innocent shop owners!
Apparently, you want freedom for chaos, i**********n, and terrorism... You're implying that they have Rights to abuse others, but we don't have Rights to have arrest them surprisingly.
If you're a Democrat, terrorist, or criminal, your comment would be expected of you.