One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mactheknife
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 next>>
May 4, 2018 15:46:20   #
Louie27 wrote:
I want to know where you got your information that it was Trump that leaked the so-called questions to be asked President Trump. I have seen no validity to those allegations. I also do seek the t***h but have a hard time believing what the MSM has reported because of so many false stories that they later retracted.


Hear, hear, for common sense at last. Thank you .
Go to
May 4, 2018 10:44:23   #
Hardwork1 wrote:
Merriam Webster definition of Treason: the offense of attempting by overt acts to o*******w the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to k**l or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign’s family.

In the past I have tried to avoid using the word “TREASON” to describe what is happening in America, but what the occupants of the “Deep State” are doing leaves me no choice! And they are not even trying to hide the fact that they h**e America and have a special deep down hatred for our Constitution! It is obvious that they are confident that no one will be prosecuted regardless of what they say or do. Hillary is the perfect example. Where is America’s system of justice?

The Mueller investigation is just one glaring example of the “Deep State’s” TREASON IN A NUMBER OF WAYS:

A list of 49 questions that Mueller wants to ask President Trump was recently leaked to the New York Times. All of the questions are absolutely ridiculous. They have little to nothing to do with the alleged Trump campaign Russia collusion. The questions were obviously crafted to deliberately trick President Trump into doing what would appear to be “lying under oath” so he can be impeached. Regarding the alleged collusion, there has not been a single shred of evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in any way. There has been a LOT of evidence made public that the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign did collude with Russia, spent millions of dollars to do so, and then illegally covered up the payments. Yet Mueller has not even asked for any DNC or Clinton campaign records, asked for access to the DNC or Clinton campaign servers, or asked to interview the Russian lawyer that arranged the meeting with President Trump’s sons to allegedly give them “dirt” on Hillary. Clearly Muller and his supporters only have one goal, to destroy the Trump Presidency at any cost! TREASON!

Mueller has also threatened to subpoena President Trump and force him to testify before a Grand Jury. This would be an absolutely unwinnable situation for President Trump, and would guarantee that Mueller would craft a way to charge him with “lying under oath”, and get him impeached! This is in stark contrast to the “interview” that Hillary got for her open TREASON where she and all her staff and associates deliberately and openly mishandled State Department communications so they could cover up the Clinton’s money laundering efforts involving hundreds of millions of dollars while recklessly putting America’s security at risk. Hillary was “interviewed” on a Sunday afternoon by FRIENDLY FBI agents without being under oath, with no recording of the interview, no notes taken and with some of her staff and legal counsel present, staff members who were given immunity! The “interview” was actually conducted AFTER Comey had drafted his memo declaring that Hillary did not break any laws, and then allowed FBI agents that were openly supportive of Hillary’s campaign for President to edit the memo to be absolutely sure she could not be charged with any crimes. To this day the Assistant A.G. Rod Rosenstein is refusing to comply with a Congressional subpoena to the DOJ for Hillary’s e-mail closed case records. And to make matters worse, Rosenstein just held a press conference and arrogantly bragged about his refusal to comply with the subpoena! The subpoena is from the Congressional Oversight Committee whose specific mandate is to oversee the DOJ!

Since Mueller’s questions were published in the New York Times there has been a constant stream of well-known and respected legal experts going public to discuss how absurd the questions are and how illegal they are based on Article II of our Constitution. Some of these legal experts are non-partisan and some were not Trump supporters. One example they all point to is the questions about what the President “was feeling” when he made the decision to fire Comey. Alan Dershowitz, a well know legal scholar and Constitutional expert said in a FOX NEWS interview shortly after the questions were published that the President has full authority to fire anyone in his administration that he wants to and he cannot be “indicted, prosecuted or tried” while he is the President of the United States. He must be impeached and removed from office before he can be charged with a crime. THIS IS WHY THE “DEEP STATE” IS SO OBSESSED WITH IMPEACHING PRESIDENT TRUMP AND WILL GO TO ANY LENGTHS TO ACCOMPLISH THAT!

I am absolutely certain that the future of America will be decided at the b****t box on November 6, 2018. If the Democrats win control of either House of Congress America will cease to exist at some point after they are sworn in! If the Democrats win control of both Houses of Congress America will cease to exist shortly after they are sworn in!
Merriam Webster definition of Treason: the offense... (show quote)


I totally agree with you and I have been calling what is going on for some time as an "extra judicial" c**p d'état that is treasonous in nature. If the DEMs win in November the end (impeachment of the president) will have justified the means (fictitious accusations of "collusions" or the "big lie" as per Lenin and Marx) and the real criminals will have gotten off scott free. The price? Destruction of America!! Only the v**ers in November can fix this problem. Please get out the v**e, the country needs you in its mortal hour!!!!!
Go to
May 3, 2018 08:52:08   #
rumitoid wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump reimbursed his personal lawyer for $130,000 in hush money paid to a porn actress days before the 2016 p**********l e******n, Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump's attorneys, said Wednesday, appearing to contradict the president's past claims that he didn't know the source of the money.

During an appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," Giuliani said the money to repay Michael Cohen had been "funneled ... through the law firm and the president repaid it."

Asked if Trump knew about the arrangement, Giuliani said: "He didn't know about the specifics of it, as far as I know. But he did know about the general arrangement, that Michael would take care of things like this, like I take care of things like this for my clients. I don't burden them with every single thing that comes along. These are busy people."

And that is not the worst of it. Giuliani offered a new — and contradictory — explanation for why Trump fired Comey. This is problematic when the goal of Trump’s lawyers is to provide Mueller with a consistent, and legal, explanation for the firing. Early in the interview, Giuliani said that Trump fired James Comey as FBI director because “Comey would not — among other things — say that he wasn’t a target of the investigation.” Giuliani said Trump was “entitled to that.”

Giuliani’s statement not only confirms that Comey was fired because he refused to publicly clear Trump in the Russia investigation, but also directly contradicts two other explanations for Comey’s firing offered by Trump.

According to Giuliani, Trump told NBC’s Lester Holt in an interview shortly after Comey’s firing that “I did it because I felt I had to explain to the American people that their president was not the target of the investigation.”

That is not, however, what Trump told Holt. Trump told Holt that he fired Comey because of his frustration with the existence of the entire Russia investigation, which he believed was an excuse concocted by Democrats who lost the e******n. (Comey was a Republican appointed as FBI director by George W. Bush.)

"And in fact when I decided to just do it I said to myself, I said, 'You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story, it’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an e******n that they should’ve won.'

In the interview with Holt, Trump did not mention Comey’s refusal to state publicly that he was not a target of the investigation.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump reimburse... (show quote)


Maybe there were several reasons for Trump firing Comey and you have just identified two. Trump gave one example, his lawyer gave another. Big deal! I would add the performance of Comey in "clearing" Clinton, which does amount to obstruction of justice but on the part of Comey.
Go to
May 2, 2018 21:48:04   #
Steve700 wrote:
You got a good, thoughtful post here. The most likely thing, in my humble opinion, of what they may be able to get up on, might be lying under oath. Totally outrageously unfair. They already had the goods on Hillary, but didn't bother to put her under oath and didn't answer the right questions. You're supposed to have the crime 1st and then interrogate the suspect. --- Not attained the right to look for our crime on falsified information and then interrogate your victim looking for something to prosecute. This is pure unadulterated bull s**t and I don't understand why they are allowed to continue to get away with this outrageous nonsense. Obviously, it is because the establishment is that corrupt that the few would point these things out have no power against the engorged corrupt establishment. --- But very sad for the American people; even the self delusional i***t trusting Libtards, who view human nature is basically good and have no understanding of the minds of a small, but pretty much demonic, elite group who plot our destiny with their g*******t agenda designed for their own benefit.
You got a good, thoughtful post here. The most li... (show quote)


I would venture that the NYTs has just prejudiced any case that Mueller might have and that it would be impossible to find a venue for a trial if it came to that. Shame on the NYTs. I agree that it smells like a trap and President Trump needs to be very careful in his responses. I also agree with the double standard re the treatment of Clinton.
Go to
Apr 27, 2018 16:11:58   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
mactheknife: It matters very much! The illogical cognitive thinking of the left would blame a fart if they could...My guns have never committed a crime as probably you're guns as well! Blaming the gun will not fly in any court of sane logic!


I agree with you although I'm not a gun owner.
Go to
Apr 27, 2018 12:12:50   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
mactheknife: further research indicates the majority of those deaths from guns are self-inflicted....!


It doesn't much matter if you blame the gun and not the person.
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 19:35:39   #
kcstargoat wrote:
Should women quit wearing tight jeans and blouses with the top two buttons unfastened? Should kids quit skateboarding and wearing X-large T-shirts with political or religious messages? People do a lot of not very bright things, but when it comes to guns and ammo - things are treated differently. As long as companies churn out guns and ammo, people will be able to procure them. Read the statistics on gun deaths versus everything else one can think of. I'm not calling you a moron, but you need to research and think before you leap!
Should women quit wearing tight jeans and blouses ... (show quote)


A lot more people die of opioid O/D (68,000 +/- in 2017) and automobile accidents (> 50,000) than from guns [15,549 people were k**led by guns in the United States in 2017, according to data collected by Gun Violence Archive (GVA)]. Thus, you claim "Read the statistics on gun deaths versus everything else one can think of", but all this shows is that you are either ignorant of the statistics and facts or you are pushing a political viewpoint..
Go to
Apr 24, 2018 13:04:32   #
no propaganda please wrote:
No, Hitler was an atheist, pretending to be a Christian. If you really want to learn about the f*****t c*******t connection and how the left manipulates our perceptions read two book with an open mind not with a socialist Marxist mind set. The books are DISINFORMATION by Lt Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa who is the highest ranking Soviet bloc intelligence official ever to defect to the left, and BLACKLISTED BY HISTORY by M. Stanton Evans which is about Senator Joe McCarthy and the t***h about the C*******t influence in American politics and the school system and media which was not released until the Venona papers and other documents were made available after the Soviet Union collapsed. It really went into hiding and has become more influential in recent years. After ll, Putin was a KGB agent for years and there is no reason to assume he changed his spots.
No, Hitler was an atheist, pretending to be a Chri... (show quote)


You are entirely correct. However, some people are doomed to repeat history with the same tragic results and they feel that they have the right to d**g the rest of us along. Who gave them that right?
Go to
Apr 24, 2018 11:34:18   #
Kevyn wrote:
Yeti, the maker of very pricy high end coolers offers discounts to members of various groups including the NRA. Yeti sent a letter to all of these groups explaining they were changing their discount program. Some paranoid jackass at the NRA came to the conclusion that this was done for political reasons so the NRA did what they do best, they whipped their members into a frenzy and this is where things got funny. Numerous members who had paid as much as $1200 for Yeti coolers decided to destroy them. Some filled them with tannarite, the explosive hoarded by the Las Vegas assault rifle mass murdurer, and blew them up. Other Yeti owners shot up or crushed their expensive personal property. These poor schmucks are going to feel pretty foolish while quaffing warm beer at their next cross burning when they discover Yeti did nothing politically aimed at the NRA. The thing the rest of the country needs to ask itself is, should people mentally unbalanced to the point of deliberately destroying their own property with firearms and explosives really have access to firearms and explosives? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/04/24/nra-supporters-are-blowing-up-yeti-coolers-yeti-says-its-all-a-big-mistake/?utm_term=.7a526a4cd218&wpisrc=nl_az_most&wpmk=1
Yeti, the maker of very pricy high end coolers off... (show quote)


And you believe the biased crap out of the WPO? Isn't this a case of the unwarranted "exception making the rule" or do you really believe it?
Go to
Apr 24, 2018 11:31:11   #
Alicia wrote:
********************
The responses I received is just what I expected. Most of you who just like throwing out garbage and attacking an independent thinker. Thought I would shake you up. And did!


N, it was a plea for you to do something useful and help yourself.
Go to
Apr 23, 2018 21:04:19   #
Alicia wrote:
****************
My relocation to Texas was the greatest mistake I've ever made. The reason I'm still here? I can't get enough money to get the hell out! Any donations would be greatly appreciated. It will be a way for those of you who wish to get rid of me.


Typical l*****t, always looking for a handout. Try working harder like the rest of us.
Go to
Apr 22, 2018 09:27:20   #
ghostgotcha wrote:
One of America's greatest threats is a national news media that constantly fails to tell the t***h.

Unfortunately; many of our resident liberals get their talking points from the same liberal media.

Looking at the main cause you find the national news media (and their talking heads) have been taken over by the new wave of European-style socialist who don't believe in our constitutional freedoms or free-market capitalism.

What to do about this scourge on our society, what to do?

http://allnewspipeline.com/images/HearSpeakSeeF**eNews.jpg
b One of America's greatest threats is a national... (show quote)


Ignore them as they have made themselves irrelevant in the big picture. It is often claimed that a democracy needs a "free press" in order to survive. Well, we have a press that is largely owned by left wing tycoons and who spout left wing drivel that history shows has failed time and again with tragic results (remember the Soviet Union?). Most people have now immunized themselves against the MSM with the result that we don't need the press that we now have and our need for them will steadily decrease with time. They only have themselves to blame!
Go to
Apr 17, 2018 12:04:38   #
cold iron wrote:
Imagine if the head of a federal agency announced a new policy for its scientific research: from now on, the agency would no longer allow its studies to be reviewed and challenged by independent scientists, only democrat scientists, and its researchers would not share the data on which their conclusions were based. The response from scientists and journalists would be outrage. By refusing peer review from outsiders, the agency would be rejecting a fundamental scientific tradition. By not sharing data with other researchers, it would be violating a standard t***sparency requirement at leading scientific journals. If a Republican official did such a thing, you’d expect to hear denunciations of this latest offensive in the “Republican war on science.”

That’s the accusation being hurled at Scott Pruitt, the Republican who heads the Environmental Protection Agency. But Pruitt hasn’t done anything to discourage peer review. In fact, he’s done the opposite: he has called for the use of more independent experts to review the EPA’s research and has just announced that the agency would rely only on studies for which data are available to be shared.

Well, that's the last thing the Al Gore people want, that will show how they are laying about the facts.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/scott-pruitt-warrior-science-15821.html
Imagine if the head of a federal agency announced ... (show quote)


I'm a scientist and I can confirm that science has become politicized mostly through issues that have been pushed by our l*****t brethren. However, this is not unexpected as, after all, science is a human activity that is subject to all of the human failures, including bias. That is why one of the treasured requirements of scientific data is reproducibility by independent researchers. That is hard to f**e as the proponents of N-rays, polywater, and cold fusion came to learn. Of much greater concern to me, at least, is the use of unsubstantiated data in formulating government regulations and policy, as is discussed in today's issue of the Wall Street Journal. Your example of DDT is classic, not so much whether the data were right or wrong, but because of the irresponsible way in which the data were used to support policy.
Go to
Apr 16, 2018 09:43:25   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Is the Calm before the next Storm?


>>>>>>>>>>


Zero Hedge: David Stockman on Trump Captured by Deep State
by Editor


The Donald seems to be taking a Deep Breath on his Syria bombfest, but the Deep State has him by the orange hairs. So we doubt the delay will last much longer. [he didn't!]

That's because our Art of the Deal genius is getting bamboozled yet again. They are telling him that wiping out up to a dozen Syrian airfields, military installations and a dog-eared factory or two that can be identified as chemical weapons sites will amount to some pretty serious Shock & Awe where it counts: That is, the mere witnessing of it will cause the Fat Boy of Pyongyang to brown his ample trousers, thereby getting his "mind right" for the upcoming summit.

That's exactly the kind of macho-bargainer stuff that the Donald thrives on, and is further proof that the Deep State has figured out exactly how to press his buttons.

To be sure, Trump is no innocent victim. He voluntarily made himself hostage to the War Party by surrounding himself with failed generals and the most rabid war-mongers to be found in the Imperial City----John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel.

Indeed, you have to wonder. How could anyone with even a half-baked notion of America First think that a hard core interventionist like John Bolton should be brought up right close and personal to the POTUS ear lobes, Walrus mustache and all?

But wh**ever the Donald was thinking when he made such horrendous choices for his top national security posts, these denizens of the War Party have wasted no time shoving their own agenda right down his throat.

And at the top of that agenda is systematic, relentless escalation of provocations against Russia and Iran. That's because confrontation with these demonized states is the best way to keep Imperial Washington (and therefore the entire country) on a war-footing and the national security gravy train overflowing with fiscal largesse.

As we indicated in Part 1, the impending attack on Syria is actually a shot across the bow aimed at Tehran and Moscow. The cover story is simply a humanitarian sounding ruse. Ostensibly, Bashar Assad is being administered a good hard spanking via a barrage of cruise missile birch switches.

That begs the question, of course, of how homeland security is actually enhanced by selectively spanking some malefactors and not others.

In this case, even the surely bogus claim that 40 civilians were gassed in Douma hardly compares to the 10,000 civilians that have been slaughtered by American bombs delivered by the Saudi air force in Yemen; or the thousands of anti-government prisoners that have been summarily executed by General al-Sisi in Egypt under this stewardship of Washington's $1.2 billion annual stipend; or the thousands of civilians that Israel has k**led during its periodic "lawn-mowing" exercises on the Gaza Strip.

Obviously, Washington shouldn't even be in the spanking business because no one appointed America as the world's policeman or moral proctor. But even if that were the true purpose (it's not) of the impending act of naked aggression against the sovereign government of Syria, you would think there at least ought to be a semblance of proof that the alleged chemical attack actually occurred.

Unlike in past Syrian incidents, in fact, the way is wide open for an honest determination of what actually happened. That's because the last rebel hold-outs in Eastern Ghouta are now all dead or have vacated the area on busses arranged by the Syrian government as part of the relocation deal that sent them to rebel-held Idlib province in the northwest.

Consequently, Douma is now safe for western journalists, government officials and international investigators from the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Warfare (OPCW) to visit the alleged sites of the attack and find the evidence.

Of course, Syrian and Russian officials who have visited the area say there is no evidence of victims, bodies, chlorine residue or that the sole hospital in the community was ever over-run with victims of toxic chemical agents. That alone is remarkable given initial reports that there were upwards of a thousand victims of the purported attack.

But now the Russian government has gone a striking step further. They are claiming they have evidence that the whole thing was staged. That is, that an incident which has the world on the brink of war was just another false f**g attack of the kind that the barbaric jihadists attacking the Syrian government have serially orchestrated since the original Ghouta event and Obama's infamous "red line" of August 2013.

A Russian government spokesman said the ministry had found those who took part in filming the rent-a-mob chemical attack in Syria’s Douma and these people told how the video had been shot.

"Today, the Russian defense ministry has other evidence proving the United Kingdom’s direct involvement in the organization of this provocation in Eastern Ghouta," he said

In his words, the so-called White Helmets were pressed by London in a period from April 3 to 6 to hurry up with the implementation of the planned provocation. "The White Helmets were told that in a period from April 3 to 6 Jaysh al-Islam militants would conduct a series of massive artillery bombings of Damascus. It would provoke a retaliation operation by government forces and the White Helmets were to use it to stage a provocation with an alleged use of chemical weapons," he said.

According to Konashenkov, officers of the Russian defense ministry spoke with two Syrian who had taken part in filming the framed-up attack. Both have medical diplomas and work with the emergency department of Douma’s hospital. The two men do not conceal their names. They told Russian officers that all those who had been taken to hospital during the filming had no symptoms of exposure to toxic agents.

"When the patients were receiving first aid unidentified people burst into the hospital, some were holding video cameras," the spokesman cited them as saying. "These people started shouting, fanning hysteria. They carried hose and douched all present with water crying out that all of them had been exposed to poisonous agents."

"The patients and their relatives yielded to panic and began to pour water on each other. After this scene was caught on video, these unidentified people fled," he added.

This is what is called evidence in the civilized world, he stressed, adding that Russia had repeatedly warned about provocations with the alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians plotted by militants in Eastern Ghouta.


We don't know whether the Russian government is lying or not, but since the whole world has been invited to come and make its own determination, we doubt it. After all, they have produced local citizens from the Douma hospital and elsewhere in the community who say they witnessed the fabrication. If these witnesses and the Russians are lying, that will quickly become evident.

To the contrary, you can't bury the evidence---including the bodies--- of a chlorine attack that allegedly caused hundreds of deaths and injuries. If it happened, the OPCW investigators and journalists will fund it; and if they don't, it didn't.

Meanwhile, why in the world are they gathered in the Situations Room arguing about targets and how to minimize risks of a direct hit on Russian military personal, when the Donald could actually pick up the red phone and tell Putin that he'll have an investigation team on the ground at Douma tomorrow AM?

We have not doubt that Cool Hand Vlad would say "be my guest". And we also have no doubt that Pat Buchanan hit the nail on the head in his recent missive when he noted:

We cannot forever fight other peoples’ wars without ending up on the same ash heap of history as the other world powers before us.

And why not talk directly to our adversaries there?

If Trump can talk to Kim Jong-un, who used an anti-aircraft gun to execute his uncle and had his half-brother murdered in a Malaysian airport with a chemical weapon, why cannot we talk to Assad?

In 1974, Richard Nixon flew to Damascus to establish ties to Assad’s father, the future “Butcher of Hama.” George H.W. Bush enlisted Hafez al-Assad and 4,000 Syrian troops in his Gulf War to liberate Kuwait.

All over this city, and across the Middle East, there are people who wish to conscript U.S. wealth and power to advance their goals and achieve their visions. Having let them succeed so often has diminished us as a superpower from what we were at the end of the Cold War.

This should stop, and the nation knows it.

Among the reasons Democrats nominated Barack Obama and America elected him was that his opponents, Hillary Clinton and John McCain, supported the Iraq war Obama opposed.

Among the reasons the Republican Party nominated Trump and the nation elected him was that he promised to take us out and keep us out of wars like the one in Syria.

Is it not ironic that today our War Party, which, almost to a man, loathed Trump and rejected his candidacy, is goading and cheering him on, deeper and deeper into the Syrian quagmire?

And that gets us to the meat of the matter. Donald Trump has now been taken hostage by the machinery of the Deep State and has become the tool of its destructive agenda.

For instance, John Bolton is an advocate of America Uber Alles---the very antithesis of America First. In fact, he is an emissary for what might be termed the "Bibi First" wing of the War Party.

Netanyahu's entire misbegotten reign as head of the Israeli government has been based on demonizing Iran, thereby gluing together a motley coalition of rightwing religious and settler parties in the parliament.

In the present circumstances, the over-riding agenda of the "Bibi First" wing is to ashcan the Iranian Nuke deal when it comes up for certification on May 12.

That's because an Iran that rejoins the community of nations, reengages in trade and commerce with the rest of the world and adheres to the nuke deal, which it has every intention of doing if Washington sticks to its end of the bargain, is an Iran that puts the lie to the entire demonization campaign that has been conducted by the neocons in Washington and Israel for the past 25 years.

Needless to say, that is a scenario that the War Party cannot abide. It would put Bibi Netanyahu out of business and severely erode the case for the hundreds of billions that are being wasted on Washington's conventional military capacities.

After all, if Washington didn't have the Persian Gulf to police or a dog in the Sunni-Shiite religious and political struggles, it wouldn't be wasting $30 billion per pop on new aircraft carriers and their battle-group armadas.

So the Deep State has moved heaven and earth to bring the Donald into its thrall and to bury every vestige of his incipient pivot toward an honest and affordable national security policy based on America First.

If the Tomahawk cruise missiles fly toward Syria over the weekend [they did], we will know that the capture has been complete; and that the Oval Office is now occupied by a hostage of the very Deep State that he campaigned against, and which, in any event, will soon sacrifice him to the vengeful furies of the Mueller witchunt.

Deep State Closes In On The Donald, Part 3: The Capture Is Complete

Deep State Closes In On The Donald, Part 2: Mueller's War

Deep State Closes In On The Donald, Part 1: There Will Be War

Editor | April 16, 2018
http://phibetaiota.net/?p=130610
Is the Calm before the next Storm? br br br >... (show quote)


Talk about colluding with the Russians; you are the epitome of that term. Are you sure that you are not being paid by the Ruskies to spread this drivel? Or are you simply naïve? Or, maybe, you have too much time on your hands and you can't find something useful to do?
Go to
Apr 13, 2018 14:25:45   #
woodguru wrote:
The second amendment does not need to be repealed, and the very suggestion is an entirely inflammatory and counter productive thing to even say.

We need sensible gun control focused at background checks and doing the best job possible keeping guns out of unhinged people's hands.

That isn't going to stop gun violence but any difference it makes is worth doing.


I agree and you are tacitly recognizing that it is the person that k**ls and that the gun is just an instrument like a car, a knife, a garrote, poison, or a bomb. Is that correct?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.