One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: SilentGeneration
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26 next>>
Apr 10, 2019 05:41:12   #
permafrost wrote:
Everyone who has paid into SS need to PO about this dumb renaming idea..
No good can come of it..

A woman dies at age 65 before collecting one benefit check. She and her employer paid into the system for almost 50 years and she collected NOTHING. Keep in mind all the working people that die every year who were paying into the system and got nothing.

And these governmental morons mismanaged the money and stole from the system, so that it's now going broke.
BEAUTIFUL! And they have the audacity to call today's seniors "vultures" in an attempt to cover their ineptitude. DISGRACEFUL!

The real reason for renaming our Social Security payments is so the government can claim that all those social security recipients are receiving entitlements thus putting them in the same category as welfare, and food stamp recipients.
THIS IS WORTH THE FEW MINUTES IT TAKES TO READ AND DIGEST!
F.Y.I. By changing the name of SS contributions, it gives them a means to refute this program in the future. It's free money for the government to spend under this guise.
The Social Security check is now (or soon will be) referred to as a *Federal Benefit Payment* ?
I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.

Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.
The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment."
This is NOT a benefit. It is OUR money , paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too ! It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.(This should be enough for you to forward this message, If not read on.)

If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.
If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both you and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved.

This is your personal investment. Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.

That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration. (Google it – it's a fact). And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger *Ponzi scheme* than Bernie Madoff ever did (or Lyndon Johnson).
They took our money and used it elsewhere. They "forgot"(oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them ... and they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer. (Isn't it funny that they NEVER say this about welfare payments?)
But is it our fault they misused our investments? And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a *benefit*, as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. This is stealing!
Just because they borrowed the money, doesn't mean that our investments were for charity!
Let's take a stand. We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government.
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going for the sake of the 92% of our population who need it.

Then call it what it is:
Our Earned Retirement Income .
90% of people won't forward this.
PLEASE! Will you?
Everyone who has paid into SS need to PO about thi... (show quote)




Go to
Apr 5, 2019 05:16:28   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Several posters have counseled me to "pick a side", some even suggesting that I'd have to, eventually. This always bewildered me, since, the act of describing my "side", prompted those responses. I recently posted an opinion that the "center" was permanently anchored on the US Constitution, which again solicited a request for me to "Pick a side". Then, I got it, they were wanting me to pick a location off to the side..................of the Constitution.

There can never be a reconciliation of a divided America, as long as we insist on "sides"......as though it is an actual place. We have decided where the "sides" were first, then tried to develop some rationale or justification for it. Each "side" claims to be true to the Constitution, and since both cannot be Constitutional, it stands to reason that OUR "side" is correct, the other wrong.................which is exactly what THEY believe as well.

I'll say it one more time, and try to be more clear; I HAVE picked a "side", the same "side" I've always been on.........right smack in the middle of the Constitution of the United States of America. I do NOT have to pick your "side" or theirs, I've picked MINE and intend to stay there. To make sure I'm understood, let me phrase it this way; any "side" not based singularly and squarely on the Constitution, without re-interpretations, t***slations, or modifications...................is wrong and always will be.

Unless and until the Constitution is amended to read the way you WANT it to read, to support your ideology or viewpoint.....................you will always be wrong when moving either to the left or right of this document. There should be only ONE ideology in America, the ideology described by the Constitution, a document that is apolitical and non partisan.
Several posters have counseled me to "pick a ... (show quote)



Go to
Mar 21, 2019 09:54:12   #
I began v****g in the mid 60's and have v**ed for Democrats more often than for Republicans. I have friends on both sides of the aisle. Regardless of our political views, we all raised children to be self-sufficient, independent adults who are gainfully employed taxpayers who are raising the next generation of self-sufficient adults.

Living in America today is more expensive than it was when we were young. The costs of higher education, housing, food, clothing, and t***sportation have all increased while wages have stagnated. For example, the cost of bacon at my local grocery has risen to $10 99 per lb.. I live in a small town in rural southwest Michigan. Our young people are not living in the same world that we grew up in.
Go to
Mar 17, 2019 08:14:04   #
The Democrats in my corner of rural southwest Michigan are mostly w****s. Our folks are w****s, b****s, or Hispanics. We have no mosques. Your definition doesn't fit out here.
Go to
Feb 11, 2019 11:53:17   #
old marine wrote:
I am 80 and draw my Social Security also. I don't even know how much it is. It goes directly to my bank account. I live off my buisness income.

My income tax last year was in the 40% bracket. My tax attorney handles my taxes. Last year it was $335,689.50. That is plain ridiculous.


Agreed
Go to
Feb 11, 2019 10:47:12   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Why no wall? We need a wall.


Why not explore all options for better border security before making a choice? The drug cartels are very creative in devising ways to get around a wall. We need to be just as creative in devising better methods for border security.
Go to
Feb 11, 2019 00:58:18   #
old marine wrote:
In 2018 tax year I was in the 40% tax bracket. Where is my tax cut.


In the language of last year's tax reform bill? Wh**ever tax relief aimed for the middle class ends in 7 years. For me that means my federal tax bill will increase even though I'm retired with income from pensions and Social Security.
Go to
Feb 11, 2019 00:51:49   #
No to open borders; yes to immigration reform
No to a wall; yes to more effective border control
Yes to tax reform; yes to infrastructure repair or replacement; yes to congressional term limits; yes to health care reform; yes to shorter e******n cycles; no to trash talking political ads; yes to political candidates running on platforms built on sound policies with solutions to our problems; yes on taking care of our own before taking care of others; and yes to running our country with the system of checks and balances put in place by our forefathers.
Go to
Feb 10, 2019 16:53:09   #
What a load of juvenile behavior. These posts exemplify one of the biggest problems in today's political climate. We have forgotten or never learned to disagree with each other with respect for each other as fellow Americans and human beings. We waste time and energy slinging mud at each other while our national problems remain unsolved. It's no wonder that small numbers of v**ers and narrow, self-serving interests have been able to wrest control of our country from the majority of our citizens. We rush headlong into the trap of fighting among ourselves leaving the doors open to those who are wreaking havoc on our nation.
Go to
Feb 10, 2019 16:39:46   #
Peewee wrote:
Please allow us to help our neighbors and stop taking our money to buy your next e******n. Welfare should only go to widows and orphans. Like it was set up to do before the politicians found that by expanding it they can get easy v**es. Plenty of jobs, find one and some self-respect. Then you too can lend a helping hand.



What about women whose husbands leave them for other women? What about military families whose breadwinners aren't earning enough to feed their families?
Go to
Feb 10, 2019 16:36:25   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Being pro birth but refusing help ( food stamps-welfare) to the mothers and children who are poor is not pro life. That is my gripe about the whole thing. We go on about being Christians but we take a hardline attitude on the poor-- contraceptives--education -SOCIAL programs, and feel we are righteous and doing what is good for our country. What we really are doing is increasing the rate of a******n by taking away the very things that prevent a******n. Nobody wants to hear that either.




Go to
Feb 10, 2019 16:34:21   #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Jealous some? It would seem that way. You're just mad because you 'backed' the wrong horse (face).


That doesn't change the fact that the middle class tax cuts will expire while corporate benefits will not.
Go to
Feb 9, 2019 14:27:25   #
Thou shalt not k**l is a commandment and a moral absolute. It's not right to k**l a baby, but it's right to k**l in war or in self defense or in capital punishment? As a society we say a******n is immoral and should be illegal but do allow for k*****g under other circumstances. What happened to Thou shalt not k**l?



Each of us is faced with the choice of obeying or not obeying moral absolutes, commandments, or laws.
Go to
Feb 9, 2019 11:33:44   #
padremike wrote:
Why? Because everyone of them advocate murdering innocent unborn children. Those aren't women, they're monsters. It's never been about mere disagreements. You've diminished the argument just like you diminish life.


I don't support a******n as it's my personal belief that life begins at conception. There are others who disagree with my view. It's not up to me to judge others nor is it up to me to diminish those who do not agree with me.
Go to
Feb 8, 2019 11:36:49   #
TrueAmerican wrote:
Yet everyone of these useless white wearing i***ts (KKK members?) gave a standing ovation to themselves SAD SAD SAD
Yet everyone of these useless white wearing i***ts... (show quote)


Why do you need to demean those with whom you disagree?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.