One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: buffalo
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 717 next>>
Mar 1, 2019 08:52:06   #
Here is how stupid and i***tic anti-gun moonbats are:

NYC’s Jumaane Williams Denounces Muzzle-Loading Guns
To celebrate Jumaane Williams becoming public advocate, positioning himself to be New York’s next mayor, and to prepare us for what comes next, let’s go back and watch a classic interview from November 2017. Here Tucker Carlson tries and fails to keep a straight face while Jumaane explains why 18th-century style muzzle-loading guns should be banned before someone uses one in a mass shooting:

https://youtu.be/3yCRsrd_gHs

Williams is truly at the cutting edge of progressivism. Other progressives bark that when the Founding Fathers drafted the Second Amendment, they meant for us to be allowed only firearms in use at that time. That argument moves the ball, but not into the endzone. In the end, no weapons in private hands will be acceptable in moonbatty utopia.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 08:49:04   #
From Moonbattery:

Some of the many h**xes on the H**e H**x List are featured in the entertaining piece below, which updates a supremely irritating Childish Gambino video in light of the Jussie Smollett farce and includes a few authentic h**e crimes for context:

http://youtu.be/5nW04o-IGy8
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 08:21:53   #
jimpack123 wrote:
I love when Trumpsters argue with themselves lol


I love it when moonbats jump in with irrelevant and i***tic bulls**t! GFY!
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 08:17:36   #
zombinis3 wrote:
I think you should read what the law says, it uses the word partial a******n and then gives a definition. Secondly it can possibly reduce the allotted time that an fetus can be terminated. If it is found to be unviable forcing the mother to carry to term because it won't allow a physician to suggest an termination or to put it plainly a******n.


Then the law as written is trying to be misleading. THERE IS NO SUCH PROCEDURE AS PARTIAL A******N!

The term is PARTIAL BIRTH A******N and it is BARBARIC!!!

See if you can stomach this description:

Brenda Pratt Shafer, a registered nurse from Dayton, Ohio, assisted Dr. Haskell in a Partial Birth A******n on a 26-1/2 week (over 6 months) pre-born baby boy. She testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee (on 11/17/95) about what she witnessed.

According to nurse Shafer, the baby was alive and moving as the a******nist “delivered the baby’s body and arms – everything but the head. The doctor kept the baby’s head just inside the uterus. The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks he might fall. The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp.”

http://www.a******nfacts.com/literature/partial-birth-a******n

Is this who we are?
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 06:45:44   #
Morgan wrote:
I believe you meant to say Rose, correct?


Yes, my bad!
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 06:41:42   #
zombinis3 wrote:
Sorry didn't press quote this answer is for buffalo
Nope it defines the partial a******n and what is to be done with the remains. Also prevents the mother from donating some of the remains if
she wants to science.My point was that if the bill passes it gets closer to allowing the government to control more of the the mothers actions. So by defining what is a partial a******n it can possibly lead to requiring the mother to have the baby even if it can't survive.


There is never a medical indication to abort a normal post viable baby for the life or health of the mother. Think about that and let it sink in. If the mother's life or health is in danger the MEDICAL indication is to deliver the baby as QUICKLY as possible, usually by c-section, not taking more time and further endangering the mother by pausing to abort it. An a******l fetus can easily be detected LONG before viability.

BTW, there is no such thing as a partial a******n.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 19:40:03   #
PeterS wrote:
To be accurate they are experts at wasting money in their state or district. You may not like that latest freeway to nowhere but I am certain his their constitutes will--even the republican--though they never will admit it...


HUH?
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:37:49   #
Jakebrake wrote:
Here's mine Booby~~~


Reckon she could eat corn through a picket fence?
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:35:44   #
woodguru wrote:
That needs a sarcasm label lest fools think it is real.


Constitutionally, it is real...The House of Representatives controls the "power of the purse". And they are really expeerts art wasting taxpayer money.

"Congress—and in particular, the House of Representatives—is invested with the “power of the purse,” the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government. Massachusetts’ Elbridge Gerry said at the Federal Constitutional Convention that the House “was more immediately the representatives of the people, and it was a maxim that the people ought to hold the purse-strings.”
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:18:49   #
Ricktloml wrote:
Keep in mind the DEMOCRATS are paying Cohen's attorney fees. The fact that Lanny Davis, (long time operative and close friend to Hillary,) is his lawyer should be something a "free press" might think the public should know. In today's media, (propaganda) atmosphere, being connected in ANY way to President Trump is reason enough for the abusively biased media to repeatedly point that out, and then smear that person relentlessly. One could say that this is taking being a sore loser to the extremes. But the Democrats, especially Hillary and Obama, (along with their operatives and appointees,) NEEDED to win. As they suspected, the unprecedented amount of corruption and abuse of power, (that no one was EVER supposed to find out about,) is starting to surface. Their arrogance, (Obama r****d the 2012 e******n by weaponizing the IRS and got away with it,) led them to be a lot less careful about covering their tracks than they should have been. So when the unthinkable happened and the American people elected Donald Trump, these political thugs started this attempt at a political c**p. ALL this is an ongoing effort to overturn the results of the 2016 e******n, (and punish President Trump and those who v**ed for him, (or against Hillary,) for daring to undermine them c***ting Hillary into the White House. There needs to be a clear message sent, if ANYONE tries to interfere with the bureaucratic state retaining and wielding power, they need to be crushed, so no one will ever attempt to reign them in again. We are witnessing an attempt at a C**P, and the media is obviously complicit, because they are covering for, excusing, defending, misinforming, REFUSING to inform and outright lying to protect those, (including themselves,) involved in this travesty.
Keep in mind the DEMOCRATS are paying Cohen's atto... (show quote)


I know. Did you see Davis behind conehead when chairman elijah (Aunt Jemima's son) was mouthing off. He looked like he was about to break down sobbing. Scumbags all of them!
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:15:36   #
Jean Deaux wrote:
I h**e to interject into this observation but I have one bone to pick. A b***h is a female dog and most have much higher standards than our resident "Wicked old witch" who is nothing but a foul mouthed gutter snipe who has lost her feeble mind.


You are absolutely right! I have been insulting female dogs for a long time. I shall refrain and in the future refer to clinton as the gutter snipe she is. My apologies.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:11:31   #
The Onion:
WASHINGTON—After passage of a bill to block President Trump’s use of a national emergency declaration to pay for a border wall, members of the House of Representatives voiced concerns Thursday about executive overreach, arguing that only Congress is allowed to misappropriate federal funds. “Throwing away millions of taxpayer dollars on vanity projects is Congress’s job, not the president’s,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi following the 245-to-182 v**e to overturn Trump’s declaration, explaining that Article I of the Constitution clearly invests the legislative branch with the sole authority to mismanage public money. “Abusing the power of the purse is expressly reserved to the House and Senate. So it’s not up to the president to decide when we funnel money from one place to another, diverting it from its intended purpose. Burning through cash—whether we’re inflating the military budget or showering millions in unnecessary spending on our home districts—is an exclusively congressional task.” Pelosi concluded her remarks by praising the Founding Fathers for making the House, which is more directly representative of the people, the place where all bills for flushing money directly down the drain must originate.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:06:23   #
woodguru wrote:
I haven't seen the bill, it seems like it went beyond the simple dealer requirement to do background checks, that would be with wait times I'd assume?

An actual place this is headed was already signed into law by Obama but eliminated by Trump before it went into effect, incorporating mental instability reporting with background checks.

The GOP sends a message that they are willing to protect the rights of unhinged people that should not have legal access to guns. Opposing that concept is going to result in far wider sweeping laws when people get fed up with the way the GOP has resisted all forms of even sensible gun control.
I haven't seen the bill, it seems like it went bey... (show quote)


And who gets to decide if a person is mentally unstable? You anti-gun moonbats think anyone believing in the Second Amendment is mentally unstable.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 12:56:17   #
Morgan wrote:
I'm sorry rose that comparison is what is lame. People drown by accident, people intentionally K**L the innocent.


Sorry, I agree with Morgan, most of boob's responses are lame and juvenile.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 12:00:26   #
woodguru wrote:
You can have my sister...have you seen what I'm sleeping with


Do you really think that is what old marine pretended to be offended by? How about you, woodie?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 717 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.