Since the C***d ** v*****es hit the shelves, the decision by individuals to take the plunge has been influenced by their political affiliations in many cases. I consider myself the exception. to illustrate my point, I am bringing up the idea of keeping an attack trained Rottweiler in one's home. Were I to live in an economically depressed area with a homeless shelter, halfway house for paroled inmates, and a trailer park full of welfare recipients within a block of my residence, it would be a no-brainer. On the other hand, were I living in an area where everyone lived at a middle class level or better, did not lock their doors, and the typical police call was a loud sweet 16 party, I would be more worried about the dog turning on myself, a family member or friend, than the virtually non-existent threat of violence from my neighbors. So what does this have to do with getting v******ted. I choose not to, because of my particular circumstance. I work in a health field with day to day contact with patients and staff. I contracted a mild case of C***d ** a year ago, and recovered within a week. I get checked monthly for both the presence and immunity and every time, I test negative for having the disease and have a high level of immunity. My regular exposure keeps my immunity high. I feel I am more at risk for side effects from a rushed to production v*****e, than from the disease, itself

Believe it or not, kemmer, there is a document called the Constitution for the United States of America. It deals with e******ns. It says the following:


Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding E******ns for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
Now then, since you are such a scholar, how about you point to anywhere in the Constitution or in GA law which states that the Sec/State can override the State Legislature?
This is the same Sec/State who falsified a conversation with then president Trump, who ignored more than 8000 proven f**e addresses to which mail in b****ts were delivered, who ignored violations of the law in counting b****ts, and who had D******n investigated by a company that is a subsidiary of D******n and called it honest.