Armageddun wrote:
Would you t***slate that into English, I'm just a country boy
Soitenly: I see some saying that evolution is a religion. I know the Funk and Wagnals version, and I know MY working definition, but,how can you come to any meeting of the minds (or mindless) without common terms such as what IS a religion. I see Christians using the Bible for proof of their faith, but if you don't believe in the Bible, it's origins or infallibility than it's a hollow argument to non-christians. Some, but not all evolutionists, brook no opposition, claiming it's "Science" so therefore irrefutable .
My point is simple, make your point, or argument, define your terms and argue with as many "facts" as you can gather and support. Leave out the invective and cursing. After all, faith in the rightness of your stand is on both sides.
If I might jump into this mash-up. I am seeing a lot of arguments/rhetoric that I have seen before, on both sides. One thing that is uncommon and I haven't seen here are the definitions. What IS your (using this in the Royal sense) definition of faith, God,god,religion, proof and evolution? How can you trot out the pin sized dance floor with agreeing on terms?
larry wrote:
Duh, we don't need anyone in between the computer for that way of doing things. Just post it from the original, then we can see where it is really coming from. I suppose they need these Mortimer Snerd puppets to handle the flack.
Not trying to be snarky but your comment kinda baffled me. What do you mean by "between the computer"? Also, are you just using puppets incorrectly since he was a "dummy", not a puppet, or are you assigning Snerd like qualities to someone manipulating some other persons strings?