Posts for: Bad Bob
Nov 14, 2018 05:43:33 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
" Parliamentary procedure, Squire Danaher has the Floor " From the movie The Quiet Man. I am defending the strict laws of conversation. According to those rules handed down for thousands of years, you have the right to say anything you wish to, but when asked you must defend your words. You continue to violate those sacred statutes.
Again, I defend my statements. You apparently are unable to defend yours'.
Again, I defend my statements. You apparently are unable to defend yours'.
I don't have to, I'm not the lying POS.
Nov 14, 2018 05:35:34 #
(Main)
JFlorio wrote:
I think people too stupid to either fill out a b****t correctly or follow mailing instructions shouldn’t have a v**e.
If that had been done in 2016, trump would not be President.
Nov 14, 2018 05:21:54 #
(Main)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-napolitano-schools-fox-business-host-on-jim-acosta-lawsuit-cnn-has-a-very-good-case?yptr=yahoo
Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano has a way of bursting his Trump-defending colleagues’ bubbles.
On Tuesday, during an appearance on Fox Business Network, Napolitano surprised host Stuart Varney by arguing that CNN has a “very good case” against the Trump administration when it comes to the company’s lawsuit over Jim Acosta’s White House access.
“The only grounds for revoking the pass are, 'Is the person a danger to the physical security of the president or his family?' And obviously, Acosta may have been an irritant to the president, but he was hardly a danger to him!" Napolitano said emphatically. “So I think CNN’s got a very good case. I think this will be resolved quickly.”
The analyst predicted that the case will likely be settled before it ever makes it to a jury trial. As Napolitano praised the language in the lawsuit about the value of a free press to help Americans “make free choices in the e*******l process,” Varney shot back, “Yeah, but not the freedom to make a circus out of something.”
“Apart from taking his credentials away, couldn’t they have just said, ‘You, out, you’re not coming in’?” Varney asked later, taking the administration’s side in the fight against press freedom.
Instead, Napolitano suggested that Trump and his team take a page out of President George W. Bush’s playbook and just not call on Acosta for a few days to let things calm down.
“You know, it’s part of the rough and tumble of the First Amendment,” he said. “Remember Jefferson: ‘I would rather have newspapers without government than a government without newspapers.’ A bit hyperbolic but you can understand the value of the free press to the Founders.”
Related in Arts and Culture
Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano has a way of bursting his Trump-defending colleagues’ bubbles.
On Tuesday, during an appearance on Fox Business Network, Napolitano surprised host Stuart Varney by arguing that CNN has a “very good case” against the Trump administration when it comes to the company’s lawsuit over Jim Acosta’s White House access.
“The only grounds for revoking the pass are, 'Is the person a danger to the physical security of the president or his family?' And obviously, Acosta may have been an irritant to the president, but he was hardly a danger to him!" Napolitano said emphatically. “So I think CNN’s got a very good case. I think this will be resolved quickly.”
The analyst predicted that the case will likely be settled before it ever makes it to a jury trial. As Napolitano praised the language in the lawsuit about the value of a free press to help Americans “make free choices in the e*******l process,” Varney shot back, “Yeah, but not the freedom to make a circus out of something.”
“Apart from taking his credentials away, couldn’t they have just said, ‘You, out, you’re not coming in’?” Varney asked later, taking the administration’s side in the fight against press freedom.
Instead, Napolitano suggested that Trump and his team take a page out of President George W. Bush’s playbook and just not call on Acosta for a few days to let things calm down.
“You know, it’s part of the rough and tumble of the First Amendment,” he said. “Remember Jefferson: ‘I would rather have newspapers without government than a government without newspapers.’ A bit hyperbolic but you can understand the value of the free press to the Founders.”
Related in Arts and Culture
Nov 13, 2018 19:47:48 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
Such magic.... b****ts seem to be found all over t... (show quote)
The Russians don't need instructions.
Nov 13, 2018 19:30:24 #
(Main)
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/13/democrats-gaining-in-georgia-as-federal-judge-orders-hundreds-of-absentee-b****ts-counted.html
Democrats gained more ground in Georgia as a federal judge ordered Gwinett County to count absentee b****ts that did not include the v**er’s birth year.
Read the full ruling:----MORE----
Democrats gained more ground in Georgia as a federal judge ordered Gwinett County to count absentee b****ts that did not include the v**er’s birth year.
Read the full ruling:----MORE----
Nov 13, 2018 19:19:28 #
(Main)
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The justice system is corrupt. Nobody dares to go after a former First Lady and two former presidents, despite their crimes of treason and s******n. That's why Sessions was forced to resign. Whitaker has the courage to prosecute a former First Lady and two former presidents, and the lefties know that.
Nov 13, 2018 19:17:18 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
I am trying to make this easy for you. I truly am.... (show quote)
Witless, have you ever thought about maybe you might be better off doing something positive rather than trying to defend the indefensible?
Nov 13, 2018 18:31:30 #
(Main)
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Maybe Whitaker will gitter done. I'm sure the lefties feel that way too by the shrieks and wails about the Whitaker appointment.
Nobody can help your lying POS.
Nov 13, 2018 18:06:26 #
(Main)
Mikeyavelli wrote:
That's the problem. Nobody dares criticize let alone prosecute any treason the lefties commit. They suggest that the lefties will pay, but nothing ever gets acted upon, as if treason and s******n are not crimes to be prosecuted, especially when committed by a member of the obama Clinton cabal.
Your wussey little boys just can't stand up to the girls.
Nov 13, 2018 16:46:50 #
(Main)
tNotMyPrez wrote:
The admonition of "Do not indoctrinate your children..." is a valid construct that you also shouldn't attempt to indoctrinate other peoples' children or empty-headed adults...
Nov 13, 2018 15:47:43 #
(Main)
Comment wrote:
iS SPENDING $35,000,000 already and indicting a co... (show quote)
The Reflubs are impotent.
Nov 13, 2018 14:52:09 #
(Main)
Nov 13, 2018 14:42:08 #
Nov 13, 2018 14:41:06 #
(Main)
archie bunker wrote:
More smegma from needy Bob...... 
How did ya like the blue wave Arch?
Nov 13, 2018 14:01:35 #
(Main)
bdamage wrote:
Wow!
Look at all those purty words you wasted your time with.
The capped, bold ones, the triple exclamation points and question marks.
I have to hand it to ya.....you really are good at throwing around all those bull-chips.
Please keep coming back to this thread for your education on t***h....it's GREAT to see ya here learning something tNot.
Now.....show me some more of those purty words that you "never" copy and paste my friend.
Look at all those purty words you wasted your time with.
The capped, bold ones, the triple exclamation points and question marks.
I have to hand it to ya.....you really are good at throwing around all those bull-chips.
Please keep coming back to this thread for your education on t***h....it's GREAT to see ya here learning something tNot.
Now.....show me some more of those purty words that you "never" copy and paste my friend.
