One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Liberty Tree
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 ... 2055 next>>
Jan 16, 2014 15:14:47   #
RetNavyCWO wrote:
So ... the tv networks have been dumbing us down over the last 80 years to pave the way for Obama's dictatorship? Is that what you are saying? Have you removed all TV's and radios from your home so they won't infect you? You should probably get rid of your computer and your smartphone, too, don't you think? Evil things!

Clozapine has been found to be effective for that.


They have certainly been promoting liberalism which makes someone like Obama more acceptable now than he would have been before America began to loose its moral compass.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 15:07:44   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Navy: You are free to choose, but you are not freed from the consequence of your choice. Its not being extreme...Its seeing beyond the lies..smoke screen.. and just plain common sense! The whole gospel of Socialism can be summed up in a single sentence: &#8232;Never under any circumstances admit that your own failure may be owing to your own weaknesses, or that the failure of anyone else may be due to his own defects - his laziness, incompetence, improvidence, or stupidity. Never believe in the honesty or disinterestedness of anyone who disagrees with you. &#8232;&#8232;This basic hatred is the heart of Liberalism. This is its animating force. You can throw away the dialectical materialism, the Hegelian framework, the technical jargon, the 'scientific' analysis, and millions of pretentious words, and you still have the core: the implacable hatred and envy that are the raison d'être for all the rest. Sheeple like you have a good chance of destroying this Country!
Navy: You are free to choose, but you are not free... (show quote)


Well stated!!!!!!!
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 15:06:26   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
Perhaps both. Then, not liking being black, they decided to take the Michael Jackson treatment to become white.


Remember, Michael Jackson lived the American dream. Where else but in America could one be born a poor Black boy and grow up to be a rich white woman?
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 14:21:06   #
slatten49 wrote:
I'll have you know, we here in Central Texas are getting sunburnt....with a slight 'chill' factor. 8-) :mrgreen:


We here in North Carolina have been getting soaked and fogged in every morning
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 14:19:07   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
How many hundred Marines did Reagan k**l in Lebanon? Over 200. I get too sick looking it up.

How many B******is did GWB have in 8 years. A dozen? If you can't have 100% security, let's stop all diplomacy?

Talk about right wing nuttery, this takes the cake! Why do I bother trying to straighten you guys out?


When in a position to be unable to defend Obama blame Bush. That will not work anymore, but if you want to play that game how many did Lyndon Johnson k**l in Viet Nam?
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 13:58:53   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
The point was that the House limits the spending. The President wants more spending. The House does not. The House wins, not the President.

The President cannot make the House give money to the State Department for security guards. Money that can be borrowed at practically zero real (inflation-adjusted) interest rate. This is k*****g an ambassador for spite rather than for money. Bush could have had all the money he wanted.


Bush could only get all he wanted if Republicans controlled both Houses of Congress. The money is not really important. If the people were not safe the they should have been brought home like the British and Red Cross did. No matter how you try to spin it or live in a state of denial those who died in B******i did so because of the negligence of Obama and H. Clinton, but you will defend them no matter what they ever do.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 13:52:42   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
How many EO's has he signed that should have gone through the House and/or Senate, not only bypassing Congress, but also the Constitution?


Old Gringo, they will just come back and say Bush did more EO's than Obama, but keep in mind it is not the number but the content that matters.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 13:38:32   #
godisreal wrote:
Then the bottom line we are doomed to have the IRS abusing and using its power to do the bidding of the president. I care less if it is a Democrat or Republican in the white house they all do the same thing. Just that Obama used it more then most of the past president and he got caught using it for his own means. He uses his office for his own means plain and simple to change American, remold us into his idea of a idea government. Unfortunately it is not our way of life as we know it now. Obama is using the IRS to forward his health care and will use them to inforce even more. But this is only my opinion does anyone agree with me on this point?
Then the bottom line we are doomed to have the IRS... (show quote)


You are right on target. If a Republican did what he has done the liberls would be going nuts yelling for impeachment, but Obama gets a pass from them on everything.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 13:36:16   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
The President cannot create a bill that he can sign all by himself. He can only sign the House's bill.

Read the Constitution!


He can also veto any bill if he does not agree with it or ask that parts be change if he feels it will put lives in danger. Read it yourself.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:43:00   #
bmac32 wrote:
For five years and it has failed at each step? Ike spent less than one trillion in 8 years, Obama has spent 5 times that much.


You should knw by now that debt and deficits only matter to a Democrat if a Republican is President. Remember how Obama called 9 trillion in debt unpatriotic and his followers cheered , but now 17 trillion is not important.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:36:54   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Not according to me. According to the Senate committee. You are the one making stuff up.


Take the report as a whole and the real blame falls on Obama and Clinton. I guess, according to you, Stevens is also responsible for the lies Obama and his minions told.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:34:47   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
The budget comes from the House. Look at the House now. How much infrastructure are they building? The GOP is doing it all alone.


Any budget has to be passed by the Senate and signed into law by thge President.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:33:30   #
Winter Solstice wrote:
I could go on and on about the Federal Reserve. It has no business existing at all but has been in control of the Country since 1913. It is NOT a Federal Agency. It is a bunch of bankers who control our money. Their only object it to increase their wealth.
I worry about a flat tax. Politicians will never v**e for a flat tax even though is is the most fair way to collect money to keep the Govt. running.
The IRS is far to powerful and does really need to be knocked down a rung or two.


You are right about Congress never v****g for a flat tax. Too much big money behind getting them reelected.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:19:27   #
jimahrens wrote:
The sickening t***h is Liberals don't give a Dam about the Lives lost. All they care about is what the Government can give them. They are so pitifully stupid it does not register in there pea Brains. Just imagine what comes next if H. Clinton get elected.


You are so right. Liberals believe lives are an appropriate sacrifice as long as the achieve their goals.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 12:12:58   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
“After reading the August 16, 2012, EAC cable, General Ham called Ambassador Stevens and asked if the Embassy needed the SST (Site Security Team) from the U.S. military, but Stevens told Ham it did not. Shortly thereafter, Stevens traveled to Germany for a previously scheduled meeting with Ham at AFRICOM headquarters. Ham again offered to sustain the SST at the meeting, and Stevens again declined.”*

*From Page 20 of the January 15, 2014 “REVIEW of the TERRORIST ATTACKS ON U.S. FACILITIES IN B******I, LIBYA, SEPTEMBER 11-13, 2012 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS” issued by the SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/senate-intelligence-committee-report-on-b******i-attack/748/

You have to be paranoid to think that a bureaucrat would deny protection for an ambassador paid for by another department.

The fact is that Stevens didn't want to appear to be armed to the hilt and frightened by the m*****as he was bargaining with for arms. He was presenting himself as a harmless buyer of goods.

From all the emails released by the CIA, the “talking points” were written by the CIA as a cover story. The question is: why do Republicans want to blow a CIA cover story? To make political hay with the lives of our agents in the field? Isn’t this close to treason? Why do you h**e America?

Government-shrinking conservatives cut $11B from the State Departments budget.http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-…
“After reading the August 16, 2012, EAC cable, Gen... (show quote)


So now it is the victim's fault according to you. That is about as low as one can get but for you anything to protect Obama is good.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 ... 2055 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.