Liberty Tree

The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report is out and confirms what most of us have known and the Obama worshippers have refused to admit. It was known from the beginning that it was a terrorist attack with Al Qaeda involvement. It was known that Ambassador Stevens and others were in danger and nothing was done to protect them or develop a rescue plan in case of an attack. The American people were repeatedly lied to by Obama, H. Clinton, Susan Rice, and everyone else involved. It is now also known that the families of those who died are right when they say they have been lied to. We all know the reason for the cover-up was to help Obama get reelected. For all you FOX news h**ers they have been right about this from the beginning. One other thing we know is that the Obama worshippers who post here are going to use every liberal spin blog they can find to still try and cover for Obama and H. Clinton. They do not care who died as long as Obama stays true to their far left agenda. Please do not try and divert attention to what Bush did. It will not work and just shows more of your true colors.

Republicrat

When you can criticize George Bush for attacks that k**led dipolmats, then you can talk, otherwise you show your true colors as being part of the "ONE TERM PRESIDENCY" crowd.
Next Republican president, if we ever have one, the Democrats need to announce he is a one term president and do everything they can to insure it,like cut appropriations for embassay security. I wonder if the Republicans will sit back and take it the way the Democrats and Obama have just sat there and taken it.?????????
Let me run their PR campaign and there would be no Republican PARTY let inspite of the BIllIONs billionaires are throwing at it. What do you mean money does not solve a problem. It did for the Republicans in 2010. I known You think I am off topic, but the whole discussion is, anti-Obama and Democrats. Did the founding Fathers intend for money to re-establish and aristocracy????

WhiteFalcon

The more I see these c****eon**icrats whine and scream the more I know the t***h has been told. The fact is that the B******i incident could have and should have been avoided. All the intelligence was in place but Hillary Clinton and Ovomit chose to ignore it, then they got together after it happened and came up with that pathetic lie about the video, and the had Susan Rice go out ant spread the lie. Anyone with a brain knew it was a lie from the start. This report was put out by democrats as well as Republicans. It is far closer to the total t***h than anything that has been put out by the Ovomit administration. Hillary Clinton, Ovomit, and Leon Panetta and Susan Rice should all hang over that incident, and hang from the same tree.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Bush didn't send out his minions to lie about any of those attacks if indeed they happened as you say. Your trying to mix apples and oranges. I would love for you to run the Democratic party. Where do I v**e? Of course George Soros and the unions, warren Buffett and Wall Street don't contribute to the Dems. You sir are a simple nit-wit.

MrEd Loc: Georgia

It seems to me that if Obama had acted to protect and defend the consulate, he would have gained in his approval rating and done even better in the e******ns then all the lying he has done. Really, the best thing he could have done was to improve the security of the consulate instead of taking it away. I can't understand how anyone could even think that sacrificing people in an assault like this is a good thing to do. It just proves once again that the only thing progressives know, is how to lie to cover things up, instead of doing the right thing to begin with.

It would seem to me that if Obama had wanted to get rid of the ambassador like some people have accused Obama of doing, there are much better ways of doing that. I don't really buy that. I just think his stupidity in handling the situation got them in trouble and neither he nor Hillary could figure a way out except lying to the people the way they have always done. The way they handle everything is to just lie. Neither one of these people can tell the t***h.

Liberty Tree

Yiu are off topic because you cannot face the t***h, nor do you want it.

MarvinSussman

“After reading the August 16, 2012, EAC cable, General Ham called Ambassador Stevens and asked if the Embassy needed the SST (Site Security Team) from the U.S. military, but Stevens told Ham it did not. Shortly thereafter, Stevens traveled to Germany for a previously scheduled meeting with Ham at AFRICOM headquarters. Ham again offered to sustain the SST at the meeting, and Stevens again declined.”*

*From Page 20 of the January 15, 2014 “REVIEW of the TERRORIST ATTACKS ON U.S. FACILITIES IN B******I, LIBYA, SEPTEMBER 11-13, 2012 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS”

issued by the SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/senate-intelligence-committee-report-on-b******i-attack/748/

MarvinSussman

“After reading the August 16, 2012, EAC cable, General Ham called Ambassador Stevens and asked if the Embassy needed the SST (Site Security Team) from the U.S. military, but Stevens told Ham it did not. Shortly thereafter, Stevens traveled to Germany for a previously scheduled meeting with Ham at AFRICOM headquarters. Ham again offered to sustain the SST at the meeting, and Stevens again declined.”*

*From Page 20 of the January 15, 2014 “REVIEW of the TERRORIST ATTACKS ON U.S. FACILITIES IN B******I, LIBYA, SEPTEMBER 11-13, 2012 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS” issued by the SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/senate-intelligence-committee-report-on-b******i-attack/748/

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

He had already been refused extra security by the State Department. Going around Hillary and her group by asking the military for additional security would not have been a very good career move. Just more petty bureaucratic bull#$%^ from this administration. Why can't you lefties ever admit a screw up?

Republicrat

You Do Know the Republicans cut the budget for securtiy operations. How does the State Department send money they are not authorized to spend. If there was a "plot" all we need is the memo the Republicans sent the terrorist letting them know that area was not budgeted.

MarvinSussman

From all the emails released by the CIA, the “talking points” were written by the CIA as a cover story. The question is: why do Republicans want to blow a CIA cover story? To make political hay with the lives of our agents in the field? Isn’t this close to treason? Why do you h**e America?

Republicrat

I simply do not understand how a party keeps saying government is broken, and keeps breaking it and then blames the Democrats for running a broken government.
The Republican solution::: give the country to the rich since they own it and let them run it. Say monarchy.

Republicrat

You Do Know the Republicans cut the budget for securtiy operations. How does the State Department send money they are not authorized to spend. If there was a "plot" all we need is the memo the Republicans sent the terrorist letting them know that area was not budgeted.

Republicrat

What would a captialist like George Soros have in common with unions? Get real the unions the Republicans are railing about are like tits on a boar. All show, no go.

MarvinSussman

You are paranoid to think that a bureaucrat would deny protection for an ambassador paid for by another department.

The fact is that Stevens didn't want to appear to be armed to the hilt and frightened by the m*****as he was bargaining with for arms. He was presenting himself as a harmless buyer of goods.