Just another lie. Show me the proof Minnesota Majority has that specifically cites the court case and conviction record, for "v***r f***d" and show me at least 40 of them, although banjojack and Minnesota Majority claim there are 177 such cases. So don't cloud the issue with some more of your lies. If you show me the proof, I'll believe it. That means verifiable proof. And the proof is not some "word" from a bias, lying organization like Minnesota Majority. I've already proved they've lied once.

You want me to "prove" 40 cases of v***r f***d. Why don't you "prove" me wrong? You cited 2 Liberal sources to substantiate your claim, I cited one Liberal and one Conservative. I believe my coverage is a little more balanced.
I am satisfied that my claims are true. Your satisfaction, or lack of it, is filed in my "who cares?" category. You want me, in order to satisfy YOU, to spend hours looking up the dispositions of at least 40 individual cases, some of which undoubtedly have other charges involved. You have access to the same sources as I do. Do your own damn legwork, Brucie Boy. If you expect me to do your paralegal research, you had better get ready to un-ass your wallet, because I will not do it for your satisfaction or entertainment. The sources I cited have already done the research. I will not do it again for your goddamn amusement. Poor little Bruce. a retired officer without a single damn luckless sailor to order around, so he can feel important. Peckerhead.

From: The National Memo

Congress Has Spent Millions On B******i Witch Hunts

The House of Representatives’ never-ending dishonest, partisan hearings on the attack that k**led four Americans in B******i, Libya in 2012 have long since been exposed as a waste of time. Now, thanks to the Pentagon, we know that they have also been a waste of money.

As The Associated Press reported on Tuesday evening, on March 11 the Pentagon sent a letter to Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), which revealed that Congress’ numerous investigations into the attack have cost millions of dollars and thousands of hours of personnel time.

“The Department has dev**ed thousands of man-hours to responding to numerous and often repetitive congressional requests regarding B******i,” the letter reads. “The total cost of compliance with B******i-related congressional requests sent to the Department and other agencies is estimated to be in the millions of dollars.”

The letter goes on to note that “these investigations validate the conclusion of the Accountability Review Board led by Ambassador Pickering and Admiral Mullen,” which revealed that interagency response to the attacks “was timely and appropriate.”

Rep. Smith responded to the letter by writing one of his own, to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-CA).

“We must stop wasting this committee’s and our military’s scarce resources chasing a scandal that does not exist,” Smith wrote, according to The Hill.

“More than any other committee in Congress, this committee should understand the financial strain on the Department of Defense, which is being made worse by these ongoing and ridiculous investigations,” he added.

Although the numerous hearings have accomplished little (aside from blowing the CIA’s cover in Libya), McKeon appears to have no intention of heeding Smith’s advice. In a statement, his spokesman Cluade Chafin retorted that “it is important that the committee see this oversight effort through to its conclusion.”

Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee, which led many of the B******i inquiries under the leadership of Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), is still busy examining another f**e scandal. As Rep. Smith urges an end to the costly B******i witch hunt, Congressman Issa is going all-out in his effort to prove illegal IRS political targeting that never actually occurred.

For those of you keeping score at home, those investigations have already cost taxpayers at least $14 million.

No one can lead without help and the bigger the organization you lead, the more help you require. With a large corporation, you have multiple department heads to manage and numerous divisions to oversee. You will have assistants, who will help you manage your time. People to answer your phone, take messages, receive your mail, answer your mail, receive and collate reports, make appointments for people to see you and you to see people.

Hopefully you do due diligence in hiring all the people who help you, including the department heads and division heads. You cannot look over the shoulders of everyone who works for you, so a level of trust MUST be there, or you'll go nuts wondering if the report you just got is accurate. You know that everybody has ambition and that a certain amount is necessary. You also know that some of your employees probably believe they can do your job better than you can.

Here's the thing; what do you do if/when an employee intentionally or accidentally sabotages you? You can't read minds, so how do you know if the guy who smiles and tells you how fortunate he is to be working for you, is secretly telling shareholders that you're an i***t? Do you put spies in every department? How would you know if your spies are telling you bad things about the department head because THEY want the job?

What if some of the board members were against you having the job and get some of your employees to "screw you up"? What if some of your employees wanted your job, didn't get it, and now would like to see you fail? How do you guard yourself from intentional or accidental sabotage? Every single day you go to work, you KNOW that someone may be setting traps for you. An important message not delivered, a phone call misdirected, a report fabricated, incorrect information given to you, etc.

Welcome to the job of President of the United States.

I'm fairly sure your vocabulary is nowhere as extensive, as mine. however that is a topic for debate. What isn't a topic for debate is how simple minded and naïve you are, not to mention infantile, since all you are capable of is name calling. Most of the posters, on this forum, have progressed past fifth grade grammar, unfortunately it seems you haven't. One could only wish that I bore you, so that you would take your sophomoric banter back to your basement which would, in turn, raise the IQ level, of this forum, ten fold.

Hello everyone...My name is james w miller and i li ve in las vegas, nevada..I am as always, very interested and sincerely concerned to what is happening to our country due to the inept politicians all around our country and to try and figure out what " We The People " can do, other than v****g, to get our great republic back on course, if at all possible because of the mishandling of our countries business for so many years...Anyway, Thanks for allowing me to come aboard, and i hope to help us all figure out how to straighten our country out, and get the ignorant v**ers to v**e correctly, instead of racially v****g for a persons color, instead of qualifications..I know this will be challenging, but I am always up for making ignorant i***ts turn around and start thinking logically..As in turning a progressive liberal away from their incorrect thinking, to a more conservative correct way of thinking...and so on it goes

I have been discussing this very point with a number of liberals that I am unfortunately forced by circumstance to interact with. None of them, not a one, will opine on the following;

Obama said over and over and over (in the spirit of big lie) that the ACA would provide immediate health care coverage for 30 million people who would otherwise not have such access. He said it over and over and over.

My question, where are the 30 million who should be beating down the doors to sign up? Why are we quibbling over the difference between 5 million and 7 million? Where are the masses this law is meant to provide for?

No Democrat, liberal, socialist, c*******t will provide an answer to this question.

V**e against anyone, ANYONE, who v**ed FOR the ACA.