One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Liberty Tree
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ... 2059 next>>
Mar 31, 2014 19:08:42   #
Homestead wrote:
You guys just don't get it.

It's a lot harder on folks once they die.

They have to dig themselves out of their graves, d**g their decomposing bodies to the polls and then get back to their grave before the witching hour is over.

You guys just don't have the respect for your elders like the Democrats do.

You h**ers!


You are right. It is also a lot harder for them to get themselves an ID.
Go to
Mar 31, 2014 16:58:39   #
50crckt51 wrote:
Howdy. Constitutional Conservative and TEA Party Member here - Let the hating begin.


Welcome, it is always good to have another one who has seen the light.
Go to
Mar 31, 2014 16:57:29   #
saloopo wrote:
Youre right, there was no problem for 200 years, not until the government decided that every person walking must cast a v**e. Citizen or not. Dead or alive. Suggesting v**er laws were a conservative idea is just another of your humorless lies. Since youre so fixated on fraud cases, name me one instance of a court case that involves a v**er claiming he has been denied the right to v**e .


You are wasting your time with him. His brain is so cemented with his ideology that nothing can penetrated it or change it. He will just keep denying anything you say and trying to insult you.
Go to
Mar 31, 2014 16:53:16   #
lpnmajor wrote:
It's not about v**er ID. It's about restricting v****g times, and number of v****g sites. There is NOT a guaranteed " time off work" to v**e. These restrictions are designed to cut the number of blue collar and "no collar" v**es, thus giving the advantage to white collar and "gold collar" v**ers, who typically v**e republican. BTW, there are plenty of i*****l a***ns in the second two categories as well.


Polls are open early enough, late enough, and have early v****g so anyone who really wants to v**e can. Remember the days of one day v****g? There are more days and more hours now so v****g has not been restricted.
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 07:12:00   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Beat them however you can.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/us/new-gop-bid-to-limit-v****g-in-swing-states.html?emc=edit_th_20140330&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=68247748

We have become so numb to shameful behavior, no one even tries to hide it anymore. Perhaps we should go back to the days when only large property owners could v**e. Or better yet, sell v****g rights, Lord knows the rest of the political landscape is for sale.


Serring aside the NYTimes liberal spin, none of this stops anyone who wants to v**e from v****g.
Go to
Mar 29, 2014 08:07:02   #
buffalo wrote:
THE DEBT CEILING
>
>
>
> * The President doesn't understand THE DEBT CEILING
>
> * Democrats don't understand THE DEBT CEILING
>
> * Republicans don't understand THE DEBT CEILING
>
> * Liberals don't understand THE DEBT CEILING
>
> * NO ONE understands THE DEBT CEILING
>
> * SO - Allow me to explain...
> Let's say you come home from work and find there has been a
>
> sewer backup in your neighborhood. Your home has sewage all
> the way up to your ceilings.
> What do you think you should do? Raise the ceilings or pump
> out the s**t?
> Your choice is coming in November 2014. Don't miss the
> opportunity.
>
THE DEBT CEILING br > br > br > br... (show quote)


On the other hand, they may understand but just not care. I believe Obama wants an economic crisis so he will have an excuse to seize more control.
Go to
Mar 29, 2014 08:04:56   #
The Dutchman wrote:
OBAMACARE SIGN-UP H**X: Hijacking Cancelled Policy Victims Akin To Detroit Kidnapping New Yorkers Posted by John Pastirchak on March 28, 2014 at 11:00pm View Blog

The Obama administration is at it again. They're running up the f**gpole an incredibly misleading ObamaCare enrollment figure. Typically, they're hoping we're all stupid enough to salute. Well, don't. The latest inflated number, 6-milliion, is fraught with enough stuffers to fill every coal-laden Christmas stocking on Capitol Hill next December.

According to a McKinsey Group study released earlier this month, just 14% of ObamaCare signups through February appeared to be "previously uninusured enrollees".

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2014/03/08/mckinsey-only-...

Since White House bluster then had claimed 5-million, even allowing McKinsey an enormously generous plus/minus allowance for error, a reasonably adjusted number through February still would have been little more than 3-million signups. And that figure would have included a still undisclosed percentage of the nearly 5-million whose plans got cancelled due to the law itself. Padding the signup numbers with this demographic is about as honest as the city of Detroit remedying it's decades-long population decline by kidnapping a couple million residents from New York City.

Another qualifier affecting enrollment is the number of enrollees legitimately "insured", those who've paid their premiums, and a statistic Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius denies knowing. So then, how many have really enrolled in ObamaCare? HHS claims 6-million. I say 4.8-million. And that's being generous.
OBAMACARE SIGN-UP H**X: Hijacking Cancelled Policy... (show quote)


The light of t***h will send all the libs and Obama worshippers straight to the DNC and ELWNJ blogs to get the latest talking points to try and spin their way out of this.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 21:49:39   #
Loki wrote:
He is almost to the point of Pavlovian response now. The same thing over and over again. Like a dog with a bone he is very fond of, he won't let go. It's not much of a bone, but it's his bone. How long do you think before he posts more of his predictable bulls**t? If he keeps doing the Pavlov thing, I may have to invest in some dog biscuits.


It is not even his bone. It is just one he has been tossed through DNC talking points.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 21:40:57   #
Loki wrote:
I'm tired of his crap, but may I point out he studiously ignores one of my sources was US News and World Report, and another was Minnesota Public Radio, neither of which are known as bastions of conservative thought. Both of his sources were left wing publications with a far smaller audience, and not very well known outside of Minnesota. (Or, for that matter, Minneapolis ). Researching the dispositions of 40 cases, many of which may have had v***r f***d as a secondary or tertiary charge, requires hours of research, which has already been done by the sources I cited. Doing them again is simply a stupid assed game he wants me to play, wasting time doing paralegal work while he sits on his couch and pulls his pud, or wh**ever it is he does. My sources are at least as credible as his, he can verify all he wants. I don't work for free, for the entertainment of a deliberately obtuse clown with an overgrown ego and an undergrown brain. The sources are there. He can look them up himself.
I'm tired of his crap, but may I point out he stud... (show quote)


No proof would ever be enough for him because he is a fraud.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 21:38:57   #
parob2005 wrote:
I wouldn't believe a fucking word that comes out of the Muslim brotherhood White House. It's a dam shame no one has been brought. To justice on this matter.Seems like democrats have forgotten the four Americans that died.All dems. Want to do is cover up the t***h about what really happened!!!!


As far as the Democrats are concerned the four who died in B******i are expendable as long as Obama is protected.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 17:04:44   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
To hell with impeachment....Put a Grand Jury to work, and send a Federal Marshall to the White House and make an arrest!


Do you believe Holder would ever sanction such a thing, no matter what Obama did? Obama knows he has a free pass with the Senate as it is, Holder as AG, and the MSM in his pocket.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 15:00:06   #
LAPhil wrote:
Is it me or is there a disconnect here?


There is a disconnect and it is between his ears.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 14:55:16   #
Patty wrote:
The house judicial committee sends it to the Senate upon approval. The Senate is the one who performs the task on impeachment.
•The Senate formulates rules and procedures for holding a trial.
•A trial will be held. The President will be represented by his lawyers. A select group of House members will serve as "prosecutors." The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (currently John G. Roberts) will preside with all 100 Senators acting as the jury.
•The Senate will meet in private session to debate a verdict.
•The Senate, in open session, will v**e on a verdict. A 2/3 v**e of the Senate will result in a conviction.
•The Senate will v**e to remove the President from office.
•The Senate may also v**e (by a simple majority) to prohibit the President from holding any public office in the future.
The house judicial committee sends it to the Senat... (show quote)


A little correction. The House issues articles of impeachment which is like an indictment and then the trial takes place in the Senate.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 14:53:05   #
jimahrens wrote:
I believe it will the pressure will be so great on the Democrats they will throw Obama under the bus.


I wish you were right, but I do not think they would ever go that far.
Go to
Mar 28, 2014 14:47:36   #
jimahrens wrote:
Patty f am correct Impeachment Has to be started in the House. I am sure there are enough v**es there to send it on to the Senate. And we all know it will not go anywhere there. However It makes sense to do it. This will put Dems in a position to have to defend Obama and force Supreme court to make a ruling and if he is found in violation of Constitutional Law. And if he is found guilty the democrats better look for life vests.


Even if Republicans take the Senate it takes a two thirds v**e there to convict. That will not happen.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ... 2059 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.