One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Randy131
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 182 next>>
Nov 13, 2017 07:35:27   #
Don't worry, that is being stopped in the Middle East and Bangladesh, by Obama and now the Democratic leadership and President Trump's Democrat obstructionist in the US Congress, who have been importing all those Muslims into the USA through legal immigration and refugee status, and if you try to oppose them, the Democrats start calling you an islamaphobe and a bigot, as the k*****gs are slacking up in the Middle East and Bangladesh, and growing by leaps and bounds here in the USA.



Oldsailor65 wrote:
More from the "Religion of Peace" 20,000 Muslims Burn Down A Hindu Village

Why? Because of a rumor that someone had insulted Mohammed. The same reason leftwing elites blamed me for the multiple Muslim assassination attempts on my life. Read the story here.

This is the misery heaped upon kuffars wherever the devout seek to assert their s*********t ideology.

Will your town be next?

ONE PERSON IS K**LED AS MOB OF 20,000 MUSLIMS BURNS DOWN HINDU VILLAGE IN BANGLADESH AFTER RUMOUR SPREAD THAT A LOCAL HAD INSULTED PROPHET MOHAMMED ON FACEBOOK

Trouble flared in the village of Thakurbari, Bangladesh, over a Facebook post
It was reported a villager had insulted Prophet Mohammed on social media
A 20,000-strong mob marched on the village, burning and l**ting houses
Protesters clashed with police and one person was k**led and five others injured
b More from the "Religion of Peace" 20,... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 07:21:55   #
"TYPICAL"!!! The American people had better respond to this for Sean Hanity's sake, or otherwise they'll lose the last semblance of any fair and balanced news in the USA, as FOX News has slowly been turning to the dark liberal side since Murdoch put his very liberal sons and their far left radical wifes in charge of FOX News.



fullspinzoo wrote:
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 01:21:06   #
"(WELL I H**E TO TELL YOU CLINTON IS NOT THE PRESIDENT SHE NEVER WAS NOT SURE IF YOU KNEW THAT BUT HISTORY HAS NEVER BEEN A STRONG POINT FROM THE RIGHT WING.)"

Every time that turdnest complains about President Trump or Republican politicians committing the same crimes as the Clintons did, or other Democrats, and conservatives remind him of his "HYPOCRISY" for not only ignoring the Clintons' crimes, but he supported them when they committed those crimes, he comes back with this quote, or similar language.

So what does this mean?

It means that to turnest the crimes only matter, and should only require punishment, if a President that is a Republican, or other Republicans politicians, have committed them, as when Bill Clinton was President he committed many of his sexual assault crimes, but turdnest never demanded punishment, and Bill Clinton was not held accountable for lying to a "Grand Jury" during his impeachmnet trial in the US Senate, because the Democrats claimed that the "lie" was only about sex, and since Hillary Clinton never became President, she should not be held accountable and punished for her crimes either, but that everyone should just ignore them because she is not the President.

But if a Republican President, or other Republican politicians, commit the same crimes as the Clintons or other Democratic polticians, they should be hung from the nearest tree, and turdnest just doesn't understand why we shouldn't ignore his "HYPOCRISY" for demanding punishment for crimes only when a Republican commits them, President or not, and not when the Clintons or other Democrats have committed the same crimes.

Also according to turdnest, when a Republican is accused of a crime, they are absolutely guilty until they can prove their innocence, unlike the American justice system that demands that everyone is "innocent until proven guilty", and with turdnest this is appropiate only if the accused is a Democrat, not a Republican, as proven by what turdnest is saying on his little soapbox against Judge Roy Moore.



tdsrnest wrote:
Now to justify Roy Moore child abuse charges. First it starts out she’s lying now that doesn’t work because two more women came out that said good old Roy dated them. One he was visiting a high school picked that one up in her civics class this guy is a real gem.
But now they are attempting to dredge up the Clinton boogeyman of abuse to distract from Roy (I like kids in civics class) and the abuse of a 14 year old.
So things are getting desperate for the party of family values.
But all these decades old conspiracy theories about Bill Clinton involving adult women is not the same as child sex abuse, but not sure Trump supporters know the difference. It’s the age Trump supporters Roy 14, 16, 17 year olds in civics class Clinton adult consensual sex dirt bag yes but not against the law.

American people are really starting to wake up to the stupid battle cry of the guy that occupies the Washington day care center. It’s always Clinton’s fault or f**e news.
(F**E NEWS, F**E NEWS, F**E NEWS, F**E NEWS, it’s all F**E NEWS AND CLINTON DID IT.

Roy the new republican senator, you know him the guy that walks the halls of high schools he likes those young girls in the Civics class he used the same thing all Democratic F**E NEWS.

(WELL I H**E TO TELL YOU CLINTON IS NOT THE PRESIDENT SHE NEVER WAS NOT SURE IF YOU KNEW THAT BUT HISTORY HAS NEVER BEEN A STRONG POINT FROM THE RIGHT WING.) Has anybody ever noticed that the republicans have never taken responsibility for any of there failed agendas. (Oh sorry) Trump supporters do not read legislation but they do love there conspiracy theories it gives them something to talk about.
Now to justify Roy Moore child abuse charges. Firs... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 18:58:59   #
Again you're expressing what GOD has done to people and organizations that you don't like or don't agree with the all important "YOU", when you have no idea or proof of GOD doing what you say, just because their are scriptures warning what he would do, so you assign that GOD has done this to those that you want Him to do it to. You're sick, and you have no idea what GOD has done to people and organizations of today, or what He may do to them in the future, because it is not your authority to judge people and organizations, but you will be judged by GOD in how you have judged others right on this OPP site. Now go away and quit bothering me, for you are a blastphemer for saying what you have in your judgements, and assigning GOD's name and will for carrying out your judgements, not His.



desparado wrote:
As I have said I don't have to judge GOD has already done it in some cases GOD says if they don't believe in his son there are already condemned therefore he has already judged them and he did it thousands of years ago!

ohn 3:18New International Version (NIV)

18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.
Now I hope you understand these people can turn from their sin and repent and obtain salvation if not their already condemned
I know the people by what they preach the Mormons teach that if they tithe regularly and work and if perfect they to can become gods
neither the JW or Mormon get salvation through the blood of Christ,
have a nice day
As I have said I don't have to judge GOD has alrea... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 16:27:03   #
I finished turdnest up last night on a different OPP site and thread, but you apparently certain know PeterS by your description of him, and you're right about turdnest too, they both are one of a kind. I haven't noticed you on these OPP sites before Candace, but I'm glad to meet you, you seem to be my type of girl, with your descriptions of PeterS and turdnest, so have a good day, and give them a piece of your mind and make them so very envious of what you can do, and they can't, speak of the t***h.



[quote=Candace Grugel][quote=Randy131]Candace, when you're replying to a comment, click on the 'Quote Reply' button, so the one you are replying to will be listed, and all will know who your comment was meant for, instead of just the 'Reply' button, that doesn't direct your comment to anyone. Just some friendly advice.[/quote
Yeppers. I realized after I hit "post." Sorry. It was meant for our little Petey. What a canker sore on the butt of thinking people that one is. Reminds me. Has anyone heard from turd lately?[/quote]
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 16:08:51   #
Candace, when you're replying to a comment, click on the 'Quote Reply' button, so the one you are replying to will be listed, and all will know who your comment was meant for, instead of just the 'Reply' button, that doesn't direct your comment to anyone. Just some friendly advice.



Candace Grugel wrote:
Boy, with all your babbling, you really need serious couch time, and I don't mean a nap. Incidentally, though it obviously pains you to face this little tidbit of fact, this country was founded upon the Ten Commandments. Look it up you insipid little f*****t.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 15:58:19   #
Your faith, as you have proven here, is centered on your own judgements, and then adhering GOD's name to your own biases, whereas my faith is centered on GOD, and waiting for Him to make His judgements, and not usurping His authority in doing so. Big difference, you're happy with what you do, and I'm happy with what I do, because no innocent person will ever suffer from my prejudices, as they will with your prejudices, because you don't even know the people you judge, or can prove what you think they are guilty of, which I instead allow GOD to decide all of that, and accept His judgement, not abrogating it. So go see your religious leader, for you're not getting any absolution from me for your judgement of others in GOD's name, just as the Muslims do.



desparado wrote:
John 3:18New International Version (NIV)

18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe "stands condemned already" because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.


you can defend trump but not your faith
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 15:35:37   #
Are you directing that question at me or PeterS? As far as the question is concerned, don't worry about it, that's been one of the nicest things said to me in a very long time, except by those of the oppsite sex, which sometimes they can be fickle, so let it be, I'm glad to be asked that, it makes me feel good now. I just didn't know that I wrote like a 15 year old 9th grader, for that would certainly embarrass the teachers in how they graded me throughout high school?



ldsuttonjr wrote:
peters: Can you prove your not 15?
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 15:25:53   #
You are completely correct Larry, but for me personally, and nobody is required to do this unless it is solely their own decision, I prefer to spell the real, true, and only GOD in all capitals, which is the least respect that I could and want to show Him. There has been a few known names given to GOD, Jehovah being just one, but I always wanted to call Him by His true name, but didn't know what that would be, until I finally accidentally learned that in the Hebrew language, the word for "I AM' is "YAHWEH".




Larry the Legend wrote:
Just for your information, God is a proper noun in this instance and therefore is spelt with a capital 'G', as in 'God'. Using the lower case instance, as in 'god', infers reference to an object, not a being (as in 'a god', or 'the god'). I know it can be confusing, but I'm sure you'll get the hang of it if you try.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 15:02:24   #
You haven't the slightest idea what GOD has judged, because it is your judgement that you are putting His name on, not His judgement, as Jesus said "All will be revealed", and when I asked you if GOD had told you that Romney was His enemy, you said no, meaning that is not a fact or judgement that has been revealed by GOD. So if that is calling you a liar, so be it, because it is your words of GOD's supposed judgement that you agree hasn't been revealed, not mine. Now you are puttting GOD's name again on your judgement of what you believe are cults, as Jesus and His Apostles were also called, and anyone else who you believe are teaching false gospels, which if they are, there is still time for them to change before they die, without GOD judging them as HIS enemy as you have claimed. By pointing out lies, I'm not judging you, for I care not if you lie all you want, for I'm just trying to warn you that GOD has said, "Judge not, less ye be judged", and calling your judgements as being that of GOD, does not exhonerate you from violating what GOD has warned us all against.

You have to live with what you say, not me. I just don't believe that GOD has named anyone specifically as His enemy, not even Satan, another of His creation, who if Satan repents and returns to GOD's ways and words, would GOD forgive him, as He has promised to forgive us? You don't even know Romney, nor any of these others you claim that GOD has condemned or called His enemy, and since GOD hasn't told you these things, as you have already admitted, then how could you possibly know one way or another, or is it that you just want to be as great as GOD is, and have also eaten the fruit of the forbidden tree, causing you to know these things about people and organizations that you don't even know?

I have never read the book of Mormon, nor do I have the interest to do so, but I'm still not going to condemn Mormons just because I have read the Holy Bible, as you apparently like to do, and also apparently have already done so many times. So I guess you are one of those who know how they are going to be judged by GOD, because you keep doing it to others. So be happy in your judgements, because you probably won't be when GOD says it is your turn.



desparado wrote:
Funny if you look back through your posts you have judged me many times, I said GOD has judged the cults and anyone who teaches a false gospel and you call me a lier. I suggest you start reading your bible and not the book of Mormon
John 3:18New International Version (NIV)

18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.

And GOD did these thousands of years before these cults were founded.
Funny if you look back through your posts you have... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 14:24:04   #
If that was really true, then why did they pay Emmanuel and Gruber all that money, if the 'ACA' (Obamacare) was just what the 'Heritage Foundation' produced, as professor Jonathon Gruber has claimed the opposite many times over, declaring that he did the lions share of the work. What a bunch of BS, Obama's worshippers learned well from him, especially in changing the facts of histroy, and lying, as the "Lying King" Obama did more of than all our previous Presidents added together did. If "the right wing added 98 amendments", then should be able to name each of those amandments (or at least some) and who were the sponors (at least the ones that you are capable of naming the amandments) of each, but don't start worrying too much, we know that you can't, because that is also a big lie, one that Obama would be proud to claim as his own.



tdsrnest wrote:
Stop talking nonsense. That ACA was crafted using the Heritage foundations plan. For people such as yourself the Heritage Foundation is a right wing think tank. You’re out of touch comment that’s its unaffordable then why do 27 Million more people in this country have healthcare insurance. You listen to right wing mis-represent the ACA. You have never read the ACA you have no idea that the right wing added 98 amendments, the concept of the ACA was put together by republicans. Republicans are mad because it was a black guy that finally gave healthcare to 27 million people in this country.

Read Obamacare then read the Heritage foundations recommendation for affordable healthcare. Then you can comment.
Stop talking nonsense. That ACA was crafted using ... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 13:37:13   #
That's right, that's only what you think, there are millions of us that think a lot differently than you, and don't have to accept what you think being crammed down our throats, as Obama and the Democrats have done for the last 8 years, but now we can continue living as all Americans have been since the founding of this country, instead of what Obama, the Democrats, and people like you have forced upon us. With President Trump, it'a new day, and our free speech rights and our freedom of religion right have once again been restored to us. We we will live like our forefathers have, with our rights of choice and association, and not being forced to do what elitists say is best for us, but instead doing what we have the right to decide and choose for ourselves what is best for us, the freedoms this country guaranteed for everyone until Obama, the Democrats, and people like you took over, and decided you'd force us to do your will, because you and your kind decided that would be best for us all.

The "Declaration" is not a list of grievances, for the American colonists had sent King George many lists of grievances over a long period of time, which he simply ignored, but this was different, much different.

The first three paragraphs explained what kind of governance man expected and deserved under a caring and omnipotent GOD (Creator), whose interventions guided man in his life and relationships with other men, and how everyone should be treated, with honor and repsect for being a creation of GOD. The next twenty seven paragraphs, many being just one sentence paragraphs, explaining the reasons, grievances as you want to call them, for what they were about to declare.

The last three paragraphs explaining the American colonists actions that they were taking to right the wrongs that had been perpetrated on them by King George, and start governing themselves, so they would no longer have to suffer the wrongs that King George constantly inflicted upon them, by declaring the thirteen American colonies to now be seperate and independent from King George and Great Britain, as a newly formed nation of states that have united for their common good and common defense, a 'Delaration of Independence' for the thirteen 'United States of America', not just a list of grievances as you want it to be, but a writ of explanation, reason, and action guided by GOD, which all the 'Founding Fathers' insisted that their success was completely owed to the intervention and providence of GOD, their Creator, and the true facts of the history of the start of the United States of America.

Now you claim that "under GOD" was added to the pledge, an oath to the USA, because the American people were afraid of the "C*******ts"? Is that the best fantasy that you can come up with, which is so ridiculous it doesn't warrant addressing. You're simply pathetic, and you need more instruction from your indoctrinators on how to indoctrinate others, for you're proving to be pathetic at it with made up ridiculous fantasies as that. I'm old enough to have the common sense and knowledge to not to believe your BS. As far as my age, and the level at which I read, the USMC declared many years ago that it is much better than what you have proven, in your own abilities of the same, in your comments on these OPP sites.

Take your atheism and fantasies to other more guillable and weak minded people like yourself, who like you have a penchant for believing the BS that your indoctrinators have you espousing in your pathetic attempt to convert others to the ridiculous beliefs that you insanely accept. You're a waste of my time, so trot along and bother someone else, your not worth arguing with, because you deny the t***h and our history. Go practice on someone elase, and quit bothering me.



PeterS wrote:
They added God because it was the 50's and everyone was terrified of the godless c*******ts. How old are you Randy? You read like you are about 16 with the comprehension level of a 9th grader. I'll give you some slack now but you have some serious catching up to do. Start with Locke. Give him a read and when you've finished I'll add to your reading list.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 00:56:17   #
Conservatives do believe in tradition that has proven to be the driving force of the success of our nation, and therefore do not want it changed, but adding to it with other similar traditions, as "under GOD", since the 'Declaration of Independence' declares we owe for our unalienable endowed Rights, is not changing anything, but adding to what has already been expressed in a founding document of the USA.

You see, the reason we oppose you liberals is because you want to change our legacy and heritage that made us and this nation so great, and if we add to that legacy and heritage, that compliments what you demand to be changed, you liberals raise hell and say stupid things that make you look like fools and antiAmerican to us Christian conservatives.

Think of why we want to preserve our legacy and heritage, and don't mind adding to them, things that won't change them, but only enhances them, but we refuse to change what has made us great, which your problem is that you want to change what made us great, not add to it.

Why don't you try to think of things that could be added to our traditions, legacy, and heritage, that will work in conjuntion with and enhance those things that made us great, instead of always wanting to change what made us great. What you liberals always want to change to, have already been proven failures all around the world, judged not by just the existence of all those being forced to live under those failures, but the conditions of how they must live and what freedoms they are allowed to better themselves, which socialism and c*******m has never ever lived up to, even though hundreds of millions have been forced to live under those initiative k*****g forms of governmemt. Ask yourself why they are being forced, instead of wanting to live under those forms of government, that you want to change our capitalistic and free market forms of government to.



PeterS wrote:
How is this an attack from within? "Under god" is an add on. I thought conservatives believed in tradition? Sad to think that you no longer do...
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 23:26:58   #
It was always said that the USA could only be conquered from within, and this is an attack from within, as is the NFL debacle. How will the defeat be achieved? By good people doing nothing and saying it is the right of those who h**e what we've long stood for, now to disrespect and dishonor our nation, our National Anthem, the American F**g and all the people who served and died for this nation in order to keep it free. So I guess these i***ts believe these people have the right to destroy the USA, it's culture and society, so they won't do anything about it. The people living in the USA with no appreciation for what this once great nation once stood for, are now destroying our culture and society by attacking and destroying our nationalism and patriotism, saying that nationalism is evil, but intelligent people know that without it, no nation can long endure. Complacency in allowing this to occur will destoy us from within.


ldsuttonjr wrote:
Liberals Attack Pledge of Allegiance



Liberals have seemingly laid out a plan to completely disrupt the entire foundation of the United States. Members of the Democratic Party have attacked nearly every ideology the nation was founded on, ranging from the Declaration of Independence to statues and important monuments throughout the country. Even the statue of Christopher Columbus in New York City is the target of attacks from individuals who want the monument toppled and destroyed. However, it has now taken another turn, with liberals publicly attacking the Pledge of Allegiance.

When going through the Pledge of Allegiance, there is no bigotry within the text of the pledge. It is straight forward and to the point. Despite this, liberals are saying there are r****t connotations behind the pledge and, due to this, the pledge either needs to be changed or scraped altogether.

This is just the latest push by liberals to attack the foundation of the country and alter it to fit their desires and plans. While the Pledge of Allegiance was originally written in 1887 and revised in 1892, it was adopted by Congress in 1945, following the end of the Second World War.

With very little of the Pledge of Allegiance changing over the years (the phrase “under God” was added in 1954), why are liberals suddenly having an issue with it now?
Liberals Attack Pledge of Allegiance br br br b... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 20:18:53   #
You can drop the 131 'Sarge', it's only there because so many other people are using the same name, but thanks anyway. Somebody needs to give these liberals at least a 'Junior High School' education, even if it does go against their indoctrination.



PLT Sarge wrote:
Amen, Randy 131
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 182 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.