One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Brian Devon
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 635 next>>
Nov 21, 2014 15:11:43   #
B****sheep wrote:
Something I have noticed is that the media hype over Dr. Ben Carson faded out pretty fast when this Bill Cosby thing broke, and the thought occurs that maybe it's to the Democrat advantage to take a very popular black man and make him look like an ogre. After all, if you can't trust Bill Cosby, how can you trust Ben Carson?

That may be a stretch beyond the actual t***h, but I don't put much past those Socialists, and if nothing else, I bet they're pushing this as far and hard as they can to their benefit.

A bit of trivia: They both have the same initials. B C.
Something I have noticed is that the media hype ov... (show quote)




**************
From the Cosby rapes to------socialism? Quite a stretch don't you think? Only a 1950s style McCarthyite, paranoid, whack-job would make that kind of a connection.

Who even thinks of such crap? Wait....don't answer...
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 15:02:48   #
JMHO wrote:
Dear President Obama, Lord, Sultan, Emperor, Pharaoh, Caesar, God-king, Prince of the Americas, wh**ever we’re supposed to call you. ‘President’ alone simply won’t suffice, will it, Your Grace? We had a thing called a president once, but that lowly office could scarcely contain your Majesty. You found that you couldn’t effectively govern while constrained by the rule of law, so you superseded it, just as you’ve done countless times before. This time you are waving your mighty scepter and magically granting defacto citizenship to millions of i*****l a***ns.

Incredibly, even after all of the scandals, corruption, lies, and deceits; even after this past week when we learned about the depth of your Obamacare deception; even after using the IRS to target your political opponents; even after letting your ambassador die in B******i and lying about it afterwards; even after dividing the nation and exploiting racial tensions for your own gain; even after six years of incompetence, dishonesty, conspiracy, and illegality; even after every law you’ve flouted, promise you’ve broken, and lie you’ve told, you still found a way to top yourself. In refusing to enforce our borders and uphold our i*********n l*ws, you are now guilty of the most profound p**********l power grab since Abraham Lincoln. This is a landmark moment, and I’m sure you’re proud of that fact.

Before you ascended to your Throne on High, you were allegedly a constitutional law professor, so I’m sure you’re quite familiar with Article II of the United States Constitution. This fascinating document details the powers of the Executive Branch, but conspicuously does not grant said branch the legal ability to formulate immigration policy through P**********l decree, and also does not vest in one man the monarchical authority to decide which laws will be enforced and which will be ignored based upon nothing more than the president’s political calculations.

Article 11 is the law. It’s real. It means something. It’s part of a system, Your Highness. A carefully constructed system meant to check the authority of one branch and balance it against the enumerated powers of the other two branches. It’s this system, this delicate balance of powers and responsibilities, that keeps our society free, my King. Without it, there is no law, there is no liberty, and we fall head first into anarchy, monarchy, oligarchy, or some other -archy.

But you know this. It’s the whole point, isn’t it, Your Holiness?

That’s what your followers don’t seem to understand, maybe because they’re too stupid — as your friend Gruber theorized — or maybe because they’re just naive. Either way, they think this amnesty plan is about being ‘compassionate’ towards i*****l a***ns. It’s kind of cute, really. They look through their rose-colored glasses at the naked despotism of your administration and see a well meaning tyrant who’s just trying to help those poor foreigners find a home. The fact that you’re suddenly acquiring 5 million new Democrat v**ers and dramatically expanding the scope of your own authority in the process is just, in their feeble minds, an incidental byproduct of your magnanimity.

I’m sure you get quite a laugh when you think about how easy this is. Man, it’s like candy from a baby — or in this case, constitutional authority from Congress. You hit all the right notes to get the lemmings to cooperate. I watched that speech last night. It was a master class in obfuscation, false dichotomy, and deflection.

Without so much as a smirk, you claimed that Republicans refused to take ‘meaningful action’ on immigration, even though you had majorities in the House and Senate when you entered office and it was your own party who declined to address the issue. They could have passed any immigration bill they wanted, but they didn’t because they had a ree******n to worry about, as did you. So you wait until the Republicans are about to be in control and you figure now is the perfect time to flood the job market with five million new workers, betraying your middle class constituency and blaming Republicans all the while.

Incredible. Absolutely incredible.

And, with no hint of irony, you attack Republicans for claiming you have no authority to act unilaterally on immigration, failing to mention that YOU have previously insisted TWENTY FIVE TIMES that you have no authority to act unilaterally on immigration. In just one example, you said, and I quote, “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order — that’s just not the case.” A man more naïve than myself may have hoped to hear you address this blatant contradiction, but I knew better, my Lordship.

I did expect you to pull out the ‘prosecutorial discretion’ card. It’s an effective tactic, I’ll admit. Indeed, you do have the authority to prioritize deportations and even the authority to refuse to deport certain individuals. But sitting back and announcing that you won’t deport anyone who falls under wh**ever arbitrary guidelines you’ve set is a clear abdication of duty. Besides, prosecutorial discretion doesn’t give you the power to grant legal benefits or documentation of any kind to i*****l a***ns. That is, without a doubt, the sole responsibility of the legislative branch. Obviously.

And what about this notion that Republican presidents have issued similar executive orders? A remarkably brazen lie considering only a five second Google search debunks it, but you largely get away with it because it makes for a convenient talking point. As you know, Reagan and Bush wrote executive orders meant to enact and implement immigration policies legislated by Congress. You, on the other hand, have handed blanket amnesty to millions of i*****l a***ns directly in defiance of the legislative branch. You said so yourself. You’re only acting ‘because [the Democrat] Congress failed to act.’

Except that’s not how this works, Dear Leader. That’s not how a government with three branches works. Or that’s not how it’s supposed to work, anyway.

And that brings me to the most important point.

I won’t waste my time telling you that your amnesty initiative is a slap in the face to all legal immigrants who followed the process and waited in line. I know you don’t care.

And I won’t bother reminding you that overwhelming the job market with 5 million low sk**led third world aliens has no chance of having anything but a detrimental impact on the working class in America. Wealthy metropolitan liberal elites might applaud because it makes them feel like they have a conscience, but middle class citizens aren’t jumping for joy over this. They have their own families to feed, so excuse them for feeling profoundly unmoved by your anecdote last night about the i*****l i*******t student who’s working on her third college degree. In fact, someone should tell her that one college degree is often a waste of money nowadays. Three is just grotesque.

And I certainly won’t hit you with a sermon about ‘national sovereignty.’ I don’t think a left wing politician has even used that phrase since the 1800s.

And I absolutely won’t respond to the Bible quotes from your speech by throwing verses at you that explicitly denounce breaking the law and lying, which you did last night, yesterday, and every day before that.

But I will ask you whether you ever considered your own daughters in all of this? It’s not that they’ll necessarily feel the devastating economic and social impact of your suicidal decision to open our borders to the third world — they are from a wealthy and powerful family so they will likely remain insulated. But, Oh Caesar, your kids are still citizens of these United States, and that is supposed to mean something. It’s supposed to mean that they enjoy the advantages of living in a free country ruled not by one man, but governed justly and prudently by those duly elected by the people and divided into branches to check and balance each other. It’s supposed to mean that they will never be subject to the whims of one single egomaniac who sits in a big white house. It’s supposed to mean that they are always protected, by the separation of powers, from tyranny and despotism.

You have stolen that from them, Oh Noble One. From your own children. You have seen to it that your daughters will be less free than you were, and will grow up in a country less democratic and more dictatorial than you did. You benefited from the liberties our nation afforded you, and have now stripped them from the rest of us, including your children.

You see, Congress is elected by the people to represent our interests. Congress didn’t, couldn’t, and wouldn’t pass amnesty because the people don’t want it. It’s our nation, Sultan. Congress gets a say because we get a say. That’s the whole crux of this ‘free country’ thing. You have taken that from us, and ‘us’ involves your daughters, my Ruler.

This is a precedent, Oh Supreme President. Who knows where it leads? Maybe the next Republican president will follow your example and dismantle Obamacare through executive order, or enact a******n restrictions, or manipulate the tax code. The possibilities are endless. By this time twenty or thirty years from now, maybe we won’t even have a Congress. I don’t really see the point if their only function is, as you seem to think, to pass ceremonial legislation endorsing actions already taken by the Executive Branch.

So don’t feel that you have to explain yourself to me. Explain yourself to your daughters. Look them in the eye and tell them why Daddy decided politics are more important than the rule of law, the Constitution, and consent of the governed. Tell them why Pops gets to go around telling everyone he isn’t legally permitted to do something, only to turn around and do that exact thing.

Tell them why the very foundation of our governmental structure had to be subverted for the sake of sucking up to your party’s Latino constituency.

Go ahead. Tell them.

It’ll be a difficult conversation, but you can handle it.

Just make sure to bring your teleprompter.

Long Live the King.

Matt Walsh
Dear President Obama, Lord, Sultan, Emperor, Phara... (show quote)










************
The way these "chicken-littles" are carrying on you would think our president had shielded 40-50 million undocumented workers from deportation, instead of a modest 4-5 million workers.

These folks go into redline mode over everything: birth certificates, Benghazai, Bergdahl, Cliven Bundy, Ebola, IRS issues.

Calm, cool, and collected they aint. Comes from listening to too much Fox Newscorpse and Am h**e radio.

No wonder President Obama can play them like a player piano

Then they just stand there with the "moo-cow in the headlights" look, with their mouths gaping open to catch flies.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 14:54:38   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
What the hell does crickets have to do with this? What am I missing here? Is there some kind of sexual connotation that I'm just not getting?




***********
Crickets are those little insects that rub their legs to make a chirping noise. When you sit outside on a summer's eve, with your spouse, and there is a lull in the conversation......the only sound you hear is "crickets"------as in no talking, no human communication, with words.

Google: crickets

Sexual connotation of crickets? Probably best to call Bill Cosby about that one....
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 14:47:18   #
greyfox wrote:
OK B****sheep go to catholiccharitiesok.org/index.php?id=44 and you will see that 90% of the money raised goes to the needy!!!!!!!




*************
Sometimes Wikipedia gets it right. Other times...not so much.

It's not exactly the Encyclopedia Britannica.

From the site "Charity Navigator", which we use to measure efficiency, before we give.


Catholic Charities---

Scores:

Overall 89.18
Accountability and t***sparency: 97.00
Program expenses (% budget spent on programs) 75.0%
Administrative expenses 16.5%
Fundraising expenses 8.3%

These are very good scores for a philanthropy.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 14:33:44   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Just thought of a little story that might explain what you consider the "randomness" of my thoughts, and it stems from my studies in math and mathematical proofs:

When you're following along in a proof, and you get to a step where the mathematician asserts: "Clearly, then, A follows from B", you know you're going to be spending at least the next 3 or 4 days and nights "connecting the dots", in order to see exactly how A follows from B.

Long nights ahead for you, Brian. I think I told you to brush up on your logic, a week or two ago.
Just thought of a little story that might explain ... (show quote)



***********
Still crickets on the two veto tyrant thingy???
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 13:33:51   #
saveamerica wrote:
They just got the worst butt kicking in 80 years and they still have not learn a lesson from the American citizens.

Well the Democrat Senate v**ed down the Keystone pipe line which would brought jobs to Americans and new taxes coming in plus, improve the Economy but, instead v**ed for a $2 Trillion Dollar Carbon Tax Bill that pass with only Democrats V****g for it.

Now you have Obama going to sign a I*****l A***ns bill to let 5 million to become American citizens outside Obama Constitution Authority.

The American citizens are not going to take this laying down and we are going to stand up and fight it.
Senate Democrats Push $2 Trillion Carbon Tax Bill After V****g Down Keystone XL

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/11/senate-dems-push-2-trillion-carbon-tax-bill-v****g-keystone-xl/

Schlafly: Obama could launch another Civil War
Describes president's amnesty plan as modern-day 'Fort Sumter'
http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/schlafly-obama-could-launch-another-civil-war/


GOP senator warns of violence after immigration order
Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn warns there could be not only a political firestorm but acts of civil disobedience and even violence in reaction to President Obama's executive order on immigration Thursday.
"The country's going to go nuts, because they're going to see it as a move outside the authority of the president, and it's going to be a very serious situation," Coburn said on Capital Download. "You're going to see — hopefully not — but you could see instances of anarchy. ... You could see violence."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/11/19/usa-today-capital-download-with-tom-coburn/19263969/
They just got the worst butt kicking in 80 years a... (show quote)



********
"Lame duck" was only on the GOP menu. The Democrats decided to eat in a better restaurant and order something a lot more appetizing.

In Nov., 2016, the GOP has already made reservations in a restaurant that specializes in "crow".

Bon appetit and salud!
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 13:29:57   #
Docadhoc wrote:
Dr. Ben Carson in a recent intetview with NewsMax has compared President Obama to Putin.

Carson stated that if Obama isn't stopped, he will be encouraged to continue with his Executive Orders.

The question is: How does the new congress stop Obama?
It is apparent that Our President is out of control. Pat Buchanan has recently described him as a "rouge" president.

2 more years of his EO actions could cause even more irreparable damage.

So, what can/should be done? What say you?
Dr. Ben Carson in a recent intetview with NewsMax ... (show quote)



**********
What can be done? Turn off Fox and turn off AM h**e radio. It's amazing how quickly the boogeymen will go away and how quickly your blood pressure will return to normal.

Good luck with that! You will feel instantly better.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 13:22:56   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I thought you might have liked the fact that I upgraded you from "vegetable" to "animal" status.

Guess not.






*********
Still no answer on the two veto-tyrant thing. Still bedeviled with "crickets"?
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 13:18:55   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Oh, and just one more thing: how do you get "random" out of my comment?




**********
Your thoughts are very disjointed and disconnected.

Still waiting to hear about why a two veto president is such a tyrant.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 13:07:19   #
jetson wrote:
Sure the liberals were asses in the Senate. Reid and Polosi and others are complete jerks. They are or were destroying our country. Me, I don't want to go down this road. I want my country back. We will be in the drivers seat Jan. 1st. Are we going to, just change drivers and drive on this bumpy dirty road or are we going to get on the conservative interstate and take this country where we once were. I don't care about revenge on these jerks. We even have many in both the house and senate coming against this administration. Many of Obama's media didn't even bother showing his immigration speech Thursday night. The house needs to get its butt to work, write a immigration bill, a health care simple bill we can understand. Repeal the Obama care junk and get more of the Democrats on board, to over ride his vetoes. Then pass a bill to pass the pipeline deal. Pass a bill to stop the enviroment dept. power. Make everything they try to pull off, be done by bills through the house and senate. etc.
Sure the liberals were asses in the Senate. Reid ... (show quote)






***********
Ah yes, the Republican dream---pave over planet earth and cover it with parking meters owned by the corporate 1%. What more could human beings possibly ask for?
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 12:57:51   #
dabende wrote:
Republican or Democrat, Libertarian, or Socialist, when a President goes outside the Constitution, outside the Law, it is time to IMPEACH that President. This is something ALL Americans should agree on.

Republicans should have done something about this way back 50 plus years ago. Eisenhower had it correct, but nobody since has obeyed our laws. This is a long standing issue, and the answer is the LAW!

Obama is at war with America!

It is as simple as that!




The victim in any case is the AMERICAN CITIZEN, and our NATION!
Republican or Democrat, Libertarian, or Socialist,... (show quote)




***********
Well, we do know two things. Republican v**ers can't do senate impeachment math and they know scant little about our constitution.

If you jump up and down, holler and scream---"no fair, no fair", the president will leave office on Jan. 20, 2017 at noon.

If you just sit on your hands...it's still the same date. Your call....
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 12:53:18   #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Oh, for God's sake. Did you not get anything out of my posts on the "He did it first" defense, and how that leads to exponential growth of encroachments? Engage your brain!!

What is BO going to dictate tomorrow?

His whole attitude is: I'm doing this and there ain't no way you can stop me.

What is he going to do to Israel? Remember, his MO is "Give them what they want, and they won't hurt you." And they want Israel. He'll be able to do that with an EO, as well, if We the People don't stand against him.
Oh, for God's sake. Did you not get anything out ... (show quote)



**********
Pretty random Carol, don't you think? I never did find out why our president, who has the least vetoes in modern American history, is some kind of tyrant? The Arab-Israeli conflict is not germane to what was being discussed.

If you want to discuss that some other time, I will be more than happy to give you a few history lessons on that conflict. As a Jew, with an undergraduate degree in political science, and as someone who has spent significant time in Israel (as well as having Israeli family members), I suspect I might know a tad more than you do.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 12:47:09   #
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
I was waiting for you to respond.

Your a damn fool, b****s didn't break the law to come here.

Illigal immigrants are just that, illigelly here and now they get to get a free pass.

In your Southern Californian opinion did Reagan's amnesty for approx 3 million illigal immigrants resolve our immigration inconsistancies? Did Bush's amnesty stop or even slow down the tide of people illegally coming across our borders?

Will obama doing the exact same thing only perhaps a bit more of an end around congress than Reagan did going to achieve fixing our immigration concerns?

So I ask again does it make sense to keep giving people an incentive to break our laws or should we find a better way.

You do realize that if they are given SS numbers there be nothing stopping people who are not may not ever be or even want to ever be US citizens from v****g.

And I took some heat for this yesterday but as soon as they come out of hiding and into the light and become legal workers we will know exactly who they are where they live. When common sense is vogue again it will be easy to round them all up, put them on buses and ship them back to Mexico. We can then let the mexican gov figure out what to do with them.

It is not r****t or bigotry to require people to enter our country legally.

And according to even the most poisonous advocates of r****m I can't be r****t. I'm white, Native American and Indonesian.

What's best for our country? To indiscriminatly let in millions of unsk**led workers or strike a balance between what our economy needs and what people get to come here legally.

We already take in over a million immigrants legally per year, more than every other country combined.

Shouldn't we be the ones who decide who gets in and who doesn't and not people who break our laws to do so.

Long term hispanics are conservative Christians who care about their economic futures. So as liberals you should be very careful of what you wish for.
I was waiting for you to respond. br br Your a d... (show quote)




***********
Hispanics are not dumb enough to take the bogus GOP "color blind" bait.

President Obama got 75% of the Hispanic v**e in 2012. All human beings are animals, whether, black, white, Hispanic, Asian or any other background. Like all animals we can tell friend from foe through body language.

Right wing Republican body language is anything but welcoming if you are anything but a white, European, conservative Christian.

Why do you think that Jews and Asians also v**ed overwhelmingly for our president twice?

No, it's the right wing Republicans who have to be careful what they wish for---a lily white, conservative Christian, America with a few minority "pets" for show.

Judging by the last two p**********l e******ns I would say that kind of narrow base is hardly working out well for the GOP.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 12:36:44   #
Brian Devon wrote:
***************
P**********l vetoes:
Bush II 12
Clinton 36
Bush I 29 (one term)
Reagan 39
Carter 11 (one term)
Ford 48 (less than one term)
-----------------------------------------------
President Obama: 2


Some tyrannical nature, Carol---eh???
*************** br P**********l vetoes: br ... (show quote)





**********
Cat got your tongue, Carol---or is it the crickets???
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 12:07:38   #
3jack wrote:
Do you mean the allen west who was kicked from the US Army, the same one who was rejected by his tea party district on his second run for Congress for being too stupid, the same one who believes that the Senate is infested with c*******t? If I were you, I wouldn't use his name to support anything I post.




**************
Thank you for your post 3jack. You beat me to it. It never ceases to amaze me how the rightwingers on OPP will use totally discredited and reviled resources to bolster their arguments.

In addition to using West, many are bizarrely fond of using Dick Morris, the reviled former Clinton operative, who paid S&M hookers in D.C., to dog collar him and lead him around on a leash while he groveled on the floor. This of course---making the cover of Time Magazine (I bet Dicky-boy's wife loved that one).

In the interest of fair play, Democrats are also capable of using their scummiest members to bolster their arguments too---such as the NAFTA/Wall St., corporate pimps---Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 635 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.