Blue Flu wrote:
If Barry is a Muslim it can only mean that he's a far better President than a Muslim.
What kind of Muslim smokes, drinks alcohol, enjoys sexual relations with other men, runs around taking credit for k*****g Bin Laden, allows true believers to languish at Guantanamo and worst of all eats pork?
The link below illustrates part of the above.
Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lrf8DbrJH0
Sir, you don't fully comprehend Islam and the Muslim philosophy. Their Qur'an permits them to lie, c***t, deceive and even commit murder, if doing so furthers the cause of Islam. Their Holy Books also allows them to eat otherwise prohibited foods, to prevent starvation or medical problems. One cannot just read an English t***slation of the Qur'an and expect to understand it. The Qur'an is completely lacking in chronology, and is further made unreadable by its "Abrogations"(also undated and randomly inserted). The document is so unreadable, even by their more learned "scholars", that the Muslims have published reams upon reams of other official documents attempting to clarify (unsuccessfully) what that "unchangeable" document "reveals". A much easier book to read and understand concerning Islam and their laws is the Muslim book, "Reliance of the Traveller(sic)"; A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, t***slated by N.H.M.Keller. It is printed in Arabic, with English "facings", well indexed for reference of subject matter and is not encumbered by chronology or "abrogation issues.
Skyhook wrote:
First one must consider this:
Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be t***hful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."
There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
Lying (Taqiyya and Kitman)....
So, is Obama lying about whether or not he is Muslim? We are not likely to know the t***h until he- if successful- hands over the crippled and weakened USofA to the Allaha worshipers.
First one must consider this: br Muslim scholars t... (
show quote)
Sir, your post is one of the most accurate (and timely) that I have encountered in some time. This Muslim/Islam issue is the gravest problem facing the great country since our civil War.
biggies wrote:
Wow, cant believe how stupid some people , the unions gave this country a middle glass, and without them we will lose, we have got to start standing up to these companies
That manufacture goods offshore, we need to boycott them. The Japanese and the Korean build there cars hear and make profits why can't GM and Ford. Companies like apple and nike manufacture all there products offshore, I say f#%# them let them that s**t off shore suport the american companies that suport the american worker or we will lose the middle class.the greed in the american corporation must be checked from time to time. Wemust also stop the tax breaks
Wow, cant believe how stupid some people , the uni... (
show quote)
Come on, it is the "people" in our free enterprise system that makes the working middle-class, not the unions. Keep in mind the unions compose but a very small percentage of the working middle class and virtually none of the farmers, ranchers and "self- employed" people. Also, why do you want to "check" the corporations "from time to time"?---the laws of supply and demand, and profit margins will do that for you.
grace scott wrote:
I mourn the loss of unions. They gave us a middle class. As the union goes, so goes the middle class. I never belonged to one--never had the opportunity, but I benefited by their existence. Companies were so afraid of unions that they treated employees like people.
The only way to regain a middle class is through our banding together and demanding change. That is what unions do.
An individual or a group of people, get together, mortgage their houses, beg and borrow money, and open a business, with most of them working very extended hours.They have calculated what the costs are going to be, including labor and they go out and hire people at the rate of "X" dollars and hour----then an "outside" union person comes along or a small group of the hired people, none of whom has any money or other "risks" in the company, demand wage increases. This is not the 1860s and later, where there was child labor and unsafe working conditions. I maintain every company should encourage and sponsor a "workers committee", who meets regularly with management on how to improve all facets of the company, including wages, but with no right to strike. Any and all unsolvable issues should be settled in court. On the "other side of the coin", I do suggest "profit sharing" and v****g stock shares for the employees should be part of the "equation.
Guardian wrote:
Mr. Dehoff, are you a liberal? You are intelligent, but not willing to accept that obamacare is the worst disaster to hit America. It hasn't helped anyone. The people who signed up ate saddled with deductibles twice to three times that they paid before this travesty. People are dropping their policies or better yet, NOT SIGNING UP, and choosing to pay the fines instead. Others have lost their homes because they couldn't afford both. If you are 70 years old, obamacare won't let the doctors give you meds to prolong your life...or pain k**lers. My God man, did you read that mandate? Yes, hundreds of pages, but you need to know how your life WILL CHANGE FOR THE WORSE. It w. as drafted to hurt Americans, not help them. Don't believe the figures this govt quotes abt anything. It's all lies ny manipulation. There is nothing redeemable abt the healthcare mandate...nothing and it must be totally repealed! Do the research...don't be fo
olish and believe the fraud's lies.
Mr. Dehoff, are you a liberal? You are intelligent... (
show quote)
Sir, if you check with "Disqus", and read my several hundred posts, you will see I am about as conservative and anti-"administration/Democrat" as they come. I am a staunch Republican and a strict constitutionalist and am reasonably well-versed on the government's health care plan. I am not objecting to "what" you say, just "how" you say it---civility is the "name of the game". The post to which I am responding, is a significant improvement. In addition, I will be 82 years "young" this month, am a retired USAF major (at age 38.) The government's plan has not YET "invaded" the existing retired military health program. I later, spent 30 years working as a Registered "Rep" for a major mutual life insurance company. I have spent most of the last 4-5 years studying the Muslim/Islamic "issue", which I consider to be the most serious problem facing this great country since our civil war---and, "time/health" permitting, I am hope to write a book on the subject.
Homestead wrote:
Years ago, I read a story written by one of the N**i guards that was leading the Jews down into a valley where they were ordered to strip and then lined up in front of a mass grave, where they were then machine gunned down.
This was when Hitler was experimenting with how he was going to solve the Jewish problem. He stopped doing it that way, because, the bullets needed, cost to much and it took to long. Plus, some of the soldiers didn't like shooting the real pretty women. It was after that that Hitler asked for suggestions from his N**i friends and they decided on the gas chambers.
I'm sure the conversations were very polite as they talked about the final solution.
The former N**i said that there were only six guards there for the two hundred Jews. If at any time the Jews had made a run for it, there would have been no way they could have stopped them. But, men women and children, stayed obediently in line, did as they were told and were cut down.
The N**i didn't say how polite they were, when they blew the brains out of the women and children.
Perhaps the N**i's asked very politely, "maam do you mind if I splatter your childs brains all over you or would you prefer that I shoot you dead first. Or do you think your children would like to see their father blown apart before they are.
I'm done with this politically correct garbage, enough is enough.
Rome is burning and people want me to listen to them fiddle.
People with cancer have had their policies cancelled, people who were beating their sickness, are now literally facing death because of it.
But, hey................ObamaCare was enacted into law, very politely.
Years ago, I read a story written by one of the N*... (
show quote)
Sir, you have a mental lock. Being civil has nothing to do with being politically correct. Being civil is the way mature adults communicate on serious matters. One can make their point(s) far more forcibly using civil logic, reason and common sense, and avoiding the game of gutter "mental masturbation", that it appears you want to play---go get your mental kicks elsewhere and let the mature people make serious and meaningful comments. On second thought, if you had to give up the profanity, obnoxious nicknames and gutter talk, you probably would be tongue-tied. Actually, I sense you are a well-informed person and all you have to do is "clean up your act". I apologize for the critical part of my post.
Floyd Brown wrote:
I did not get a good connection on the video.
Not having seen much said on this site about the problems in Germany at that time I just wanted to put a few thoughts down.
Germany was in such bad shape after WW1 that things were right for a man like Hitler to take advantage of.
After WW2 the US lead in the effort to put Germany & Japan back on their feet. Not wanting to see more of the results like Germany after WW1.
I do feel that we are living at a time when conflicts like the World Wars will be a thing of the past.
There will be armed conflicts to be sure but not as wide spread as in the past.
I also believe that the first man that pushes the button for a nuclear weapon will be tried for a War Crime. Even in their own country.
I did not get a good connection on the video. br ... (
show quote)
Sir, you live in dream world. Already "they" have used poison gas and bombed civilians. There will be many "smaller conflicts" all under the indirect control of a NWO organization or the Muslims which will be tantamount to a world war---several are in progress as we speak. And, we have a couple of million (maybe many more) Muslims in this country, just waiting to respond to a "call to "Jihad"--wherein heads will be removed. Bottom line, without a "standing army now", we will be forced to use nuclear weapons or surrender.
Homestead wrote:
Yea, I've read history.
On January 30, 1933, the Jews were more interested in smelling the flowers than the guy Hindenburg appointed as chancellor of Germany.
As I recall, that didn't work out to well for them.
Get your head out of your ass, evil doesn't go away just because your to busy smoking dope to worry about it.
Sir, right or wrong, keep it civil. Even if you did have a valid comment , it was lost lost while you were down in the gutter. Solutions to serious issues, require serious and civil discourse. There are professional commenters "out there" whose sole purpose is to create off-subject, one-on-one gutter talk (mental masturbation) to take our focus off of the real issues at hand---and when you participate, you unwittingly "become one of them".
Homestead wrote:
You'd better start understanding what Islam is, because their bringing over here.
These are short videos, but, don't take them lightly.
Three Stages of Jihad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_468896&feature=iv&src_vid=-SoXs0_rHY&v=ERou_Q5l9Gw
What Normal Muslims Think - And Europe Fails to Understand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYAcLudBbhg#t=89
American Muslim Children Taught to H**e
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/american-muslim-children-taught-h**e?fb_action_ids=932408324544&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=[467490229988102]&action_type_map=[%22og.likes%22]&action_ref_map=[]
You'd better start understanding what Islam is, be... (
show quote)
Quote=Saltwind: In Muslim countries, a raped women, to prove her innocence, must have 4 witnesses. and If she does not win her case she can be "stoned to death" for "contributing to the rape". An obvious problem is, if there were 4 "uninvolved" witnesses in the area, the rape probably would not have occurred. And, there are major witness problems for other legal issues.
Floyd Brown wrote:
One would think that after 70 posts a person would have gotten an idea of how this site works.
That leaves me confused too.
I just don't have the time or desire to explain it to you.
I am not a "new kid" on the block, I have several thousand posts on the internet. In this case, I ask 4 different people and received 3 different answers (one had no clue). As Perry Mason (for you old guys) would say, "Your Honor, I rest my case".
Editors, your format is confusing, I have no idea who said what and when. This post is to the one who stated that the President could not be a Muslim, in that he supported gay persuasions.. Well, the Qur'an permits "most anything", including lying, c***ting and even murder, if doing so furthers the cause of Islam. Also, we can "surmise" all we want and still not be sure the President is gay. Editors, clean up your posting format to remove the "confusion". For instance, in my case, you could say, "Don DeHoff" says...at the beginning of my post.
saltwind 78 wrote:
Like they say, " denial isn't a river in Egypt". I didn't say that all disagreement is because of r****m, but I did say that I know many people that say that they don't like Obama because he is Black. These people call themselves conservatives. If he were white, conservatives still wouldn't agree with his program, but I don't think there would be this kind of terrible disrespect, and outright hatred for the President of the United States.
Yes, there are r****ts "out there" and always will be. Gads, a "red haired" child or one with lots of freckles, will get singled out with ugly remarks and pointed fingers. In this case, however, if one could hide the fact that our President is half-black, and just look at the huge number of subversive, NWO, socialist and Muslim actions he has implemented, he would have received far more "thumbs down" comments and probably he would have, long ago, been impeached. Let us not mix-up the "cause & effect" issues----congress has to step forward and put an end to his Oval Office career.
Billhuggins wrote:
Only a fool gets caught. If you believe that a sniper would leave his DNA from a 100 yards U better get on the shrink's couch pronto. List all of the possible forensics and all other physical evidence and eliminate the possibility. Thousands of murders annually are not solved. I am just sayin that's how U think not to go to prison.
Sir, the jails are full of people who were "fools"---and in this "crowded world", it is difficult to be alone. I am now 82 but in the olden days in the "back country", I frequently was surprised by others also enjoying the remote "God's Country".
Billhuggins wrote:
Either way I still have to pull the trigger. I am of sound mind and if the slime is in my house and he ws able to form the intent, oh! Well.
Sir, your gun "education" is lacking. Many "cocked" guns fire when they are dropped or moved while under a pillow or a child plays "cops & robbers" with dad's gun, or when dad has a sexy dream and squeezes his pillow. I suggest you immediately take an NRA gun safety course.